» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: Home protection

Written By: John_Seminal on 02/15/03 at 11:22 p.m.

Does anyone own a gun to protect their home? I am researching guns and debating the pro's/con's of buying a gun. Are there any reccomendations on a good gun? A police officer who lives next door reccomended a glock (I hope I spelled that right). He said a .45 may be too much gun for the home, but I want a gun with power. A 9mm looks like it is weak. Does anyone have any suggestions on a good gun?

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: FussBudgetVanPelt on 02/15/03 at 11:43 p.m.

No !  You are not allowed to over here.  I realise that is beside your point....and I realise that doesn't mean people don't......

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: John_Seminal on 02/15/03 at 11:50 p.m.


Quoting:
No !  You are not allowed to over here.  I realise that is beside your point....and I realise that doesn't mean people don't......
End Quote


If you are against gun ownership, speak up. I am looking for all opinions. Part of me does not like the idea of having a death machine, but I like the idea of protection better. Is there a "Dirty Harry" here who could give me some gun advice?

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: 80sRocked on 02/15/03 at 11:51 p.m.

Quoting:
Does anyone own a gun to protect their home? I am researching guns and debating the pro's/con's of buying a gun. Are there any reccomendations on a good gun? A police officer who lives next door reccomended a glock (I hope I spelled that right). He said a .45 may be too much gun for the home, but I want a gun with power. A 9mm looks like it is weak. Does anyone have any suggestions on a good gun?
End Quote



If you are just starting out, I would suggest a 9mm.  Its not the most powerful gun out there by any means, but it will do the job if you are just using it for home protection.  Plus its easy on the wallet.

On the other hand, if you are willing to shell out more cash, a .45 is a great gun.  And powerful at that. ;)  If you're thinking of getting a Glock, I recommend a "Glock 21", or "Glock 30".  Its just a smaller version of the "21".

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: southernspitfire on 02/15/03 at 11:53 p.m.

I own 2 handguns....and won't even go into what they are right now....first thing you need to do is learn how to shoot one...take a class about firearms and get certified and then make sure before you actually buy a gun, that if need be, you can use it to take another person life, cuz that is exactly what a firearm can do in the wrong persons hand

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: FussBudgetVanPelt on 02/16/03 at 00:01 a.m.


Quoting:

If you are against gun ownership, speak up. I am looking for all opinions. Part of me does not like the idea of having a death machine, but I like the idea of protection better. Is there a "Dirty Harry" here who could give me some gun advice?
End Quote



Not particularly, John.  I live in a place where there is simply not a demonstrated need to have a gun to defend yourself, and for that I give thanks every day.  ;)

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: John_Seminal on 02/16/03 at 00:03 a.m.


Quoting:
I own 2 handguns....and won't even go into what they are right now....first thing you need to do is learn how to shoot one...take a class about firearms and get certified and then make sure before you actually buy a gun, that if need be, you can use it to take another person life, cuz that is exactly what a firearm can do in the wrong persons hand
End Quote



I have been to a gun range, and shooting was fairly easy for me. I always hit the target, and often was no more than one circle away from the bullseye. I also learned how to shoot prone and from different positions. The problem was, the shooting club as an accuracy club. All they used were .22 rifles.

The other problem I have in picking a gun is most people with good advice tell me I should own multiple guns for multiple reasons. I just want one, if any. The police officer next door also told me the ammo can be more important than the gun. He suggested something called "black talons".

What I would like to know is what is the best gun for personal saftey?

Maybe I should just get a second dog. God knows my current dog would want to hump the leg of a robber rather than scare him.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: John_Seminal on 02/16/03 at 00:05 a.m.


Quoting:


Not particularly, John.  I live in a place where there is simply not a demonstrated need to have a gun to defend yourself, and for that I give thanks every day.  ;)


End Quote



Can I move in with you?  ;D

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: FussBudgetVanPelt on 02/16/03 at 00:09 a.m.


Quoting:


Can I move in with you?  ;D
End Quote



No !  I read some of your other posts and I'm afraid I would be terribly jealous !  :P ::)

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: John_Seminal on 02/16/03 at 00:14 a.m.


Quoting:


No !  I read some of your other posts and I'm afraid I would be terribly jealous !  :P ::)
End Quote



This is anteater discrimination at its worst.  ;D ;D ;D

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: southernspitfire on 02/16/03 at 00:15 a.m.

If you want powerful without having a large pistol...then I say go with a .380.  They are small yet very powerful and if you are a good aim....will make a very good protection weapon.  

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: 80sRocked on 02/16/03 at 00:16 a.m.

Quoting:

What I would like to know is what is the best gun for personal saftey?End Quote



like I said above, Glock "21" or Glock "30".  Just my opinion.



Quoting:Maybe I should just get a second dog. God knows my current dog would want to hump the leg of a robber rather than scare him. End Quote




hehe, mine would just bite their ankles, or get stepped on.  Whichever came first. :D



Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: FussBudgetVanPelt on 02/16/03 at 00:19 a.m.


Quoting:


This is anteater discrimination at its worst.  ;D ;D ;D
End Quote



I hadn't even thought of that !  That's 2 reasons  ;D

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: ayhab on 02/16/03 at 00:41 a.m.

For strictly home protection, and especially for someone not "intimate" with handguns, I wouldn't even suggest a handgun.  (going to a range is one thing, being comfortable and confident enough to hit anything in a crisis is entirely different).

A legal, shortbarrelled shotgun with pistol grip would be my suggestion.  Easy to aim, intimidating to hear and see.

http://webpages.charter.net/ayhab/shotgun.jpg

And you can get it for half the price of a decent automatic handgun.  The Mossberg Maverick 88 goes for about $180 and the pistol grip's about $25.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: jamminoldies on 02/16/03 at 03:18 p.m.

Sorry to say,Our family does not own a gun nor should we need one to protect us.BUT,lately there has been some robberies across the street from our house but thank god it wasn't ours.

Howard

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/16/03 at 07:34 p.m.


Quoting:
For strictly home protection, and especially for someone not "intimate" with handguns, I wouldn't even suggest a handgun.  (going to a range is one thing, being comfortable and confident enough to hit anything in a crisis is entirely different).

A legal, shortbarrelled shotgun with pistol grip would be my suggestion.  Easy to aim, intimidating to hear and see.

http://webpages.charter.net/ayhab/shotgun.jpg

And you can get it for half the price of a decent automatic handgun.  The Mossberg Maverick 88 goes for about $180 and the pistol grip's about $25.


End Quote



Hehehe...oh yeah.  That's my weapon of choice alright.  Burglars best beware, because I'm not afraid of making a few exit wounds ;)

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Race_Bannon on 02/16/03 at 08:02 p.m.

I've owned a few, including two glocks, a 9 and 40 caliber, a couple of walthers, 380 and 40 cal, Beretta 40, and a Smith and Wesson 357 revolver.  I currently have my collection down to a Kimber 45, Ruger 9, and a little Beretta 22.  

Key thing is to know what you want it for, 95% of my purpose is for fun at the range, and the remainder for home protection, so if I don'tshoot it well, then I'm unhappy with it.  I don't like the glocks, they don't "feel" good to me and I don't shoot them as well as others, also they don't have a real safety.  If it's for home protectiion though they are good, very simple to use and break down for cleaning, some of the best non-failure rates in testing, and reasonably priced.  The best gun that I had for accuracy and reliabiltiy was the S&W 357, revolvers are more accurate and have less moving parts to fail then a semi-auto.  Also the advantage to the 357 is you can fire 38 rounds from it too, which are less powerful and cheaper so good to practice with.  My new Kimber 45 is great, it's easy to shoot, not as scary as some would think, plus it has a very slim profile so it wanted to pack then could easily do.  Kimber also has some great reliability test ratings and they can be found from $650 on up.  
Good points were made on getting some training, pistols are very different from 22 caliber rifles, also imporant to learn your areas gun laws, and if there are ever any kids at home to have a safe to put them in, even if it's a just visits make sure they can never be accessed.  Plenty of people assure that thier kids have been trained with guns an would never access them, your kids friends, neighbors, and relatives haven't.
That shotgun is a good suggestion too, the advantage to them is that they are for short distances only, unlike a bullet walls can stop them at if they don't hit a target the shot weakens quickly, once a stadard bullet is fired it goes a greater distance and retains power longer.
Let me know if what you come up with.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: 80sRocked on 02/17/03 at 00:34 a.m.


Quoting:

Who do you work for? Tom Ridge, John Ashcroft, John Poindexter?
End Quote



Anonymous, care to elaborate on that comment?

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Rice Cube on 02/17/03 at 00:36 a.m.

Quoting:


Anonymous, care to elaborate on that comment?
End Quote



I believe he may be an anti-gun advocate, but associates the gunownership supporters with certain characters he believes to be either "right wing wackos" or "fascists".

Just my humble opinion.

I think you should have a right to protect your home.  The Second Amendment of the Constitution allows you to bear arms.  While it's not justifying you putting a bullet in an intruder's 'nads, I think it makes people feel safer :)

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: 80sRocked on 02/17/03 at 00:46 a.m.


Quoting:
I believe he may be an anti-gun advocate, but associates the gunownership supporters with certain characters he believes to be either "right wing wackos" or "fascists".End Quote



I know, I just wanted him to to admit it himself.  I'm tired of people posting "anonymously" just so they don't have to take any responsibility for what they say.





Quoting:I think you should have a right to protect your home.  The Second Amendment of the Constitution allows you to bear arms.  While it's not justifying you putting a bullet in an intruder's 'nads, I think it makes people feel safer :)
End Quote



you are absolutely right.  Although I guarantee that taking a bullet in the nads would make you think twice before robbing that house again. ;D

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Dude on 02/17/03 at 03:13 a.m.

Its just my 2 cents man, but as far as "what is best", if you actually do have to shoot to kill someone (think about that for a minute) its going to be the most traumatic event of your life, and whether you have a $25 Jennings .22 with plain ol' led shells, or a $750 Glock with Black Talon (cop killer) shells, if your aim is true, and you empty the clip (or cylinder) into his torso (think about it now), the perp (or family member) is going to drop. I'm a gun owner, and believe in the 2nd amendment as strongly as anyone, but these are the real questions one should be asking when deciding whether or not to own a weapon.

Modified to add that I wrote this before even reading the second page of this thread, lest anyone thinks that I was the "Anonymous" poster.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Goreripper on 02/17/03 at 04:07 a.m.

I think the real questions you have to ask yourself is:

1. Once I have a gun, would I be prepared to use it?

2. Am I confident enough in my ability to shoot at someone who may also have a gun and be a better shot than me, and have less qualms about using it, and hit them?

3. Am I prepared for the possible consequences of shooting someone, especially if it's by mistake?

4. Do I want to have a lethal weapon laying around in my home that someone else could find and use against me?

There's probably others too, but those are the ones I can think of at the time.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Goreripper on 02/17/03 at 04:17 a.m.

Also, as I recall, Glocks don't have a safety. If I absolutely had to have a gun around the house, I think I'd want one with a safety.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: John_Seminal on 02/17/03 at 10:53 a.m.


Quoting:
Also, as I recall, Glocks don't have a safety. If I absolutely had to have a gun around the house, I think I'd want one with a safety.
End Quote



If I had a gun without a saftey I would just keep the loaded clip out of the gun, and keep the clip next to the gun. It only takes a second to put the clip in the gun. I guess the glocks not having a saftey would make me have to think a little longer about weather or not I would buy that gun.

As for the people who say I should think about "if I could put a bullet in an intruder", all I can say is this is better than a crook shooting me for a TV or DVD player.

The reason I started this thread was to get input from gun owners so I could make a good decision. There is a police officer next door, but his advice was limited as I always seem to catch him leaving for work when he does not have that much time to talk. I do not want to get a gun which will rip through the intruder, then the wall, then another person.

As for Black Talons, they are not "cop killers" and they are legal in my state. Where did you get the idea that they are cop killers? They are very weak bullets which can not penetrate vests like real "cop killers". Black Talons are bullets which mushroom out on impact. That way, if you miss hitting a part of the body which would bring down an intruder, the bullet would spin around inside the person and would do more damage, bringing the crook down. Also, Black Talons could not make it through a criminal into another person because of the mushroom effect. That makes them safer.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Dude on 02/17/03 at 11:55 a.m.

Saying that A Black Talon is a "very weak bullet" shows me how little you know about weapons and ammo. Go to Gunbroker.com and see what they recommend .44 magnum, 500 grain Black Talon shells for. To hunt elk, wild boar, and bear. I'm not going to argue the physics of how certain rounds work or the street name of certain ammo. If thats all you got out of my post then you completely missed my point. I knew I should have stuck to my guns (pardon the pun) about commenting on serious issues on this board. ::)

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: 80sRocked on 02/17/03 at 12:01 a.m.

Quoting:
Also, as I recall, Glocks don't have a safety. If I absolutely had to have a gun around the house, I think I'd want one with a safety.
End Quote



the Glock "21" and "30"(.45 caliber), actually have 3 safeties.  You must be thinking of another brand.





Quoting:Do I want to have a lethal weapon laying around in my home that someone else could find and use against me?
End Quote



anyone who just leaves there gun "laying around the house" shouldn't have a gun in the first place, especially if there's children in the house.  Thats not smart.

Thats what a pistol lockbox is for. ;)  








Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: jamminoldies on 02/17/03 at 01:51 p.m.

That's what the police is for.Why should I own a gun or My Family should? They think it's dangerous.There's always butcher knives.But,then you'd be charged for slaughtering and 1st degree murder so I guess knives are out of the question.

Howard

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: 80sRocked on 02/17/03 at 02:03 p.m.


Quoting:
That's what the police is for.Why should I own a gun or My Family should? They think it's dangerous.

End Quote



...must be nice having your own private police officer guarding your house 24/7. ;)

My apartment was robbed 3 years ago when I first moved here.  Thank God I wasn't home that night nor have I been robbed since, but I definitely don't expect the police to protect my home from another incident.  Just not possible, not enough officers to protect every single household at once.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: jamminoldies on 02/17/03 at 02:20 p.m.

You would need a gun license and I don't feel the need to have one.This neighborhood is pretty safe to say the least. :)

Howard

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: John_Seminal on 02/17/03 at 03:25 p.m.


Quoting:
Saying that A Black Talon is a "very weak bullet" shows me how little you know about weapons and ammo. Go to Gunbroker.com and see what they recommend .44 magnum, 500 grain Black Talon shells for. To hunt elk, wild boar, and bear. I'm not going to argue the physics of how certain rounds work or the street name of certain ammo. If thats all you got out of my post then you completely missed my point. I knew I should have stuck to my guns (pardon the pun) about commenting on serious issues on this board. ::)
End Quote



That is the whole reason i started the thread. I do not know anything about guns or ammo. All I know is what people tell me in the stores or what the guy next door says. And I do not want to go off the advice of a salesman or a cop who gives me a two sentance reccomendation. I would like to know how the different guns work and what they are capible of. I will be an informed gun owner. I will check out the site that you mentioned.

BTW, it was a salesperson who told me black talons will not go through a person to hit another person where some other bullets can. He was trying to convince me that is the bullet I should buy.

BTW, one last question. If I purchased a .38 or 9mm, could I put in more than one kind of bullet in the magazine? For example, if I wanted to go black talon then a normal bullet and then a black talon again, could I do that or would the gun jam?

One last comment. I still have not purchased anything. I am in the information gathering stage. So I may ask some dumb questions. I figure it is better to get anwsers before I buy then get stuck with a gun I do not want or need.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Race_Bannon on 02/17/03 at 04:55 p.m.

You can switch bullets back and forth as long as they are the same caliber.  I have home protection rounds that cost about $20 for a box of 20 rounds and when I go to the range I buy "plinking" rounds for about $12 for 50.  
The range I go to has quite a few guns that can be checked out for a small fee to shoot with there, it's great if you want to try different calibers and models for minimal costs.  I have bought guns that I have regretted a bit later simply cause they didn't fit my hand well.  

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Goreripper on 02/17/03 at 05:29 p.m.


Quoting:
the Glock "21" and "30"(.45 caliber), actually have 3 safeties.  You must be thinking of another brand.
End Quote



Well I wouldn't knew really because if I owned one where I lived I'd be breaking the law. But the 9mm Glocks the state Police have don't have a safety.


Quoting:
anyone who just leaves there gun "laying around the house" shouldn't have a gun in the first place, especially if there's children in the house.  Thats not smart.

Thats what a pistol lockbox is for. ;)  
End Quote



I realise you're being facetious here, but my point is, while you have a gun in your home, there's a chance someone could use it against you.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: 80sRocked on 02/17/03 at 05:48 p.m.


Quoting:
I realise you're being facetious here, but my point is, while you have a gun in your home, there's a chance someone could use it against you.
End Quote



yes I suppose there is that chance, although its a very small chance.  However that argument should not deter someone from having a gun, just because of the very very small chance someone would break in and shoot them with it.


BTW, just out of curiosity, where do you live were it is illegal to own a gun?

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Race_Bannon on 02/17/03 at 07:08 p.m.

Here is a link to the Glock website that describes there "safety" systems.  There is no external system, the way that you disengage the safety on a Glock is to pull the trigger. It is not the traditional safety associated with most guns and I think it stretches the term.
http://www.glock.com/_safe_action_.htm

Quoting:


Well I wouldn't knew really because if I owned one where I lived I'd be breaking the law. But the 9mm Glocks the state Police have don't have a safety.



I realise you're being facetious here, but my point is, while you have a gun in your home, there's a chance someone could use it against you.
End Quote

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: John_Seminal on 02/17/03 at 07:41 p.m.


Quoting:
the way that you disengage the safety on a Glock is to pull the triggerEnd Quote



ROFL!! LMAO!!  ;D ;D ;D

That is HALLARIOUS! You remind me of an instructor I had in ROTC. That is where we shot the .22's. One of the guys in the class was looking down the barrel of the gun and asked "how do i clean the barrel". The instructer said "pull the trigger". He later said this is how they "weed out the bottom feeders". Of course it was all a joke, there was no bullet in the rifle.

Anyways, I am starting to lean toward getting a second dog. I have been thinking about this a long time, and I think a robber would not want to pick a house with 2 dogs. The dogs would make to much noise. I figure robbers are cowards who like to remain hidden and out of view. Instead I am going to start going to a local range to test out a few guns. Maybe I will buy a gun if something goes down in the future.

One last thought for those against legal gun ownership. I remember a quote from Archie Bunker where his daughter said "guns are bad, the only purpose of a gun is to kill people" and Archie responded: "would you feel better if people were pushed out windows." I think what Archie was getting at is human nature can be bad, and you have to protect yourself first.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: keegan on 02/17/03 at 07:57 p.m.


Quoting:


Well I wouldn't knew really because if I owned one where I lived I'd be breaking the law. But the 9mm Glocks the state Police have don't have a safety.

End Quote



i don't think i'd want to live someplace where the police have guns but the common man is a criminal if he has one. smacks of fascism to me.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Goreripper on 02/17/03 at 07:59 p.m.


Quoting:
BTW, just out of curiosity, where do you live were it is illegal to own a gun?
End Quote



Australia. Actually it's not illegal to own a gun, as long as it's not a semi-automatic rifle or a handgun. Rifles and shotguns are fine, as long as you're a farmer or a professional shooter. Even if you're a sports shooter, you can't keep your gun at home. It has to be locked up at the gun club and only used while you're there. Owning a gun for protection of property or person is not an adequate reason to own a firearm. If you want to know why, put it down to Sunday, April 28, 1996.

http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/mass/bryant/index_1.html

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Goreripper on 02/17/03 at 08:03 p.m.


Quoting:


i don't think i'd want to live someplace where the police have guns but the common man is a criminal if he has one. smacks of fascism to me.
End Quote



What you have them use instead of guns? Big sticks?

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Anonymous on 02/17/03 at 08:17 p.m.


Quoting:


I believe he may be an anti-gun advocate, but associates the gunownership supporters with certain characters he believes to be either "right wing wackos" or "fascists".

Just my humble opinion.

End Quote

Wrong. I'm as pro-gun as you can get.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: 80sRocked on 02/17/03 at 08:27 p.m.


Quoting:
i don't think i'd want to live someplace where the police have guns but the common man is a criminal if he has one. smacks of fascism to me.
End Quote



I agree 100%.  





Quoting:
What you have them use instead of guns? Big sticks?
End Quote



huh?  I think you misunderstood what he was saying.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Goreripper on 02/17/03 at 08:47 p.m.

No I didn't. I was being facetious. Fascism would be the restriction of a citizen's right to have a gun, but here that's never been an issue and, as I also pointed out, you can own certain types of guns if you have a good reason. But walking around town with a handgun strapped to your hip is illegal. Of course law enforcement officers are going to have guns - criminals have them, and they don't care what the law says.

I will also add here that cops aren't allowed to take their guns home with them either.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: 80sRocked on 02/17/03 at 09:13 p.m.


Quoting:
...you can own certain types of guns if you have a good reason. End Quote



...which begs the question:  what happens when the Australian govt decides to change the acceptable "reasons" for owning guns, leaving all guns in the hands of police and criminals.  

I don't like that at all.




Quoting:I will also add here that cops aren't allowed to take their guns home with them either.
End Quote



Wow, I didn't know that.  Sounds insane to me.  

Thats just my opinion.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Goreripper on 02/18/03 at 01:54 a.m.


Quoting:
...which begs the question:  what happens when the Australian govt decides to change the acceptable "reasons" for owning guns, leaving all guns in the hands of police and criminals.  
End Quote



I doubt they will do that, because that would put them up against the farmers, who are allowed to own rifles and shotguns to keep down the numbers of kangaroos, dingos, rabbits, etc. and the Farmers Association is a group that governments here mess with at their peril. In any case, my previous posts may have been a little misleading. Gun ownership isn't banned, only certain types of guns: handguns, automatic weapons, rimfire rifles and any self-loading rifle with a capacity of more than 15 rounds. You can own a gun, you're just not allowed to carry it in public or keep it at home. So, effectively, gun ownership is actually useless!

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: 80sRocked on 02/18/03 at 03:42 a.m.


Quoting:
You can own a gun, you're just not allowed to carry it or keep it at home.
End Quote



Thats the part I am having trouble with.  

Has Australia always been that way?  I'll admit, before having this conversation, I didn't know Australia was so strict on gun possession.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: ayhab on 02/18/03 at 11:38 a.m.

I still recommend the shotgun, which, loaded with dove shot should accomplish everything you need, and in the "right order."

Scare, intimidate, wound, kill.  After all, protection is the objective, not just killing someone.  And, if you miss on all the shots, you still have a nice bludgeon.

But, if a handgun is your choice, why not choose a revolver?  Regardless of the "reliability factor" of automatic weapons, they still can't make the same claim as revolvers, that they NEVER jam.  Also, revolvers are cheaper, easier to clean and maintain, and generally safer - from an "accidental discharge" point of view.  Owning an automatic weapon with a 17-shot staggered clip is good if you're in a shootout and don't wanna reload really often, but in a home confrontation, it's gonna be over within six shots, probably within 3.

I always thought a 357 magnum - which will fire .38 caliber as well,  was a good choice.  You can shoot .38s to practice, and buy .38 cal semi-wadcutters - (cheap, low powder charge practice rounds), at any gun shop.  So, you can practice all you like without going broke, and then just keep the gun loaded with the more expensive .357 magnum steel-jacketed hollowpoints for home protection.

A thought about safety, though.  Guns are not meant to be safe, but safety devices sold these days make the gun unusable in a timely crisis.  Beware the salesman who talks you into a 25 dollar gunlock because he realizes you are a novice.  A triggerguard/gunlock with key looks nice and will indeed keep the gun from firing, but it also takes time to find the key and try to unlock it while your hands are shaking because someone is in your house.

There's another word for a handgun with a gunlock.  It's called a "rock", because the only thing you can do in a crisis is throw it at someone.

Use gunlocks on displayed or easily accessible guns, but keep the "crisis gun" ready for action.

With children in the house, I always kept the gun stored in a high location and, more importantly,  a "secret" location that my kids didn't even know about.  A kid can figure out how to get to a high shelf, but not if they never see you take it down or put it back. Nothing to be curious about.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Race_Bannon on 02/18/03 at 11:46 a.m.

This is the model I had, very simple and effective.  
http://www.wingevapen.no/images/s&w686.gif

Quoting:

But, if a handgun is your choice, why not choose a revolver?  Regardless of the "reliability factor" of automatic weapons, they still can't make the same claim as revolvers, that they NEVER jam.  Also, revolvers are cheaper, easier to clean and maintain, and generally safer - from an "accidental discharge" point of view.  Owning an automatic weapon with a 17-shot staggered clip is good if you're in a shootout and don't wanna reload really often, but in a home confrontation, it's gonna be over within six shots, probably within 3.

I always thought a 357 magnum - which will fire .38 caliber as well,  was a good choice.  You can shoot .38s to practice, and buy .38 cal semi-wadcutters - (cheap, low powder charge practice rounds), at any gun shop.  So, you can practice all you like without going broke, and then just keep the gun loaded with the more expensive .357 magnum steel-jacketed hollowpoints for home protection.

/quote]

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: ayhab on 02/18/03 at 12:19 a.m.

I had a Colt Python with the neoprene grips back in the 80s that resembled that gun, which reminds me of a funny story.  (begin rambling).

I lent the 357 to a female friend who was newly divorced in Maryland, a military friend of mine living off-post in an apartment complex.  She had received a few perv calls but the guy even told her he was coming over and told her the apt she lived in.

About six months later, someone broke into 7 apartments on her floor and stole all their stereos, jewelry, etc and, of course, they stole my gun.  I filed the report, and then six months later got a call from Maryland Police giving me a court date for the handgun theft charge.

It seems that the thief had been identified by a friend in a plea bargain agreement, and also had been identified of shooting a man with my gun in a local bar the very night the gun was stolen 6 months back.  He had already been tried and convicted on the assault with a deadly weapon charge, so on my court date he showed up shackled and in prison garb - they explained he was violent and disruptive in his many prior visits to courtrooms.

They convicted of the handgun theft, made his sentence concurrent, and ordered him to pay restitution of 350 dollars to me for the gun, and made full payback a condition of any possible parole in the future.  Needless to say, doing laundry and other work in prison doesn't pay much, but they DO indeed make a little money for personal items, SO every month for 35 months in a row, I got a check for ten dollars in the mail from the Maryland prison he was visiting.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: jamminoldies on 02/18/03 at 12:58 a.m.

I might accidently shoot myself if I don't know what the hell I'm doin'.Like If I need to see if there are any bullets and the gun goes off and shoots me in the stomach! I get too anxious. :(

Howard :)

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Goreripper on 02/19/03 at 01:45 p.m.


Quoting:Has Australia always been that way?  I'll admit, before having this conversation, I didn't know Australia was so strict on gun possession.
End Quote



We only became strict after the Port Arthur Massacre. Gun control was never really an issue before that, but it's never been a problem here because gun ownership isn't a part of the culture like it is in America. For the main, we simply don't see the need for people to own guns.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: shazzaah on 02/19/03 at 02:04 p.m.


Quoting:


We only became strict after the Port Arthur Massacre. Gun control was never really an issue before that, but it's never been a problem here because gun ownership isn't a part of the culture like it is in America. For the main, we simply don't see the need for people to own guns.
End Quote



I wish it could be that way here!   :(

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Race_Bannon on 02/19/03 at 02:17 p.m.

Here is a link that describes the Port Aurther massacre, I remember hearing of it but needed to be reminded.  A very brutal and bizzare incident.
http://www.crimelibrary.com/serial/bryant/

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: 80sRocked on 02/19/03 at 02:41 p.m.


Quoting:


I wish it could be that way here!   :(
End Quote



...speak for yourself. ;)

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: shazzaah on 02/19/03 at 02:47 p.m.

I do speak for myself, and I do wish we did not have reason to have guns here. Why would anyone wish we had a reason to have one?  ??? My sentiment is not jeopardizing your right to bear arms.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: 80sRocked on 02/19/03 at 05:04 p.m.


Quoting:
I do speak for myself, and I do wish we did not have reason to have guns here. Why would anyone wish we had a reason to have one?  ??? My sentiment is not jeopardizing your right to bear arms.
End Quote



I guess I mis-interpreted your statement.   8)

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: Race_Bannon on 02/19/03 at 05:36 p.m.

I've got to mention my other form of home protection, my Lab mix dog Vedder.  He's 13 months old now and a good one to let us know if something's going on outside.  He gets his hair standing and his aggressive stance accompanied by a scary growl if there is activity at the door or close to home.  As soon as people come in though he's met his new best friends.  Autumn feels much safer when I'm not about with him in the house.

Subject: Re: Home protection

Written By: shazzaah on 02/19/03 at 07:01 p.m.

I have a dog, Bodie-Kai, and she protects us from trash sacks.
Not people, oh, Gosh no, a person could just come up and pet her no problem, but if  one of those vicious roving white trash sacks rolls in or through our yard, she is on it. She will bark and growl until it is gone. We're safe from those!  ;) A guard dog is not a bad idea at all...I mean a real one not my stupid dog.