» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: CatwomanofV on 03/11/04 at 12:58 a.m.

There was an article in the local paper about our local high school discussing the possibilty of random drug testing in the school. My chiropractor stuck up a discussion about this topic with me yesterday and I thought this would be a good discussion here too.

My chiropractor thinks it is a good idea but I told him that I didn't because it violates the students' civil liberties. He did go one to say that many state employees are subject to the same test-but (as I informed him) when people sign up for those jobs, they are informed that testing can be done. By taking the job, that employee is saying that it is ok to test them. High school students do not have that option. If parents sign forms saying that it was ok, then I wouldn't have a problem.

I know many sports teams also test. Most students before joining the teams are well aware of the proceedure. So in that case, I do not have a problem because students have the OPTION of NOT joining the team if they don't want to be subjected to it. But, the students who don't have the option, I don't like the idea.

Any thoughts?

Cat

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: LyricBoy on 03/11/04 at 01:18 p.m.

Since the PUBLIC schools are government entities, I see RANDOM drug testing as a violation of the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, regardless of whether or not it is associated with sports teams or so on.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

There is no "probable cause" to do random drug tests.  Now, if Junior is staggering down the halls or appears to be otherwise "whacked out" then we have probable cause for drug testing, but that is not RANDOM.

The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 ruling that allows random drug testing for extracurricular activities.  "We find that testing students who participate in extracurricular activities is a reasonably effective means of addressing the school district's legitimate concerns in preventing, deterring, and detecting drug use," Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the court.

But the Court and Thomas missed the point.  This is not a privacy issue.  It is an issue of conducting a search (and seizure of blood evidence) without any probable cause.

The decision should be reversed.

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: Race_Bannon on 03/11/04 at 01:27 p.m.

I don't agreee with random drug testing of HS students, not even scheduled testing for the sports teams.  It is a violation of civil liberties and assumes guilt without cause.
If the football team says it needs to test for drugs, why shouldn't the pep band or the chess club have the same argument? It's just as needless.
The only testing I could accept for sports teams is if the disctrict felt there was risk for steroid abuse, that is a legitamte and applicable health concern that realates to sports activity.

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: Junior on 03/11/04 at 02:06 p.m.

Quoting:

There is no "probable cause" to do random drug tests.  Now, if Junior is staggering down the halls or appears to be otherwise "whacked out" then we have probable cause for drug testing, but that is not RANDOM.

End Quote



Of course, I would never be "whacked out". :D

Anyways, I agree with what LyricBoy said.

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: Wicked on 03/11/04 at 05:05 p.m.

I think that would be pretty bogus.  I don't think they should have video cameras in our schools either...

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/11/04 at 07:34 p.m.

I don't really have an opinion on this but I do hate it when I go into the bathroom and it smells like tobacco and pot :P

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: Secret_Squirrell on 03/11/04 at 08:29 p.m.

Quoting:
My chiropractor thinks it is a good idea but I told him that I didn't because it violates the students' civil liberties.End Quote


Just a quick thought here: but because they're minors are they really protected by laws like that?  Or are they declarations like the Geneva Convention?

Another thought, what do they do when they find someone who failed the drug test?  Kick them out?  Uh-oh, great just what the country needs.. another DODO ("doped-out drop-out"  <- ya like that??  I just thought of it.  Copywrong, No Rights Deserved 2004. Secret Squirrell Enterprises.  There, now everyone who uses that has to pay me. :D).

But then, lots of dopers end up dropping out.  :P

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: @ssKicker on 03/12/04 at 00:03 a.m.

I fully agree with random drugs tests. If the students haven't been taking drugs, they have nothing to worry about. It's no more invasive than taking someone's fingerprints for an inquiry into any other crime.

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/12/04 at 06:04 a.m.

When I was in high school, involved in cheerleading & sports, we had to sign (as did our parents) an "honor code" stating that we would not use illegal drugs/alcohol.  It also listed the consequences of being "caught".  We were never actually tested, but some of my friends were "busted" based on the word of another student (who had been drinking also) and suspended from all extracurricular activities for a short period.  One of my friends hadn't been drinking, but she was still suspended for trying to "cover" for the other.  I think if you're involved in ANY extracurricular activity, you should have to sign one and be subject to random testing.  For the rest of the student body, however, I don't think it's right.

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: Dagwood on 03/12/04 at 06:15 a.m.

I agree with Cheer.  Especially if the extracurricular activities are ones that could be dangerous if you aren't paying attention.  Football, Cheering etc.  Plus, I think it helps these kids think about consequences if they know they could be tested.  Maybe they will think before they partake.

I like the idea of cameras in the halls and classrooms at schools.  If there is a problem and you have a student saying "nope didn't happen" and another student or teacher saying "yes it did" then the cameras can clear that up.  

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: Mr_80s on 03/12/04 at 09:28 a.m.

Quoting:
There was an article in the local paper about our local high school discussing the possibilty of random drug testing in the school. My chiropractor stuck up a discussion about this topic with me yesterday and I thought this would be a good discussion here too.

My chiropractor thinks it is a good idea but I told him that I didn't because it violates the students' civil liberties.
End Quote



Sure, here is a thought.

For all students under the age of 18, just get a parental conscent form.  After all, under the age of 18, the student has no rights.  They are a ward of their parents.

Personally, I wish such a program was available nation wide.  This in conjunction with a good drug program might help parents get involved with their kid's drug activities, and know for a fact if their kids are useing drugs or not.

Of course, if they are over 18, they can always refuse and drop out.  I think most people are forgetting that school is a benefit, and not a right.  And I know that when I was in school, I was real tired of the druggies hastling us "straight" kids.  I could even tell you about the riot that broke out in my HS when 6 of them tried to take the US Flag from myself and 3 other ROTC cadets before a High School football game in 1983, but that is another topic.  :P

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: Rice Cube on 03/12/04 at 10:28 a.m.


Quoting:I could even tell you about the riot that broke out in my HS when 6 of them tried to take the US Flag from myself and 3 other ROTC cadets before a High School football game in 1983, but that is another topic.  :P
End Quote



Oh dude, I have to hear this :D  Don't be disrespecting the flag, punks 8)

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: Joelle on 03/12/04 at 06:54 p.m.


Quoting:
Since the PUBLIC schools are government entities, I see RANDOM drug testing as a violation of the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution, regardless of whether or not it is associated with sports teams or so on.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

There is no "probable cause" to do random drug tests.  Now, if Junior is staggering down the halls or appears to be otherwise "whacked out" then we have probable cause for drug testing, but that is not RANDOM.

The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 ruling that allows random drug testing for extracurricular activities.  "We find that testing students who participate in extracurricular activities is a reasonably effective means of addressing the school district's legitimate concerns in preventing, deterring, and detecting drug use," Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the court.

But the Court and Thomas missed the point.  This is not a privacy issue.  It is an issue of conducting a search (and seizure of blood evidence) without any probable cause.

The decision should be reversed.
End Quote




I completely agree. Contrary to what a lot of people believe, not all teens are like that. I'm not and neither are any of my friends.

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: My_name_is_Kenny on 03/12/04 at 08:43 p.m.

Are there forms you have to fill out allowing them to do random searches of the football team?

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/13/04 at 08:05 a.m.


Quoting:
Are there forms you have to fill out allowing them to do random searches of the football team?
End Quote



It depends.  At schools like mine, there was, but at some, there aren't.  I think in IL, the IHSA requires such a form stating that you will refrain from using drugs/alcohol if you are involved in any sport.  However, it is up to the schools to decide how they are going to determine if athletes are using illegal substances.  I think some of them even do random urine testing, which is covered in their "waiver".

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: Wicked on 03/13/04 at 05:44 p.m.


Quoting:
I agree with Cheer.  Especially if the extracurricular activities are ones that could be dangerous if you aren't paying attention.  Football, Cheering etc.  Plus, I think it helps these kids think about consequences if they know they could be tested.  Maybe they will think before they partake.

I like the idea of cameras in the halls and classrooms at schools.  If there is a problem and you have a student saying "nope didn't happen" and another student or teacher saying "yes it did" then the cameras can clear that up.  
End Quote


I don't like having cameras at my school because they're everywhere, and I hate the feeling that i'm being watched, and at school I know that I am, and it makes me paranoid.  :-/

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: Tony S N Jr Fan on 03/13/04 at 06:16 p.m.


Quoting:
When I was in high school, involved in cheerleading & sports, we had to sign (as did our parents) an "honor code" stating that we would not use illegal drugs/alcohol.  It also listed the consequences of being "caught".  We were never actually tested, but some of my friends were "busted" based on the word of another student (who had been drinking also) and suspended from all extracurricular activities for a short period.  One of my friends hadn't been drinking, but she was still suspended for trying to "cover" for the other.  I think if you're involved in ANY extracurricular activity, you should have to sign one and be subject to random testing.  For the rest of the student body, however, I don't think it's right.
End Quote

I think random drug testing might help students who hide their habit to face up to it and GET HELP. But that can get hairy if the kid and his/her parents don't get along or if the kid's parents are abusive.

Subject: Re: Random Drug Testing in High Schools

Written By: ... on 03/21/04 at 10:40 a.m.

Personally, I have no opinion, since I graduated from HS six years ago; however, it might be a good idea.

Thats all I'm gonna say.  :-X