» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: Big change in smokers

Written By: Arcfire on 05/23/03 at 08:39 a.m.

Since I have been back at college for just under a year, I have noticed the rise of women smokers, as compared to when I first attended college back in '84. One out of 5 might have lit up a cigarette, where as today it seems that one out of 5 would not smoke! Its the exact opposite for men! I can remember hanging sidewall on a construction site where everyone smoked. I just returned from a  4 hour demonstration of a new laser measuring/level system shown to a group of 20 constuction workers in an outdoor environment and only 2 smoked!

According to a recent study, only 13% of adult women have given up smoking compared with 33% of adult males. Even assuming somewhat exaggerated figures, it is obvious that men are more likely to discontinue cigarette smoking. And though one million adults are quitting smoking annually, teenagers are beginning to smoke in increasing numbers, with girls accounting for a growing proportion of teenage smokers. In the last four years, smoking among the 12 to 18 year age group increased from 14.7% to 15.7% among boys and from 8.4% to 15.3% among girls.

So what is causing this big decline in male smokers yet almost doubling Females? Stress of the jobs today? the introduction of a technology dependant workplace? Discuss

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Durania on 05/23/03 at 08:47 a.m.

Well, I think that men in general are becoming a bit more health conscious than they used to be.  So that could be part of the reason for the decline among men.  And with women, the increase could be because there are so many more women in the workplace now.  I'm not really great at 'analyzing' such things  ::)

I started smoking when I was 15.  My husband quit back in 2000, but I just wasnt able to at that time.  Finally, in August of 2001 I quit and still am smoke-free.  I still miss it sometimes, but all-in-all I'm very glad that I did.  Hmm, I kind of got off topic a bit...I'll shush now!

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: resinchaser on 05/23/03 at 08:56 a.m.

Most of the women in my family are afraid to quit because they think they will gain weight.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: 98vfr on 05/23/03 at 12:00 a.m.


Quoting:
Most of the women in my family are afraid to quit because they think they will gain weight.
End Quote

4 years ago me and a girl friend of only 1 year broke up (we both smoked ciggs) a month later i was over my sisters house & she came over, i couldn`t believe how much weight she gained just because she quit smoking after we split. i teased her & put some tears in her eyes. afterwards i felt so bad. not too long after that she started smoking again. again ,i felt so bad. i hope this doesn`t discourage any women from quitting!!!!!!!!!!!

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Tarzan Boy on 05/23/03 at 01:42 p.m.


Quoting:
Most of the women in my family are afraid to quit because they think they will gain weight.
End Quote



And they're willing to risk heart disease for it?? What's the point? Weight gain comes from an unhealthy combination of not eating right and not exercising.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: princessofpop on 05/23/03 at 01:45 p.m.

I think if someone uses the excuse that they will "gain weight", therefore they should continue to smoke, doesn't care about their body & health anyway, so what's the point?

Modified to add:  Yeah what TB said ^

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: FOXVOX on 05/23/03 at 05:02 p.m.

Health issues* such as asthma, chronic bronchitus and lung cancer, are difficult for society to frown upon when they are internal and therefore not as outwardly noticable, but society does have a problem with external & cosmetic issues*, including obesity.  It is hard not to be concientious, and afraid of weight gain.

Personally, my biggest obstacle in staying smoke-free is not so much my addiciton to nicotine; but rather that I am somewhat ritualistic and after 20-some years, it is definitely a HABIT.  I've quit 4 or 5 times, for as long as 9 months, but to quote Sean Penn in 'The Game', "It didn't take".  

*sometimes there is no substitute for the word "Issues"... sorry!

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Tarzan Boy on 05/23/03 at 05:17 p.m.

Quoting:
Health issues* such as asthma, chronic bronchitus and lung cancer, are difficult for society to frown upon when they are internal and therefore not as outwardly noticable, but society does have a problem with external & cosmetic issues*, including obesity.  It is hard not to be conscientious, and afraid of weight gain.
End Quote



Hey, it's a T & A world out there, but I would not go blaming my blatant disregard for my own health on society. Cancer is not outwardly noticeable?? Huh?? Obesity goes above and beyond a "cosmetic concern." It is also a health hazard - as bad as lung cancer, except that something can be done about it most of the time. Weight gain should only be a concern if one eats in excess and doesn't exercise. Smoking only adds to the sedentary lifestyle of fat people, plus I could not buy into the whole smoking culture since they directly support the marketing of a known addictive toxicant to children. Ugh.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Marian on 05/23/03 at 05:32 p.m.


Quoting:
Most of the women in my family are afraid to quit because they think they will gain weight.
End Quote

:o :o :oHard to believe,with some of the smokers I've seen! :oI mean,what---they'd weigh 300 instead of 200 if they didn't smoke???Give me a break!!! ::)I'm 5'4" and weigh about 115 pounds,and I've never smoked1In fact,I'm allergic to it!Cheers! ;)

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Arcfire on 05/23/03 at 06:55 p.m.

Quoting:

:o :o :oHard to believe,with some of the smokers I've seen! :oI mean,what---they'd weigh 300 instead of 200 if they didn't smoke???Give me a break!!! ::)I'm 5'4" and weigh about 115 pounds,and I've never smoked1In fact,I'm allergic to it!Cheers! ;)
End Quote



The study I read also said that only after 10-20 years of smoking did they see a difference in the loss of weight by those who smoked and were overweight. I dont know how reliable the study was, but I never heard of Men smoking because of possible weight gain, Its always nerves. Here is one article that I found that states  gender specific issues

http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/sgr/sgr_forwomen/factsheet_outcomes.htm

Smoking and Reproductive Outcomes
Women smokers, like men smokers, are at increased risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and pulmonary disease, but women smokers also experience unique risks related to menstrual and reproductive function.
 
Women who smoke have increased risk conception delay and for primary and secondary infertility.
 
Women who smoke may have a modest increase in risks for ectopic pregnancy and spontaneous abortion.
 
Smoking during pregnancy is associated with increased risk for premature rupture of membranes, abruptio placentae (placenta separation from the uterus), and placenta previal (abnormal location of the placenta, which can cause massive hemorrhaging during delivery; smoking is also associated with a modest increase in risk for preterm delivery.
 
Infants born to women who smoke during pregnancy have a lower average birth weight and are more likely to be small for gestational age than infants born to women who do not smoke. Low birth weight is associated with increased risk for neonatal, perinatal, and infant morbidity and mortality. The longer the mother smokes during pregnancy, the greater the effect on the infant’s birth weight.
 
The risk for perinatal mortality, both stillbirths and neonatal deaths, and the risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) are higher for the offspring of women who smoke during pregnancy.
 
Women who smoke are less likely to breast-feed their infants than are women who do not.


If having a child isnt a reason to stop smoking I dont know what is!

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: jamminoldies on 05/23/03 at 07:05 p.m.

My Parents used to smoke like 15,20 years ago.They don't smoke anymore.They realized it was a bad habit and quit in the late 80's.

Howard

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: oddxsocks on 05/23/03 at 08:12 p.m.

it's odd, i've noticed a lot more kids at my school smoking...some guy in my gym class reeked of cigarette smoke today.  (which wasn't helping my massive headache, but that's another story...)  what i find amusing though is watching this guy in my grade after school...you can almost always see him riding his bike home while talking to his friends, doing bike stunts, drinking a sprite and smoking all at the same time...not to mention that he has the intelligence of a stapler.  it's a miracle he's not crashed yet! :D

that was really off-topic.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Fred on 05/23/03 at 09:18 p.m.

I know guys like that at my school. For example, he works out and then he smokes???? Why?

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Tarzan Boy on 05/24/03 at 04:39 a.m.


Quoting:
I know guys like that at my school. For example, he works out and then he smokes???? Why?
End Quote



I dunno, but I bet he only works out with weights. The only guys I know who smoke and work out do it with weights, exclusively. They can't run worth a d@mn, much less swim or do any cycling... They're gasping by the time I am getting warmed up!

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Marian on 05/24/03 at 10:53 a.m.


Quoting:
I know guys like that at my school. For example, he works out and then he smokes???? Why?
End Quote

I think at some schools they make people air themselves out before they can come to class,if they;ve been smoking.Cheers!

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: jamminoldies on 05/24/03 at 10:57 a.m.

My friend Robert still smokes.He's been smoking for 20 years and When I used to come over his house to hang out,his room always used to reek of ciggarrette smoke :P and I always came home smelling like a smokestack.My Mother told me to deepwash my clothes so to get the stink out.And my friend Robert is almost 40 years old.God Bless Him. :)

Howard

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Fred on 05/24/03 at 11:22 a.m.


Quoting:


I dunno, but I bet he only works out with weights. The only guys I know who smoke and work out do it with weights, exclusively. They can't run worth a d@mn, much less swim or do any cycling... They're gasping by the time I am getting warmed up!
End Quote



Yeah, that explains them.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: FOXVOX on 05/26/03 at 06:01 p.m.

Quoting:


Hey, it's a T & A world out there, but I would not go blaming my blatant disregard for my own health on society. Cancer is not outwardly noticeable?? Huh?? Obesity goes above and beyond a "cosmetic concern." It is also a health hazard - as bad as lung cancer, except that something can be done about it most of the time. Weight gain should only be a concern if one eats in excess and doesn't exercise. Smoking only adds to the sedentary lifestyle of fat people, plus I could not buy into the whole smoking culture since they directly support the marketing of a known addictive toxicant to children. Ugh.

End Quote



Well, duh...of course obesity is more than just a cosmetic concern, my point was that it is more noticable to everyone to be fat than to have an internal health issue and is therefore probably a more significant concern to those smokers who are weight-conscious.  I'm not justifying, I'm merely providing a plausible explanation for why some women hesitate to quit.  I smoke four cigarettes a day and I am very curteous about it.  What I cannot tolerate is someone who has never experienced addiction, but feels they have a right to judge someone who has.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Tarzan Boy on 05/26/03 at 06:27 p.m.

Quoting:


Well, duh...of course obesity is more than just a cosmetic concern, my point was that it is more noticable to everyone to be fat than to have an internal health issue and is therefore probably a more significant concern to those smokers who are weight-conscious.  I'm not justifying, I'm merely providing a plausible explanation for why some women hesitate to quit.  I smoke four cigarettes a day and I am very curteous about it.  What I cannot tolerate is someone who has never experienced addiction, but feels they have a right to judge someone who has.


End Quote



Everyone has the propensity to get addicted to smoking. If smokers chose to bite the marketing strategy, then it's their fault. They had a choice in the matter, just like being obese. It's not a judgment, but a fact of life.

*edited to add: Cancer is usually very noticeable. It is 100% noticeable in its late stages. The hardening of the arteries is also very noticeable in males in the form of erectile dysfunction.

I've not experienced addiction to anything because 1) I chose not to smoke and 2) I do not do things in excess and maintain myself a bit active. I know it's very easy to fall into either one or both at the same time. Pointing the finger at others and calling them judgmental is not the answer though. I cannot tolerate people who fling phrases like "right to judge" because that is exactly what humans do: judge. We do it everyday and it is one of the measures of how we determine who we like and who we don't. So I will judge accordingly, actually. Obesity is bad. Yeah, I'll be honest. I could not "be with" someone who is obese. I don't like obesity. It looks bad. Obesity is not natural; it is not standard of any animal to be obese. This same physical repulsion applies to a smoker.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: FOXVOX on 05/26/03 at 07:22 p.m.

Ouch!  I judge people by their actions; not their outward appearances, and therefore, likewise, I could not "be with" someone who is so intolerant.

BTW-- you might wanna do some research on obesity.  It is not always brought on by a person's slovenly attitude about food and exercise.  (See:  Cushing's syndrome, Cushing's disease).

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/26/03 at 07:31 p.m.


Quoting:
Ouch!  I judge people by their actions; not their outward appearances, and therefore, likewise, I could not "be with" someone who is so intolerant. End Quote



Well, while I agree with you that we should judge people by their character rather than their appearances, I do have to say that it's not inappropriate to have a few standards to live by.  Some of these standards are, of course, physical.  I don't think he's intolerant, he just knows what his standards are.

Quoting:

BTW-- you might wanna do some research on obesity.  It is not always brought on by a person's slovenly attitude about food and exercise.  (See:  Cushing's syndrome, Cushing's disease).
End Quote



I can't speak for him, but the way I read it was that he did not sympathize with people who were lazy bums who inhale hamburgers by the bushel.  I am aware of the diseases you speak of, in addition to some genetic links to obesity.  So you raised a good point there.

By the way, I also hate smoking.  

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: FOXVOX on 05/26/03 at 07:52 p.m.

It's okay... really.  And I apologize if I sound terse... my take is that I just don't think it's fair to judge, exclude, discount, reject, view etc. an overweight person or a smoker in a negative light just because they are fat, or smoking, respectively.  People of all sizes and vices contribute to society, and if they can make me laugh, I don't care if they smoke or weigh 300 pounds.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Rice Cube on 05/26/03 at 07:58 p.m.


Quoting:
It's okay... really.  And I apologize if I sound terse... my take is that I just don't think it's fair to judge, exclude, discount, reject, view etc. an overweight person or a smoker in a negative light just because they are fat, or smoking, respectively.  People of all sizes and vices contribute to society, and if they can make me laugh, I don't care if they smoke or weigh 300 pounds.
End Quote



No hard feelings :)  I understood what you meant, just putting my own light on it.

Tarzan Boy is right, people are made to judge others.  I personally choose either to not exercise my right to judge (because frankly, sometimes I just don't care) or judge based on certain criteria I have set for myself (re: standards).

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: FOXVOX on 05/26/03 at 08:29 p.m.


Quoting:


No hard feelings :)  I understood what you meant, just putting my own light on it.

Tarzan Boy is right, people are made to judge others.  I personally choose either to not exercise my right to judge (because frankly, sometimes I just don't care) or judge based on certain criteria I have set for myself (re: standards).


End Quote



And I think it's pretty common for men and women to have vastly different criteria when selecting those standards.   ;)

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Tarzan Boy on 05/27/03 at 01:37 a.m.

Quoting:
Ouch!  I judge people by their actions; not their outward appearances, and therefore, likewise, I could not "be with" someone who is so intolerant.

BTW-- you might wanna do some research on obesity.  It is not always brought on by a person's slovenly attitude about food and exercise.  (See:  Cushing's syndrome, Cushing's disease).
End Quote



Cushing's Syndrome cannot be masked by smoking. Smoking can act with an additive effect for myriad other problems. It can compound thyroid problems. Thyroid problems already arise from Cushing's disease and now smoking comes into play... Good choice for an example ::) Someone with Cushing's syndrome and who smokes is not someone who really cares about their own health. The public does not react lightly to people who don't care about themselves.

Outward apperances matter, actually. Any introductory class in anthropology, biology, and genetics can tell you that right away. The more deviant and dangerous the mutation, the less likely that gene will propagate. This works outside of the subjective realm of "actions." Tolerant or not, that is the way nature works. That is why you don't see albinos and dwarves everywhere coming from all species, for example. That is why there is always a median, an average in how all animals look. It is about survival of the fittest, not fattest.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: turnipgreen on 05/27/03 at 01:43 a.m.

Huh? When did we need excuses to smoke??

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Don_Carlos on 05/27/03 at 01:14 p.m.

"You've come a long way baby".  Now you are free to become a slave to the media version of female beauty (so skinny that you have no boobs) and the tobacco that will curb your appitite - so that you slowly die of starvation or from smoking.   ??? And this is "liberation" ???  Man, those media guys are smart.  We should be smarter (but I do love a good Cuban cigar  ;))

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Tarzan Boy on 05/27/03 at 02:08 p.m.

Quoting:
"You've come a long way baby".  Now you are free to become a slave to the media version of female beauty (so skinny that you have no boobs) and the tobacco that will curb your appitite - so that you slowly die of starvation or from smoking.   ??? And this is "liberation" ???  Man, those media guys are smart.  We should be smarter (but I do love a good Cuban cigar  ;))
End Quote



But obesity from overeating is far more rampant than anorexia nervosa. So much for the media's influence on our eating habits. Apparently, they are liberated enough to keep consuming and consuming... and it is not only females who bear the mediatized versions of body image. We look to males so strong and powerful that testosterone flows through their veins! ::) We should be more aware. I try to be very objective when it comes to the physical.

Enjoy. "Always Coca Cola" :)

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Don_Carlos on 05/27/03 at 03:41 p.m.


Quoting:


But obesity from overeating is far more rampant than anorexia nervosa. So much for the media's influence on our eating habits. Apparently, they are liberated enough to keep consuming and consuming... and it is not only females who bear the mediatized versions of body image. We look to males so strong and powerful that testosterone flows through their veins! ::) We should be more aware. I try to be very objective when it comes to the physical.

Enjoy. "Always Coca Cola" :)
End Quote



Yes, eating disorders are rampant, and the media, with its "body type" hype is partly responsible.  But, I don't know about the younger generation, but John Wayne never impressed me as the ideal man.  I had other, more positive, role models who, at least to some extent, could allow their feminin side to show through.  You might be interested in a video with Robert Bly and Bill Moyers called A Gathering of Men.  I don't buy all of it, but some of what Bly has to say makes sense.  Coka Cola is good - with RUM  ;D

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: XenaKat13 on 05/27/03 at 06:35 p.m.


Quoting:


{snip} What I cannot tolerate is someone who has never experienced addiction, but feels they have a right to judge someone who has.


End Quote



I feel I have to respond to this part of your post FOXVOX...I have gotten the general sense that a lot of people here do not agree with you on this point.

I do.

I wish people in general would take into account the possibility that many older smokers had no earthly idea how bad smoking was for your health. A lot of the older smokers I know chose to smoke their first cigarette way back when nobody thought it was dangerous or addicting.  By the time they became aware that it was detrimental to their health...it was too late.  They'd become addicted.

Yes...doctors had been telling people for years that smoking was bad for you....but they did not have facts and figures to prove it back in the 1940's like they do now.  (That was when my mother started.) They did not have decades of research proving that 100 people who smoke have more cancer than 100 people who don't smoke.  And back then the family doctor would also be in cahoots with your parents...if your parents thought smoking was "unladylike", so did the doctor.  But if you were a boy...you never got that little lecture.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Tarzan Boy on 05/28/03 at 11:01 a.m.


Quoting:


Yes, eating disorders are rampant, and the media, with its "body type" hype is partly responsible...  
End Quote



I disagree. I believe that is a cop-out excuse for the true problem of blaming others for our own actions.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: FOXVOX on 05/28/03 at 04:59 p.m.

With all due respect, then why did anexoria nervosa and bulimia only become wide-spread in the mid-to-late 20th century, coinciding with media hype?  Women were never pressured to conform to a certain body type more until the 60s when the waifish Twiggy became the most visible 'model' on the cover of nearly all popular women's magazines.  The same magazines that were filled with ads portraying smoking as 'glamorous'.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Don_Carlos on 05/29/03 at 03:34 p.m.


Quoting:
With all due respect, then why did anexoria nervosa and bulimia only become wide-spread in the mid-to-late 20th century, coinciding with media hype?  Women were never pressured to conform to a certain body type more until the 60s when the waifish Twiggy became the most visible 'model' on the cover of nearly all popular women's magazines.  The same magazines that were filled with ads portraying smoking as 'glamorous'.
End Quote



Thanks Fox, couldn't have said it better. and Xena's post, on older folks' addiction also rigns true.  My dad was a smoker, and I had my first butt at 14, sooo many years ago.  If you can, check out Doonsbury's "Mr Butts" series - Trudeau says it all.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: Tarzan Boy on 05/29/03 at 03:51 p.m.

Quoting:
With all due respect, then why did anexoria nervosa and bulimia only become wide-spread in the mid-to-late 20th century, coinciding with media hype?  Women were never pressured to conform to a certain body type more until the 60s when the waifish Twiggy became the most visible 'model' on the cover of nearly all popular women's magazines.  The same magazines that were filled with ads portraying smoking as 'glamorous'.
End Quote



The same type of conformity that has driven women to wear those rings around their necks to stretch them and men to carve their teeth to make them look sharp. We are no different from them.

Anyone who is stupid enough to be taken in by the "hype" deserves the results that come of it. If they think starving and vomiting will make them appealing to others, then, by all means, they can starve and vomit 'til their heart's content. Of course, besides smokers and fat people, mental cases are not attractive to me.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: resinchaser on 05/30/03 at 07:58 a.m.

Quoting:



Anyone who is stupid enough to be taken in by the "hype" deserves the results that come of it. If they think starving and vomiting will make them appealing to others, then, by all means, they can starve and vomit 'til their heart's content.
End Quote



I don't think that a 13 year old girl who vomits and starves herself and thinks that the only way to be beautiful is to have a boob job is "stupid" and deserves what she gets.

I agree with you "adults" should be responsible for their own actions, but I have a problem when the "hype" is aimed at children.

Subject: Re: Big change in smokers

Written By: princessofpop on 05/30/03 at 08:26 a.m.


Quoting:


I don't think that a 13 year old girl who vomits and starves herself and thinks that the only way to be beautiful is to have a boob job is "stupid" and deserves what she gets.
End Quote



This is why the parents or the guardians need to step up to the plate if this is what their 13 y.o. child is thinking.  I am so sick of constantly hearing people say "don't blame the parents, blah blah...", screw that. If my 13 y.o. thought that starving herself & having a boob job is the way to a self gratification, then I would be re-thinking my way of parenting.

This also applies to a child overeating or smoking as well.  :)