» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/14/03 at 03:26 a.m.

Who's your fave team in the Eastern Conference? In the Western Conference? Who do you predict will take home the cherished mug?

My beloved Canucks got embarassed by St. Louis in game 1 but came back to tie the series in game 2. If they get through this series they can go all the way in the West. Their biggest competition is Dallas and if Turco gets off his game then they're all over them. Detroit has a chance but they're gonna have to play better than they have against Anaheim so far.

My other fave team, the Devils have a stranglehold on the Bruins in the East. I predict they will face Ottawa for the conference final unless an upset happens.

What say you, hockey fan?

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: resinchaser on 04/14/03 at 07:37 a.m.

I'm one those people that says goaltending wins Cups. Therefore I say that the Devils will reach the finals on the back of the best goalie in the game today, Martin Brodeur. At the beginning of the playoffs I said that it would be the Devils and the Avalanche in the finals, and even though Patrick Roy was left with his jock swinging from the rafters in game one, I stand by my prediction.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 04/14/03 at 09:18 a.m.

I'd like to see a Canadian team at least get to the Finals.  I think Vancouver and Ottawa have the right stuff to make it all the way.  Vancouver over Ottawa in seven games ;)

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Gary Bettman on 04/14/03 at 09:28 a.m.


Quoting:
I'd like to see a Canadian team at least get to the Finals.  I think Vancouver and Ottawa have the right stuff to make it all the way.  Vancouver over Ottawa in seven games ;)
End Quote



NOOOOOOOO!!!!!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: jj65 on 04/14/03 at 09:30 a.m.

go oilers!!!
I want to see an Oilers-Leafs final!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 04/14/03 at 09:37 a.m.


Quoting:


NOOOOOOOO!!!!!
End Quote



Suck it up, Bettman!  The mighty Canadian hockey force shall rise again!  ;D

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/14/03 at 11:42 a.m.


Quoting:
I'd like to see a Canadian team at least get to the Finals.  I think Vancouver and Ottawa have the right stuff to make it all the way.  Vancouver over Ottawa in seven games ;)
End Quote



This would be fantastic for those of us in Canada!! LOL...I can see Mr. Bettman having a cow though.

Don Cherry predicted a Senators/Canucks final about a month ago but I think he's changed his tune a bit.

I also believe goaltending wins you cups and I could see a Devils/Avs final again. Only this time the Avs don't have Ray Borque so the Devils would feel just fine kicking they're butt!! Heheeee...sorry Detroit fans but I don't think Cujo has the right stuff...

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Race_Bannon on 04/14/03 at 01:41 p.m.

Please be it Vancouver, the Pac. NorthWest area needs a winning team.  

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: princessofpop on 04/14/03 at 01:47 p.m.

Where do the Washington Capitals fit in to all this hockey hoopla?  ::)

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 04/14/03 at 02:25 p.m.


Quoting:
Where do the Washington Capitals fit in to all this hockey hoopla?  ::)
End Quote



They have a load of talent but I don't think they're focused enough to go far into the playoffs :-/

Plus Jagr's a sellout (I'm still mad about that).  So sad when the Penguins become nothing more than a farm team for the rest of the league :(

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Kenlos on 04/14/03 at 03:42 p.m.

Unfortunately, my favorite team didnt make it (Kings).  But if I had to make a prediction I would have to pick a Colorado vs. Ottawa final.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: FunkyFresh on 04/15/03 at 12:25 a.m.


Quoting:
Plus Jagr's a sellout (I'm still mad about that).  So sad when the Penguins become nothing more than a farm team for the rest of the league :(
End Quote



Oh, how the mighty have fallen.  Their coach even got canned today. The glory days of the early 90s seem like they never even happened anymore.

Team I'd like to see win- Vancouver
Team I don't want to see win- Dallas

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/15/03 at 01:00 p.m.

Holy Crap! Can you believe that Anaheim is up 3 games to 0 against Detroit? WOW!! Who'd a thunk it?

My Canucks just can't get past the stellar defense of the Blues. They're like a blanket on them. Very good defensive play. And the penalties...hooo boy...it's bad for both teams. I do question the officiating in the games I've seen so far. They're calling EVERYTHING in the Canucks/Blues yet are letting everything GO in the Devils/Bruins games I've seen.

The Devils can knock the Bruins out tonight. GO NEW JERSEY!

Rumours are flying around here that Mario is going to retire and Pittsburgh is gonna go through a major rebuild. And sorry about the Caps PoP...I agree with the comment about Jagr being a sell-out.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: RockandRollFan on 04/15/03 at 02:14 p.m.

I would LOVE to see the "Dead Wings" get knocked out early...then I can give all my attention to the Colorado Avalanche :)

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: resinchaser on 04/15/03 at 04:04 p.m.


Quoting:
Holy Crap! Can you believe that Anaheim is up 3 games to 0 against Detroit? WOW!! Who'd a thunk it?

My Canucks just can't get past the stellar defense of the Blues. They're like a blanket on them. Very good defensive play. And the penalties...hooo boy...it's bad for both teams. I do question the officiating in the games I've seen so far. They're calling EVERYTHING in the Canucks/Blues yet are letting everything GO in the Devils/Bruins games I've seen.

The Devils can knock the Bruins out tonight. GO NEW JERSEY!
End Quote



The officiating in the Oil/Stars series has been pretty bad as well. I hope the Devils send the Bruins packing tonight, being a Habs fan, I can't stand them. But not as much as I hate those whiny crybaby Toronto Maplelaughs.

Devils all the way.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Indy Gent on 04/15/03 at 04:44 p.m.

I'll say Stars and Devils, but only because the Wings are all but out of it. They're only down 0-3 to the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: STARStender on 04/15/03 at 10:50 p.m.

Based on my Drafts I was Predicting Toronto- Colorado, although I think St. Louis could pull it off, depends which Osgood shows up!

Go Eddie!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/16/03 at 03:55 a.m.

Quoting:
Based on my Drafts I was Predicting Toronto- Colorado, although I think St. Louis could pull it off, depends which Osgood shows up!

Go Eddie!
End Quote



With a name like STARStender I assumed you were a Marty Turco fan? Not wanting the Stars to take it? I think St. Louis could pull it off too. Osgood hasn't had much rubber thrown at him though in this series...and as much as I love Joe Sakic I really don't want the Avs to win it again...

Who said Maplelaughs? Heheeeee....I about peed!!!

edited to add that the Devils didn't do it tonight...Boston kicked them 5 - 1!!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: resinchaser on 04/16/03 at 07:22 a.m.

Word is that Shayne Corson has quit the Mapleleafs. So now the players have to deal with the media frenzy that this will cause, with this and all the injuries they have, the Flyers should be able to take them out, if they could score some goals and get some decent goaltending .

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: RockandRollFan on 04/17/03 at 07:46 a.m.

Let me be the first to say...Bye-Bye to the Detroit

DEAD WINGS!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/17/03 at 10:43 a.m.


Quoting:
Let me be the first to say...Bye-Bye to the Detroit

DEAD WINGS!
End Quote



HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/18/03 at 02:47 a.m.

NJ Devils advance to round 2!!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Yzerfan1973 on 04/18/03 at 11:04 a.m.

I'm a die-hard Red Wings fan, even after their utterly embarrassing defeat in the first round . Go ahead and laugh - they deserve it this year. No one bothered to show up for the games, but their biggest mistake all year was picking up that overrated Joseph!

I don't care who wins now, as long as its not the Anaheim "Disney on Ice" ( which will never happen).  And no, I'm not from Detroit, I'm from Chicago, home of the sh******t hockey team ever!

As for other teams: West: Colorado has a good chance if Roy learns to keep his fat a** in the crease and doesn't wander off to handle the puck (he gets burned too often, when will he learn?).  St. Louis will not advance far because Osgood lets in too many shots made from any further than the tops of the circles. Shoot close to the blue line and he becomes a seive. Anaheim?  Yeah, right. Dallas?  Probably will be battered after the Edmonton series, so 50 - 50 chance.

East:  New Jersey - still playing that boring yet effective trap defense, so chances are good (I hate having to admit that!). Philly/Toronto - whoever wins will be very battered after that series, but both strong teams - so maybe ( I still keep hoping someone will knock that a*****e Domi on his ass).  Ottawa, nope, sorry, try again next year, like always.  Washington/Tampa - doesn't matter who wins, the south east division is weaker than the rest. No Chance.

Prediction:  New Jersey/ Colorado finals ( which I obviously WILL NOT watch).  Winner - Jersey in 6.

Any one else have predictions?  

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/20/03 at 01:08 p.m.

IF Vancouver can get past St. Louis I predict a Vancouver/New Jersey final...if they can't then I predict Colorado/New Jersey. I will watch it. Not just because I'm a Devils fan as well but because hockey is hockey and I love the game!

What do you think the odds paid in Vegas for the Ducks to sweep the Dead Things? Heheeee...some folks probably made a killing! But will they go all the way? Nope. Not in my books.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: princessofpop on 04/20/03 at 05:57 p.m.

Well, the Caps dissapoint me AGAIN!  >:(  

Dam hockey team!  :P

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Indy Gent on 04/20/03 at 07:15 p.m.

The Blues have been in the playoffs 24 straight times without winning one. Kinda makes you think they're the Pacers of the NHL. :(

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/21/03 at 01:36 a.m.

Quoting:
Well, the Caps dissapoint me AGAIN!  >:(  

Dam hockey team!  :P
End Quote



They gave it their best today PoP! What a game!! Ollie the Goalie was amazing at times..as was Khabibulin (or however the f*** you spell his name LOL) ... I was hoping for the Caps for you, I really was!


Quoting:
The Blues have been in the playoffs 24 straight times without winning one. Kinda makes you think they're the Pacers of the NHL. :(
End Quote



Let's hope!! The Canucks live to play another game...and I get to go to another playoff party ;D It's a 1 game series now!!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 04/21/03 at 09:00 a.m.


Quoting:


They gave it their best today PoP! What a game!! Ollie the Goalie was amazing at times..as was Khabibulin (or however the f*** you spell his name LOL) ... I was hoping for the Caps for you, I really was!End Quote



Hey, Hell already froze over when the Bucs won the Super Bowl, so why not?  ;)

Quoting:



Let's hope!! The Canucks live to play another game...and I get to go to another playoff party ;D It's a 1 game series now!!
End Quote



If it's just one game, is it REALLY a "series"?  ;)

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/21/03 at 09:31 a.m.


Quoting:
If it's just one game, is it REALLY a "series"?  ;)
End Quote



LOL! I guess not ;D

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/21/03 at 11:38 p.m.

3 game Seven's tomorrow!! Holy wow Batman!

GO CANUCKS GO!
GO WILD GO!

Who cares about the Maplelaughs/Floofers...Heheeeee...

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: ragebass on 04/22/03 at 01:12 a.m.

I want to see the Ducks go down for taking out my Red Wings.

Go Canucks

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/22/03 at 01:23 a.m.


Quoting:
I want to see the Ducks go down for taking out my Red Wings.

Go Canucks
End Quote



Hallelujah! We have a convert!!

Ducks vs. Stars? Dallas in 4...

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 04/22/03 at 11:06 p.m.

So the Flyers win in style...so do the Canucks (barring a miracle comeback).

But the WILD?  :o  3-2 in overtime, what a sweet deal for an expansion team!  :D

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/23/03 at 01:31 a.m.

CANUCKS ADVANCE!!!

Bring on the Wild! Wooooooooo Hoooooooooo!!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: RockandRollFan on 04/23/03 at 07:32 a.m.


Quoting:
CANUCKS ADVANCE!!!

Bring on the Wild! Wooooooooo Hoooooooooo!!
End Quote

Wild Things happen...Avs lose...hey, the Wild wanted it more.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Kenlos on 04/23/03 at 10:02 a.m.

Well with the Wild winning that killed my prediction of a Colorado vs. Ottawa final, at least Ottawa made it past the first round or that would have really made me look bad.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Indy Gent on 04/23/03 at 06:18 p.m.

Both of the teams I predicted are still alive (Dallas-New Jersey), although I'd rather see a Canucks-Senators Stanley Cup Finals.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/25/03 at 02:16 a.m.

Wow! What a game between Dallas and Anaheim!! 5th longest in Playoff history! At least it was a nice goal and not garbage that won it ;D

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 04/28/03 at 01:43 p.m.

Is Cechmanek that good or are the Senators just that bad?  I thought they had the Flyers on the ropes even down 1-0 and they squandered all kinds of scoring chances.

Meanwhile, how about them Wild, eh?  ;D

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: resinchaser on 04/28/03 at 02:46 p.m.

I find Cechmanek plays the same style as Dominik Hasek played. He just seems to throw himself in front of the puck as opposed to reacting to it. I don't think Cechmanek is consistent enough to win this series for Philly, all it takes is one goal to throw him off his game.

Those Wild seem to be conjuring up the ghosts of 1991. Who else but Jacques Lemaire would dare to use a two goalie system in the playoffs?

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 04/28/03 at 02:57 p.m.

I'm all about the two-goalie system...different looks for different shifts :)  I wish they'd translate it to football, but I guess they have to stay with one QB for some trick plays to work.

Hey, I can do just about anything on ice skates but stop...anyone have any pointers for how I can stop on a dime to prevent myself from viciously hipchecking unsuspecting young children?  ;D

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: resinchaser on 04/28/03 at 03:22 p.m.


Quoting:
Hey, I can do just about anything on ice skates but stop...anyone have any pointers for how I can stop on a dime to prevent myself from viciously hipchecking unsuspecting young children?  ;D
End Quote



When stopping sideways put most of your weight on your inside skate. If your skates are sharp and they dig in you might stop too sharply and kiss the ice, if thats the case then practice with dull skates until you get the hang of it.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 04/28/03 at 03:28 p.m.


Quoting:


When stopping sideways put most of your weight on your inside skate. If your skates are sharp and they dig in you might stop too sharply and kiss the ice, if thats the case then practice with dull skates until you get the hang of it.


End Quote



That makes sense...that's what I usually try to do, but for some reason my heels won't dig in.

I've had my hockey skates for 7 years and I've kept them in excellent shape for when I play, always sharp and rust-free.  I never lose my edge but I just can't seem to dig in the right way, so instead of stopping and skirting up a lot of ice I slide sideways for about 10 feet (3 meters for you :D) and that just won't cut it :-/

Any other pointers, and other ways I can stop rather than the turn/sideways stopping technique?  Thanks.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 04/29/03 at 01:21 a.m.

Quoting:


When stopping sideways put most of your weight on your inside skate. If your skates are sharp and they dig in you might stop too sharply and kiss the ice, if thats the case then practice with dull skates until you get the hang of it.


End Quote



I disagree. I play hockey regularly and have since I was 7 (a LONG LONG time ago lol)...when I stop "sideways" as you put it, I put all my weight on my outside leg..or the leg that closest to the direction I'm heading and I put my weight squarely on the ball of my foot and drag my inside toe. I stop instantly and I'm already on the right leg to push off to head the opposite direction. Outside leg...watch the players on TV...that's why the snow flies up..if it was inside leg you would spray snow on your outside leg.

Ice skating is more about the ball of your foot than the heel. That's where you get your speed from...pushing with the ball of your foot. Think about running...taking off from a stand still you push with the ball of your foot...same with skating.

Just my thoughts on the subject :)

edited to add...yeah, what about them Wild? What a series this is!! I hope it goes 7 games...and of course, the Canucks win!! LOL

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Belden on 04/29/03 at 01:37 a.m.

Anybody else think the refs suck this year -- just as bad as all the previous years?  All that clutch and grab the NHL was supposed to be getting rid of is back with a vengeance!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: resinchaser on 04/29/03 at 07:44 a.m.


Quoting:


I disagree. I play hockey regularly and have since I was 7 (a LONG LONG time ago lol)...when I stop "sideways" as you put it, I put all my weight on my outside leg..or the leg that closest to the direction I'm heading and I put my weight squarely on the ball of my foot and drag my inside toe. I stop instantly and I'm already on the right leg to push off to head the opposite direction. Outside leg...watch the players on TV...that's why the snow flies up..if it was inside leg you would spray snow on your outside leg.

Ice skating is more about the ball of your foot than the heel. That's where you get your speed from...pushing with the ball of your foot. Think about running...taking off from a stand still you push with the ball of your foot...same with skating.

Just my thoughts on the subject :)
End Quote



I meant to say outside, the inside is used for balance. I agree with not using the heel of the skate, you'll just end up making a sharp turn.

When I was a child I used to stop on just the inside foot, I would lift my outside foot completely off the ice. My coach put an end to that, but I still do it sometimes to this day, i'm just comfortable that way.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 04/29/03 at 09:54 a.m.


Quoting:


I disagree. I play hockey regularly and have since I was 7 (a LONG LONG time ago lol)...when I stop "sideways" as you put it, I put all my weight on my outside leg..or the leg that closest to the direction I'm heading and I put my weight squarely on the ball of my foot and drag my inside toe. I stop instantly and I'm already on the right leg to push off to head the opposite direction. Outside leg...watch the players on TV...that's why the snow flies up..if it was inside leg you would spray snow on your outside leg.

Ice skating is more about the ball of your foot than the heel. That's where you get your speed from...pushing with the ball of your foot. Think about running...taking off from a stand still you push with the ball of your foot...same with skating.

Just my thoughts on the subject :)End Quote



Yeah, I actually thought about that last night and I was like, "Hmmm, waitaminute..."  But perhaps what I've been doing wrong is what you suggested, using my heel.  I never learned to play from a coach or anything, just from what I absorbed from watching hours of NHL games :)  Got a wicked wrister now, thanks to Mike Modano ;)

Quoting:

edited to add...yeah, what about them Wild? What a series this is!! I hope it goes 7 games...and of course, the Canucks win!! LOL
End Quote



I am ALL ABOUT 7-game series!  :D

Quoting:


I meant to say outside, the inside is used for balance. I agree with not using the heel of the skate, you'll just end up making a sharp turn.

When I was a child I used to stop on just the inside foot, I would lift my outside foot completely off the ice. My coach put an end to that, but I still do it sometimes to this day, i'm just comfortable that way.

End Quote



Plus that way it just looks cooler ;D  I think I actually did that once, I went skatefirst into the boards though and put a hole into it :P

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 05/01/03 at 02:29 a.m.

WTF is up with the Mighty Ducks? Sheesh!! I thought when Dallas got a game on them that would be it but nooooooooooo...they come back and win 1-0 tonight to take a stranglehold on the series!!

I've been giving this some serious thought and as a very serious hockey fan I'd like to know your thoughts on the cherished hockey grail, aka The Stanley Cup being engraved with the words "The Mighty Ducks of Anaheim"? How does that sit with you? Think about it before you answer. This is a team that is named after a Disney movie...and personally I would hate to see it. I really don't know why either. They have every right to it, just like any other team in the league...I guess it's because I just hate the name. GREAT logo...stoopid, stoopid name. I'd hate to see it on the cup.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/01/03 at 10:52 a.m.


Quoting:
WTF is up with the Mighty Ducks? Sheesh!! I thought when Dallas got a game on them that would be it but nooooooooooo...they come back and win 1-0 tonight to take a stranglehold on the series!!

I've been giving this some serious thought and as a very serious hockey fan I'd like to know your thoughts on the cherished hockey grail, aka The Stanley Cup being engraved with the words "The Mighty Ducks of Anaheim"? How does that sit with you? Think about it before you answer. This is a team that is named after a Disney movie...and personally I would hate to see it. I really don't know why either. They have every right to it, just like any other team in the league...I guess it's because I just hate the name. GREAT logo...stoopid, stoopid name. I'd hate to see it on the cup.
End Quote



You gotta admit, though...Giguere made a BEAUTIFUL save on Modano's potential game-winning shot, and then with the clock winding down, the Ducks *shudder* scored an equally beautiful goal.  But is the "Mighty Ducks" name really that much worse than, say, the Montreal "Maroons" of so many years ago?  

What a maroon ;D  

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 05/01/03 at 11:15 a.m.

Quoting:


You gotta admit, though...Giguere made a BEAUTIFUL save on Modano's potential game-winning shot, and then with the clock winding down, the Ducks *shudder* scored an equally beautiful goal.  But is the "Mighty Ducks" name really that much worse than, say, the Montreal "Maroons" of so many years ago?  

What a maroon ;D  
End Quote



Yeah, that was an amazing save! Did you notice how dejected Modano looked after? And true enough, the Ducks goal was nice too and not a garbage goal.

I don't know about the Maroon's...that name never bothered me. It paints a picture of a team in maroon jersey's...but the Mighty Ducks...what kind of picture will that paint to kids 80 yrs from now? "They had DUCKS playing hockey?"...

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/01/03 at 11:16 a.m.


Quoting:

I don't know about the Maroon's...that name never bothered me. It paints a picture of a team in maroon jersey's...but the Mighty Ducks...what kind of picture will that paint to kids 80 yrs from now? "They had DUCKS playing hockey?"...
End Quote



And nobody remembers the Maroons anyway ;)  

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 05/06/03 at 02:18 a.m.

The Ducks advance again!! What is up with that?? Is there any stopping them? Come on Vancouver...we can't have a team named after a Disney movie on the cup before us...

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/06/03 at 10:17 a.m.


Quoting:
The Ducks advance again!! What is up with that?? Is there any stopping them? Come on Vancouver...we can't have a team named after a Disney movie on the cup before us...
End Quote



That was a beautiful game-winning goal, although it was off a rebound, the "pass" made it happen ;D  I was talking to my friend (;)) last night and as they scored I started screaming "YES!  YES!!!"  Good times.

Speaking of Vancouver...7-2?!  ??? :o

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: A friend on 05/06/03 at 11:13 a.m.


Quoting:


That was a beautiful game-winning goal, although it was off a rebound, the "pass" made it happen ;D  I was talking to my friend (;)) last night and as they scored I started screaming "YES!  YES!!!"  Good times.
End Quote



Gee, and I just thought it was my sparkling personality and "cute" voice that got you so excited ;) ;D

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Me on 05/06/03 at 11:25 a.m.


Quoting:


Gee, and I just thought it was my sparkling personality and "cute" voice that got you so excited ;) ;D
End Quote



Actually, I thought RiceCube was more of a "looks only matter" kind of man.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/06/03 at 11:29 a.m.


Quoting:


Gee, and I just thought it was my sparkling personality and "cute" voice that got you so excited ;) ;D
End Quote



Oh yeah, that too ;D  'Twas most divine to hear thy voice :)


Quoting:


Actually, I thought RiceCube was more of a "looks only matter" kind of man.
End Quote



Methinks you have misunderstood my post in the other thread :-/  But I guess I had it coming :P

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 05/06/03 at 12:08 a.m.


Quoting:


That was a beautiful game-winning goal, although it was off a rebound, the "pass" made it happen ;D  I was talking to my friend (;)) last night and as they scored I started screaming "YES!  YES!!!"  Good times.End Quote



Yes, it was a beautiful goal. As most of theirs have been so far. I was very happy too ;D

Quoting:
Speaking of Vancouver...7-2?!  ??? :o
End Quote



This I wasn't so happy about...we'll get 'em tomorrow!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/06/03 at 01:01 p.m.


Quoting:


Yes, it was a beautiful goal. As most of theirs have been so far. I was very happy too ;D
End Quote



If you're talking beauty, I hope you saw the Ottawa game, because there were a couple of plays where the Senators made it look soooo easy...didn't help that Philly kept losing their cool and turning the puck over.  I just have the image of (either Hossa or Havlat) getting tripped up and then flipping a beauty pass over to an open Senator for an easy open-net goal.  That's dedication.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 05/06/03 at 01:16 p.m.


Quoting:


If you're talking beauty, I hope you saw the Ottawa game, because there were a couple of plays where the Senators made it look soooo easy...didn't help that Philly kept losing their cool and turning the puck over.  I just have the image of (either Hossa or Havlat) getting tripped up and then flipping a beauty pass over to an open Senator for an easy open-net goal.  That's dedication.
End Quote



I agree. But what was Cechmanek thinking when he came out of the net like that? Talk about an easy goal!! And did you see it when they were skating the puck out from behind his net and he just nonchalantly lifted up his mask and took a drink of water? It was like he had just given up and didn't care what happened at that point...

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/07/03 at 10:07 p.m.


Quoting:

Speaking of Vancouver...7-2?!  ??? :o
End Quote


Quoting:
This I wasn't so happy about...we'll get 'em tomorrow!
End Quote



Dang man...5-1 :o  Talk about a shutdown...if they keep playing like crap they're not gonna be able to beat the Ducks, even IF they win Game 7 :-/

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 05/08/03 at 02:40 a.m.


Quoting:



Dang man...5-1 :o  Talk about a shutdown...if they keep playing like crap they're not gonna be able to beat the Ducks, even IF they win Game 7 :-/
End Quote



I hang my head in shame...I'm just glad I was in rehearsal and missed this one...gawd, I can only imagine. The news/sports shows all say Cloutier played fab but where were the defensemen...*sigh*...I guess I'll have to go with my fave Eastern Conference team now....GO DEVILS!!

Okay, my bad...I'm not gonna lose the faith just yet..we still have one more crack at it...I love my Canucks dammit!! GO CANUCKS GO!!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: bloviatrix on 05/08/03 at 05:13 p.m.

Ever since my beloved Islanders lost to the Sens in round 1 I've been rooting for the Devils.  

I love Brodeur.  He is so under-rated and doesn't get the respect he deserves.  I'm also a big Scott Stevens fan.  There are few things more beautiful in hockey than an open-ice check initiated by number 4.  

Someone said in an earlier post that goaltending wins the play-offs.  I've got to expand that to add stingy defense.  The Devs lost the season series to Ottawa, but I'm not worried.  They seem to know how to take their game to the next level.

In the west, if someone had told me back in March that the Ducks would be in the conference finals, I wouldn't have believed them.  They're riding some great goaltending.  Jiggy has made some incredible saves.  Plus, they have some great veterans in Oates and Thomas, and that always helps in the locker room.  

I have no idea who's going to take the Canucks-Wild series, but I think the Canucks have the stronger team.

I'm hoping to see the Devils play the Canucks in the final.  (which means all 3 NY teams will have played the Canucks in the Stanley Cup finals)

Ultimately, it doesn't matter to me who is in the finals, as long there's hockey to watch on TV.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/08/03 at 10:47 p.m.

Dude Jonman, I don't know how to tell you this...but massive CHOKE!

Canucks blow a 2-0 lead, and the Wild score 3 goals in the third to run away with it!  4-2 final.  Dang.  What a game 7.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Indy Gent on 05/08/03 at 10:52 p.m.

Another sad chapter in Vancouver pro-sports. But who would've thought the Mighty Ducks and Wild, two expansion teams, would play for a berth in the Stanley Cup finals?!! :o
Now I am rooting for the Sens to win it all, but I belive the evils experience will carry them to the title.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 05/09/03 at 01:12 a.m.

For Sale:

1 Canucks jersey
1 Canucks car flag
1 bottle white face paint
1 bottle dark blue face paint
1 bottle light blue face paint

All items are slightly used. Willing to trade for a Devils car flag and red and black face paint.


I still can't believe we had a 3 - 1 series lead on Monday and here it is Thursday and our season is finished. What the f*** happened? There's gonna be some serious evaluations happening now. If I were Dan Cloutier I'd maybe pack a few things...just in case...

FYI, I'm only kidding about selling my Canucks stuff...I'm a true and true fan and I love my team...but we seriously need a goalie who won't choke in the playoffs like Dan Cloutier has the last two seasons...

GO DEVILS!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 05/14/03 at 03:40 p.m.

Are we still watching? I think Anaheim is playing SO well!! The Devils dominated last night against Ottawa even with the really one-sided refereeing by Bill "I used to be Jonman's favourite" McReary...man what a horrid display of penalty calling  :P

Is there any way to beat J S Giguere? The man is playing amazing hockey!!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/14/03 at 04:41 p.m.


Quoting:
Is there any way to beat J S Giguere? The man is playing amazing hockey!!
End Quote



Some of the saves he's made defy physical laws.  I didn't realize someone could move that fast.  I'd say it was because the Wild were inept, but seeing as they dispatched Colorado and Vancouver (in seven games, but still!), I'd say that it takes a special goalie to blank a team for two games and change.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/15/03 at 05:42 p.m.

Yeah, make that three shutouts in a row.  Giguere is officially invincible.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 05/16/03 at 12:07 a.m.

Did you see the Devils get hosed on that goal last night? It was SO in!! I was jumping off my couch and then...nothing. Even the goal judge didn't see it! Wow!

I loved Colin Campbell's explanation..."That's one of the problems with the hurry-up face-off..." Dude, if you have 6 people in the replay booth and at least 6 different TV's don't you think you could look at more than ONE ANGLE AT A TIME??

They really blew that one...I can't believe they didn't see it until it was too late.

Still, the Devils didn't need the goal as Marty Brodeur was his usual amazing self! ;D

Can the Wild find a way through JSG tonight?

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: resinchaser on 05/16/03 at 12:32 a.m.


Quoting:
Can the Wild find a way through JSG tonight?
End Quote



I hope not! As much as I would hate to see a name like "The Mighty Ducks" on the cup, I can't help but root for J.S Giguere.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/16/03 at 12:42 a.m.

This is the part where I throw my karma missile at Ottawa so they will stop SUCKING.  :P

It'd be kind of sad for TV execs, but I'd love to see an Anaheim-Ottawa final ;)  We'll see...we'll see.  I think Giguere and Brodeur are just too darn good though, so any way, a return of the Cup to Cah-nah-dah may have to wait :-/

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/23/03 at 01:23 p.m.

Hey, they stopped sucking!  :D

Now let's see what happens in Ottawa tonight in Game 7 8)

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 05/23/03 at 07:32 p.m.

DEVILS! DEVILS! DEVILS!

There's gonna be roast duck next week!!

Sorry Rice...the good thing is the Sens didn't suck...one mistake. That's all it takes. What a game!

DEVILS! DEVILS! DEVILS!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/24/03 at 01:13 p.m.

You DO realize that I'm going to have to root for the MIGHTY DUCKS now :P :D 8)

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 05/25/03 at 02:36 a.m.


Quoting:
You DO realize that I'm going to have to root for the MIGHTY DUCKS now :P :D 8)
End Quote



Well, someone has to! ;)

I created a new avatar just for the Stanley Cup Finals...as soon as they are over and the cherished mug is awarded I'll go back to the other one...

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/26/03 at 07:34 p.m.


Quoting:


Well, someone has to! ;)

I created a new avatar just for the Stanley Cup Finals...as soon as they are over and the cherished mug is awarded I'll go back to the other one...
End Quote



I like the avatar.

But I still hate the Devils ;D  Go Ducks!  Quack quack!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 05/27/03 at 02:20 a.m.


Quoting:


I like the avatar.

But I still hate the Devils ;D  Go Ducks!  Quack quack!
End Quote



Thanks! I like your avatar too. I've said it before and I'll say it again...they have a great logo...stoopid name though...

I love the Flying V too..except I prefer it in a Gibson guitar ;)

Tomorrow it begins!! Bring it on!! I'm going CUP CRAZY!!!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 06/02/03 at 09:19 p.m.

Quack quack.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 06/02/03 at 11:20 p.m.

LMAO!! It's now a 3 game series!!

Anaheim totally dominated tonight...they deserved the win and it was a very nice goal...so now we're back to NJ...

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice Cube on 06/03/03 at 10:05 a.m.


Quoting:
LMAO!! It's now a 3 game series!!

Anaheim totally dominated tonight...they deserved the win and it was a very nice goal...so now we're back to NJ...
End Quote



Quack quack ;)  It'll be fun, for sure.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 06/08/03 at 12:24 a.m.

We're down to 1 game...I have no fingernails left...

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice_Cube on 06/09/03 at 10:04 a.m.

It's times like these that I'm so fortunate to have a big screen TV ;D

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 06/09/03 at 04:54 p.m.


Quoting:
It's times like these that I'm so fortunate to have a big screen TV ;D
End Quote



I'm coming over to watch at your house Rice!! (WB BTW!! ;D)

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice_Cube on 06/09/03 at 08:35 p.m.

Well...'tis about that time to concede the Cup to the Devilish ones ::)

But quite a series, no?  :)  Very exciting, back and forth, never any true "momentum"...and the "Mighty Ducks of Anaheim" engraving shall remain off the cherished chalice for at least another season ;D

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 06/09/03 at 08:50 p.m.


Quoting:
Well...'tis about that time to concede the Cup to the Devilish ones ::)

But quite a series, no?  :)  Very exciting, back and forth, never any true "momentum"...and the "Mighty Ducks of Anaheim" engraving shall remain off the cherished chalice for at least another season ;D
End Quote



Yes, a very exciting series! Back and forth. It was heartbreaking to see Giguere crying after the game. I feel bad for the Ducks as they also deserved to win it.

However I'm VERY happy for my NEW JERSEY DEVILS, the 2003 Stanley Cup Champions!!

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Rice_Cube on 06/09/03 at 08:53 p.m.


Quoting:
It was heartbreaking to see Giguere crying after the game. End Quote



Well, he did win the Conn Smythe...the ultimate "Ron Hextall F**k You" prize ::)  But for getting the Ducks there, he deserved it.

Quoting:

I feel bad for the Ducks as they also deserved to win it.
End Quote



Liar ;D  S'all good.

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Indy Gent on 06/09/03 at 09:19 p.m.

Congratulations Devils on another Stanley Cup, and good luck next year, Ducks. Now let's get back to the real sports. ;)

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 06/10/03 at 02:42 a.m.


Quoting:
Congratulations Devils on another Stanley Cup, and good luck next year, Ducks. Now let's get back to the real sports. ;)
End Quote



LOL IG...you know as well as anyone there are no other real sports!! ;D

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: 98vfr on 06/10/03 at 11:42 a.m.

RANGERS  IN 2004 ;D         THE ONLY CONCLUSION I CAN COME TO OF WHY THE DEVILS BEEN SO GOOD FOR ALL THESE YEARS IS ONE REASON---BRODEUR                                         (sorry about the CAPS)

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 06/12/03 at 01:53 a.m.

Quoting:
I created a new avatar just for the Stanley Cup Finals...as soon as they are over and the cherished mug is awarded I'll go back to the other one...
End Quote



I know, I know...I said I'd go back...but I can't let the celebration end just yet...I made this avatar just for when the Devils won so I gotta keep it for at least week!!

And yes Rice, I made one in case they lost as well...that one shall never see the light of day!! LOL


Quoting:
RANGERS  IN 2004 ;D         THE ONLY CONCLUSION I CAN COME TO OF WHY THE DEVILS BEEN SO GOOD FOR ALL THESE YEARS IS ONE REASON---BRODEUR                                         (sorry about the CAPS)
End Quote



I have to agree that Brodeur has been excellent, although not the ONLY reason...in '95 it was also Scott Stevens, Ken Daneyko, Bobby Holik and *gasp* CLOD Lemieux...then in 2000 it was Scott Stevens, Bobby Holik, Patrick Elias, Scott Gomez and *gasp* Alexander Mogilny...THIS year it was Scott Stevens, Patrick Elias, Scott Neidermeyer, Jason Gionta, Turner Stevenson and Jeff Friesen who helped Mr. Brodeur out to win the cup. The Devils also have won 3 cups with 3 different coaches so ya know that ain't what's doing it...

The Rangers? Serious? Come on...the highest payroll with ZERO production...what a joke to the league they have become...they are a prime example of why salary caps will work...the players that WANT to play WILL...without regard of money...the more they make the less production there is...and the NYR are the PERFECT example of that. Even hiring Scotty Bowman couldn't help them...and when the job WAS offered to him he said (and I quote) "I thought about it for about 12 seconds and decided no thank-you"...even Scotty knows the team doesn't gel...there's zero chemistry on that team. Sather used to be considered a hockey genius...now people are wondering if maybe he was just lucky to get the players he did in those Edmonton dynasty years...

Anyway, next season is only 13 weeks away!! Bring it on!!

;D ;D ;D ;D

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Indy Gent on 06/12/03 at 06:49 p.m.

Depends on who you ask. Some people prefer sports where men are getting their faces smashed into a hard surface with several penalties and broken teeth. I prefer football. ;D

Quoting:


LOL IG...you know as well as anyone there are no other real sports!! ;D
End Quote

Subject: Re: 2003 Stanley Cup Playoffs

Written By: Jonman on 06/13/03 at 01:58 a.m.


Quoting:
Depends on who you ask. Some people prefer sports where men are getting their faces smashed into a hard surface with several penalties and broken teeth. I prefer football. ;D

End Quote



GO GIANTS!! Heheeee...I think we need to start a new thread though!! ;D ;D