» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: ChuckyG on 01/29/02 at 11:17 a.m.

Which are more screwed up?

http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/01/29/jeb.bush.daughter.drugs/index.html

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Hairspray on 01/29/02 at 02:01 p.m.

At least Chelsea Clinton had the good sense to keep her nose clean during her father's Presidency.

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Indy Gent on 01/29/02 at 06:03 p.m.

Yeah Chucky. But this is Jeb Bush's daughter, Noelle. Lauren Bush has been clean so far and is a gorgeous model. I believe Jenna is the more disturbed of Dubya's twins.

Quoting:
Which are more screwed up?

http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/01/29/jeb.bush.daughter.drugs/index.html
End Quote

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Indy Gent on 01/29/02 at 06:07 p.m.

Yeah, Hairspray, but that's ancient history now. The tabloids had a cover photo of Chelsea that looked so terrible, it didn't look like her at first. It may be a result of being with Daddy a little too much. And for the ex-Pres, although I didn't vote for you and consider you a lying scumbag, I am saddened of Buddy's (your dog's) recent death. I wouldn't wish it on my greatest enemy. :'(

Quoting:
At least Chelsea Clinton had the good sense to keep her nose clean during her father's Presidency.
End Quote

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Marci on 01/30/02 at 01:40 a.m.


Quoting:
At least Chelsea Clinton had the good sense to keep her nose clean during her father's Presidency.
End Quote



I totally agree with you on that one, Hairspray.  Those Bush girls have been all over the place with their "bad" behavior from day one it seems.  (Actually did they even wait that long?)  At least Chelsea "behaved" when Clinton was in office.  Maybe that's because he had enough bad press on his own to cover the whole family..LOL!   ::)  And now with even GW's niece being in trouble, ya have to wonder what kind of an upbringing that whole family had??  I'm sure Chelsea is no angel, but at least she hasn't been bad enough to be reported on the nightly news!  

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Gis on 01/30/02 at 02:55 a.m.

I have to say whatever Chelsea did or didn't do during her father's office she has pissed off people in the U.K big time by moaning about everything and everyone since she got here.If England is so terrible and (my hometown)Oxford such a bad place to live why the hell did she come to university here in the first place??  

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: merry-beth on 01/30/02 at 04:27 p.m.

i do have to wonder....had Chelsea done something less than acceptable during her father's presidency, how much press would she have received? her father seemed to have covered that department...with all of the lewinsky tales and so forth, would the public have even noticed, or would we have written off to the fact that she is a clinton?

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Wicked Lester on 01/30/02 at 04:59 p.m.

And bear this in mind: very early in the Clinton administration, the press was "invited" to not report on Chelsea. That's understandable because she was so young at the time, however, the Bush girls are college students and very inviting subjects. Naturally they are going to be scrutinized more.

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Gis on 01/31/02 at 03:34 a.m.

Same as Prince William and Prince Harry here doing typical teenage/student things and 'scandalising' the media.Yeah right.

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Marci on 01/31/02 at 12:23 a.m.


Quoting:
Same as Prince William and Prince Harry here doing typical teenage/student things and 'scandalising' the media.Yeah right.
End Quote



Well, while I think you make an interesting point, the only thing I can see with William and Harry is that they are the future kings of the country.  I mean, no matter what the Bush girls or Chelsea Clinton do, they don't have to be in charge of anything here in the future.  When they screw up, while it could look poorly on their fathers' "parenting skills", it doesn't have to have an effect on the whole country.  Unfortunately, the princes, while it may be a helluva lot to bear, they are royalty, and they are probably scrutinized much more closely than children of the presidents. They will eventually run the country.. Don't get me wrong, I don't envy that!!  But not only can a "scandal"  look bad on them, then you have to add in Charles' "parenting skills" as well..and frankly, it's no wonder the kids are having problems.  But, then again, we in the U.S. may not hear nearly as much about their behavior as you all do.  I've never really heard anything negative about the boys until Harry's drug "problem", and over here, it seems to be taken more like a joke than anything else.  I keep hearing him refferred to as "the pot smoking prince".   You gotta feel for them..but I would think they are in a much different position than any of these presidential kids over here.

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: RockandRollFan on 04/25/02 at 02:27 p.m.


Quoting:
At least Chelsea Clinton had the good sense to keep her nose clean during her father's Presidency.
End Quote


True, but George W. has kept his nose clean...un-like Clinton....so far ;)

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Hairspray on 04/25/02 at 02:33 p.m.


Quoting:

True, but George W. has kept his nose clean...un-like Clinton....so far ;)
End Quote




Hey, hey! We're talkin' 'bout the girls heah.   ;)

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: RockandRollFan on 04/25/02 at 02:58 p.m.


Quoting:



Hey, hey! We're talkin' 'bout the girls heah.   ;)
End Quote


Oops...sorry :-X Then I'll just say that two girls are better than one ;)

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: ThunderVamp9 on 04/25/02 at 05:28 p.m.

Hey, you know what they say:  A girl in the hand is better than two in the Bush...

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: RockandRollFan on 04/25/02 at 07:04 p.m.


Quoting:
Hey, you know what they say:  A girl in the hand is better than two in the Bush...
End Quote


And here I thought I was being "Naughty!"  ;)

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: philbo_baggins on 04/26/02 at 06:05 a.m.


Quoting:
Hey, you know what they say:  A girl in the hand is better than two in the Bush...
End Quote


.."a girl in the bush is better than two off the hand"???

Phil

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Tarzan Boy (Guest) on 04/26/02 at 12:11 a.m.


Quoting:
Hey, you know what they say:  A girl in the hand is better than two in the Bush...
End Quote



There should be a warning for this. I nearly chocked on a saltine cracker!

Tarzan Boy

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Alicia. on 04/27/02 at 01:56 p.m.

Chelsea Clinton doesn't get on my nerves. I do know that the  Bush Daughters get on my nerves. They take after their father and are annoying.

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Banasy on 04/27/02 at 03:33 p.m.


Quoting:

True, but George W. has kept his nose clean...un-like Clinton....so far ;)
End Quote



Uh-uh....his nose wasn't always so "clean"...what, he didn't inhale?

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: langdon_hughes on 04/27/02 at 11:52 p.m.

Quoting:


Uh-uh....his nose wasn't always so "clean"...what, he didn't inhale?
End Quote



I swear to God, you're gonna kill me. Hi-friggin-larious!

As for the girls, I have always had a personal prejudice against "pretty people" and Bush's girls are the perfect examples. Pampered, petted, and permitted. At least Chelsea's gonna have some character, what with that face and all. (Did I say that?)

The royals are also "pretty", admittedly, but they are taught that from birth, with privilege comes responsibility. Not something American upper classes are taught.

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: TAIKO (Guest) on 04/28/02 at 00:31 a.m.

there are no real winner here.

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: RockandRollFan on 04/28/02 at 06:42 p.m.


Quoting:


Uh-uh....his nose wasn't always so "clean"...what, he didn't inhale?
End Quote

So you like my choice of words, Huh?
Chelsea comes out looking better because of all the things her dad did or "Things that were done to him" as for the Bush girls...give Jenna a beer & me and she'll just drink the beer :(

Subject: Re: Bush Daughters or Chelsea Clinton?

Written By: Gandalf on 05/03/02 at 00:11 a.m.

Jenna and Barbara Bush are like 19 year old adult women.  They're fair game as far as the media is concerned.  Chelsea Clinton was a 13 year old, big difference.  Once Chelsea became 18, the media has been going after her more then they did before.

Plus, they were initially pretty mean to her when she was 13, SNL calling her ugly and everything.