» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: State of the Union

Written By: CatwomanofV on 01/28/03 at 06:55 p.m.

Is anyone interested in the State of the Union address?




Cat

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Steve_H on 01/28/03 at 07:13 p.m.

Listening to it as I type, Cat...http://www.clicksmilie.de/sammlung/cool/cool030.gif

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 01/28/03 at 07:14 p.m.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: CatwomanofV on 01/28/03 at 07:16 p.m.


Quoting:
Listening to it as I type, Cat...http://www.clicksmilie.de/sammlung/cool/cool030.gif
End Quote






Me too.



Cat

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Steve_H on 01/28/03 at 07:29 p.m.

Now I'm just waiting for Daniel Schorr to come on and tell me what I think about the address... (I wish Mara Liason would quit coughing in the mic)

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: CatwomanofV on 01/28/03 at 07:33 p.m.

Lmao.   What network are you watching? We are on CBS. Of course, they are all the same. First the newscaster comes on and tells us what he is going to say. Then he says it. Then the newscaster comes back on and tells us what he just said. Don't understand that.




Cat

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: RockandRollFan on 01/28/03 at 07:34 p.m.

I was quiet when what some called our BEST President ever (Clinton) spurted his B.S. to us...I think THIS speech is Sincere....Bush is much better than his Morally corrupt predecessor...IMHO ;)

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: CatwomanofV on 01/28/03 at 07:36 p.m.


Quoting:
I was quiet when what some called our BEST President ever (Clinton) spurted his B.S. to us...I think THIS speech is Sincere....Bush is much better than his Morally corrupt predecessor...IMHO ;)
End Quote





Ow, ow ow. (me biting my tongue)



Cat

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Steve_H on 01/28/03 at 07:37 p.m.


Quoting:
Lmao.   What network are you watching? We are on CBS. Of course, they are all the same. First the newscaster comes on and tells us what he is going to say. Then he says it. Then the newscaster comes back on and tells us what he just said. Don't understand that.




Cat
End Quote



Listening to it on NPR.  The only time the announcer butts in is too tell us when he's getting a standing ovation.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: CatwomanofV on 01/28/03 at 07:38 p.m.

NPR is deffinately the best. Listen to it all the time.



Cat

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: RockandRollFan on 01/28/03 at 07:39 p.m.


Quoting:




Ow, ow ow. (me biting my tongue)



Cat
End Quote

No, NO...I didn't mean anything...I was just voicing My opinion....as the homies might say..."It's All Good"  :D

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: CatwomanofV on 01/28/03 at 07:43 p.m.


Quoting:

No, NO...I didn't mean anything...I was just voicing My opinion....as the homies might say..."It's All Good"  :D
End Quote





I know you were voicing your opinion. I happen to disagree with your opinion and I don't want to get into anything tonight.



Cat

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: RockandRollFan on 01/28/03 at 07:59 p.m.


Quoting:




I know you were voicing your opinion. I happen to disagree with your opinion and I don't want to get into anything tonight.



Cat
End Quote

That's quite alright...I respect your opinion....all I ask is you respect mine...for we may not always agree....but I do care ;)

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: CatwomanofV on 01/28/03 at 08:03 p.m.


Quoting:

That's quite alright...I respect your opinion....all I ask is you respect mine...for we may not always agree....but I do care ;)
End Quote




I do respect other people's opinion. I'm just getting tired and don't feel like defending my point of view.



Cat

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: 80sRocked on 01/28/03 at 08:08 p.m.


Quoting:
I was quiet when what some called our BEST President ever (Clinton) spurted his B.S. to us..End Quote



Ha ha...you're not alone buddy!


Quoting:I think THIS speech is Sincere....Bush is much better than his Morally corrupt predecessor...IMHO ;)
End Quote



You got that right!

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Rice Cube on 01/28/03 at 08:21 p.m.

My friend, a Democrat, voiced his opinion that this was a well-conceived and delivered speech.  However, I happen to agree with him that while Bush did outline certain domestic reforms, he did not go into detail how he was going to do it.  I figured that was due to lack of time, but maybe this is something he will have to do in the coming weeks...

I think he finally, forcefully, sold the war against Iraq.  

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Zella on 01/28/03 at 08:32 p.m.

I thought is was a very good, and very sincere speech. My only regret is that although he outlined so much reform in domestic matters, and  I do believe he is sincere in wanting this reform, it is questionable how much of it he will actually be able to achieve. It is a very ambitious program requiring much time, money and support of the congress.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Steve_H on 01/28/03 at 08:33 p.m.


Quoting:
My friend, a Democrat, voiced his opinion that this was a well-conceived and delivered speech.  However, I happen to agree with him that while Bush did outline certain domestic reforms, he did not go into detail how he was going to do it.  I figured that was due to lack of time, but maybe this is something he will have to do in the coming weeks...

I think he finally, forcefully, sold the war against Iraq.  
End Quote



I'm going to wait til I read it to say anything more than I thought it was a good speech.  He's going to have a tough time selling his tax cut proposals, even to his own party.
About the war... I'm not so sure he sold it.  

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: 80sRocked on 01/28/03 at 08:36 p.m.


Quoting:
My friend, a Democrat, voiced his opinion that this was a well-conceived and delivered speech.  However, I happen to agree with him that while Bush did outline certain domestic reforms, he did not go into detail how he was going to do it.  I figured that was due to lack of time, but maybe this is something he will have to do in the coming weeks...End Quote



This isn't a big surprise.  Poll after poll and the 2002 elections prove that, while the domestic issues are on everyone's minds and are of big concern, the most outstanding issue in America right now is the possibility of war with Iraq and terrrorism in general.  I think it was only fitting that the main focus of this address was to prove to the country and world that Iraq is a true threat, and he did that very well.



Quoting:
I think he finally, forcefully, sold the war against Iraq.  
End Quote



...with flying colors.   There is no way that anyone, even the great and knowledgable foreign policy experts Susan Sarandon and Sean Penn, can admit that action is not necessary.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Zella on 01/28/03 at 08:41 p.m.


Quoting:

...with flying colors.   There is no way that anyone, even the great and knowledgable foreign policy experts Susan Sarandon and Sean Penn, can admit that action is not necessary.
End Quote



Wanna put money on that? Some people can never be convinced... ;)

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: shazzaah on 01/28/03 at 08:41 p.m.



" Instead of bureaucrats and trial lawyers and HMOs, we must put doctors and nurses and patients back in charge of American medicine.


To improve our health care system, we must address one of the prime causes of higher cost: the constant threat that physicians and hospitals will be unfairly sued.

Because of excessive litigation, everybody pays more for health care, and many parts of America are losing fine doctors. No one has ever been healed by a frivolous lawsuit; I urge the Congress to pass medical liability reform."




I can honestly say this is a vast oversimplification of the problem with not being able to obtain affordable insurance. This is the problem:

Individuals do not pay their medical bills(for whatever reason)= hospitals and doctors must raise the cost of services to make up for this deficit=insurance companies raise premiums to make up for the rising costs of services=people being underinsured because they cannot afford insurance....and round and round we go. I work in the HMO PPO etc environment and can see firsthand that this system does not work (for many reasons that I won't go into). Am I, an employee of an insurance company that sells managed care products, telling you to buy an indemnity type policy so that you can see whatever doc you choose? Yes.  ;D

In an nutshell, medical liability reform is not going to help so much as people paying their bills would help. IMO

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: jeremy on 01/28/03 at 08:41 p.m.

Mediocre speech from a bad President.

I'm not buying into these tax cuts, seems like he's pushing us over the cliff, all signs point to another Bush recession, this time it's double dip.

The War on Iraq is inevitable, that part of the speech was a ploy to raise his approval ratings and public support for the war, both have been free falling. It may raise them temporarily but the country is clearly not with Mr. Bush anymore.

he'll be a one term president, thank god.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Zella on 01/28/03 at 08:44 p.m.


Quoting:he'll be a one term president, thank god.
End Quote



And you wanna put money on that? (Gee I could be rich shortly.... ::) )

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: 80sRocked on 01/28/03 at 08:45 p.m.


Quoting:


Wanna put money on that? Some people can never be convinced... ;)
End Quote



I know I know, thats why I put those names in italics.  I realize some people will never ever change their mindset, no matter what proof is presented.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: shazzaah on 01/28/03 at 08:47 p.m.

On terrorists:

"All told, more than 3,000 suspected terrorists have been arrested in many countries

And many others have met a different fate. Let's put it this way: They are no longer a problem to the United States and our friends and allies. "


Comments?  ;D What do you suppose happened to these others?

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Rice Cube on 01/28/03 at 08:48 p.m.


Quoting:
On terrorists:

"All told, more than 3,000 suspected terrorists have been arrested in many countries

And many others have met a different fate. Let's put it this way: They are no longer a problem to the United States and our friends and allies. "


Comments?  ;D What do you suppose happened to these others?

End Quote



I loved that part ;D  A-plus there.  Terrorists best not f**k with the Bush ;)

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: 80sRocked on 01/28/03 at 08:49 p.m.


Quoting:
The War on Iraq is inevitable, that part of the speech was a ploy to raise his approval ratings and public support for the war, both have been free falling. End Quote



...and on the other hand, if he hadn't addressed the Iraq situation, people like yourself would have come here claiming he didn't present enough proof that action is needed against Iraq.

::)

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Zella on 01/28/03 at 08:49 p.m.


Quoting:
On terrorists:

"All told, more than 3,000 suspected terrorists have been arrested in many countries

And many others have met a different fate. Let's put it this way: They are no longer a problem to the United States and our friends and allies. "


Comments?  ;D What do you suppose happened to these others?

End Quote



My husband loved that part! ;D

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Davester on 01/28/03 at 08:50 p.m.


Quoting:
On terrorists:

"All told, more than 3,000 suspected terrorists have been arrested in many countries

And many others have met a different fate. Let's put it this way: They are no longer a problem to the United States and our friends and allies. "


Comments?  ;D What do you suppose happened to these others?

End Quote



  They all slipped on bars of soap, hit their heads on the edge of the tub and died instantaneously. ;D

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: shazzaah on 01/28/03 at 08:52 p.m.

I must say I loved that part, it sounds so mafioso....hehehe.  ;D Methinks that these others are sharing a condo with Jimmy Hoffa? LOL

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: 80sRocked on 01/28/03 at 08:53 p.m.


Quoting:
On terrorists:

"All told, more than 3,000 suspected terrorists have been arrested in many countries

And many others have met a different fate. Let's put it this way: They are no longer a problem to the United States and our friends and allies. "
End Quote




Finally, we have a president who won't just turn his head and look the other way.

Kudos, kudos. :D

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: feldy32000 on 01/28/03 at 08:55 p.m.

Did anyone listen to the democratic response by the Governor of Washington?

Opinions, comments....

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: 80sRocked on 01/28/03 at 08:57 p.m.


Quoting:
Did anyone listen to the democratic response by the Governor of Washington?

Opinions, comments....
End Quote



It was the usual canned response given by Democrats thus far.  Nothing new.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Rice Cube on 01/28/03 at 08:59 p.m.


Quoting:
Did anyone listen to the democratic response by the Governor of Washington?

Opinions, comments....
End Quote



What did he say?  I decided to shut it down after the speech ended.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: feldy32000 on 01/28/03 at 09:00 p.m.

Quoting:


It was the usual canned response given by Democrats thus far.  Nothing new.
End Quote



And you have the gall to say that some people will never be convinced!

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Davester on 01/28/03 at 09:02 p.m.


Quoting:


...and on the other hand, if he hadn't addressed the Iraq situation, people like yourself would have come here claiming he didn't present enough proof that action is needed against Iraq.

::)
End Quote



   I was reading in the paper this morning that Blix's report on the inspections doesn't bode well for Iraq.  I'll wait for that, instead.  I don't expect either proof or truth going into any speech from a president whos arse is on the line.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: 80sRocked on 01/28/03 at 09:05 p.m.


Quoting:


And you have the gall to say that some people will never be convinced!
End Quote



yes thats right.  Maybe if the Democrats would have presented some new ideas, rather than the broken record they have been playing the last 2 years, I would have been convinced.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Rice Cube on 01/28/03 at 09:05 p.m.


Quoting:
I don't expect either proof or truth going into any speech from a president whos arse is on the line.

End Quote



Clinton's butt was also on the line, so he bombed Kosovo...

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: 80sRocked on 01/28/03 at 09:08 p.m.

Quoting:


Clinton's butt was also on the line, so he bombed Kosovo...
End Quote




excellent point.  Although many Clinton supporters selectively choose to omit that incident from memory.

What is amazing, many of the same folks who oppose action on Iraq had no problem bombing Kosovo a few years ago.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: feldy32000 on 01/28/03 at 09:13 p.m.

" Instead of bureaucrats and trial lawyers and HMOs, we must put doctors and nurses and patients back in charge of American medicine.
To improve our health care system, we must address one of the prime causes of higher cost: the constant threat that physicians and hospitals will be unfairly sued.
Because of excessive litigation, everybody pays more for health care, and many parts of America are losing fine doctors. No one has ever been healed by a frivolous lawsuit; I urge the Congress to pass medical liability reform."

I have a question.  Who awards these patients of malpractice these  punitive damages? Hmm...  a jury of people like us! Not the lawyers. If the claim IS frivolous, then they won't win the case.  The only thing that lawyers can be blamed for is clogging up the courts with some less than credible claims, right?  They don't award the judgement or the damages!

The people accountable here are the doctors.  The cases that have the huge punitive damages are justifiable because of gross misconduct by the doctor, proven in a court of law.

I'll tell you what if a doctor  removed my left kidney when my right was the one that needed to be taken out and that leaves me unable to earn a living,  not to mention the expenses, pain, and emotional damage, you bet I want more than $250,000

You would also.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Davester on 01/28/03 at 09:15 p.m.


Quoting:


Clinton's butt was also on the line, so he bombed Kosovo...
End Quote



  Okay, I'll buy that.  I probably should've stated anypresident, not Bush, in particullar.  That was just my way of dismissing tonights S.O.U. address altogether.  
 

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Rice Cube on 01/28/03 at 09:26 p.m.


Quoting:


What did he say?  I decided to shut it down after the speech ended.
End Quote



Anybody?  Bueller?  Bueller?

Seriously, what did the Democrats say?  I wanna know from y'all before I have to dig up CNN meself...

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: shazzaah on 01/28/03 at 09:27 p.m.


Quoting:
" Instead of bureaucrats and trial lawyers and HMOs, we must put doctors and nurses and patients back in charge of American medicine.
To improve our health care system, we must address one of the prime causes of higher cost: the constant threat that physicians and hospitals will be unfairly sued.
Because of excessive litigation, everybody pays more for health care, and many parts of America are losing fine doctors. No one has ever been healed by a frivolous lawsuit; I urge the Congress to pass medical liability reform."

I have a question.  Who awards these patients of malpractice these  punitive damages? Hmm...  a jury of people like us! Not the lawyers. If the claim IS frivolous, then they won't win the case.  The only thing that lawyers can be blamed for is clogging up the courts with some less than credible claims, right?  They don't award the judgement or the damages!

The people accountable here are the doctors.  The cases that have the huge punitive damages are justifiable because of gross misconduct by the doctor, proven in a court of law.

I'll tell you what if a doctor  removed my left kidney when my right was the one that needed to be taken out and that leaves me unable to earn a living,  not to mention the expenses, pain, and emotional damage, you bet I want more than $250,000

You would also.
End Quote



I see where you are coming from but if you look at the facts....the actual incidences of malpractice are quite low compared to the cases that are currently pending. No, the problem is costs are being driven by the fact that people do not pay their bills. Some cannot, understandable, but many just don't, and that puts the costs off on all of us who do pay, and our insurance companies. At least, this is what I hear from both the insurance industry and the medical industry. When a doctor is standardly billing $150 for five minutes of his/her time, do you think they are doing this due to the dozens of malpractice lawsuits that are currently pending against them? No. It is for the dozens of patients he will see that will never pay their bill. I have no argument with people who have a legitimate lawsuit for malpractice, but that is not where the majority of costs of healthcare are adding up. Anyway...this is really really o.t. so thanks for all of your patience.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: feldy32000 on 01/28/03 at 09:33 p.m.

Quoting:


Anybody?  Bueller?  Bueller?

Seriously, what did the Democrats say?  I wanna know from y'all before I have to dig up CNN meself...
End Quote


http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/28/dems.transcript/index.html

I'd rather you read it. I don't want to screw it up.

I just read it after hearing it a little bit ago, and... it just makes more sense to me.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: shazzaah on 01/28/03 at 09:46 p.m.

"We must convince the world that Saddam Hussein is not America's problem alone -- he's the world's problem. We urge President Bush to stay this course for we are far stronger when we stand with other nations than when we stand alone. I have no doubt that together, we can meet these global challenges. "

"Democrats have a positive, specific plan to turn our nation around." What is the plan? I missed it I guess.


This is going to upset a few people, but....basically this boils down to " Let's just keep talking about Saddam Hussein to everybody and convince all other countries that he is bad, because we cannot handle him by ourselves." First: all of the other countries whom we are friendly with already have that figured out! There is nothing stating how we would meet these "global challenges". Sorry, but we need to do something about Hussein now, hell we should have done something about him a long time ago. Let the flames begin!  ;D

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Davester on 01/28/03 at 09:51 p.m.


Quoting:
"We must convince the world that Saddam Hussein is not America's problem alone -- he's the world's problem. We urge President Bush to stay this course for we are far stronger when we stand with other nations than when we stand alone. I have no doubt that together, we can meet these global challenges. "

"Democrats have a positive, specific plan to turn our nation around." What is the plan? I missed it I guess.


This is going to upset a few people, but....basically this boils down to " Let's just keep talking about Saddam Hussein to everybody and convince all other countries that he is bad, because we cannot handle him by ourselves." First: all of the other countries whom we are friendly with already have that figured out! There is nothing stating how we would meet these "global challenges". Sorry, but we need to do something about Hussein now, hell we should have done something about him a long time ago. Let the flames begin!  ;D

End Quote



  *stands back, crosses arms and nods in approval @  shazzaah*  ;)

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: feldy32000 on 01/28/03 at 09:55 p.m.

So, is mid June a good time move our remaining forces into North Korea?  We have the proof there, yet the oilfields are the priority.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Rice Cube on 01/28/03 at 09:57 p.m.


Quoting:
So, is mid June a good time move our remaining forces into North Korea?  We have the proof there, yet the oilfields are the priority.
End Quote



Jesus Christ superstar...are we doing this stupid oil argument again?  And North Korea is getting taken care of by the surrounding countries.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: 80sRocked on 01/28/03 at 10:04 p.m.

Quoting:


Jesus Christ superstar...are we doing this stupid oil argument again?  And North Korea is getting taken care of by the surrounding countries.
End Quote




Some people are determined its all about oil, and thats the way they'll think till they die.  Despite how absurd that argument is.

All i can say is where were all you "no blood for oil" anti-war hippies in 1998 when Clinton threatend action against Iraq?  Nobody suspected it was about oil then.  

It was a ridiculous thing to suspect then, and its a ridiculous thing to suspect now.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: . on 01/28/03 at 10:05 p.m.

China has North Korea's back, that's why America is so scared of them. We want nothing to do with China.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: shazzaah on 01/28/03 at 10:14 p.m.


Quoting:
China has North Korea's back, that's why America is so scared of them. We want nothing to do with China.
End Quote



Whaaatt? so you obtained this information from....? BTW, I don't feel particularly "scared" of China right now....maybe I would be if there were some kind of facts that I could peruse....

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: . on 01/28/03 at 10:22 p.m.

well, China is a bigger threat than weak little Iraq.

Here's a communist country who's developed into a superpower, they have nuclear (or as bush would say, "nucular") weapons and the biggest army in the world. They've sold weapons to NK and Iraq.

so why aren't we taking on big red?


"Mr. Zemin, tear down that Great Wall......Nancy, I soiled myself again"

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Rice Cube on 01/28/03 at 10:26 p.m.


Quoting:
well, China is a bigger threat than weak little Iraq.

Here's a communist country who's developed into a superpower, they have nuclear (or as bush would say, "nucular") weapons and the biggest army in the world. They've sold weapons to NK and Iraq.

so why aren't we taking on big red?


"Mr. Zemin, tear down that Great Wall......Nancy, I soiled myself again"
End Quote



"Big Red" is our peaceful trade ally.  That wouldn't be good business.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: . on 01/28/03 at 10:28 p.m.

yea, Iraq and Bin Ladin were allies too.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Rice Cube on 01/28/03 at 10:29 p.m.


Quoting:
yea, Iraq and Bin Ladin were allies too.
End Quote



Cool, so NOW can we bomb the shiitake out of Iraq?  PLEASE??

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Race_Bannon on 01/28/03 at 11:21 p.m.

Just to let everyone know Gov. Gary Locke's approval rating is down to 30% or so.  He's not an effective leader, can't get much done here.  My biggest issue is that he was governing the state with the greatest growth in wealth in the country, and the state suffered the consequences of it. Inflated housing, clogging roads, back in '99 there was a negative employment rate for low end service type jobs, never enough people to fill them.  That time is over and what do we have to show for it?  Inflated housing costs and clogged roads cause that tax revenue that was pouring in (and we pay taxes, 2nd highest in the country, Mass. 1st) didn't go long term needs like new roads.  We've also lost Boeing under his watch, that was a huge F-up, they are steadily moving the jobs away from here.  But hey, he looks good, Chinese American making good, good looking wife and young kids. But if he ever goes national politically, don't vote for him.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Hank McCarthy on 01/28/03 at 11:59 p.m.

George W. Bush is a hero.  I thought his address to the Union was fantastic.  

But the immoral and perverted liberal Democrats are constantly trying to undermine him.  Democrats just want to tax and spend and take my money and give it to the homey in the streets.  Liberals want to take my guns away too.  Well my money is my money and my shotguns are my shotguns.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: ? on 01/29/03 at 00:04 a.m.

It's better than me paraphrasing these guys. Any conservative and liberal can consider these guys' opinions, so I'm not posting some random website by some unknown author.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: dagwood on 01/29/03 at 06:05 a.m.

(serious Bush supporter alert)
I thought the speech was great.  My only problem was the repeated use of the word nuculear...the word is nuclear! (pet peeve).  I watched it on the local Fox station and there wasn't any voice over at all.  That was nice.

As for the Demo response...it wasn't bad.  My main question is this big tax reform they have.  He quoted numbers but I have yet to see anyone explain the Democrat tax reform.  Come on guys, quit slamming Bush's plan and let us know what yours is so we can see which one we would prefer.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: RockandRollFan on 01/29/03 at 07:54 a.m.


Quoting:



Some people are determined its all about oil, and thats the way they'll think till they die.  Despite how absurd that argument is.

All i can say is where were all you "no blood for oil" anti-war hippies in 1998 when Clinton threatend action against Iraq?  Nobody suspected it was about oil then.  

It was a ridiculous thing to suspect then, and its a ridiculous thing to suspect now.

End Quote

Let's Get, Let's Get, Let's Get 80sRocked a Monica brand cigar :D IMO you are RIGHT on the money with that reply ;) And BTW, let's see if Bush frees a bunch of criminals in his last days in office just like Slick Willy did....you remember, the ones who made illegal contributions to his '96 run...greatest president in history...Sure ::)

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Hairspray on 01/29/03 at 09:39 a.m.

Alright....alright. Let's remember to keep it nice boys & girls.  ;)

It's not only this forum, but the entire world is divided.

I don't know what to think right now, in reference to the S.O.U. address, only to say that I noticed Bush started with an attempt to gain approval with "plans/proposals".

It reminded me of when he was running for the Presidency.

His last half of the speech was almost declaration of war. He was very determined in his delivery and I believe it is no longer just a threat but a promise.

The way troops are continually sent and placed over there, I have no doubt it is for specific, strategic purposes. We're going to war whether we like it or not.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: ? on 01/29/03 at 09:57 a.m.

Is there a reason why my link to the Cato Institute was removed, Hairspray? It is not an inappropriate link by any means, so the reasoning behind its removal is baffling.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Hairspray on 01/29/03 at 10:22 a.m.


Quoting:
Is there a reason why my link to the Cato Institute was removed, Hairspray? It is not an inappropriate link by any means, so the reasoning behind its removal is baffling.
End Quote



Had you been a member, I would have sent a message to you about it. Alas, the link became corrupt.  :-/

Hey, membership is free and hassle free if you should care to join. Unless you are one of us posting incognito.  ;D

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: dalton on 01/29/03 at 01:33 p.m.

i though it was alot of bull by bush :-/

Quoting:
Is anyone interested in the State of the Union address?




Cat
End Quote

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Davester on 01/29/03 at 03:10 p.m.


Quoting:
Alright....alright. Let's remember to keep it nice boys & girls.  ;)

End Quote



  We nice boys and girls, Spray.  :)

Quoting:
His last half of the speech was almost declaration of war. He was very determined in his delivery and I believe it is no longer just a threat but a promise.

The way troops are continually sent and placed over there, I have no doubt it is for specific, strategic purposes. We're going to war whether we like it or not.
End Quote



  Let them go to war: I only hope this goes as smoothly as we talk. I would hate for the American people to learn their lesson the hard way, if many of our troops die. However, I can also comfort myself from the notion that the people won't learn, no matter how well or poorly it might go, and therefore they will suffer no ill effects from sending troops pointlessly to their deaths. So, in effect, I'm right back from whence I came.
  When catharsis equals zilch, numb, and void simultaneously, what the hell do you do? There's nothing there to give my compassion. I might as well fuel a lighter with it and find an opium parlor.
  Nonetheless, every once in a while, you have to let people simply hurt themselves. Otherwise they don't learn. I only hope they don't hurt themselves too badly or take everyone else down with them. This madness has to end, and if the only way to do that is to let the psychos burn out, then taking a vacation from my conscience is the least I can do.
  It's becoming downright treasonous in this country to aim for human decency. When the people reach blind cruelty, I can no longer support their excesses.  That's all. :)

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: mm on 01/29/03 at 03:49 p.m.

Bush is a little too radical christian right for me, I find him very disturbing and unintelligent. He's a terrible orator, but I'll be nice and give his speech a C-. Probably got his ratings up, mission accomplished

2004 should be interesting. John Edwards seems to be a threat to the GOP but he's not a real high profile guy....not yet at least. I won't vote for anybody but Edwards. Dean, Gephardt, Kerry, and Lieberman :P can all take a hike.

Edwards will have some small shoes to fill, but at least we can finally have a successful, self made President that we can be proud of.

it's Edwards or bust in 04.

Subject: Re: State of the Union

Written By: Rice Cube on 01/29/03 at 04:20 p.m.

To lighten the mood:

http://www.theonion.com/onion3809/gulf_war_2.html