http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/stephenfoster8.shtml

It is an attack parody. >:(

http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/stephenfoster8.shtml

It is an attack parody. >:(
"black man" is amazingly racist. that "proud american" guy is a real piece of work. ::)

"black man" is amazingly racist. that "proud american" guy is a real piece of work. ::)


Sorry, but if you don't want proud Americans like me go to China. Ching chong chang. You like that, Tia Zedong?

Sorry, but if you don't want proud Americans like me go to China. Ching chong chang. You like that, Tia Zedong?
dude, you need your own talk show! you make conservatives look so bad libs'll be running the country for the next 50 years. ;D

Sorry, but if you don't want proud Americans like me go to China. Ching chong chang. You like that, Tia Zedong?


again, READ THE RULES BEFORE YOU SUBMIT

http://www.amiright.com/parody/submitting.shtml

so far you've ignored two of them:

# No Adult content.
If your parody descibes sexual behavoir, it will not be added to this site. If your parody deals with sex, don't submit it. If you can't say it to someone 10 or older, don't submit it. I also don't post parodies which advocate domestic violence, or threats against individuals.

# No parodies about other parody authors.
No attack parodies please.

Keep ignoring them, or using the comment section to attack other authors, you'll find yourself banned.  If you don't like our rules, you're free to post somewhere else.  I'm sure StormFront would welcome some of your parodies.

I'm sure StormFront would welcome some of your parodies.
;D

i kinda like the sound of "tia zedong." has a nice ring to it.

I had to remove another, which I assume is just ProudAmerican posting as someone else anyways, advocating violence against people (ie. "I want to kill" or "So and so should be killed") is also against the rules.

so that's now three different guidelines.  I'm guessing that following the rules is something you're not interested in, so I would suggest not bothering to submit in the future.

ChuckyG, I have noticed this author's work. Perhaps he is George Hamlinton IV under a new name. All of his parodies should be removed at once since they are all very offensive.

<< i kinda like the sound of "tia zedong." has a nice ring to it.  >>

I don't know, it sounds suspiciously like the name of either a stripper or a porn actress.

Which, if true, would still make you more moral than the so-called Proud American, who should not be the former and is not, by any definition the Founding Fathers would recognize, the latter.

(This is usually the part where "Lurker" comes in and says, "Polack Mike, you ignorant lib fool, etc....")

<< i kinda like the sound of "tia zedong." has a nice ring to it.  >>

I don't know, it sounds suspiciously like the name of either a stripper or a porn actress.
that might explain why i like it.

it also could be another in that long line of kim jong il's less-than-stunning short-range missiles. "A test of north korea's new Tia Zedong II missile was cut short yesterday when it fell into the sea far short of its target..."

proud american might want to write a parody about riding a Tia Zedong missile all the way to the ground, while waving his cowboy hat in the air and letting out mighty, slim-pickens-worthy whoops and hollers. yee-haw!

Please remove http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/pinkfloyd250.shtml

http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/brucespringsteen4.shtml probably needs to be removed as a plagiarism.

Please compare with http://members.tripod.com/Tiny_dancer/add.html

http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional1339.shtml needs to be removed as it cannot be sung well to the tune of the O.S. at all.

The parody http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/bangles11.shtml posted today (1/25) by "rok iz kool" is one of my old parodies. Strangely, I feel flattered.

The parody http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/bangles11.shtml posted today (1/25) by "rok iz kool" is one of my old parodies. Strangely, I feel flattered.

Omg, someone plagiarized one of your parodies? :o Thank goodness it was removed.

Admins...please remove this: http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/tomjones12.shtml

Admins...please remove this: http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/tomjones12.shtml



Admins...please do not remove that parody; it is not an attack parody, nor does it describe sexual activity.  Because that parody does not violate Chucky G's attack parody and sexual parody rule, it should be considered free speech, even though it is childish and offends some individuals' sense of propriety. Thank you.

Admins...please do not remove that parody; it is not an attack parody, nor does it describe sexual activity.  Because that parody does not violate Chucky G's attack parody and sexual parody rule, it should be considered free speech, even though it is childish and offends some individuals' sense of propriety. Thank you.


NO. DO remove it please. Free speech does NOT give anyone the right to say rude, vulger and crass things that offend other people. Its like when I drive my car. Just because I choose what route to drive to my destination does NOT give me the right to violate stop signs, traffic lights etc. This parody is the same thing. It is DISGUSTING, pure and simple.

Jason.

;D

i kinda like the sound of "tia zedong." has a nice ring to it.


http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/73955

He's a great break dancer.

About 75% of the OS is missing in this parody:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/donmclean109.shtml

Jason

http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/wierdalyankovich0.shtml

It is almost entirely verbatim from the OS, and it doesnt pace well at all.

The classic "what if god smoked cannabis" parody got through somehow

http://amiright.com/parody/80s/joanosborne0.shtml

The classic "what if god smoked cannabis" parody got through somehow

http://amiright.com/parody/80s/joanosborne0.shtml



Bob Rivers did it, I haven't heard it before.  it's gone now.

ChuckyG, this is a resubmission of the song that I reported for being very uncomplete:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/donmclean110.shtml

It only has one verse and two choruses.

Jason

ChuckyG, this is a resubmission of the song that I reported for being very uncomplete:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/donmclean110.shtml

It only has one verse and two choruses.

Jason


sad to see that many comments left on an incomplete parody, yet good parodies go unremarked on

sad to see that many comments left on an incomplete parody, yet good parodies go unremarked on


Well there is something else I have noticed. If a brand-new author submits his/her very first parody on the site, no matter how good (or bad) it is, it will not get commented on, and Im willing to bet that if one of the established authors (such as Michael Pacholek) wrote the same parody, it would get much more feedback and votes.

Jason.

I think poomaster goes wayyyyyyy too far here:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/yusufislam0.shtml

Its not funny, its absolutely sickening.

Jason.

Yeah, it's pretty bad, but you know what you're ging to get with that author so if you read those parodies it must be because you want to.

I'm not sure if I mentioned this already but I'll say it again. There's an old joke about a woman who goes to court about young men swimming nearby without any clothes on.  The judge gives a court order for the swimmers to go somewhere else so they don't bother the woman. They do so, and she complains again. The judge asks how can she see them when they're so far away, and she says she can still see them with her binoculars.

That's what this whole poomaster complaining business reminds me of

Yeah, it's pretty bad, but you know what you're ging to get with that author so if you read those parodies it must be because you want to.

I'm not sure if I mentioned this already but I'll say it again. There's an old joke about a woman who goes to court about young men swimming nearby without any clothes on.  The judge gives a court order for the swimmers to go somewhere else so they don't bother the woman. They do so, and she complains again. The judge asks how can she see them when they're so far away, and she says she can still see them with her binoculars.

That's what this whole poomaster complaining business reminds me of


Yes, its all very well for you to stick up for poomaster and while I admire your courage for doing so, I also disagree with your comments.

Firstly, if you look at most of poomaster's parodies, virtually all of them have comments relating to how 'disgusting' and 'sickening' the parodies are. In his most recent submission, someone named LPGUnit even goes as far as suggesting poomaster sets up his own poo-fetish website, something that I agree with, as well as the other said comments.

Secondly, have you considered the fact that children and people with a sensitive nature may well also visit AmIRight? Do you think most parents will be happy for their children to be reading such filth on the internet? You are probably aware that most ISPs provide some sort of 'parental' control so that children don't access inappropriate websites. Here poomaster, (and a few other authors who I am not going to mention) are systematically turning AmIRight into a poo fetish website. When I first started visiting the site a few years ago I used to enjoy the varied content from authors. Yes some authors were good, some others were not so good, but at least there was hardly any trace of what is appearing on the site today.

Ok, at the risk of sounding like a hypocrite, some toilet humour is acceptable in small doses. Here poomaster is blasting out the same revolting stuff on quite a regular basis. To reiterate what I said above, its not just me who are finding this beyond a joke now, plenty of other people are. I don't know what turns poomaster on regarding what he writes and obviously I cannot stop him for doing what he does, but if he really wants to enforce his poo fetish on others, he really should set up his own website, complete with disclaimers and warnings. I stand  by everything I say in this message.

Jason.

Jason

The point Ethan is making is that if these parodies "sicken" you then don't read them.  They are not difficult to avoid!  Titles like Diarrhea and something about Brown, Stained and Poo are big giveaways as to the subject.  ::)  It is chucky's website and, like it or not, he has said that these parodies can be posted on the site.  If you have an issue with that take it up with him.

There is the potential for people to be offended by anything...including the fact that a parody writer is trying hard not to offend people. If poo parodies get banned, what next? Double entendre parodies? Political parodies? Parodies making fun of a band that could offend that band's fanbase? You'd end up having to delete practically the entire site.

If poo parodies start making up over 20% of the submissions to amiright on a regular basis, then it might be time to worry. Otherwise, obsessing over them gives them more attention than they probably deserve.

I've worked with young children. They're quite familiar with "poopie" without reading parodies about it, and they're not going to be reading parodies anyway. Maybe some will by fourth or fifth grade, but kids get "corrupted" enough by other sources by that age that scatological parodies won't do them any "harm".

Poop fetish parodies don't belong here, but I haven't seen any of those. Are you sure that you know what a fetish is?

Poop fetish parodies don't belong here, but I haven't seen any of those. Are you sure that you know what a fetish is?


Yes I know what a fetish is. Correct me if Im wrong, but a 'fetish' is usually something that strongly appeals to someone, and from what I have seen, poop strongly appeals to poomaster.

you're wrong...I don't think this is really the right place to define the word for you but dictionary.com might help.

You should understand words that you use or else you might start going around telling people you have a parody fetish and that could get embarassing.

Dear Admins, please remove http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/greenday128.shtml

I realized I had some booboos in it, so I resubmitted it.



Thank you.

The incomplete American Spy parody has been submitted for the third time:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/donmclean111.shtml

It still only has one verse and two choruses. If you can please have a word with the author not to keep submitting it.

Jason.

Dear Admins, please remove http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/greenday128.shtml

I realized I had some booboos in it, so I resubmitted it.



Thank you.

I already requested to have this one removed, but I see it's still here. Please take this one down.

Thank you.

There should be a section titled "Amended parodies" or something. (in reply to Gay Voice's comment).

It seems like someone is commenting on parodies using my name for some reason. Here someone has commented on this parody using my name. Also this parody appears to poke fun at me for some reason, just because I mentioned on the site that I was informed that the name "A Room Full Of Monkeys" is a generic name for those who don't wish to use their real parody names. And the last part of this parody also seems to poke fun at me because im trying to do well in SOTM contests.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/nodoubt40.shtml

Jason.

It seems like someone is commenting on parodies using my name for some reason. Here someone has commented on this parody using my name.



That comment has been removed (decade complaint).


Also this parody appears to poke fun at me for some reason, just because I mentioned on the site that I was informed that the name "A Room Full Of Monkeys" is a generic name for those who don't wish to use their real parody names. And the last part of this parody also seems to poke fun at me because im trying to do well in SOTM contests.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/nodoubt40.shtml

Jason.


I don't think the parody is aimed at you, Jason.

Thank you.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/afi27.shtml

This particular song not only is false, breathing of hate and attack in nature. . .it also talks very openly about anal sex.  Actually, anal sex with a fair amount of detail. . .it should be removed.

Yes I know what a fetish is. Correct me if Im wrong, but a 'fetish' is usually something that strongly appeals to someone, and from what I have seen, poop strongly appeals to poomaster.


Or to be more precise, a fetish in general is a sort of thing that is appealing in a naughty way. I know from the particular fetishes I have...

Or to be more precise, a fetish in general is a sort of thing that is appealing in a naughty way. I know from the particular fetishes I have...


I liked the way you cleaned it up (naughty way) . . .But yeah, a fetish is a sexual attraction to something that as a general rule of thumb the majority of people would not find attractive.  Some fairly common fetishes do happen to include Water Sports and Poo (which I'm sure are on Poo Master's List), they aren't on the top of the list for rare fetishes, there is a sock fetish out there and even one to Turtles . . .it takes all kinds, we all have some kind of fetish--wether it be Feet or Ears etc---I will not go into mine as it's probably not a good board for it. . .but I'd say "Eat My Feces" kinda gives away that it's a fetish.

I liked the way you cleaned it up (naughty way) . . .But yeah, a fetish is a sexual attraction to something that as a general rule of thumb the majority of people would not find attractive.  Some fairly common fetishes do happen to include Water Sports and Poo (which I'm sure are on Poo Master's List), they aren't on the top of the list for rare fetishes, there is a sock fetish out there and even one to Turtles . . .it takes all kinds, we all have some kind of fetish--wether it be Feet or Ears etc---I will not go into mine as it's probably not a good board for it. . .but I'd say "Eat My Feces" kinda gives away that it's a fetish.


I read that one...

I remember going into a section that involved blood and gore(on another site)....

Very shocking, but I'd never attack anyone who was into it.

Also seen some poo/bodily functions section on anothe siter(Not shocking, just gross).

Read and voted on Poomaster's Teen Spirit parody(gave it 333, not the worst Nirvana parody, but it needs abit of work).

This parody is very very racist. It attacks Iranian people.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/greenday377.shtml

I think this parody is a rip/plagiarized stuff from Mad TV:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/50cent48.shtml

This parody contains the use of the F-word throughout it, and some rather sexual references:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/ashleytisdale1.shtml

Jason.

This isn't a parody, this is spam:

http://amiright.com/parody/2000s/kanyewest9.shtml

This isn't a parody, this is spam:

http://amiright.com/parody/2000s/kanyewest9.shtml


Man... Lack of effort to even change half of it(I seen "5 whole words" on the comments to it).

Man... Lack of effort to even change half of it(I seen "5 whole words" on the comments to it).


This reminds me of the 'Medley' fiasco some time ago, where TSB was simply cobbling bits of other people's parodies together and claiming it was his. When I mentioned it on inthe00s it sparked a huge outcry.

Perhaps TSB has really bled the Lemon Demon topic dry, so he is turning into a plagarist now.

Jason.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/plainwhitets10.shtml

Fragment.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/plainwhitets10.shtml

Fragment.


thought that looked awfully short this morning.  thanks

http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditonal27.shtml

It's way too short, and the pacing doesn't work, especially in the cohrus.

This parody is very very racist. It attacks Iranian people.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/greenday377.shtml
also, it just isn't very good.

Chuck, please take this one down:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/juliaroberts0.shtml

I made a boo boo in this one, so I resubmitted it with the correct info (the "good" version should be up tomorrow).

Thank you.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/rkelly57.shtml

I don't have the time to analyze the entire submission, but I would guess that 90% or more is a complete lift of the original song. >:(

TSB is ripping off Weird Al lyrics for some reason. Please remove, and give the kid a warning.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/weirdalyankovic7.shtml

Anonymous submission of a Weird Al parody...

http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/joanjetttheblackhearts0.shtml ::)

According to Agrimorfee, TSB has sent yet ANOTHER plaigarism:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/styx39.shtml

He should be given a final warning, then banned if he plaigarises again.

Jason.

This one should be taken down; it's way too short:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional1541.shtml



Also, it appears that this one:

This parody is very very racist. It attacks Iranian people.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/greenday377.shtml

still has not yet been removed.

And Iranian Idiot won't be removed (though it's a pity to write something of that nature and NOT ENABLE COMMENTS)

I am a firm believer that if you are going to go out and post something that is clearly controversial, you should have the balls to take criticism from those that disagree. . .

but that said. . .

Iranian Idiot is an opinion based parody, and while some may be offended by it-it does not violate any rules.  It is not a blatant attack parody on another author, it does not use outrageous or adult natured language, it does not use overtly sexual wording. . .there is nothing in that parody that would get it removed, which is why it hasn't been.

Not that I make those decisions, but clearly by the fact it's still there, it does at least to some extent also reflect what Chucky has to say about it.

If we removed every parody that someone found discriminatory or offensive, there would be NO parodies left, because someone will be offended by anything you could say whether it be PETA, Vegans, Fat People, Skinny People, People with Diseases, Straight People, Gay People, Transexuals, Blacks, Whites, Asians, Cubans, Japanese, Smelly People, Homeless People, Poor People, Rich People, Middle Class People, Republicans, Democrats, Liberterians, Religious People, Cults, Criminals, Moms, Dads, Satan Worshippers. . .

I mean do you get the point?  Anything that is truly funny, WILL piss someone off. . .period. . .that particular one I didn't find terribly funny, but I would never suggest that it be removed because it's 'controversial'

^

I haven't seen it .... but who's Ian ?  ???




A fan of 'Flock of Seagull's ' ?  ???








Hey Ian ....  yes, I ran Ian .... I ran so far away  ....

:P  ;D

If we removed every parody that someone found discriminatory or offensive, there would be NO parodies left, because someone will be offended by anything you could say whether it be PETA, Vegans, Fat People, Skinny People, People with Diseases, Straight People, Gay People, Transexuals, Blacks, Whites, Asians, Cubans, Japanese, Smelly People, Homeless People, Poor People, Rich People, Middle Class People, Republicans, Democrats, Liberterians, Religious People, Cults, Criminals, Moms, Dads, Satan Worshippers. . .


You forget extra terrestrial amputee midgets. I'm deeply offended.

Ant

You forget extra terrestrial amputee midgets. I'm deeply offended.

Ant


And women - typical

http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/airfarcewon0.shtml should be deleted because the parody author's name is listed as the "original" performer, when it is in fact the Beatles.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/glitch0.shtml

This "Author" has tried submitting made-up crap every so often, under various names, but always specifically about a cartoon company.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/airfarcewon0.shtml should be deleted because the parody author's name is listed as the "original" performer, when it is in fact the Beatles.


Well duh. But that's not a valid reason to remove a perfectly good parody. The author will have to resubmit it and ask ChuckyG to delete the old...if he wants to.

TSB has just written a silly 'list' of the ABC song:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional1545.shtml

This is not a parody at all, its just the Greek alphabet written out, so technically its NOT a parody.

Jason.

http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/glitch0.shtml

This "Author" has tried submitting made-up crap every so often, under various names, but always specifically about a cartoon company.


Once again.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/glitch1.shtml

www.amiright.com/parody/70s/toto3.shtml - it does not follow the os well at all.

Dear admins, I strongly think THIS parody needs to be taken down:
www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/afi21.shtml

There's all kinds of inane comments being posted on there, many of which have hardly anything to do with the parody... and most of the comments involve name-calling and arguing; things that are not very welcoming to site visitors. You could just clear all the comments (as I suspect might've been done before), but that would make the regulars (who are probably not mentally a day over 10 y.o.) wanna post some new immature inane commentary. So the best thing I could think of would be to remove the parody, and if the author (who also seems to call everyone names if they say a thing about A.F.I.) tries to resubmit it, he should get a warning and a possible ban.

Thank you.

Dear admins, I strongly think THIS parody needs to be taken down:
www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/afi21.shtml

There's all kinds of inane comments being posted on there, many of which have hardly anything to do with the parody... and most of the comments involve name-calling and arguing; things that are not very welcoming to site visitors. You could just clear all the comments (as I suspect might've been done before), but that would make the regulars (who are probably not mentally a day over 10 y.o.) wanna post some new immature inane commentary. So the best thing I could think of would be to remove the parody, and if the author (who also seems to call everyone names if they say a thing about A.F.I.) tries to resubmit it, he should get a warning and a possible ban.

Thank you.


I'll hold off on removing the parody for now, but the comments are wiped out again. 

Wait...there's already a Tia here. :o

This parody (if you can call it that) is very racist. Please remove:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/johncougarmellencamp15.shtml

And Iranian Idiot won't be removed (though it's a pity to write something of that nature and NOT ENABLE COMMENTS)

I am a firm believer that if you are going to go out and post something that is clearly controversial, you should have the balls to take criticism from those that disagree. . .

but that said. . .

Iranian Idiot is an opinion based parody, and while some may be offended by it-it does not violate any rules.  It is not a blatant attack parody on another author, it does not use outrageous or adult natured language, it does not use overtly sexual wording. . .there is nothing in that parody that would get it removed, which is why it hasn't been.

Not that I make those decisions, but clearly by the fact it's still there, it does at least to some extent also reflect what Chucky has to say about it.

If we removed every parody that someone found discriminatory or offensive, there would be NO parodies left, because someone will be offended by anything you could say whether it be PETA, Vegans, Fat People, Skinny People, People with Diseases, Straight People, Gay People, Transexuals, Blacks, Whites, Asians, Cubans, Japanese, Smelly People, Homeless People, Poor People, Rich People, Middle Class People, Republicans, Democrats, Liberterians, Religious People, Cults, Criminals, Moms, Dads, Satan Worshippers. . .

I mean do you get the point?  Anything that is truly funny, WILL piss someone off. . .period. . .that particular one I didn't find terribly funny, but I would never suggest that it be removed because it's 'controversial'
a lot of people have been beaten and murdered as victims of racist attacks and words like "******" and "camel jockey" were among the last they ever heard.

This parody (if you can call it that) is very racist. Please remove:

http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/johncougarmellencamp15.shtml


you should have seen the Obama one he submitted right after it... I didn't see the lines near the end when I approved it...

you should have seen the Obama one he submitted right after it... I didn't see the lines near the end when I approved it...


Oh right what was the content? or have you deleted it? Was just curious.

Oh right what was the content? or have you deleted it? Was just curious.


it didn't get past the approval stage... his fondness for the n-word was apparent pretty early on in that one