inthe00s
The Pop Culture Information Society...

These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.

Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.

This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.




Check for new replies or respond here...

Subject: Non-fat Chocolate ?

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/29/09 at 3:35 am

A bar of chocolate has been created that can be eaten while you diet.

Its makers claim it has 90% fewer calories than a normal bar and doesn't melt as easy as every day chocolate.

Swiss chocolatier Barry Callebaut has named his secret ingredient "Vulcano" because it can withstand heat up to 55C.

A spokesman told the Daily Mirror: "Our engineers stumbled upon the technique by accident.

"It's nice and chocolatey with a strong aroma. It does melt in the mouth but it is the enzymes in saliva rather than the heat that cause it to dissolve."

The company hope to sell Vulcano to Cadbury's and Nestle and It could be used in their bars within two years.

Subject: Re: Non-fat Chocolate ?

Written By: danootaandme on 07/29/09 at 5:57 am

Non-fat Chocolate?  Kinda like non-fat ice cream, why bother?  ;D

Subject: Re: Non-fat Chocolate ?

Written By: Brigitte on 07/29/09 at 10:49 am

I would rather have 1 piece of real chocolate than have 10 pieces of non-fat chocolate. I don't think processed food is a good thing.

Subject: Re: Non-fat Chocolate ?

Written By: Jessica on 07/29/09 at 10:59 am

Methinks it would rather taste like the chocolate Ex-Lax. :P

I think I'll just indulge now and then in real chocolate.

Subject: Re: Non-fat Chocolate ?

Written By: coqueta83 on 07/29/09 at 7:47 pm


Methinks it would rather taste like the chocolate Ex-Lax. :P

I think I'll just indulge now and then in real chocolate.


Oh, man, chocolate Ex-Lax!  I tried this stuff one time, out of curiosity....never, ever again!  8-P


As far as non-fat chocolate goes....I don't think so!

Subject: Re: Non-fat Chocolate ?

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/30/09 at 1:55 am

Is the chocolate used for cooking non-fat?

Subject: Re: Non-fat Chocolate ?

Written By: Fairee07 on 07/31/09 at 7:30 pm

I wonder how many chemicals and addititves are in it....

Subject: Re: Non-fat Chocolate ?

Written By: robby76 on 08/11/09 at 7:16 am

Cadburys low-fat Flytes are yummy! Not sure about a non-fat one.

http://www.sweetiebag.com/product_images/full/Flyte.jpg

Subject: Re: Non-fat Chocolate ?

Written By: Ashkicksass on 08/11/09 at 9:07 pm


A bar of chocolate has been created that can be eaten while you diet.

Its makers claim it has 90% fewer calories than a normal bar and doesn't melt as easy as every day chocolate.

Swiss chocolatier Barry Callebaut has named his secret ingredient "Vulcano" because it can withstand heat up to 55C.

A spokesman told the Daily Mirror: "Our engineers stumbled upon the technique by accident.

"It's nice and chocolatey with a strong aroma. It does melt in the mouth but it is the enzymes in saliva rather than the heat that cause it to dissolve."

The company hope to sell Vulcano to Cadbury's and Nestle and It could be used in their bars within two years.



For some reason I keep thinking of margarine.  I don't want to eat the margarine of chocolate.  8-P

Subject: Re: Non-fat Chocolate ?

Written By: 2kidsami on 08/29/09 at 3:28 pm

I had Chocolate covered bacon at Iowa State Fair - and it was surprisingly YUMMY (do not believe it or the bacon was non-fat though ::))

Subject: Re: Non-fat Chocolate ?

Written By: apollonia1986 on 09/02/09 at 7:37 pm

"Non-fat chocolate" is an oxymoron.

That's like calling someone a "tall midget".  :D It doesn't happen.

Subject: Re: Non-fat Chocolate ?

Written By: Badfinger-fan on 09/09/09 at 2:15 am

N-f C?      ughh....take it away!


I had Chocolate covered bacon at Iowa State Fair - and it was surprisingly YUMMY (do not believe it or the bacon was non-fat though ::))
surprisingly yummy?  sounds scary but if you ate it, I'd try some just to say I did  8)

Check for new replies or respond here...