inthe00s
The Pop Culture Information Society...

These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.

Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.

This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.




Check for new replies or respond here...

Subject: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: Reynolds1863 on 06/13/08 at 4:15 pm

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/chi-r-kelly-verdict-webjun14,0,4739709.story

Still think he's a slime ball.

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: danootaandme on 06/13/08 at 6:01 pm

I can't believe it.  I think he's guilty, and the prosecution probably is at fault for not doing the job right.  This is soooo disgusting.

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: MaxwellSmart on 06/13/08 at 6:03 pm

So I guess the woman in the video was just another one of his peons!
8-P

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: danootaandme on 06/13/08 at 6:04 pm

::)  Maxwell

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: Jessica on 06/13/08 at 7:00 pm


So I guess the woman in the video was just another one of his peons!
8-P


You're so wrong. ;D

Seriously? I think he's guilty. I think the prosecution did their job very well, but they knew as well as everyone else that he was going to get off the hook because he's a celebrity. ::)

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: Reynolds1863 on 06/13/08 at 7:06 pm


So I guess the woman in the video was just another one of his peons!
8-P


Yeah, probably.  However if you look at how much time he spent in and out of court plus court cost . . . she's one expensive target.

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: Red Ant on 06/13/08 at 8:20 pm

R Kelly got off... again.

Ant

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: whistledog on 06/13/08 at 9:11 pm

Man, was it the same jury that worked the O.J. Simpson case?

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: MaxwellSmart on 06/13/08 at 10:11 pm


Man, was it the same jury that worked the O.J. Simpson case?


Yeah, there would be a resemblance, if OJ ran up naked and peed on Anna Nicole and Ron Brown, like he's been peein' on the Brown family ever since the civil judgment.  You don't mess with the Juice, 'coz the Juice is gonna win, and you better hope he does not lose, because he can be such an S.O.B. when he don't get me what I want! 
"Another triple scotch-on-the-rocks was it, Mr. Simpson?"
"What am I, on your Pay-No-Mind-List ovah heah?"
:D

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: haleym8826 on 06/13/08 at 10:35 pm

Actually R. Kelly really is innocent. The case was held for absolutely no reason. the only thing the force knew about the tape was that the guys was black and had corn rows. when they brought R. Kelly in the girl told them herself that it wasn't him and they still held the case anyway. They just wanted something to do to get everyone riled up, that or they just went after him because he had history down that ally

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: MaxwellSmart on 06/13/08 at 11:21 pm


Actually R. Kelly really is innocent. The case was held for absolutely no reason. the only thing the force knew about the tape was that the guys was black and had corn rows. when they brought R. Kelly in the girl told them herself that it wasn't him and they still held the case anyway. They just wanted something to do to get everyone riled up, that or they just went after him because he had history down that ally

If that's not R. Kelly, which porn star is it?
:-\\

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: quirky_cat_girl on 06/13/08 at 11:26 pm

effin figures. ::)

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: haleym8826 on 06/13/08 at 11:28 pm


If that's not R. Kelly, which porn star is it?
:-\\


I'm guessing they dont know and that the girl doesn't plan on sharing anyime soon. so maybe you guys are right and she is just covering for him but my previous post is what I have heard and what i am going to believe for now.

Subject: Re: R. Kelly found not guilty.

Written By: MaxwellSmart on 06/13/08 at 11:44 pm

OK, Now I'm gonna have to tell a Lyndon B. Johsnon story:

OK, he was running for U.S. Senator against the sitting governor of Texas, a dude named "Pappy O'Daniel."

His campaign's trying to nail this beloved former radio talkshow host."

"Well," Lyndon suggests, "We'll tell 'em Pappy O'Daniel f**ks pigs."
"What?"
"I said, "We'll tell them Pappy O'Daniel f**ks pigs!"
"Lyndon...we can't just come out with something like that, it's just slander!"
And LBJ sez:
"We'll let him deny it!"

See, whether R. Kelly done did didn't, don't do did, didn't don't figure in to the fact that the idea and mock-image of him out there urinating on an underaged model will remain his legacy!

Look what happened to Ed Muskie!  He blubbered about after they called his wife a drunk one too many times," and that's the first thing anybody thinks of when they think of Sen. Muskie even though he was secretry of state under Carter (at the end anyway), and before that he had been governor and then senator from Maine! You think Ed Muske, you think

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYhD7iN2vMI

Johnson understood politics and power like Gingrich and Rove!
:o

And Muskie never even cried it was that William Loeb thug over at the Manchester Union-Leader (The Manchester "Loony-Reader" I call it) said he did.  When you see the tape, you can see Muskied is blinking a snowflake out of his eye.  OK, even that's not so macho-sounding, but sometimes a snowflake gets in your eye and you have to blink it out!

Grandpa, what were snowflakes?

Shut up and eat your protein pills!
:o

I mean, just can't find the footage on YouTube, I know I've seen it!

Check for new replies or respond here...