» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 08:00 a.m.

From the introduction to one of the many lateral thinking books:

These puzzles are meant to test your powers of questioning, deduction, and persistence.  If at first the direct approach leads nowhere, try coming at the problem from the side; in other words, lateral thinking.
To help solve the puzzles, you may ask questions that can be answered yes, no, or irrelevant.  Clues will be provided if the question remains unanswered.

THE APPLE PROBLEM
There were six apples in a basket and six girls in the room.   Each girl took one apple, yet one apple remained in the basket.  How come?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: CatwomanofV on 02/22/03 at 08:22 a.m.

One of the girls put the apple she took, back.



Thanks for bringing these back, Steve.




Cat

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 09:01 a.m.


Quoting:
One of the girls put the apple she took, back.
End Quote



Close enough!
THE APPLE PROBLEM
The first five girls each took an apple.  The sixth girl took the basket as well as the apple in it.

Tally -
Catwoman - 1

GAME, SET AND MATCH
Two men were playing tennis.  They played five sets and each man won three sets.  How did they do this?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: CatwomanofV on 02/22/03 at 09:02 a.m.

One game they were playing doubles-on the same team.





Cat

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 09:22 a.m.

Game-set-match to Cat!
GAME, SET, AND MATCH
The two men were partners playing doubles.

Tally -
Catwoman - 2

FATHER AND SON
William's father was older than his grandfather.  How did this happen?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: CatwomanofV on 02/22/03 at 09:38 a.m.

Is this like, "I'm my own Grandpa" syndrom? His grandmother married a younger man, so technically it is his "step-grandfather".




Cat

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 09:45 a.m.

N'uh-uh.  As I step out for a bit, I'll post the book clue.

Clue: It is impossible for a father to be younger than his son.  However, it is possible to have a grandfather who is younger than your father.  Alternatively, you could have a grandmother younger than your mother.  However, it is not possible to have a grandfather and grandmother younger than your father and mother.  Confused?  Keep thinking!

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: CatwomanofV on 02/22/03 at 09:47 a.m.

Oh, his father was older than his MATERNAL grandfather.




Cat

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/22/03 at 09:49 a.m.

Did his father live longer than his grandfather?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 09:55 a.m.

Cat builds an early lead!
FATHER AND SON
Let's say that William's father was 60, his mother was 25, and his mother's father was 45.  Because everyone has two grandfathers, it is quite possible for a maternal grandfather to be younger than one's father.

Tally -
Catwoman - 3

Okay, now I'm really outta here for a while.
SHOPPING IS GOOD FOR YOU
A man got up at 9 a.m.  He became so engrossed in his newspaper he did not have time to go out and shop as he had planned.  At 11 a.m. he went for a flying lesson.  He carefully followed all the instructions given to him by his instructor until he came in to land.  He then ignored his instructor and crashed the plane killing them both.  The accident would not have happened if he had gone shopping, which just goes to show how important shopping can be.  Why should this be so?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: CatwomanofV on 02/22/03 at 09:59 a.m.

He had to buy his medication.




Cat

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/22/03 at 11:54 a.m.

He had to buy eye-glasses?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 12:50 a.m.

He had to buy his medication. No
He had to buy eye-glasses? No

Clues:
Q- Did he need to buy some drug or medication?
A- No.

Q- Was he fully conscious and awake when he crashed the plane?
A- Yes

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/22/03 at 12:57 a.m.

He forgot his replacement glass eye ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/22/03 at 01:38 p.m.

Was this related to the newspaper, or something in the newspaper?

Did he forget to buy something for the plane trip?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 01:42 p.m.


He forgot his replacement glass eye ;D No
Was this related to the newspaper, or something in the newspaper? No
Did he forget to buy something for the plane trip? No

Clue:
Q- Did he deliberately ignore his tutor's instructions?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/22/03 at 01:43 p.m.

Hearing aid battery!  Because he had just lost the last of his battery power as the instructor told him how to land properly so he did not receive the instruction...

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 08:06 p.m.

Earl!
SHOPPING IS GOOD FOR YOU
The man had neglected to buy a new battery for his hearing aid.  The old battery failed just as he was coming in to land and he therefore did not hear his tutor's crucial instructions.

Tally -
Catwoman - 3
Rice Cube - 1
 
YOUR TURN TO DRIVE
Two brothers were talking.  One said, "I am fed up with living in Birmingham because I have to drive all the time.  Why don't we move to London?"  His brother replied, "But that would mean that I would have to drive all the time."  Why was this true?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/22/03 at 08:07 p.m.

They were Siamese twins ;D  In America they drive on the right side of the road so Left Twin drives all the time...In the UK they drive on the left side of the road so Right Twin would have to drive all the time.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 08:27 p.m.

Earl!
YOUR TURN TO DRIVE
The brothers were Siamese twins, joined at the side.  They lived in Birmingham, Alabama.  Because they drove on the right-hand side of the road the steering wheel was on the left-hand side of the car.  The brother who sat on the left always drove.  When they were in London, England, the other drove because the steering wheel was on the right-hand side of the car.

Tally -
Catwoman - 3
Rice Cube - 2

SEE SAW
A deaf man needed to buy a saw to cut some wood. He went into a hardware store.  How did he indicate to the storekeeper that he wanted to buy a saw?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/22/03 at 08:30 p.m.

He just told him.  He was deaf, not mute :P

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 08:35 p.m.

Righto Earl.
SEE SAW
The deaf man says to the storekeeper, "I would like to buy a saw, please."

Tally -
Catwoman - 3
Rice Cube - 3

THE DEADLY PARTY
A man went to a party and drank some of the punch.  He then left early.  Everyone else at the party who drank the punch subsequently died of poisoning.  Why did the man not die?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/22/03 at 08:37 p.m.

He poisoned the punch after he drank it?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Ice Princess on 02/22/03 at 08:46 p.m.

The person that didn't die didn't drink as much as the rest of the guests that died.

Quoting:
THE DEADLY PARTY
A man went to a party and drank some of the punch.  He then left early.  Everyone else at the party who drank the punch subsequently died of poisoning.  Why did the man not die?End Quote

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 09:28 p.m.


He poisoned the punch after he drank it? No
The person that didn't die didn't drink as much as the rest of the guests that died. No

Clues:
Q- Did the man poison the other people?
A- No

Q- Did anybody add anything to the punch after he left?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/22/03 at 09:34 p.m.

Did anyone do anythign to the punch in any way?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/22/03 at 09:39 p.m.

He threw it all up?  That's why he left early?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 09:45 p.m.

Did anyone do anything to the punch in any way? Besides prepare it initially, no
He threw it all up?  That's why he left early? No

Clue:
Q- Was there something wrong with the glasses, ladle, or the punch bowl itself?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/22/03 at 09:46 p.m.

Was he the only one who wasn't allergic to the punch?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/22/03 at 10:59 p.m.

Was he the only one who wasn't allergic to the punch? No

Clue:
Q- Were all the people physically normal?
A- Yes

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/22/03 at 11:02 p.m.

Is it possible that it was the ladle that was poisoned, i.e. it was made out of lead and as the night went on it kept dissolving into the punch?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: BadAngel on 02/22/03 at 11:06 p.m.

The poison wasn't in the punch....it was in something else being served at the party.  (Maybe?  No?  Yes?  lol )

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Indy Gent on 02/22/03 at 11:20 p.m.

The man did not swallow the punch. He tried some punch, left it in his mouth and spat it outside. The punch tasted bad enough for him to detect might have had botulism or poison. But he wasn't sure so he left without telling everybody.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/23/03 at 00:06 a.m.

Is it possible that it was the ladle that was poisoned, i.e. it was made out of lead and as the night went on it kept dissolving into the punch? No
The poison wasn't in the punch....it was in something else being served at the party.Yes, the poison was not in the punch
The man did not swallow the punch. He tried some punch, left it in his mouth and spat it outside No

Clue:
Q- Was there a relationship between the people, or between them and the man who left early, that matters here?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/23/03 at 02:06 a.m.

Did the man put the poison into the punch in some way?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/23/03 at 04:52 a.m.

Is it because there was poison in the ice & he didn't stay long enough for them to melt?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/23/03 at 08:38 a.m.

PoP!
THE DEADLY PARTY
The poison in the punch came from the ice cubes in it.  Whe the man drank from the punch the ice had just been added and was still solid.  Gradually, during the course of the evening, the ice melted contaminating the punch with the poison.

Tally -
Catwoman - 3
Rice Cube - 3
Princess of Pop - 1

SPEECHLESS
Two men who were good friends had not seen each other for several years.  One afternoon they met but they did not speak to each other.  Neither was deaf or dumb and there was no prohibition on speaking in the place where they met.  Why did they not speak to each other?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: CatwomanofV on 02/23/03 at 08:40 a.m.

They didn't recongize each other.





Cat

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/23/03 at 09:35 a.m.

They didn't recongize each other. No

Clues:
Q- Did the two friends recognize and greet each other?
A- Yes

Q- Were they close to each other?
A- Yes


Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: CatwomanofV on 02/23/03 at 09:43 a.m.

They were in a scuba class and it was underwater. (ok, maybe I am grasping at straws here.)





Cat

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/23/03 at 09:51 a.m.

Were they in a place or attending a function that speaking would have been allowed, but in-appropriate?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/23/03 at 10:07 a.m.


Quoting:
They were in a scuba class and it was underwater. (ok, maybe I am grasping at straws here.)
Cat
End Quote



http://e4u.deltait.com.au/sport/sport10.gif  "bloop bloop bloop"?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/23/03 at 10:16 a.m.


Quoting:


http://e4u.deltait.com.au/sport/sport10.gif  "bloop bloop bloop"?
End Quote


YEP!!!
SPEECHLESS
The two men were both divers.  They met on afternoon while scuba diving on the sea bed.

Tally -
Catwoman - 4
Rice Cube - 3
Princess of Pop - 1

HOW TO HUG
A boy was about to go on his first date.  Since he had never embraced a girl before he was anxious to learn a little about how to do it.  He went to his local public library and saw a book entitled How to Hug.  He took it home and was greatly disappointed; it gave him no useful advice at all. Why not?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/23/03 at 10:23 a.m.

Cause it was a book on "huggin the porcelain god"?  ;D

Just kiddin Steve!  ;)

but seriously.....was it a book on something that had nothing to do with hugging a person?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/23/03 at 10:27 a.m.

was it a book on something that had nothing to do with hugging a person? Yes

Clues:
Q- Was the book about hugging or embracing?
A- No

Q- Did it have the wrong cover or a misprinted cover?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: CatwomanofV on 02/23/03 at 10:50 a.m.

HUG is probably an acronom-H.U.G. that stood for something else. Maybe Home Utility Guidence (or something like that.)





Cat

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/23/03 at 12:31 a.m.

HUG is probably an acronom-H.U.G. that stood for something else. Maybe Home Utility Guidence (or something like that.) No

Clue:
Q- Was it a genuine non-fiction book written in English?
A- Yes

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/23/03 at 12:34 a.m.

Was the book about hugging in a metaphorical sense, like how to embrace different cultures, rather than individual people?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/23/03 at 01:43 p.m.

Was the book about hugging in a metaphorical sense, like how to embrace different cultures, rather than individual people? No

Clue:
Q- Was the boy physically normal and could he read?
A- Yes

Q- Was the title of the book an accurate description of its contents?
A- Yes

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/23/03 at 01:48 p.m.

Did the book have no pictures?  :D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/23/03 at 05:55 p.m.

Did the book have no pictures?  :D Irrelevant

Clue:
Q-Was the title of the book an accurate description of its contents?
A- Yes

Q- Would one recognize this type of book if one saw it?
A- Yes

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/23/03 at 05:56 p.m.

Was it a joke book about hugs?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/23/03 at 06:48 p.m.

Even though you said there was no misprint on the cover, was part of the cover torn?  

Was it a book on hugging that pictured adults & not children, therefore he didn't think it applied to him? (okay- I am reaching on that one)  :-/

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/23/03 at 09:28 p.m.

Was it a joke book about hugs? No.  It is a unique species of books that has been with us for centuries
Even though you said there was no misprint on the cover, was part of the cover torn?No  
Was it a book on hugging that pictured adults & not children, therefore he didn't think it applied to him? No, it was a book about everything, really...

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/23/03 at 09:40 p.m.

Hmmm...was it a book on tape?  ;)  And he couldn't play it at home because he didn't have a working tape deck?  :D

Was the book in ye olde English and he couldn't read the language?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/24/03 at 06:09 a.m.

Was it an encylopedia that started with the word "How" and ended in "Hug"?  Or was it a religous book of some sort?  :-/

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/24/03 at 06:20 a.m.


Quoting:
Was it an encylopedia that started with the word "How" and ended in "Hug"?
End Quote



YES!  I'll tally points when I get home...

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/24/03 at 09:07 a.m.

*smacks forehead*   ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/24/03 at 03:12 p.m.

Do we need to put an A.P.B. out on Steve H?  Or does he just have a more interesting life than the rest of us?  :-/

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/24/03 at 03:13 p.m.


Quoting:
Do we need to put an A.P.B. out on Steve H?  Or does he just have a more interesting life than the rest of us?  :-/
End Quote



Unlike some of us *cough* the man actually has to work ;)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/24/03 at 04:00 p.m.

HOW TO HUG
What the boy had picked up at the library was a volume of an encyclopedia.  It was a section covering the words beginning with H from How to Hug and that was what was printed on the cover

Tally -
Catwoman - 4
Rice Cube - 3
Princess of Pop - 2

THE HEALTHY DAIRYMAIDS
In the eighteenth century a disease called smallpox was responsible for the deaths of millions of people worldwide.  The man whom we can thank for defeating the scourge of smallpox is Edward Jenner, an English country doctor who lived from 1749 to 1823.  He noticed that dairymaids never caught smallpox.  From this observation he went on to develop a treatment to prevent smallpox and thereby became one of the world's most famous doctors.  Why did dairymaids never catch smallpox?


Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/24/03 at 04:01 p.m.

because they got antibodies from drinking fresh cow's milk?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/24/03 at 04:02 p.m.


Quoting:
THE HEALTHY DAIRYMAIDS
In the eighteenth century a disease called smallpox was responsible for the deaths of millions of people worldwide.  The man whom we can thank for defeating the scourge of smallpox is Edward Jenner, an English country doctor who lived from 1749 to 1823.  He noticed that dairymaids never caught smallpox.  From this observation he went on to develop a treatment to prevent smallpox and thereby became one of the world's most famous doctors.  Why did dairymaids never catch smallpox?

End Quote



They got cowpox, which was like smallpox, but less dangerous so they survived with an immunity to smallpox as well.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/24/03 at 04:08 p.m.

EARL!
THE HEALTHY DAIRYMAIDS
Dairymaids caught the disease cowpox (a relatively harmless disease) from cows.  This, however, gave them immunity from the related but much more dangerous disease smallpox.  Jenner researched and developed the technique for inoculation with cowpox vaccine which eventually became widespread and overcame the bane of smallpox.

Tally -
Catwoman - 4
Rice Cube - 4
Princess of Pop - 2

THE LAKE PROBLEM
There is a large irregularly shaped lake on your estate.  It is of variable and unknown depth.  There are no rivers or streams entering or leaving the lake.  How would you find the volume of water in the lake?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/24/03 at 04:10 p.m.


Quoting:
THE LAKE PROBLEM
There is a large irregularly shaped lake on your estate.  It is of variable and unknown depth.  There are no rivers or streams entering or leaving the lake.  How would you find the volume of water in the lake?


End Quote



Drain it and fill it up again, with a water measurer thingie :)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/24/03 at 04:16 p.m.

Measure how many acres you live on & figure out how deep the lake is and add that?  :-/

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/24/03 at 04:21 p.m.

sonar?  Heck I have no clue!!!

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/24/03 at 04:28 p.m.

Drain it and fill it up again, with a water measurer thingie :) No
Measure how many acres you live on & figure out how deep the lake is and add that? No
sonar?  Heck I have no clue!!! No

Clue:
Q- Does the solution involve measuring the height of the water in the lake?
A- No  

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/24/03 at 04:31 p.m.

How about building a retaining wall around the lake and sandbagging the lake until it rises so you can measure it based on the wall?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/24/03 at 04:40 p.m.


Quoting:
How about building a retaining wall around the lake and sandbagging the lake until it rises so you can measure it based on the wall?
End Quote



gosh rice.....that's outta my league  ::)

I think I will wait for the next question.....................

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/24/03 at 04:41 p.m.

How about building a retaining wall around the lake and sandbagging the lake until it rises so you can measure it based on the wall? No

A couple of clues and I'm outta here for a while.

Clues:
Q- Does the solution involve measuring the temperature of the lake?
A- No

Q- Is the solution a practical and realistic way of estimating the volume of water in the lake?
A- Yes

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/24/03 at 04:43 p.m.

Can you put in some sort of solute where you know the rate of dissolution, and then measure the volume based on when the solute starts precipitating out of the lake?

Although that would totally screw up your lake :D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: QueenAmenRa on 02/24/03 at 04:53 p.m.

Ask the former owner of your estate, who measured it himself.

OR

Throw an object of known mass in the lake, use a stopwatch for how long it takes to rise up, and calculate density and crap...

:-/  I was never very good at physics labs...

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/24/03 at 06:47 p.m.

Earl comes close enough!
THE LAKE PROBLEM
You pour into the lake a know quantity of a concentrated chemical or vegetable dye.  After allowing some time for the harmless chemical to disperse, you take samples of the water in several places.  The more diluted the solution the greater the volume of water in the lake.  Precise analysis of the concentration of chemicals in the samples would give a good estimate of the water volume of the lake.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 5
Catwoman - 4
Princess of Pop - 2

THE TWO LOOKOUTS
Two sentries were on duty outside a barracks.  One faced up the road to watch for anyone approaching from the north.  The other looked down the road to see if anyone approached from the south.  Suddenly one of them said to the other, "Why are you smiling?"  How did he know his companion was smiling?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: CatwomanofV on 02/24/03 at 07:14 p.m.

They were facing each other and watching over the other's shoulder.




Cat

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/24/03 at 08:04 p.m.

Cat!
THE TWO LOOKOUTS
Although the guards were looking in opposite directions, they were not back to back.  They were facing each other.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 5
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 2

THE BOXING MATCH
At the end of a long hard boxing match one boxer was knocked out by the other.  The judges agreed it was a completely proper victory.  Yet during the course of the match no man threw a punch.  What happened?


Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/24/03 at 08:07 p.m.


Quoting:
THE BOXING MATCH
At the end of a long hard boxing match one boxer was knocked out by the other.  The judges agreed it was a completely proper victory.  Yet during the course of the match no man threw a punch.  What happened?



End Quote



Either a headbutt or it was kickboxing.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/24/03 at 09:04 p.m.

He hadn't showered in a few weeks and the BO eminating from his body knocked his opponent out?  Just a guess ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/24/03 at 09:50 p.m.

Either a headbutt or it was kickboxing. No
He hadn't showered in a few weeks and the BO eminating from his body knocked his opponent out?  Just a guess No

Clues:
Q- Was everything about the fight legal and proper?
A- Yes

Q- And yet no punches were thrown?
A- No man threw a punch

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/24/03 at 09:52 p.m.

Was the other man disqualified before any punches were thrown?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/25/03 at 05:38 a.m.

They were female boxers!  I actually have heard this one before!  :P

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/25/03 at 06:07 a.m.


Quoting:
They were female boxers!  I actually have heard this one before!  :P
End Quote


And you heard it right!  Tallying will be done when I get home from work.   :D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: QueenAmenRa on 02/25/03 at 03:21 p.m.


Quoting:
They were female boxers!  I actually have heard this one before!  :P
End Quote



>:(  Dangit! I knew that before I saw the answer! Guess I just have a little need for speed.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/25/03 at 03:46 p.m.

THE BOXING MATCH
No man threw a punch because the boxing match was between two women boxers.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 5
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 2

THE NEPHEW
A man and his sister were out shopping one day when the man said, "That boy over there is my nephew."  "That is right," replied his sister, "but he is not my nephew."  How come?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/25/03 at 03:47 p.m.


Quoting:
THE BOXING MATCH
No man threw a punch because the boxing match was between two women boxers.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 5
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 2
End Quote



Princess has 3 now ;)

Quoting:
THE NEPHEW
A man and his sister were out shopping one day when the man said, "That boy over there is my nephew."  "That is right," replied his sister, "but he is not my nephew."  How come?
End Quote



Were they half-siblings?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/25/03 at 03:48 p.m.

No wait, it was her son :)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/25/03 at 04:01 p.m.

Oops.  Sorry Princess... :-THE NEPHEW
The boy was the woman's son, and therefore he was her brother's nephew.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 6
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 3

NUTS AWAY!
A man was changing a wheel on his car when the four nuts used to hold the wheel in place fell into a sewer drain and were lost.  He was afraid he was stuck there, but a passing boy made a very useful suggestion which enabled the man to drive off.  What was the boy's idea?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/25/03 at 04:02 p.m.

Take 1 off the 3 remaining tires, then all would have 3?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: QueenAmenRa on 02/25/03 at 04:11 p.m.


Quoting:
Take 1 off the 3 remaining tires, then all would have 3?
End Quote



That was my guess...so if SHE gets a point, I should get a point too!!!   >:(   ;)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/25/03 at 04:18 p.m.

80s Cheerleader!
NUTS AWAY!
The boy suggested that the man take one wheel nut off each of the other three wheels in order to attach the fourth wheel.  Once he had done this, the man could safely drive to the nearest garage with each wheel firmly attached by three nuts.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 6
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 3
80s Cheerleader - 1

Last one for a while.

MOVING PARTS
Two common objects carry out the same function.  One of the objects has many thousands of moving parts while the other object has no moving parts.  What are the objects?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: QueenAmenRa on 02/25/03 at 04:23 p.m.

The post office and a computer.
They both send mail.  :D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/25/03 at 05:03 p.m.

The post office and a computer.
They both send mail.  :D No

Clues:
Q- Do both objects serve a common and useful function?
A- Yes

Q- Does either of them use electricity?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/25/03 at 05:17 p.m.


Quoting:
MOVING PARTS
Two common objects carry out the same function.  One of the objects has many thousands of moving parts while the other object has no moving parts.  What are the objects?
End Quote



Is one of these objects a cutting tool?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/25/03 at 06:19 p.m.

Is one of these objects a cutting tool? No

Clue:
Q- Are the thousands of moving parts man-made?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: QueenAmenRa on 02/25/03 at 06:44 p.m.

I have a feeling its some kind of bodily function that some living creature also carries out....
but I can't quite put my finger on it...

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/25/03 at 07:53 p.m.

Is one a clock & the other a sun clock?


Or do these objects have to do with water?  :-/

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Indy Gent on 02/25/03 at 08:08 p.m.

I believe your first answer P of P, is correct, because I was going to guess one was an analog clock and the other was a digital watch.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/25/03 at 08:11 p.m.

Too close, Princess!
MOVING PARTS
The two objects are an hourglass (often used in the kitchen as an egg-timer) and a sundial.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 6
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 4
80s Cheerleader - 1

THE VALUABLE BOOK
A man had a book which was worth $40,000.  Why did he deliberately destroy it?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/25/03 at 08:15 p.m.

Because the book was already damaged & so he couldn't really get $40,000 for it, so he trashed it?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/25/03 at 08:28 p.m.

Because the book was already damaged & so he couldn't really get $40,000 for it, so he trashed it?  No

Two clues before I leave for the night.

Clues:
Q- Did he destroy the book because it contained something damaging or threatening to him or his family?
A- No

Q- Was he hoping to collect the insurance?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/25/03 at 08:34 p.m.

Did he destroy it not knowing it was worth $40,000?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/26/03 at 01:14 a.m.

Perhaps he had another copy of the same book, and destroyed that one book to make the other book worth even more since it was more rare now :P

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/26/03 at 06:05 a.m.


Quoting:
Perhaps he had another copy of the same book, and destroyed that one book to make the other book worth even more since it was more rare now :P
End Quote



Exactly!  I'll tally when I get home.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/26/03 at 03:55 p.m.

THE VALUABLE BOOK
The man actually owned two copies of the valuable book.  By destroying one copy he increased the value of the other.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 7
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 4
80s Cheerleader - 1

THE TWO SISTERS
One day, two sisters decided to clean out the old shed at the bottom of their garden.  When they had finished the cleaning, one of them had a dirty face and the other had a clean face.  The sister with the clean face went and washed her face, but the girl with the dirty face did not wash.  Why should this be so?


Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/26/03 at 03:58 p.m.


Quoting:
THE TWO SISTERS
One day, two sisters decided to clean out the old shed at the bottom of their garden.  When they had finished the cleaning, one of them had a dirty face and the other had a clean face.  The sister with the clean face went and washed her face, but the girl with the dirty face did not wash.  Why should this be so?
End Quote



Could it be because she didn't want to get her face even more dirty, since her hands would probably be dirty?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/26/03 at 04:28 p.m.

Could it be because she didn't want to get her face even more dirty, since her hands would probably be dirty? No

Clue:
Q- Did the girl who washed want to clean her face?
A- Yes

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/26/03 at 04:31 p.m.


Quoting:
THE TWO SISTERS
One day, two sisters decided to clean out the old shed at the bottom of their garden.  When they had finished the cleaning, one of them had a dirty face and the other had a clean face.  The sister with the clean face went and washed her face, but the girl with the dirty face did not wash.  Why should this be so?
End Quote



Did one of the sisters supervise while the other one did all the work?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: CatwomanofV on 02/26/03 at 04:50 p.m.

The sister with a dirty face had more work to do.




Cat

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/26/03 at 05:25 p.m.

Did one of the sisters supervise while the other one did all the work? No
The sister with a dirty face had more work to do. No

Clue:
Q- Did she think her face was dirty?
A- Yes

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/26/03 at 05:26 p.m.

Was the dirt life-threatening or something?  ::)

Was she unable to wash her own face?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/26/03 at 07:15 p.m.

Did she not wash her face because they had finished "cleaning out" the shed, but had to put everything back in and she figured she'd just get dirty again?

Or, maybe she was going to go swimming and figured it would get clean then?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/26/03 at 09:25 p.m.

Was the dirt life-threatening or something?  ::) No
Was she unable to wash her own face? No
Did she not wash her face because they had finished "cleaning out" the shed, but had to put everything back in and she figured she'd just get dirty again? No
Or, maybe she was going to go swimming and figured it would get clean then?  No

Clue:
Q- So the girl who did not wash thought her face was already clean?
A- Yes

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/26/03 at 09:37 p.m.

Was the other girl blind which meant she didn't tell the other one her face was dirty?   :P  <does that even make sense?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/26/03 at 10:19 p.m.

Was the other girl blind which meant she didn't tell the other one her face was dirty?   :P  <does that even make sense? No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/26/03 at 10:21 p.m.

This is silly, but what of the girl with the cleaned face was unable to speak so she could not tell the girl with the dirty face that her face was still dirty?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/26/03 at 10:32 p.m.

This is silly, but what of the girl with the cleaned face was unable to speak so she could not tell the girl with the dirty face that her face was still dirty? Closer... but no

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/26/03 at 10:34 p.m.

(*#&!!!

Okay...How about the clean sister just DIDN'T tell the dirty sister that her face was dirty, as a joke?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/26/03 at 10:58 p.m.

Close enough!
THE TWO SISTERS
When they had finished the cleaning, they had no mirror to look at, so each girl looked at her sister.  The girl with the clean face saw that her sister was dirty and assumed that she would be dirty, so she washed.  Her sister made the reverse assumption.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 8
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 4
80s Cheerleader - 1

WATER AND WINE
There are two glasses on the table, one containing water and the other one wine.  They both contain exactly the same amount by volume.  If you take a teaspoon of water and mix it into the wine and then take a teaspoonful from the wine glass and mix it with the water, both glasses become contaminated.  But which is the more contaminated?  Does the water now contain more wine than the wine does water or the other way around?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/26/03 at 11:01 p.m.


Quoting:
WATER AND WINE
There are two glasses on the table, one containing water and the other one wine.  They both contain exactly the same amount by volume.  If you take a teaspoon of water and mix it into the wine and then take a teaspoonful from the wine glass and mix it with the water, both glasses become contaminated.  But which is the more contaminated?  Doe the water now contain more wine than the wine does water or the other way around?
End Quote



Wine is partially water.  So if you put water in wine it just becomes slightly more water, but if you put a little bit of wine in water, the alcohol will spread out and it won't be as contaminated as the water-in-wine, which is still mostly alcohol.  Or something like that ???

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/27/03 at 05:59 a.m.

The wine.  You added water to the wine so the wine is diluted with 'pure' water.  When you then take a spoonful out of the wine glass to add it to the water, you are adding both wine and water to the water glass because the wine was no longer 'pure'.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/27/03 at 06:46 a.m.



Wine is partially water.  So if you put water in wine it just becomes slightly more water, but if you put a little bit of wine in water, the alcohol will spread out and it won't be as contaminated as the water-in-wine, which is still mostly alcohol.  Or something like that ???  No
The wine.  You added water to the wine so the wine is diluted with 'pure' water.  When you then take a spoonful out of the wine glass to add it to the water, you are adding both wine and water to the water glass because the wine was no longer 'pure'. No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/27/03 at 06:49 a.m.

The wine-in-water because the water was contaminated to begin with, but the alcohol killed the contamination in the wine?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/27/03 at 08:38 a.m.

Wouldn't they BOTH have equal parts contamination?  Since you are transferring equal parts of each liquid?   :-/

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/27/03 at 08:42 a.m.


Quoting:
Wouldn't they BOTH have equal parts contamination?  Since you are transferring equal parts of each liquid?   :-/
End Quote


YES!!! Point tallied when I get home...

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/27/03 at 09:15 a.m.

But, if you added water to the wine first, then, the wine would be a water/wine solution.  So, if you take a teaspoon of that solution and added it to the water, you would be adding wine and water to the water, but you only added water to the wine.  So, there should be more water in the wine than wine in the water.  They would only be equal if you removed a teaspoon of each prior to adding them to the other.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 02/27/03 at 09:26 a.m.

But you have to remember.....wine is about 90% water anyway.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/27/03 at 10:01 a.m.

so wine is 10% alcohol by volume, right?  and water is 0% alcohol by volume, right?  a teaspoon of water in the wine wouldn't make a lot of difference, but a teaspoon of wine in the water and you'll taste it, guaranteed.

I protest this question :D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/27/03 at 10:15 a.m.

Me too.  

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: shazzaah on 02/27/03 at 11:09 a.m.

How are these equal parts If one is pure water and the other is wine/water? I think the game is wrong on this one. Of course, I never play so maybe my opinion doesn't really count. ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Syncronos on 02/27/03 at 11:23 a.m.

testing http://www.fortunecity.com/tattooine/obiwan/92/newlantern.gif

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/27/03 at 03:33 p.m.

Protests noted.  :)  (And if any of the protesters are willing to pay the airfare, they are invited to come here and rip up the page the offending question and answer are on... :D)
WATER AND WINE
They are both equally contaminated.  The water contains exactly as much wine as the wine contains water.  The most elegant proof for this celebrated little puzzle is as follows:  It does not matter how many transfers are made between the glasses or whether the contents are stirred.  Provided that the volumes in the two glasses are equal, then any water not in the glass must be in the wine, there is nowhere else it can be.  The wine that it has replaced must be in the water glass.  The water glass therefore contains as much wine as the wine contains water

(For the record, when I first read this I thought that the sequence mattered.  If you transfered the water first, then the wine, the wine would be more contaminated.)

Tally -
Rice Cube - 8
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 5
80s Cheerleader - 1

THE MAN IN THE PAINTING
A man stands in front of a painting and says the following: "Brothers and sisters have I none.  But this man's father is my father's son."  How is the man in the painting related to the man who is in front of it?


Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/27/03 at 03:58 p.m.

He was referring to himself.
Wait, no, he was referring to his son.

Because his son's father would be him, who is his father's son.  Yeah.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Taoist on 02/27/03 at 04:18 p.m.

The man in the painting is his son.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/27/03 at 04:31 p.m.

Earl! (The edit would have been disallowed if it had occured prior to Taoist's correct answer)
THE MAN IN THE PAINTING
It is the man's son in the painting.  'My father's son' must be the man himself (since he had no brothers or sisters).  Therefore, 'this man's father is my father's son' becomes 'this man's father is me'.  So, the man in the picture is his son.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 9
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 5
80s Cheerleader - 1

THE SINGLE STATEMENT
An explorer was captured by a tribe whose chief decided that the man should die.  The chief was a very logical man and gave the explorer a choice.  The explorer was to make a single statement.  If it was true, he would be thrown over a high cliff.  If it was false, he would be eaten by lions.
What statement did the clever explorer make that forced the chief to let him go?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/27/03 at 04:34 p.m.


Quoting:
Earl! (The edit would have been disallowed if it had occured prior to Taoist's correct answer)
End Quote



I know :)  I would've said something if Tao had the correct answer before me :)

Quoting:
THE SINGLE STATEMENT
An explorer was captured by a tribe whose chief decided that the man should die.  The chief was a very logical man and gave the explorer a choice.  The explorer was to make a single statement.  If it was true, he would be thrown over a high cliff.  If it was false, he would be eaten by lions.
What statement did the clever explorer make that forced the chief to let him go?
End Quote



Was the statement pertaining to either torture/death method?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/27/03 at 04:46 p.m.

Was the statement pertaining to either torture/death method? Yes

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/27/03 at 04:47 p.m.


Quoting:
THE SINGLE STATEMENT
An explorer was captured by a tribe whose chief decided that the man should die.  The chief was a very logical man and gave the explorer a choice.  The explorer was to make a single statement.  If it was true, he would be thrown over a high cliff.  If it was false, he would be eaten by lions.
What statement did the clever explorer make that forced the chief to let him go?
End Quote



Did he dissuade the chief from employing those methods?

Did he make the chief laugh?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/27/03 at 05:48 p.m.

Did he dissuade the chief from employing those methods? No
Did he make the chief laugh? No

Clue:
The explorer must make a statement that is both true and false at the same time.  Better still, it should be a statement that means that any action the chief takes would place him in the position of having acted illogically.
Can you construct a statement about the way the explorer will die that is neither true nor false?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/27/03 at 05:52 p.m.

Did he ask the chief to throw the lions off the cliff?  :P

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Thunderbolt on 02/27/03 at 06:57 p.m.

He asked "Are you going to feed me to lions?"

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/27/03 at 07:33 p.m.

Thunderbolt is close enough!
THE SINGLE STATEMENT
The explorer made the statement, "I will be eaten by lions."  Now, if the chief does feed him to the lions, his statement will have been true, so he should have been thrown off the cliff.  But if he is thrown off the cliff, his statement will have been false.  The chief had to admit that the only fair course of action was to let the explorer go free.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 9
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 5
80s Cheerleader - 1
Thunderbolt - 1

THE COAL, CARROT, AND SCARF
Five pieces of coal, a carrot, and a scarf are lying on the lawn.  Nobody put them on the lawn, but here is a perfectly logical reason for their being there.  What is it?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/27/03 at 07:38 p.m.

They were the decorations on a snowman.  The weather got warm and the snowman melted. ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Thunderbolt on 02/27/03 at 07:39 p.m.

Did they fall from the sky?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/27/03 at 07:45 p.m.

80s Cheerleader!
THE COAL, CARROT, AND SCARF
They were used by children who made a snowman.  The snow has now melted.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 9
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 5
80s Cheerleader - 2
Thunderbolt - 1

THE FOUR SHEEP
Farmer Giles has four sheep.  One day, he notices that they are standing in such a way that they are all the same distance away from each other.  That is to say, the distance between any two of the four sheep is the same.  How can this be so?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/27/03 at 07:49 p.m.

They are all touching?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/27/03 at 07:57 p.m.

They are all touching? No

Clue:
Start by defining how three sheep can be equidistant from each other-- it's easy, isn't it?
Your mind should then jump from a triangle to a square.  But if you find that a square cannot produce a solution then, you need to start thinking laterally, i.e. along different lines entirely!

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/27/03 at 08:15 p.m.

They are standing in a cross shape?

        I
     -    -
        I

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/27/03 at 09:10 p.m.

three of the sheep were at the base of a hill, while the fourth sheep was at the top of the hill.  If you think of them as points, they will form the vertices of a tetrahedron.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/28/03 at 06:09 a.m.

Earl gets it!  Point tallied when I get home!

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/28/03 at 03:57 p.m.

THE FOUR SHEEP
The sheep are standing on the four corner points of an equal-sided pyramid.  Or to put it another way, three are on the points of an equilateral triangle and the other is on a mound of earth in the center.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 10
Catwoman - 5
Princess of Pop - 5
80s Cheerleader - 2
Thunderbolt - 1

THE MAN WITH THE WOOD
A man had some wood.  On Monday, it was in the shape of a cube.  On Tuesday, he changed it into the shape of a cylinder, and on Wednesday he changed it into the shape of a pyramid.  He did not cut or carve the wood into these shapes.  How did he do it?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/28/03 at 04:00 p.m.

Was the wood already molded so that he could arrange it into these shapes?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/28/03 at 04:30 p.m.

Was it a puzzle?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: CatwomanofV on 02/28/03 at 06:03 p.m.

Did he sand it into those shapes?



Cat

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 02/28/03 at 08:42 p.m.

Was the wood already molded so that he could arrange it into these shapes? No
Was it a puzzle? No
Did he sand it into those shapes? Hmmm... no

Clue:
Q- Did he have it in blocks that he rearranged?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/28/03 at 08:44 p.m.


Quoting:
THE MAN WITH THE WOOD
A man had some wood.  On Monday, it was in the shape of a cube.  On Tuesday, he changed it into the shape of a cylinder, and on Wednesday he changed it into the shape of a pyramid.  He did not cut or carve the wood into these shapes.  How did he do it?

End Quote



Was he a magician?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/01/03 at 07:06 a.m.

Was he a magician? No

Clue:
Q- Did he use fire or heat to mold it?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/01/03 at 07:13 a.m.

Were they wood chips?  

Was it a single piece of wood?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/01/03 at 09:41 a.m.

Were they wood chips?  HMMMM!... No 
Was it a single piece of wood? No

Clues:
Q- Was it wood from a tree?
A- Yes

Q- Did changing the wood's shape require a special skill?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Taoist on 03/01/03 at 10:31 a.m.

On monday he had a crate, he opened it and got something cylindrical from it.  Then on Wednesday he piled the wood into a bonfire.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Tangle on 03/01/03 at 11:13 a.m.

Almost the same as Taoist's answer; I think he chopped up a crate and tied it in a cylindrical bundle, before making a pyramid out of it for a fire.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/01/03 at 11:26 a.m.

I was going to say firewood ^ or sawdust that he made into those shapes?  But you know how my answers can get me in trouble sometimes!  :-/

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/01/03 at 04:21 p.m.


Quoting:
I was going to say firewood ^ or sawdust that he made into those shapes?  But you know how my answers can get me in trouble sometimes!  :-/
End Quote


Yeah, but you said the magic word, Princess!  Sawdust!
THE MAN WITH THE WOOD
The wood was sawdust.  He poured it into a square box to make a cube shape, a bucket to make the cylinder, and then into a pyramid-shaped box to make the pyramid.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 10
Princess of Pop - 6
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 2
Thunderbolt - 1

STUCK TIGHT
A truck became wedged under a low bridge.  It could not move forward or back without severly damaging its roof.  The truck driver was perplexed until a little girl standing nearby suggested an easy solution.  What was it?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/01/03 at 04:23 p.m.

let the air out of the tires and then fill them up again after he's out of the bridge ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/01/03 at 04:34 p.m.

Earl!  
STUCK TIGHT
The little girl suggested that the driver let some air out of the truck tires.  He let out enough to lower the truck by the small amount required to let it pass under the bridge

Tally -
Rice Cube - 11
Princess of Pop - 6
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 2
Thunderbolt - 1

COMING HOME
A man walked home after having been out drinking.  He walked down the middle of a deserted country road.  There were no street lights to illuminate the road and there was no moonlight.  He was dressed all in black  Suddenly a car that did not have its headlights on came racing down the road.  At the last moment, the driver of the car saw the man and swerved to avoid him.  How did he manage to see him?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/01/03 at 04:38 p.m.


Quoting:
COMING HOME
A man walked home after having been out drinking.  He walked down the middle of a deserted country road.  There were no street lights to illuminate the road and there was no moonlight.  He was dressed all in black  Suddenly a car that did not have its headlights on came racing down the road.  At the last moment, the driver of the car saw the man and swerved to avoid him.  How did he manage to see him?
End Quote



Did he smile?  :D

Um...it was during the day.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Tangle on 03/01/03 at 04:39 p.m.

A flash of lightening?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/01/03 at 05:51 p.m.

Earl!
COMING HOME
This puzzle depends on the reader maing the false assumption that the man was coming home at night.  He was returning home in bright sunlight, so anyone could have seen him.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 6
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 2
Thunderbolt - 1

A RIDDLE
For a little light relief, we will now have an old riddle.  What is it that gets wetter as it dries?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/01/03 at 05:53 p.m.

A towel?  ???

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop lurking on 03/01/03 at 07:13 p.m.

A Sponge?  ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/01/03 at 08:19 p.m.

POPLURK!  A sponge!  
A RIDDLE
The answer is a sponge

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 7
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 2
Thunderbolt - 1


ANOTHER RIDDLE
What is it that the man who makes it does not need; the man who buys it does not use himself, and the person who uses it does so without knowing?



Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/01/03 at 08:23 p.m.

a diaper?  ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/01/03 at 11:14 p.m.


a diaper?  ;D No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/01/03 at 11:16 p.m.

Is this something that can be bought easily?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/02/03 at 04:30 a.m.

Is it a coffin?  :o  

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/02/03 at 07:54 a.m.

PoP!
ANOTHER RIDDLE
The answer is a coffin

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 8
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 2
Thunderbolt - 1

THE HORSE DYED
A man went buffalo hunting.  He rode a beautiful white stallion and carried a powerful rifle to shoot his prey.  Unfortunately, the buffalo could see the white horse approaching and ran off long before he could shoot.  The hunter hit on the plan of dying the horse brown so as to camoflage it.  He painted a brown dye on the horse and went hunting.  The camouflage worked, but he was even less successful with his hunting than before.  Why?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Thunderbolt on 03/02/03 at 08:20 a.m.

Did another hunter confuse his horse for a buffalo? ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Tangle on 03/02/03 at 09:22 a.m.

The smell of the dye?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/02/03 at 10:18 a.m.

Tangle!
THE HORSE DYED
Although the dye made the horse harder to see, it also made it much easier to smell.  The buffalo caught the scent of the dye from a long distance and made their escape.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 8
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 2
Thunderbolt - 1
Tangle - 1

PUSH THAT CAR
A man pushing his car stopped outside a hotel.  As soon as he got there, he knew he was bankrupt.  Why?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Taoist on 03/02/03 at 10:27 a.m.

Easy - He was playing monopoly!

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/02/03 at 10:35 a.m.

>:( yeah, what ^ said.  ;)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/02/03 at 02:16 p.m.

Taoist!
PUSH THAT CAR
He was playing Monopoly.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 8
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 2
Thunderbolt - 1
Tangle - 1
Taoist - 1

THE TWO GOLFERS
Archie and Ben were professional golfers and keen rivals.  One day during a game, they had each scored 30 when Ben hit a bad shot.  Archie immediately added 10 to his own score.  Archie then hit a good shot and he had won the game. Why?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/02/03 at 02:30 p.m.


Quoting:
THE TWO GOLFERS
Archie and Ben were professional golfers and keen rivals.  One day during a game, they had each scored 30 when Ben hit a bad shot.  Archie immediately added 10 to his own score.  Archie then hit a good shot and he had won the game. Why?
End Quote



They were bowling?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/02/03 at 02:37 p.m.

Were they playing Tennis?  ::)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/02/03 at 02:40 p.m.


Quoting:
Were they playing Tennis?  ::)
End Quote



D'oooooooh, I didn't think of that :D  Bravo!

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/02/03 at 02:48 p.m.

PoP!
THE TWO GOLFERS
They were playing tennis.  At 30-all Ben hit a shot out.  Archie then served an ace to win the game and match.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 9
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 2
Thunderbolt - 1
Tangle - 1
Taoist - 1

LORD STRATHALLEN
Lord Strathallen was an important Scottish nobleman who was used to getting what he wanted.  One day in 1746, he ordered some food and drink even though he was neither hungry nor thirsty.  What he wanted was not available and he was offered whiskey and oakcake instead.  He was glad to quickly consume a little of each.  Why?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/02/03 at 02:49 p.m.


Quoting:
LORD STRATHALLEN
Lord Strathallen was an important Scottish nobleman who was used to getting what he wanted.  One day in 1746, he ordered some food and drink even though he was neither hungry nor thirsty.  What he wanted was not available and he was offered whiskey and oakcake instead.  He was glad to quickly consume a little of each.  Why?
End Quote



To pretend that that was actually what he wanted so he could keep up his reputation?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Thunderbolt on 03/02/03 at 03:05 p.m.

Was he about to be executed and was this supposed to dope him up so he wouldn't feel pain?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/02/03 at 03:19 p.m.

To pretend that that was actually what he wanted so he could keep up his reputation? No
Was he about to be executed and was this supposed to dope him up so he wouldn't feel pain? No

Clue:
Q- Did he need the food and drink for some medical condition?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/02/03 at 03:25 p.m.

Did he do it to ward off some kind of magic?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Tangle on 03/02/03 at 03:42 p.m.

Right, I know that Strathallan died at the battle of Culloden in 1746, and I also know that the Scots army was suffering from hunger before the battle.

So I'm guessing that he had to eat some of what he'd been given to avoid mutiny from his own men who'd otherwise have guessed that he'd been well fed and they hadn't.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/02/03 at 05:32 p.m.

Did he do it to ward off some kind of magic? No
Right, I know that Strathallan died at the battle of Culloden in 1746, and I also know that the Scots army was suffering from hunger before the battle.
So I'm guessing that he had to eat some of what he'd been given to avoid mutiny from his own men who'd otherwise have guessed that he'd been well fed and they hadn't. You're correct, Strathallan died as a result of wounds suffered during the battle of Culloden, but he did not eat the oatcake and drink the whiskey to avoid mutiny.

Clues:
Q- Did the whiskey and oatcake meet a real need that he had?
A- Yes

Q- What did he ask for?
A- Wine and bread

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/02/03 at 05:33 p.m.

Did he use it to build a fire?  ::)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Tangle on 03/02/03 at 07:06 p.m.

Last rites? Or even a quick baptism before he died?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/02/03 at 07:14 p.m.

Tangle!
LORD STRATHALLEN
Lord Strathallen was mortally wounded during the battle of Culloden Moor on April 16th, 1746, when the Scots under Bonnie Prince Charlie were defeated by the Duke of Cumberland to end the "Forty-five" rebellion.  Lord Strathallen was a Catholic and asked for the Holy Eucharist before he died.  The priest could find no bread and wine, so he consecrated oatcake and whiskey instead.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 9
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 2
Tangle - 2
Thunderbolt - 1
Taoist - 1

A REMARKABLE JOURNEY
In 1930, two men drove from New York to Los Angeles in a Ford motor car.  The journey of 3,340 miles took 18 days.
This wasn't the first, the fastest, or the slowest journey of its kind.  They drove on normal roads.  The car was not remarkable and the two men were normal.  But because of this journey, these two men hold a world record that endures to this day.  What is it?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/02/03 at 07:18 p.m.


Quoting:
A REMARKABLE JOURNEY
In 1930, two men drove from New York to Los Angeles in a Ford motor car.  The journey of 3,340 miles took 18 days.
This wasn't the first, the fastest, or the slowest journey of its kind.  They drove on normal roads.  The car was not remarkable and the two men were normal.  But because of this journey, these two men hold a world record that endures to this day.  What is it?
End Quote



they drove backwards?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/02/03 at 07:47 p.m.

Earl!
A REMARKABLE JOURNEY
They hold the world record for the longest journey driven in reverse.  Charles Creighton and James Hargis drove their Ford Model A in reverse all the way from New York to Los Angeles between July 26 and August 13, 1930.  They then drove back to New York again in reverse!

Tally -
Rice Cube - 13
Princess of Pop - 9
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 2
Tangle - 2
Thunderbolt - 1
Taoist - 1

WOMAN ON THE BRIDGE I
During the second World War, there was a footbridge over a ravine between Germany and Switzerland.  It was guarded by a German sentry.  His orders were to shoot anyone trying to escape over the bridge and to turn back anyone who did not have a signed authorization to cross.  The sentry was on the German side of the bridge.  He sat in a sentry post and he came out every three minutes to survey the bridge.
There was a woman who desperately needed to escape from Germany to Switzerland.  She could not possibly get a pass.  She knew that she could sneak past the sentry while he was in the sentry post, but it would take between five and six minutes to cross the bridge.  There was no place to hide on or under the bridge, so the guard would be easily able to shoot her if he saw her on the bridge escaping to Switzerland.  How did she escape across the bridge?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/02/03 at 07:49 p.m.

Was she hot?  Did she prostitute herself for free passage?  ::)

Did she use a disguise?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/02/03 at 07:54 p.m.

Did she dig a tunnel to somehow go under the bridge?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Tangle on 03/02/03 at 07:58 p.m.

She walked slightly over halfway, then turned back and started walking the other way. The guard then turned her back in her original direction.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: TripsMom on 03/02/03 at 08:00 p.m.

She wanted to escape into Switzerland not into Germany. She had no papers so was turned away~into Switzerland~where she wanted to go?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 06:05 a.m.

Tangle!  I'll tally the score when I get home

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 04:24 p.m.

WOMAN ON THE BRIDGE I
The woman waited until the sentry went into his hut.  She then sneaked onto the bridge and walked towards the Swiss border.  She walked for nearly three minutes, then she turned around and started to walk back towards German.  The guard came out and saw her.  When she reached him he saw she had no authority to enter Germany, and he therefore ordered her to go back--to Switzerland!

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 9
Catwoman - 5
Tangle - 3
80s Cheerleader - 2
Thunderbolt - 1
Taoist - 1


WOMAN ON THE BRIDGE II
In South America, a woman was being chased by a gang of bandits.  She had escaped with two solid gold balls, and the bandits wanted to kill her and take the balls.  She came to a wooden bridge over a deep ravine.  There was a notice on the bridge that said "Maximum weight on this bridge 112 pounds."  Strangely enough, this notice was 100% accurate--the bridge would break if it carried more than 112 pounds.  She weighed 100 pounds and each of the two balls weighed 10 pounds.  There was no time to leave one ball behind and come back for it later.  And yet she managed to escape across the bridge to safety with both balls.  How could this be?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/03/03 at 04:28 p.m.


Quoting:

WOMAN ON THE BRIDGE II
In South America, a woman was being chased by a gang of bandits.  She had escaped with two solid gold balls, and the bandits wanted to kill her and take the balls.  She came to a wooden bridge over a deep ravine.  There was a notice on the bridge that said "Maximum weight on this bridge 112 pounds."  Strangely enough, this notice was 100% accurate--the bridge would break if it carried more than 112 pounds.  She weighed 100 pounds and each of the two balls weighed 10 pounds.  There was no time to leave one ball behind and come back for it later.  And yet she managed to escape across the bridge to safety with both balls.  How could this be?
End Quote



Did she shed her clothes so that she could run across naked while she could still carry the gold balls?  (Assume clothes weighed 8 pounds for whatever reason)

Did she roll the balls along?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Thunderbolt on 03/03/03 at 05:06 p.m.

Was it a very short bridge?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 05:20 p.m.

Did she shed her clothes so that she could run across naked while she could still carry the gold balls?  (Assume clothes weighed 8 pounds for whatever reason)No
Did she roll the balls along?No
Was it a very short bridge? No

Clue:
Q- Did she throw them to the other side?
A- No

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/03/03 at 05:25 p.m.

Did she at any point use a tool to help her get across?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Thunderbolt on 03/03/03 at 05:34 p.m.

Were any animals involved?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 05:43 p.m.

Did she at any point use a tool to help her get across? No
Were any animals involved? No

Clue:
Q- Did she take them with her as she went across?
A- Yes

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/03/03 at 05:44 p.m.

Did she juggle them while crossing?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 05:55 p.m.

80s Cheerleader!
WOMAN ON THE BRIDGE II
She juggled the balls as she went over the bridge.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 9
Catwoman - 5
Tangle - 3
80s Cheerleader - 3
Thunderbolt - 1
Taoist - 1

SILENCE ON THE TRAIN
A man boarded a train and sat in a carriage.  The only other person in the carriage was a woman who was sitting opposite him.  After a little while, she took from her bag a pencil and paper and passed it to the man.  He wrote on the piece of paper and gave it back to her.  At the next stop, she got off the train and threw the piece of paper away.
They had never met before.  Their meeting on the train was by chance and not arranged.  They did not speak to each other.
Can you determine the story behind this sequence of events?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/03/03 at 05:59 p.m.


Quoting:
80s Cheerleader!
WOMAN ON THE BRIDGE II
She juggled the balls as she went over the bridge.
End Quote



TEN POUND BALLS????  You gotta be sh!ttin' me!!!  :D ::)

For a 100-pounder that's quite impressive ;)

Quoting:
SILENCE ON THE TRAIN
A man boarded a train and sat in a carriage.  The only other person in the carriage was a woman who was sitting opposite him.  After a little while, she took from her bag a pencil and paper and passed it to the man.  He wrote on the piece of paper and gave it back to her.  At the next stop, she got off the train and threw the piece of paper away.
They had never met before.  Their meeting on the train was by chance and not arranged.  They did not speak to each other.
Can you determine the story behind this sequence of events?


End Quote



He gave her his phone number/autograph.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/03/03 at 06:06 p.m.

She had written on the paper when her stop was to be, the man responded that it was the next one, so when she got off the train, she no longer needed it.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Tangle on 03/03/03 at 06:10 p.m.

The ticket lady?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 07:37 p.m.

Remember, this is a story, and not a single answer.  Whoever has all the facts together first wins the point.

He gave her his phone number/autograph. Yes, and...
She had written on the paper when her stop was to be, the man responded that it was the next one, so when she got off the train, she no longer needed it. No
The ticket lady? No

Clues:
Q- Did they recognize each other in any way?
A- No

Q- Did the man make any movements or gestures?
A- Yes, with his mouth




Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/03/03 at 07:38 p.m.


Quoting:


TEN POUND BALLS????  You gotta be sh!ttin' me!!!  :D ::)

For a 100-pounder that's quite impressive ;)
End Quote



She must've had a big boyfriend!!!  It's all in the wrist baby! ;)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/03/03 at 07:43 p.m.

okay, they were both married people.  he then wrote his name & number on a piece of paper, mouthed the words "call me" & since she was meeting her husband at the train depot, she remembered the info & threw it away to avoid being caught?  :-/

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 07:46 p.m.

okay, they were both married people.  he then wrote his name & number on a piece of paper, mouthed the words "call me" & since she was meeting her husband at the train depot, she remembered the info & threw it away to avoid being caught?  :-/ No

Clues:
Q- Was the man remarkable in any way?
A- Yes

Q- Was the woman remarkable in any way?
A- Yes

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/03/03 at 08:06 p.m.

He gave her his phone number/autograph and then licked his lips seductively?   :-*

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/03/03 at 08:06 p.m.

OK...I think I got it........

Was the woman deaf & the man wrote directions (maybe the train stop she needed to get off on).  OK, she was deaf & he was mute?  ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 08:19 p.m.

He gave her his phone number/autograph and then licked his lips seductively?   :-*
Was the woman deaf & the man wrote directions (maybe the train stop she needed to get off on).  OK, she was deaf & he was mute?  

Within an ace of getting this one...

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/03/03 at 08:20 p.m.

was the gesture obscene?  Maybe he gave her his name and number, but then made an obscene gesture with his mouth, so she decided she didn't want someone like that so she decided to throw it away?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 08:24 p.m.

was the gesture obscene?  Maybe he gave her his name and number, but then made an obscene gesture with his mouth, so she decided she didn't want someone like that so she decided to throw it away? Getting colder...

Clue:
The man was an author.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/03/03 at 08:29 p.m.


Quoting:


Clue:
The man was an author.
End Quote



And this clue is supposed to make it easier, HOW?  Now I am totally clueless!  :P

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 08:34 p.m.

Clue:
The man was chewing gum

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/03/03 at 08:35 p.m.

So she asked for an autograph in sign, but he wrote back "no"?  That's why she threw it away?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/03/03 at 08:36 p.m.

What the?..........

Alllllrighty then......did he put gum in the paper & she threw it away?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/03/03 at 08:37 p.m.

AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!  He signed the gum wrapper?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/03/03 at 08:44 p.m.

She asked him for some gum?  He signed the gum and then she threw the wrapper away because the signature was on the gum?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/03/03 at 08:48 p.m.

He wrote the Dewey decimal number of his book on the wrapper, along with his name.  He blew a bubble and she caught it with the wrapper, so she had to throw it away?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/03/03 at 08:49 p.m.


Quoting:
He blew a bubble and she caught it with the wrapper, so she had to throw it away?
End Quote


;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 08:50 p.m.

So she asked for an autograph in sign, but he wrote back "no"?  That's why she threw it away? No.  She was deaf and mute.  She didn't communicate anything to him at all
He signed the gum wrapper? No
She asked him for some gum?  He signed the gum and then she threw the wrapper away because the signature was on the gum? Blergh....

:) You guys are SOOO close...

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/03/03 at 08:51 p.m.

She wrote and asked if he was a famous author, and he was chewing gum so didn't feel polite talking, SO wrote back that he was on the gum wrapper, and then she threw it away?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 08:52 p.m.

What might someone who is chewing gum appear to be doing if you turn down the volume?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Thunderbolt on 03/03/03 at 08:55 p.m.

Talking, so...

Trying to sell a book?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/03/03 at 08:57 p.m.

okay, she was deaf and mute.  she thought he was talking to her and thought he said "Throw this away" so when she got off the train, she did so, not realizing that it was worth millions?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/03/03 at 08:58 p.m.

She thought he was talking, so she asked him what he was saying, then he said he was just chewing gum on the piece of paper and then she nodded and threw it away.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 08:58 p.m.

Why did the woman hand the man the piece of paper?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/03/03 at 09:01 p.m.

Because she wanted his name?  or uh...autograph?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 09:03 p.m.

She's deaf and he's chewing gum... and he maybe thinks he's more famous than he is...

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/03/03 at 09:04 p.m.

she thought he wanted it to throw his gum out?  He wrote his name, the title of the book, and the price on the wrapper and she didn't care to read it?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/03/03 at 09:08 p.m.

He signed the paper, put his gum in it, thinking she would want it, but she thought he was talking about himself (which he probably was) and had never heard of him so she threw it away, not realizing the pile of money she could make on ebay? ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/03/03 at 09:17 p.m.

80s Cheerleader!  Close enough for this one...
SILENCE ON THE TRAIN
The man was a moderately well-known author.  He sat in the carriage and started to chew gum.  The woman was deaf and mute and thought he might be speaking to her.  She gave him pen and paper on which to write his message.  He, being rather vain, thought she had recognized him as a celebrity and wanted his autograph.  He signed the paper.  His signature meant nothing to her, so she threw the piece of paper away as soon as she left the train.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 9
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 4
Tangle - 3
Thunderbolt - 1
Taoist - 1

THE DISTANT IMAGE
A man was in a room.  It was ten feet square and ten feet high with solid walls, ceiling, and floor.  There were no windows and the door was close fitting and closed.  It was a dark night and no light entered the room from outside.  There was a light on in the room.  Apart from the light there was not other electrical or powered object in the room.  The interesting thing is this--althought the room was only ten feet across, the man could see something 40 feet away.  How could this be?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/03/03 at 09:23 p.m.

The "light" was coming from a video monitor?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/03/03 at 09:24 p.m.


Quoting:
THE DISTANT IMAGE
A man was in a room.  It was ten feet square and ten feet high with solid walls, ceiling, and floor.  There were no windows and the door was close fitting and closed.  It was a dark night and no light entered the room from outside.  There was a light on in the room.  Apart from the light there was not other electrical or powered object in the room.  The interesting thing is this--althought the room was only ten feet across, the man could see something 40 feet away.  How could this be?
End Quote



He looked down?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/04/03 at 03:47 a.m.

Was he looking at a picture on the wall of an object in the distance?    or   Was he looking at his reflection in a mirror?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Taoist on 03/04/03 at 04:49 a.m.

There were two mirrors on opposite walls, looking at one would give the 'infinite tunnel' effect.  At least one of the images would be at 40ft.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/04/03 at 06:53 a.m.

Taoist!  Point tallied when I get home.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/04/03 at 03:31 p.m.

Ooops!  Sorry Taoist, but PoP beat you to it (she said the magic word "mirror"  ;D) ... but, then again, it was more than one mirror... hmmm... Point PoP...and Taoist!
THE DISTANT IMAGE
What he could see 40 feet away was the reflection of his hand.  There were mirrors on opposite sides of the room.  The man held his hand up and slightly to the side of him.  He could see its image reflected many times in the mirror in front of him.  The first reflection is 20 feet away, the second is 40 feet away, and so on.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 10
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 4
Tangle - 3
Taoist - 2
Thunderbolt - 1

COINS OF THE REALM
Why are 1988 pennies worth more than 1983 pennies?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Tangle on 03/04/03 at 04:22 p.m.

A change in the quality of the metal used, giving each penny a higher intrinsic value?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/04/03 at 04:42 p.m.

It's either that or it was the year they "updated" the pics on the coins.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: CatwomanofV on 03/04/03 at 05:03 p.m.

They made less of them.



Cat

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/04/03 at 05:11 p.m.

A change in the quality of the metal used, giving each penny a higher intrinsic value? No
It's either that or it was the year they "updated" the pics on the coins. No
They made less of them. No

Clue:
Q- Are the 1988 pennies in better condition than the 1983 pennies?
A- No


Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/04/03 at 05:18 p.m.

They didn't make pennies in 1983?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Tangle on 03/04/03 at 06:00 p.m.

OK, I felt very stupid when this came to me at long last:

One thousand, nine hundred and eighty-eight pennies are worth more than one thousand, nine hundred and eighty-three.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/04/03 at 06:30 p.m.

Tangle untangles it!
COINS OF THE REALM
Why are 20 pennies worth more than 15 pennies?  Because there are five more of them!  The same is true for 1988 pennies and 1983 pennies.  The trouble is caused because the brain automatically sees these numbers as dates.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 10
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 4
Tangle - 4
Taoist - 2
Thunderbolt - 1

BABY HAS LOTS
What is it that a baby has more of than an adult?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/04/03 at 06:32 p.m.

Dependence?  :-/  

The letter "b"?  :-/

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/04/03 at 06:49 p.m.

Dependence?  :-/  No

The letter "b"?  :-/ No

Clue:
Q- Is the answer something abstract, such as innocence or expectations?
A- No.  The answer is something physical that a baby has more of than an adult.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Tangle on 03/04/03 at 06:55 p.m.

Sleep? Diaper changes? Years ahead of it?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/04/03 at 07:17 p.m.

Body fat (if we are talking a "normal" sized adult)?  Or something to do with their eyes?  :o

Body Hair (you know how babies are so fuzzy!)  :D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/04/03 at 07:21 p.m.

Sleep? Diaper changes? Years ahead of it? No
Body fat (if we are talking a "normal" sized adult)?  No
Or something to do with their eyes?  No
Body Hair (you know how babies are so fuzzy!) No

Clue:
Q- Does the number a baby has reduce as he or she grows older?
A- Yes  

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/04/03 at 07:31 p.m.

Bowel Movements?  ::)

Heartbeats?  ::)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Tangle on 03/04/03 at 07:33 p.m.

Brain cells?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: John_Harvey on 03/04/03 at 07:42 p.m.

Years left in their life

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/04/03 at 08:09 p.m.


Quoting:
Years left in their life
End Quote



We got a live one ;)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/04/03 at 08:10 p.m.

Bones?  Their skulls are not one single bone.  The bones in the skull fuse together as they grow.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/04/03 at 08:36 p.m.

80s Cheerleader!
BABY HAS LOTS
A baby is born with some 350 separate bones.  As the baby grows, some of these bones join together so that in maturity the same person has only some 206 bones.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 10
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 5
Tangle - 4
Taoist - 2
Thunderbolt - 1

FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF SOUND
What was the first man-made object to travel faster than the speed of sound?
The speed of sound is about 1100 feet per second (340 meters per second).  Concorde travels faster than the speed of sound.  But the answer to this question is an object created a long time before Concorde.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/04/03 at 08:38 p.m.

A bullet or a whip?  (miniature sonic booms, plus bullets go around Mach 1-2)

Or fire or some form of light, which travels at the speed of light :D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/04/03 at 08:45 p.m.

snot flying out of your nose when you sneeze? ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/04/03 at 08:48 p.m.

Earl!
FASTER THAN THE SPEED OF SOUND
The first man-made object to travel faster than the speed of sound was the tip of a whip.  The characteristic noise of the crack of a whip is the result of the tip breaking the sound barrier.

Tally -
Rice Cube - 13
Princess of Pop - 10
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 5
Tangle - 4
Taoist - 2
Thunderbolt - 1


DINNER FOR THREE
An ancient Arabic puzzle goes like this:  A hunter met two shepherds, one of whom had three loaves and the other five loaves.  All the loaves were the same size.  The three men agreed to share the eight loaves equally between them.  After they had eaten, the hunter gave the shepherds eight bronze coins as payment for the meal.  How should the two shepherds fairly divide the money?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/04/03 at 08:50 p.m.

In half :)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/04/03 at 08:51 p.m.

Well, since Rice beat me to the answer, I'll say one should get 3, the other should get 5?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Taoist on 03/05/03 at 04:17 a.m.

Captain Math to the rescue....

The first shepherd (A) gets 1
The second (B) gets 7

Explaination

A donates 3 loaves but eats 8/3 himself (8/3 is the proportion each man gets)
therefore he donates 1/3 of a loaf to the meal
B donates 5 loaves, eats 3/8
therefore he donates 7/3 loaves to the meal

B donates 7 times the bread

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/05/03 at 06:08 a.m.

Taoist! Point tallied after work.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: karen (Guest) on 03/05/03 at 06:39 a.m.

I want to complain!  :(

Whenever I read this thread either

1) I start thinking "ooh ooh I know this one" only to find someone has already worked it out and I don't know the next one.

or
2) Steve hasn't posted the next puzzle.

It ust be the time of day I'm on-line

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Taoist on 03/05/03 at 06:43 a.m.

Karen

I agree

We should force these Americans to post on GMT  ;D
So what if they have to get up in the middle of the night!

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Mr. Bojangles on 03/05/03 at 07:55 a.m.


Quoting:
Captain Math to the rescue....

The first shepherd (A) gets 1
The second (B) gets 7

Explaination

A donates 3 loaves but eats 8/3 himself (8/3 is the proportion each man gets)
therefore he donates 1/3 of a loaf to the meal
B donates 5 loaves, eats 3/8
therefore he donates 7/3 loaves to the meal

B donates 7 times the bread

End Quote



Can you say "Google"?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Taoist on 03/05/03 at 09:10 a.m.

Quoting:
Can you say "Google"?
End Quote


Are you questioning my integrity?

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/05/03 at 09:24 a.m.

Quoting:

Are you questioning my integrity?
End Quote



I think you're intelligent enough to get this on your own steam :)  I probably would've figured it out except that I didn't feel like thinking last night ;D

And no, I'm not Mr. Bojangles ;)  Not to mention that to find this exact question on the web would take some creative web engine finagling ::)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: princessofpop on 03/05/03 at 09:26 a.m.

I think that if we all just start ignoring the lurkers they will go away.  They just want attention & to stir up the pot, thats all.

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/05/03 at 03:51 p.m.

Taoist gets the point!  (And, if he was indeed able to google an answer out a google-proof question like this he deserves a second point  ;D  Elsewise, I don't feel anyone has been playing any way less than fair and square.)


Tally -
Rice Cube - 12
Princess of Pop - 10
Catwoman - 5
80s Cheerleader - 4
Tangle - 4
Taoist - 3
Thunderbolt - 1


The winner is...
EARL!!!

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/05/03 at 03:53 p.m.

Aww, no more?  :-/

Yay, I won!  Yay me!  :)  Heehee...

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Steve_H on 03/05/03 at 03:58 p.m.

Party on, Earl.  We got a few more posts 'til they close 'er down...

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/05/03 at 04:04 p.m.

That last question was deceptively easy :)  I just didn't want to think ;)

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/05/03 at 04:32 p.m.

Although you should credit the guy with more bread for his generosity...parting with that much bread is harsh!  :o

But at least he got repaid handsomely ;D

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/05/03 at 04:33 p.m.

And.................

Subject: Re: Revenge of Lateral Thinking

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/05/03 at 04:36 p.m.

LOCK!  :D