» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: 80sRocked on 10/21/03 at 07:09 p.m.

After 7 years of debating whether its ok to stick a needle into the skull of a child and suck their brains out, the Senate finally bans Partial-Birth Abortion.  

Next stop:  GW Bush's desk.


...its about time. :)


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,100713,00.html













Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Rice_Cube on 10/21/03 at 08:13 p.m.

About frickin' time :P  It would have been passed years ago if not for a certain person vetoing it all the time ::)

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: 80sRocked on 10/21/03 at 08:26 p.m.


Quoting:
About frickin' time :P  It would have been passed years ago if not for a certain person vetoing it all the time ::)
End Quote



gee, who could that person be? ::)


IMO, theres regular murder, then theres Partial-Birth abortion.  That ranks above conventional murder, and if anyone condones that barabaric act, they have serious mental disorders.  ehhem Mr Clinton. ;)

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Def_Trick on 10/21/03 at 10:16 p.m.

I'm glad they finally got it banned!  I'm against any form of abortion (unless it occurs naturally, which a woman really can't help), but partial birth has got to be the worst!  It makes no logical sense to me!  30 seconds later, it would have been murder, but before that it's legal?  Seriously!   I can understand why there's contraversy about it before the baby is mature enough to survive outside the womb, even though I've already stated my views on that, but how did partial birth even become an issue?   It makes no sense whatever to me.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: 80sRocked on 10/22/03 at 02:28 a.m.


Quoting:
I'm glad they finally got it banned!  I'm against any form of abortion (unless it occurs naturally, which a woman really can't help), but partial birth has got to be the worst!  It makes no logical sense to me!  30 seconds later, it would have been murder, but before that it's legal?  Seriously!   I can understand why there's contraversy about it before the baby is mature enough to survive outside the womb, even though I've already stated my views on that, but how did partial birth even become an issue?   It makes no sense whatever to me.
End Quote



I agree.

Abortion is one thing, and has arguments on both sides.

But PARTIAL birth abortion is simply dispicable.  The baby is able to be born, so theres no argument whether or not its a "human or not".  And sticking a needle in its head and sucking the brains out is nothing short of barbaric.  I don;t know how anyone can approve of this act.  It is simply murder, no quesition about it.


But neverhteless, some Democrats are prepared to file suit in court to overturn this law. ::)   I guess this barabaric practice is still acceptable to some folks.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: John_Harvey on 10/22/03 at 03:13 p.m.

The reason Clinton vetoed the bill before was because there was no provision that allows for late term abortion when the mother's life is in danger. I am totally against partial birth abortion simply for convenience sake. I'm against abortion in general, but it's stupid that there is not a little blip in the law that allows for abortion in case of health complications.

What do you guys think?

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Joelle on 10/22/03 at 03:14 p.m.

YAY!  ;D

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Billy_Florio on 10/22/03 at 03:21 p.m.


Quoting:
The reason Clinton vetoed the bill before was because there was no provision that allows for late term abortion when the mother's life is in danger. I am totally against partial birth abortion simply for convenience sake. I'm against abortion in general, but it's stupid that there is not a little blip in the law that allows for abortion in case of health complications.

What do you guys think?
End Quote



I dont know why John, but Im shocked that I heard this from you......

anyway, I am 100% against partial birth abortion.....

but to answer John's question, if the mothers life is in danger, then I have no problem with aborting the child to save her life....

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: John_Harvey on 10/22/03 at 03:31 p.m.

Quoting:


I dont know why John, but Im shocked that I heard this from you......

anyway, I am 100% against partial birth abortion.....

but to answer John's question, if the mothers life is in danger, then I have no problem with aborting the child to save her life....
End Quote


What? Did you think I was a parrot? ;D I don't follow EVERYTHING that is a leftist stance.

My concerns about the mothers' health were not addressed in the law, however. Not only does this compromise the mother's health, but it will delay the illegalization of partial birth abortion because now family-planning groups have a reason to get it thrown out.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Indy Gent on 10/22/03 at 05:58 p.m.

Finally, Congress got something right for a change. One can't deny that abortion outside the womb is murder, no matter what pro-Choice advocates might think. I hope the Supreme Court shares in this belief.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Def_Trick on 10/22/03 at 08:15 p.m.

I'm not in the medical field, but I really don't understand how a partial birth abortion could save a mother's life.  Maybe if it's earlier in the term, but what difference does it make to the mother's health if the baby is born alive instead of being killed a few minutes before birth?

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: John_Harvey on 10/22/03 at 10:11 p.m.

Quoting:
I'm not in the medical field, but I really don't understand how a partial birth abortion could save a mother's life.  Maybe if it's earlier in the term, but what difference does it make to the mother's health if the baby is born alive instead of being killed a few minutes before birth?
End Quote


No, this is a ban on late term abortions in general and sometimes there are unforseen complications that might compromise the life of the mother unless an abortion is performed. I'm not a doctor, so I'm not sure of what the complications are, but I'm sure they exist.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Def_Trick on 10/23/03 at 01:47 p.m.

There definately can be complications in a pregnancy.   But if it's late term and the baby can probably live outside the womb anyway, don't they usually just induce labor or perform a C-section?  I've heard of that happening.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: NullandVoid on 10/25/03 at 12:40 a.m.

Thank God, I find early abortion bad enough, but partial birth...disgusting. Finally something Gov does that I agree with. Now let's see if they could ban the death penalty. >:(

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: RockandRollFan on 10/25/03 at 04:01 p.m.

Just another one on clintons MANY horrible  deeds....finally it's being corrected

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: karen (Guest) on 10/27/03 at 05:18 a.m.


Quoting:
There definately can be complications in a pregnancy.   But if it's late term and the baby can probably live outside the womb anyway, don't they usually just induce labor or perform a C-section?  I've heard of that happening.
End Quote



There are some complications either with the mother or the foetus that can't be detected until 16 -20 weeks into pregnancy. (In Britain many mothers do not have an ultrasound scan until 18-20 weeks).  The foetus will not survive if born at that age but cannot be aborted in the usual method.  In these cases the labour is usually induced and the mother gives birth.

This is not to say I approve of this method but just to explain why there are late abortions.  And, by extension, perhaps it was felt that there needed to be a quick way to end the foetus's life.  Not sure that the method chosen was ideal but would anyone care to suggest an alternative?

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: RockandRollFan on 10/27/03 at 05:07 p.m.


Quoting:


 Not sure that the method chosen was ideal but would anyone care to suggest an alternative?
End Quote

NO excuse for waiting until that late stage in a pregnancy....Choose Life!

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Rice_Cube on 10/27/03 at 05:30 p.m.

The ban bill does have an exemption for medical emergencies.  I think we can all understand that.

But using it as a form of birth control is screwed up.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Dagwood on 10/27/03 at 06:16 p.m.


Quoting:
The reason Clinton vetoed the bill before was because there was no provision that allows for late term abortion when the mother's life is in danger. I am totally against partial birth abortion simply for convenience sake. I'm against abortion in general, but it's stupid that there is not a little blip in the law that allows for abortion in case of health complications.

What do you guys think?
End Quote




Ok, I have been gone for a while and will come back and wade right in here...I agree with you, John.(shocking isn't it?)  I am against abortion, too...but if the mothers life were at stake or in the case of rape or incest, then it should be allowed.  Partial birth abortion needs to be banned no matter what...it is just wrong, IMO.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Mike_Florio on 10/27/03 at 08:39 p.m.

Quoting:



Ok, I have been gone for a while and will come back and wade right in here...I agree with you, John.(shocking isn't it?)  I am against abortion, too...but if the mothers life were at stake or in the case of rape or incest, then it should be allowed.  Partial birth abortion needs to be banned no matter what...it is just wrong, IMO.


End Quote



Dag, I think me and you just might agree on everything  :D

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: karen (Guest) on 10/28/03 at 02:35 a.m.


Quoting:

NO excuse for waiting until that late stage in a pregnancy....Choose Life!
End Quote



Mark

Reread my post and you'll see I pointed out reasons why the abortion might not happen until a late stage.  I agree that it isn't an acceptable method for birth control.

A friend of mine didn't find out until a scan at 18 weeks that she was carrying conjoined (Siamese) twins.  The way they were joined meant that they could not be separated and would not survive long after being born.  Would you seriously make someone carry these babies for another 32 weeks so that they could be born 'naturally' and die anyway?

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Dagwood on 10/28/03 at 05:52 a.m.


Quoting:


Dag, I think me and you just might agree on everything  :D
End Quote



I guess great minds think alike! ;D

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: ladybug316 on 10/28/03 at 07:29 a.m.


Quoting:


Mark

Reread my post and you'll see I pointed out reasons why the abortion might not happen until a late stage.  I agree that it isn't an acceptable method for birth control.

A friend of mine didn't find out until a scan at 18 weeks that she was carrying conjoined (Siamese) twins.  The way they were joined meant that they could not be separated and would not survive long after being born.  Would you seriously make someone carry these babies for another 32 weeks so that they could be born 'naturally' and die anyway?
End Quote


I would like to point out that many women agonize over the decision of abortion, and not just have an "oh, well..." approach to ending a pregnancy.  This is not simply a black or white issue as Rockandrollfan would suggest by "Choosing Life".  This must be a case to case basis and as Karen suggests, certainly not an acceptable means of birth control.  There would be no reason to put babies or mothers through such horrors as she suggested of her friend's pregnancy.  I thank the heavens that I've never had to make such a choice.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: RockandRollFan on 10/28/03 at 03:52 p.m.

I feel for your friend karen, I was just putting in my two-cents.... :)..and ladybug316, I meant no offense either ;)

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Mike_Florio on 10/28/03 at 07:33 p.m.

Quoting:


I guess great minds think alike! ;D
End Quote



lol

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Chameleon on 10/29/03 at 04:09 a.m.


Quoting:
About frickin' time :P  It would have been passed years ago if not for a certain person vetoing it all the time ::)
End Quote



8)

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: ladybug316 on 10/29/03 at 07:18 a.m.


Quoting:
I feel for your friend karen, I was just putting in my two-cents.... :)..and ladybug316, I meant no offense either ;)
End Quote

None taken.  That's why it's a debate. :)

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: karen (Guest) on 10/29/03 at 07:21 a.m.


Quoting:
I feel for your friend karen, I was just putting in my two-cents.... :)..and ladybug316, I meant no offense either ;)
End Quote



Sure Mark and I respect your opinion.  I was just pointing out that there are sometimes reasons why women 'chose' another option.  As with many things the issue is not as black and white as people would like.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: RockandRollFan on 11/02/03 at 11:36 a.m.

Thanks ladybug and karen ;)

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: luvmechaparita on 11/02/03 at 07:44 p.m.

I have two things to say to that:
1) I believe that partial birth abortions are wrong, it is murder. Either way you try to look at it, it is murder. If you try to deny it, it won't work. You are killing a human being. I think that any kind of abortion is wrong. Whether it be birth control pills, abortion, anything like that. If you want to have "sexual intercourses", and you get pregnant,then its your fault. If you don't want to get pregnant, then you shouldn't do it in the first place.
and 2) i think anyone who has an abortion should be on trial for murder.

(i am sorry if this offended anybody in any way, i am very outspoken, please do not take any of this offensively)

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: 80sRocked on 11/02/03 at 08:43 p.m.


Quoting:i think anyone who has an abortion should be on trial for murder.End Quote



I agree. :)


I could go out and manually end the life of somebody on the street, and I would get tried and charged for murder.

But for some reason, some think its ok to manually end the life of a baby.  

What a crazy (and sometimes sick) world we live in.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Rice_Cube on 11/02/03 at 11:09 p.m.

For those of you who are adamantly against abortion, would you give a little leeway if the procedure were performed on mothers whose health were being threatened, and were not using it as birth control?

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: ladybug316 on 11/03/03 at 06:38 a.m.


Quoting:
I have two things to say to that:
1) I believe that partial birth abortions are wrong, it is murder. Either way you try to look at it, it is murder. If you try to deny it, it won't work. You are killing a human being. I think that any kind of abortion is wrong. Whether it be birth control pills, abortion, anything like that. If you want to have "sexual intercourses", and you get pregnant,then its your fault. If you don't want to get pregnant, then you shouldn't do it in the first place.
and 2) i think anyone who has an abortion should be on trial for murder.

(i am sorry if this offended anybody in any way, i am very outspoken, please do not take any of this offensively)

End Quote

Did you know that 13 year old rape victims get pregnant all the time?  Why do you assume that "sexual intercourse" and pregnancy are a woman's fault?  I have no problem with your opinion about abortion being wrong, but when you don't have all the angles covered it makes you seem a bit immature.  

Oh, no offense.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Rice_Cube on 11/05/03 at 06:15 p.m.

Judge puts block on abortion bill

Figures ::)  This displeases me.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: RockandRollFan on 11/06/03 at 01:19 p.m.


Quoting:
Judge puts block on abortion bill

Figures ::)  This displeases me.
End Quote

He must be a close friend of former prez Billary clinton ::)

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: Rice_Cube on 11/06/03 at 08:54 p.m.

More blocks of the new law

Figures.  I love it when they legislate from the courts.  It's awesome.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: 80sRocked on 11/06/03 at 09:12 p.m.


Quoting:
More blocks of the new law

Figures.  I love it when they legislate from the courts.  It's awesome.
End Quote



I'm not surprised at all these people are trying to block it.

Yesterday as soon as the bill was signed, there was a groupd of Democrats in Washington plastered on C-SPAN protesting it, saying it was "unconstitutional". ::)  Maybe I missed something, but where in the Constitution does it say its ok to shove a needle into a real live and developed baby's head and suck its brains out?  If anyone can give me a reason why thats not murder, I would love to hear it.

After all, this law didn't ban conventional abortions, it would ban killing a baby in the last tri-mester.  


Although I am not a supporter of abortions in general, I do understand the arguments for using conventional abortions in very very obscure circumstances.  I don't support it, but I acknowledge the arguments (if that makes any sense ???).  

But, as long as I live, I will never support or akcnowledge any excuse to perform late-term, or "partial-birth" abortions.  Its barbaric, its inhumane, its murder.  No question about it.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: resinchaser on 11/07/03 at 07:55 a.m.

I support a mother's right to choose. That's it that's all. No one, and I mean no one has any right to tell me what I should do when it comes to the health of me, my wife, or my baby. This horrible decision that some people are forced to make in no way has any affect on anyone elses life, so the feelings and beliefs of others should not be in question.

Besides, this procedure is extremely rare and is only used in the most serious cases. Cases where the baby will probably be stillborn, or have deformities that will make survival impossible.

Subject: Re: Senate Bans Partial-Birth Abortion, Finally.

Written By: MethodActor85 on 11/09/03 at 02:59 p.m.

Quoting:I support a mother's right to choose. That's it that's all. No one, and I mean no one has any right to tell me what I should do when it comes to the health of me, my wife, or my baby. End Quote



    I agree, and that is why I am a high school student for pro-Choice.

      I remember hearing about a movie once where this woman finds out that her unborn child is going to be a gay male, and her husband wants to have it aborted. It kinda brought up an idea within me...if such profiling about a child's future were available, and you could find out if your child was gay and you disaprove of that lifestyle, or mentally or physically handidcaped, or with a terminally ill defect, or will grow up to be a psychotic serial killer...and there was nothing you could do about it, would you still have it, knowing that this would not be the kind of child you had in mind? I don't presume to know that absolutely every pro-Lifer would change their mind about abortion if they found out the fetus they were carrying would not turn out the kind of child they wanted, but I'm sure some would definitely consider it.

    At the end of the day, abortion happens. It's been happening, I assume, probaly since the beginning of time. Unwanted pregnancies always have happened, and there has been a search of ways to end them. Abortions were illegal in America from 1883 to 1973, and they still happened! Gov't tried to tell women what they could and couldn't do with their pregnancies, and alot of them risked their own lives and health to get illegal abortions because they simply couldn't carry out their pregnancy! So even if it is someday made illegal again, that won't stop it from happening because at the end of the day, abortion is the only option for some women.