» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: The Two Towers

Written By: Syanne on 12/16/02 at 10:34 p.m.

;D I just got home from a special sneak preview of The Two Towers.  IMO, it was worth the wait!  The opening was  seamless - it was like there wasn't even a year inbetween films.

The battle scenes are pretty gruesome for someone like me (who watches the scary parts from the space between my fingers) but the special effects are good and I especially liked how Gollum was depicted (he's so ugly he's cute).

The only crappy thing is that the projector acted up about a quarter of the way into the movie and we had to watch a split screen for about five minutes or so until someone from the theatre went to find someone to complain to.

I hope the other Tolkien fans on the boards enjoy it as much as I did -  :D

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Rice Cube on 12/16/02 at 10:41 p.m.

Methinks 'twas the best book in the trilogy in terms of action.  I'm jealous of you, I don't get to see it until Wednesday at the earliest...  :-/

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: 80sRocked on 12/16/02 at 10:59 p.m.

I just can't get myself into the Lord of the Rings thing.

I haven't read any of the books, so I guess that may have something to do with it.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: shazzaah on 12/17/02 at 08:58 a.m.

You are so lucky!  LOTR  is one of the best stories I have ever read. And since I loved the first film, I am encouraged by your description of the Two Towers....

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: nickelback_girl on 12/17/02 at 09:49 a.m.

i think that they should have chosen a differant name for that film out of respect of sept 11!!!!!!!

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Rice Cube on 12/17/02 at 09:51 a.m.


Quoting:
i think that they should have chosen a differant name for that film out of respect of sept 11!!!!!!!
End Quote



The book was called "The Two Towers" looooooooooooooong before 9/11.  They're not going to change the title just because some people are uppity.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Goreripper on 12/17/02 at 04:01 p.m.


Quoting:
i think that they should have chosen a differant name for that film out of respect of sept 11!!!!!!!
End Quote



Maybe you should write to the estate of JRR Tolkien and suggest that they change the name of the book, as well.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: shazzaah on 12/17/02 at 04:28 p.m.


Quoting:


The book was called "The Two Towers" looooooooooooooong before 9/11.  They're not going to change the title just because some people are uppity.
End Quote



and actually, I always heard WTC One and WTC Two referred to as "The Twin Towers"... unfortunately we are going to run into some things referenced in a way that will remind us all of that dreadful day... it is just a fact of life. Now I never made a connection between Lord of the Rings, The Two Towers, and The World Trade Center Two Towers, but that is just my opinion.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: lebeiw15 on 12/17/02 at 04:33 p.m.

When I hear "The Two Towers", I think of LOTR looong before I think of Sept. 11, and I'm not even a LOTR fan.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: SamRice Gamgee on 12/17/02 at 06:41 p.m.

http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/Movies/12/17/sproject.ca02.review.two.towers/index.html

An utter triumph, they say!  If 'tis anything like the first movie, Hobbit Nation hopes that this one will win the Golden Dude :)  Unless, of course, the Academy has a brain fart again...as they normally do.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: philbo_baggins on 12/18/02 at 09:06 a.m.


Quoting:
If 'tis anything like the first movie, Hobbit Nation hopes that this one will win the Golden Dude :)  
End Quote


Is winning a "Golden Dude" some kind of hip replacement?

TTT seems to be bigger, darker, scarier and on a much bigger scale than FOTR - just like the book.  Though I hope the film doesn't end "Frodo was alive - but taken by the enemy" (and leave you having to read hundreds of pages before you get back to Frodo and Sam).

Philbo Baggins.  A hobbit and proud of it ;-)

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Taoist on 12/18/02 at 09:12 a.m.

Quoting:
TTT seems to be bigger, darker, scarier and on a much bigger scale than FOTR - just like the book.  Though I hope the film doesn't end "Frodo was alive - but taken by the enemy" (and leave you having to read hundreds of pages before you get back to Frodo and Sam).
End Quote


It sounds good
Personally I preferred the non-Frodo parts of the book.
Frodo's journey is the classic hero's quest which I thnk drags on a bit, I much prefer the politics and battles of the other characters.

Tao

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Rice Cube on 12/18/02 at 09:48 a.m.


Quoting:

Is winning a "Golden Dude" some kind of hip replacement?

TTT seems to be bigger, darker, scarier and on a much bigger scale than FOTR - just like the book.  Though I hope the film doesn't end "Frodo was alive - but taken by the enemy" (and leave you having to read hundreds of pages before you get back to Frodo and Sam).

Philbo Baggins.  A hobbit and proud of it ;-)
End Quote



The first film was robbed of an Oscar last year :)  The Two Towers actually is a cooler book than the first because of all the characters that are introduced, like the Ents ("Hoom!") and the Rohans.  I suppose there's also a lot more character development now that everyone is separated and you are able to focus on one group at a time.  I think the movie is supposed to be more seamless, though...and I think they're going to move the last part with the giant spider into the third movie.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: ThunderVamp9 on 12/18/02 at 10:01 a.m.


Quoting:
i think that they should have chosen a differant name for that film out of respect of sept 11!!!!!!!
End Quote



And I think they should change the emergency number 911 to something else out of respect for Sept. 11!

And I think in math, we shouldn't use the term pentagon anymore, it should be 5-side-agon or something, out of respect for Sept. 11!


Now come on, these books ahve been around for DECADES, and the title should not be changed out of "respect" for Sept 11.  This sensitivity crap is really going too far, especially when I read that people are protesting this movie because of a title that was given to it before those terrorists were even born...

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Enlight2k on 12/18/02 at 10:23 a.m.

Quoting:
i think that they should have chosen a differant name for that film out of respect of sept 11!!!!!!!
End Quote



Please get over with this PC crap.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: 80sRocked on 12/18/02 at 11:43 a.m.


Quoting:


Please get over with this PC crap.
End Quote




Well said, well said.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Rice Cube on 01/03/03 at 08:46 a.m.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/books/01/03/film.hobbit.reut/index.html

For all you tricksy hobbitses who are interested, J.R.R. Tolkien would've been eleventy-one today.  Quite a respectable age, no?  :)

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Goreripper on 01/03/03 at 02:06 p.m.


Quoting:
The first film was robbed of an Oscar last year :)  The Two Towers actually is a cooler book than the first because of all the characters that are introduced, like the Ents ("Hoom!") and the Rohans.  I suppose there's also a lot more character development now that everyone is separated and you are able to focus on one group at a time.  I think the movie is supposed to be more seamless, though...and I think they're going to move the last part with the giant spider into the third movie.
End Quote



Actually the film ends just after the Battle at Helm's Deep. Because the third book is so short, a lot of the story from the second will be used in the third film. And in the movie, the Ents don't go "HOOM!". They don't really do much at all, except right at the end, but what they do is waaayyy cool!

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: ButtonstheUnicorn on 01/04/03 at 02:23 p.m.

:o :o :o OMG It was the greatest movie EVER I have seen it only twice I have to go again and again and again!!! I have only read the first two books cuz i want to see the return of the king before i read it dunno why.

What's everyone' favorite quotes? Mine:

Gimli: "Don't tell the elf."

Gollum: "Stupid fat hobbit!"

Aragorn "It's the beards."

Gimli: "What' goin on out there??" Legolas: "Would you like me to describe it to you? Or should I get a box?"

I love Gollum. He's so cute. (SPOILER maybe) --- It's a pity what someone told me happens in the third movie w/him. :(

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: SamRice Gamgee on 01/04/03 at 02:28 p.m.


Quoting:


I love Gollum. He's so cute. (SPOILER maybe) --- It's a pity what someone told me happens in the third movie w/him. :(
End Quote



You should hold back from reading ROTK because the third movie is going to suck up a bunch of the end of TTT to fill it up...the third book was way short and was basically the end of the chase :)

As for Gollum...he served his purpose, and now I'm stuck saying "Tricksy hobbitses" all the time ::)

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: shazzaah on 01/06/03 at 08:33 p.m.


Quoting:


You should hold back from reading ROTK because the third movie is going to suck up a bunch of the end of TTT to fill it up...the third book was way short and was basically the end of the chase :)

As for Gollum...he served his purpose, and now I'm stuck saying "Tricksy hobbitses" all the time ::)
End Quote



I know what you mean. I haven't seen TT yet (plan to soon) but every time I read that book...I end up saying "Oh, yes, precious." or "Hoom, hmmm", the word hasty is becomes an often used one and of course, the already popular "Tricksy hobbitses"... ;D Of course, my brother and I Tolkien-talk all the time when we get together. Drives everyone crazy..hmmm..hoomm..can't imagine why.... ;)

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Gis on 01/13/03 at 07:02 a.m.

I finally saw it yesterday and I have to say much as I enjoyed it I prefer the first film ! I am going to go again as I have been told by a couple of people they thought it was better watched the second time around.
I read before hand that to get the noise of an army of that size going into battle the producer stood with 8 microphones in the middle of the pitch at a football game and sure enough if you listen you can hear chants being sung as well as a general roar.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: shazzaah on 01/13/03 at 07:08 a.m.


Quoting:
I finally saw it yesterday and I have to say much as I enjoyed it I prefer the first film ! I am going to go again as I have been told by a couple of people they thought it was better watched the second time around.
I read before hand that to get the noise of an army of that size going into battle the producer stood with 8 microphones in the middle of the pitch at a football game and sure enough if you listen you can hear chants being sung as well as a general roar.
End Quote



IMO, book 2 is not as good as One or Three, because other than meeting ents, and Gollum, it is mostly just running 'round, gathering forces and skirmishes Tolkien also splits the group, leaving Samwise and Frodo to go it alone, while the others go off together. It may be necessary for story but it splits the dynamic. I haven't seen the movie but I would imagine it reflects the book.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: philbo_baggins on 01/13/03 at 07:35 a.m.


Quoting:
IMO, book 2 is not as good as One or Three, because other than meeting ents, and Gollum, it is mostly just running 'round, gathering forces and skirmishes Tolkien also splits the group, leaving Samwise and Frodo to go it alone, while the others go off together.
End Quote


...it also finished "Frodo was alive, but taken by the enemy", and you have to read half of ROTK before you get back to Frodo and Sam

Say, that's given me an idea: has anyone written a "Frodo and Sam" parody to "Jack and Diane"?  Sort of:

A little ditty, 'bout Frodo and Sam
Two doughty hobbits, trekkin off in Mordor land
Frodo's gotta throw the ring into Mount Doom
Sam tells Frodo, he's gonna come along too
Oh yeah, the quest goes on
Long after the fellow-
Ship of the Ring's gone

;-)

Phil

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: shazzaah on 01/13/03 at 07:52 a.m.

Good one Phil! ;D I hope you finish it!

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Rice Cube on 01/13/03 at 09:07 a.m.


Quoting:

Say, that's given me an idea: has anyone written a "Frodo and Sam" parody to "Jack and Diane"?  Sort of:

A little ditty, 'bout Frodo and Sam
Two doughty hobbits, trekkin off in Mordor land
Frodo's gotta throw the ring into Mount Doom
Sam tells Frodo, he's gonna come along too
Oh yeah, the quest goes on
Long after the fellow-
Ship of the Ring's gone

;-)

Phil
End Quote



Good idea, my dear Hobbit...perhaps you should work on the pacing a bit but it shows lots of promise :)

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: philbo_baggins on 01/14/03 at 03:33 a.m.


Quoting:
Good idea, my dear Hobbit...perhaps you should work on the pacing a bit but it shows lots of promise :)
End Quote


..yeah, kind of assumes the word "Fellowship" has one syllable.  I've played around a bit with the idea in the car on the way home/back in to work, and because of the length of time he spends on the word "Thrill", you could probably get away with it...

Anyway, it's posted.

Phil

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Gis on 01/14/03 at 07:53 a.m.



Quoting:



Say, that's given me an idea: has anyone written a "Frodo and Sam" parody to "Jack and Diane"?  Sort of:

A little ditty, 'bout Frodo and Sam
Two doughty hobbits, trekkin off in Mordor land
Frodo's gotta throw the ring into Mount Doom
Sam tells Frodo, he's gonna come along too
Oh yeah, the quest goes on
Long after the fellow-
Ship of the Ring's gone

;-)

Phil
End Quote

LOL, good one Phil !

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: philbo_baggins on 01/14/03 at 09:00 a.m.

The finished version's turned up :-)

Phil

http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/johncougarmellencamp0.shtml

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Goreripper on 01/14/03 at 01:09 p.m.


Quoting:


IMO, book 2 is not as good as One or Three, because other than meeting ents, and Gollum, it is mostly just running 'round, gathering forces and skirmishes Tolkien also splits the group, leaving Samwise and Frodo to go it alone, while the others go off together. It may be necessary for story but it splits the dynamic. I haven't seen the movie but I would imagine it reflects the book.
End Quote



I always thought this myself. Gandalf rides here, then he rides there, then he rides back. Aragorn, Gimli and Legolas run across Rohan, then they go to Edoras, then they go somewhere else. There's a big battle, then they go to Isengard, then they go back to Edoras, and then they go somewhere else! A lot of riding hither and yon, but the film does it well.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Gis on 01/15/03 at 05:30 a.m.

I'd ride hither and yon with Legolas any day !!

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: shazzaah on 01/15/03 at 07:16 a.m.


Quoting:
I'd ride hither and yon with Legolas any day !!
End Quote



I quite agree! :)

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Child of the 80s on 01/16/03 at 07:21 p.m.

The Two Towers was better than the first one.The battle scenes were better!I did notice some far fetched stuff though!When they were riding out of the fort how can a dozen men on horses ride into hundreds of orcs and get through ???Wouldnt they know to stab the horses ???When that one guy who was banished came back with so many more soldiers and Gandolf those "Middle Earth Horses" must have some strong hooves to go down such down a steephill like that!Or maybe Gandolf put that"Super Glue Horse Hoof Spell" on them.In the first movie did you notice when they were running from the orcs Gandolf was leaving everybody in the dust LMAO how can an old man who walks with a staff turn into Carl Lewis ???

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: philbo_baggins on 01/17/03 at 04:56 a.m.


Quoting:
When they were riding out of the fort how can a dozen men on horses ride into hundreds of orcs and get through ???Wouldnt they know to stab the horses ???
End Quote


Orcs are thick.  They didn't have time to think about it ;-)


Quoting:
When that one guy who was banished came back with so many more soldiers and Gandalf those "Middle Earth Horses" must have some strong hooves to go down such down a steephill like that!
End Quote


The horses of Rohan are renowned for that kind of thing (it was Éomer wasn't it who came back?)


Quoting:
In the first movie did you notice when they were running from the orcs Gandolf was leaving everybody in the dust LMAO how can an old man who walks with a staff turn into Carl Lewis ???
End Quote


Gandalf doesn't need the staff to walk with.  Wizards in Tolkein aren't simply special humans, they're a completely different race - virtually immortal (I mean, could you survive a trip down a chasm with a Balrog?), strong (Glamdring isn't a small sword) and full of magic.  There's a bit which explains (probably in the Silmarillion) how wizards don't actually need a staff for magic, but it helps to concentrate the mind.

Phil

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: Goreripper on 01/17/03 at 10:43 a.m.


Quoting:
The Two Towers was better than the first one.The battle scenes were better!I did notice some far fetched stuff though!When they were riding out of the fort how can a dozen men on horses ride into hundreds of orcs and get through ???Wouldnt they know to stab the horses ???When that one guy who was banished came back with so many more soldiers and Gandolf those "Middle Earth Horses" must have some strong hooves to go down such down a steephill like that!Or maybe Gandolf put that"Super Glue Horse Hoof Spell" on them.In the first movie did you notice when they were running from the orcs Gandolf was leaving everybody in the dust LMAO how can an old man who walks with a staff turn into Carl Lewis ???
End Quote



So much of that would make sense if you had read the book. No matter what the merits of the film, parts of it aren't going to make sense without knowledge of the books. The Rohirrim's horses are descended from the Mearas (Gandalf's horse Shadowfax is the last of them), a sort of super race of horse that could run faster than the wind and communicate with people. As for how a dozen men on horse can ride through a hundred or so guys on foot, well, in real battles like that, that's exactly what does happen!
Also yeah, philbo's right. Gandalf isn't actually a man, he's an Istari, a minor god in human form who's been sent to Middle-earth to help destroy Sauron.

Subject: Re: The Two Towers

Written By: shazzaah on 01/17/03 at 11:55 a.m.

Read the book and it will all make much more sense. Gore is right the book (regardless of what movie/book combination we are talking about) will always have more backstory, and better groundwork. :)