inthe00s
The Pop Culture Information Society...

These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.

Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.

This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.




Check for new replies or respond here...

Subject: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: warped on 05/23/14 at 9:59 am

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view4/1191223/dog-pees-on-curb-o.gif

Discuss.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/23/14 at 3:05 pm

http://i988.photobucket.com/albums/af8/kaiqiaoqingdao/forum%20use/naughtyBoy_zps801ed5f1.gif

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/23/14 at 3:31 pm

How do I start it?  ???

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/23/14 at 3:34 pm


How do I start it?  ???
In a zeitgeist market, the number of new entrants is high, the ability to launch differentiated high value products (the strongest predictor of new product success) is more difficult to achieve, and new forms of business model innovation are required for success (e.g., service and solution innovation rather than product and process innovation; experiential innovation; legal rights and bundling innovation; privacy rights innovation; agency innovation, where businesses act on behalf of customers).

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 05/23/14 at 7:37 pm

Such Zeitgeist! So times! Very decadeology!
zeit·geist


/ˈtsītˌgīst,ˈzīt-/


noun

noun: zeitgeist

the defining spirit or mood of a particular period of history as shown by the ideas and beliefs of the time.

"the story captured the zeitgeist of the late 1960s"

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: 80sfan on 05/23/14 at 7:49 pm

AAaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Inertia on 05/23/14 at 7:58 pm

Is the zeitgeist of decadeology more like the zeitgeist of zoology or the zeitgeist of Scientology?

Is 1867 more like 2001 or 1984? The summer of 1867 seems more like 2001, but the winter has a strict 1984 vibe.  :D

http://i.imgur.com/YdmGHYG.gif

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 05/23/14 at 8:07 pm

Let me hop in my time machine a minute!

The summer of 1867 definately feels like a repeat of 2005. So much so that it's scary.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Inertia on 05/23/14 at 8:13 pm


Let me hop in my time machine a minute!

The summer of 1867 definately feels like a repeat of 2005. So much so that it's scary.


Is the autumn of 1867 more similar to the zeitgeist of 1999 or the zeitgeist 1763?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 05/23/14 at 8:14 pm


Is the autumn of 1867 more similar to the zeitgeist of 1999 or 1763?

I disagree! It's got a 1985 zeitgeist! I was born in '85, I would know!  ;D

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Inertia on 05/23/14 at 8:16 pm


I disagree! It's got a 1985 zeitgeist! I was born in '85, I would know!  ;D


I think the spring of 1867 is more like 1985 than the autumn of 1867. The autumn had a distinct 1999 vibe.  8)

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 05/23/14 at 8:39 pm


I think the spring of 1867 is more like 1985 than the autumn of 1867. The autumn had a distinct 1999 vibe.  8)

Well the 1800's were so happening I can't even!  :D

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: af2010 on 05/23/14 at 9:21 pm

Oh look, another satirical topic about decadeology...

I don't think I've ever used the word 'zeitgeist', but I don't see why it's a problem. Isn't this is a forum to talk about different eras of pop culture?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: whistledog on 05/23/14 at 10:37 pm


I don't think I've ever used the word 'zeitgeist', but I don't see why it's a problem. Isn't this is a forum to talk about different eras of pop culture?


No harm in talking about different eras of pop culture, but when you can't see where the wrong is, then it's decadeology

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/24/14 at 2:22 am


AAaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/24/14 at 2:23 am


Is the zeitgeist of decadeology more like the zeitgeist of zoology or the zeitgeist of Scientology?

Is 1867 more like 2001 or 1984? The summer of 1867 seems more like 2001, but the winter has a strict 1984 vibe.  :D

http://i.imgur.com/YdmGHYG.gif
Is that the swing of zeitgeistism?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/24/14 at 2:25 am


Let me hop in my time machine a minute!

The summer of 1867 definately feels like a repeat of 2005. So much so that it's scary.
Zeitgeists do not a time machine there are already there.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/24/14 at 2:27 am


Is the autumn of 1867 more similar to the zeitgeist of 1999 or the zeitgeist 1763?
Zeitgeists wore thicker coats in the autumn of 1867.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/24/14 at 2:28 am


I disagree! It's got a 1985 zeitgeist! I was born in '85, I would know!  ;D
Where is your 1985  zeitgeist, locked in a cupboard?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/24/14 at 2:29 am


I think the spring of 1867 is more like 1985 than the autumn of 1867. The autumn had a distinct 1999 vibe.  8)
Zeitgeists could start to take their coats of in the spring of 1985.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/24/14 at 2:40 am


Well the 1800's were so happening I can't even!  :D
Happened to quickly

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/24/14 at 2:41 am


Oh look, another satirical topic about decadeology...

I don't think I've ever used the word 'zeitgeist', but I don't see why it's a problem. Isn't this is a forum to talk about different eras of pop culture?
I have known the word, and never used it

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Paul on 05/24/14 at 2:44 am

I'm gonna put dibs on the word 'zeitgeistology'... :P

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/24/14 at 2:45 am


I'm gonna put dibs on the word 'zeitgeistology'... :P
Slap a patent on it quickly!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: AL-B Mk. III on 05/24/14 at 3:19 am

This is the zeitgeist of inthe00s.

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE CHEVROLET SMALL-BLOCK V-8.

Chevrolet's small-block V8 is a famous automobile engine. Nicknamed "mouse motor" (opposed to the big block engine, nicknamed "rat") for its compact dimensions compared to other V8 engines of the time, production began in 1955 with the 265 engine. By 1957 it had grown to 283 cu in (4.6 L), and with the optional Rochester mechanical fuel injection, it became one of the first production engines ever to make one horsepower per cubic inch. This engine was used to power the Corvette, and the Bel Air at that time. It would later be extended to other vehicles as well, and replace the old style 265 V8s. The displacement changed over the years, eventually reaching 400 cu in (6.6 L), but none caught on like the 350 cu in (5.7 L) small-block. This engine is still in production today at General Motors Toluca, Mexico plant (primarily for the GM over-the-counter Goodwrench powerplants), but is no longer offered in current model year vehicles since the year 2004. Its production numbers were impressive, with more than 90,000,000 built. It has been produced in carbureted, mechanical fuel injection, and electronic fuel injection forms.

From 1955-74, the small-block engine was known as the "Turbo-Fire V8".

Although Buick, Cadillac, Oldsmobile, and Pontiac also designed V8 engines (see list of GM engines), it was Chevrolet's 350 cu in (5.7 L) small-block that became the GM corporate standard. Over the years, every American General Motors division except Saturn used the Chevrolet small-block, and its descendants (see GM LT engine and GM LS engine) continue as the company's mainstream V8 design today.

The small-block was on the Ward's 10 Best Engines of the 20th Century list.

Chevrolet tested the small-block twice with no water and no oil at wide-open throttle. The first time it lasted an hour and 15 minutes and the second time it lasted two hours.

Major Versions

Generation 1

The original design of the small block remained remarkably unchanged for its production run, which began in 1955 and ended, in passenger vehicles, in 2003. The engine is still being built today for many aftermarket applications, both to replace worn-out older engines and also by many builders as high-performance applications. There were, however many minor changes made to the engine over the years; these changes are listed below.

    * 1955 - The first year of introduction in 265 cu in (4.3 L) only. As was fairly common for the time, no provision for an oil filter was included in the engine design.
    * 1956 - Oil filtration was introduced, using a sock style filter in a canister.
    * 1957 - The engine came with only front mounts, the side mount bosses were present but not drilled and tapped leaving its retrofitting problematic.
    * 1962 - The block's cylinder wall casting was revised to allow four inch bores. Previously, only certain years of the 283 engine (1958-1962) could be bored safely to four inches.
    * 1968 - The main journal diameter was increased to 2.45 in from 2.30 in and the connecting rod journal diameter was increased to 2.10 in from 2.00 in. This allowed the use of cast iron crankshafts as the previous parts were made of forged steel. The rod bolts were changed from 11/32 in. diameter to 3/8 inch. Additionally, the canister/sock style oil filter was now converted to use spin on filters. The oil fill location was moved from a tube on the front of the intake manifold to a cap on either side valve cover.
    * 1987 - The valve cover surfaces were changed such that cylinder head mounting lip was raised and the bolt location was moved from 4 bolts on the perimeter, to 4 bolts down the centerline of the valve cover (this design debuted on the Corvette in 1985, and Chevrolet 4.3 L the year before). The rear main seal was changed from a 2-piece rubber design to a 1-piece rubber design that used a mounting appliance to hold it in place. This necessitated a change in the flywheel/flexplate bolt pattern as well. Also changed were the mounting angles of the center 2 bolts on each side of the intake manifold (from 90 degrees to 73 degrees) and the lifter bosses were increased in height to accept roller lifters. The alloy heads for use in the Corvette still retain the non-angled bolts (center 2 bolts attaching to the intake). Also all carburetors were done away with and replaced by TBI (throttle-body injection) fuel injection that acts some what like a carburetor.
    * 1996 - This was the last change for the Generation I engine, and continued through the end of the production run in 2003; all 1997-2003 Generation I engines were Vortec truck engines. The cylinder heads were redesigned using improved ports and combustion chambers similar to those in the Generation II LT1. This change resulted in significant power increases.

SB2 and SB2.2

(Small Block/second generation) This engine was produced from 1996 to the present for racing applications only. The cylinder heads were redesigned and the lifter bores were offset. The valve sequence for each head was changed from the traditional E-I-I-E-E-I-I-E to a new I-E-I-E-E-I-E-I and because of this the camshaft was redesigned.

Generation II
LT1 from a 1993 Chevrolet Camaro Z28

See the GM LT engine page for more information on the Generation II small-block V8s, which differ mainly in their reverse-flow cooling system.

Generation III / IV
LS1 from a 1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28

See the GM LS engine page for more information on the current family of General Motors small-block V8s.

Early Small Blocks

The first small block Chevrolet V-8 was a 265 cu in (4.3 L) engine that was developed in 1955 for the Corvette. Displacement and power eventually reached 327 cu in (5.4 L) and 375 hp (280 kW) (in prototypes) before the Corvette switched to Chevrolet big-block power. Although less powerful than big blocks, small block engines have remained popular due to their lower cost (including the cost of performance add-ons) and solid performance and reliability.

265

The 265 cu in (4.3 L) V8 was the first Chevrolet small block. Designed by Ed Cole's group at Chevrolet, it filled the power gap in the 1955 Corvette lineup, producing an impressive 250 hp (186 kW). The little engine went from drawings to production in just 15 weeks. Besides its compact dimensions, the small-block was known for its novel green-sand foundry construction process.

Dimensions were oversquare - 3.75 in (95 mm) bore and 3 in (76 mm) stroke. The small-block's 4.4 in (111.8 mm) bore spacing would continue in use for decades. It was a pushrod cast-iron engine with hydraulic lifters and a 2-barrel or 4-barrel Rochester carburetor. The 1955 conventional passenger car version produced 162 hp (121 kW) with a 2-barrel carburetor, or could be upgraded at extra cost to a "Power Pack" version conservatively rated at 180 hp (134 kW) with a four-barrel Rochester and dual exhaust. The first production year of this engine had no provision for oil filtration built into the block; however, an add-on filter mounted on the thermostat housing was installed during production. Due to the lack of adequate oil filtration provisions, the '55 model year block is typically only desirable to period collectors.

The 1956 Corvette introduced three versions of this engine - 210 hp (157 kW), 225 hp (168 kW) with twin 4-barrel carbs, and 240 hp (179 kW) with a high-lift cam.

    * 1955, 1956 Chevrolet Corvette
    * 1955 Chevrolet, 165 hp (123 kW) (2-barrel) and 195 hp (145 kW) (4-barrel)

283

The 283 cu in (4.6 L) V8 was introduced in 1957. It was a version of the 265 cu in (4.3 L) with a larger bore at 3.87 in (98 mm). There were five different versions ranging from 185 hp (138 kW) to 283 hp (211 kW) depending on whether a single carb, twin carbs, or fuel injection was used. Power was up a bit each year for 1958, 1959, and 1960.

The 1957 engine featured Ramjet mechanical fuel injection, allowing the engine to produce 1 hp (1 kW) per cubic inch, an impressive feat at the time. For 1961, an amazing 315 hp (235 kW) was available from this unit.

    * 1957-1962 Chevrolet Corvette

302

Chevrolet produced a special 302 cu in (4.9 L) engine for Trans Am racing from 1967-1969. It was the product of placing the 3-inch stroke crankshaft from a 283 into a 4-inch bore 327 block. This engine was mostly used in the first-generation Camaro Z28. Just over 100 DZ block 302 engines were used in the, unique to South Africa, Chevrolet Firenza Can Am. Conservatively rated at 290 hp (216 kW), actual output was around 360 hp (268 kW). This block is one of 3 displacements that underwent a transformation for the 1968/1969 period when the main bearing size was increased from 2.30 in to 2.45 in.

307

A 307 cu in (5 L) version was produced from 1968 through 1973. Engine bore was 3.875 inches (98.4 mm) with a 3.25-inch (82.6 mm) stroke.

The 307 replaced the 283 in Chevrolet cars and produced 200 hp (149 kW) SAE gross at 4600 rpm and 300 lb·ft (407 N·m) of torque at 2400 rpm in the 1960s. The later emissions-modified versions produced just 115 hp (86 kW) SAE net, giving the engine one of the lowest power-per-displacement ratings of all time. Chevrolet never produced a high-performance version of this engine, though they did produce, for Outboard Marine Corporation, a high-performance marinized 307, rated at 235 hp (175 kW) and 245 hp (183 kW) SAE gross, depending on year, that shipped with the Corvette/Z-28's cast aluminum valve covers and Rochester QuadraJet carb. Chevy also built other versions of the OMC 307 rated at 210 hp (157 kW), 215 hp (160 kW) and 225 hp (168 kW) SAE gross.

One of the biggest myths about the 307 is that all the blocks were cast with a very low nickel content. However, some 307 blocks, such as casting number 3970020 with suffix VxxxxTHA (x's in place for date), had 010 and 020 stamped under the timing chain cover indicating high tin and nickel content.

327

The 327 cu in (5.4 L) V8, introduced in 1962, had a bore and stroke of 4 in (102 mm) by 3.25 in. Power ranged from 250 hp (186 kW) to 375 hp (280 kW) depending on the choice of carburetor or fuel injection, camshaft, cylinder heads, pistons and intake manifold. In 1962, the Duntov solid lifter cam versions produced 340 hp (254 kW), 344 lb·ft (466 N·m) with single Carter 4-brl, and 360 hp (268 kW), 352 lb·ft (477 N·m) with Rochester mechanical fuel injection. In 1964, horsepower increased to 365 hp (272 kW) for the now dubbed L79 version, and 375 hp (280 kW) for the fuel injected L84 respectively, making the L84 the most powerful naturally aspirated, single-cam, production small block V8 until the appearance of the 385 hp (287 kW), 385 lb·ft (522 N·m) Generation III LS6 in 2001. * L79, L84 1963-1965; Chevrolet Corvette. This block is one of three displacements that under went a major change in 1968/1969 when the main bearing size was increased from 2.30 to 2.4 inches (58.4–61.0 mm). In 1965 the SS malibu choice of the 327/350 hp know as the "L79", with a aluminum manifold, holley squarebore carb, chrome valve covers, a huge 8" balancer, huge 2.02" intake valves and could only be ordered with a 4 speed trans.

400

A 400 cu in (6.6 L) small-block was introduced in 1970 and produced for 10 years. It had a 4.125-inch (104.8 mm) bore and a 3.75-inch (95.3 mm) stroke. Initial output was 265 hp (198 kW) and was only available equipped with a 2-barrel carburetor. In 1974 a 4-barrel version of the 400 was introduced,while the 2-barrel version stopped production in 1975. 1976 was the last year that the 400 was used in a Chevrolet Passenger car, available in both the A-Body and B-Body line. While popular with circle-track racers, the engine was prone to cooling troubles if cylinder heads without steam holes were used. they mostly put out 250 hp stock.

Later Small Blocks

This section documents the odd-size small blocks developed after the 350 appeared in 1969. Many of these basic blocks are variations of the 350 design.

262

The 262 was a 262 cu in (4.3 L) 90° pushrod V8 with an iron block and heads. Bore and stroke were 3.67 in (93 mm) by 3.10 in (78.7 mm). Power output for 1975 was 110 hp (82 kW) and 195 lb·ft (264 N·m). The 262 was underpowered and was replaced by the 305 the following year.

This was Chevrolet's second 4.3 L-displacement powerplant; two other Chevrolet engines displaced 4.3 L: the Vortec 4300 (based on the Chevrolet 350, with two cylinders removed), and a derivative of the LT1 known as the L99 (using the 305's 3.736-inch bore, 5.94-inch connecting rods, and a 3-inch crankshaft stroke).

This engine was used in the following cars:

    * 1975-1976 Chevrolet Monza
    * 1975 Chevrolet Nova

267

The 267 was introduced in 1979 for GM F-Body(Camaro), G-bodies (Chevrolet Monte Carlo, El Camino, and Malibu Classic) and also used on GM B-body cars (Impala and Caprice models). The 267 cu in (4.4 L) had the 350's crankshaft stroke of 3.48" and the smallest bore of any small-block, 3.500 in. The 3.500" bore was also used on the 200 cu in (3.3 L) V6, which was introduced a year earlier. (The 200 was a Chevrolet V6 engine based on the small block with the #3 and #6 cylinders removed).

It was available with a Rochester Dualjet 210 - effectively a Rochester Quadrajet with no rear barrels. After 1980, electronic feedback carburetion was used on the 267.

While similar in displacement to the other 4.3-4.4 L V8 engines produced by General Motors (including the Oldsmobile 260 and Pontiac 265, the small bore 267 shared no parts with the other engines and was phased out after the 1982 model year due to inability to conform to emission standards. Chevrolet vehicles eventually used the 305 cu in (5 L) as its base V8 engine.

305

The 305 variant of the small-block Chevrolet had a displacement of 305 cu in (5 L) with a 3.736-inch (95 mm) bore and 3.48-inch (88.4 mm) stroke. The 262 was considered underpowered for use in vehicles with a wheelbase greater than 110 inches, so GM engineers decided to increase the bore diameter from 3.671 to 3.736 inches (93.2–94.9 mm) and increase the stroke from 3.10 to 3.48 inches (78.7–88.4 mm) (from the 350). Some performance enthusiasts have noted a marked resistance to performance upgrades on the 305 because of its small bore, poor selection of aftermarket cylinder heads, and the relatively high availability of 350 cu in (5.7 L) engines.

Induction systems for the 305 included carburetors (both 2 and 4-barrel), throttle-body injection (TBI), tuned-port fuel injection (TPI), and sequential fuel injection (GM Vortec).

After 1996, its usage was limited to light trucks and SUVs as the Vortec 5000.
Year hp (kW) lb·ft (N·m)
1976 140 250 w/2bbl.
1977 145 245 w/2bbl.
1978 140 240 w/2bbl.
1978 160 235 w/4bbl.
1979 130 245 w/2bbl.
1979† 125 235 w/2bbl.
1980 155 240 w/4bbl.
1981 150 240 w/4bbl

† California Emissions

The 305 was used in the following cars:

    * 1977-1993 Chevrolet Caprice (includes Impala)
    * 1977-1986 Pontiac Parisienne
    * 1976-1979 Chevrolet Monza
    * 1976-1979 Chevrolet Nova (also GM X-body clones after 1976)
    * 1976-1992 Chevrolet Camaro
    * 1976-1988 Chevrolet Malibu, Chevrolet El Camino, and Chevrolet Monte Carlo
    * 1978-1992 Pontiac Firebird
    * 1978-1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass (US Market only, Canadian market 1978-1987)
    * 1991-1992 Oldsmobile Custom Cruiser
    * 1981-1987 Pontiac Grand Prix
    * 1975-1979 Buick Skylark
    * 1977-2003 Chevrolet/GMC Trucks, SUVs, Vans
    * 1991-1992 Cadillac Brougham

LG3

Years:1976-1980

Dualjet 2 bbl carb version with 8.5:1 compression.

LG4

Years: 1980-1987

The LG4 was the "low output" 305 cu in (5 L) (compared to the L69). It produced 150 hp (112 kW)-170 hp (127 kW) and 240 lb·ft (325 N·m)-250 lb·ft (339 N·m). The addition of a knock sensor for the engine management system in 1985 allowed an increase in compression and a more aggressive spark timing map in the ECM. As a result power increased for the 1985 models to 165 hp (123 kW) from the 150 hp (112 kW) rating in 1984.

L69

Years: 1983-1986

The L69 was the last true H.O. engine. The High Output 5 L (305 cu in) , featuring higher compression of 9.5:1 with heads of the to-be-discontinued LU5 Cross-Fire fuel injection engine, and utilizing camshaft and 4" catalytic converter of the 5.7 L (350 cu in) L83 which was used on the Corvette of 1982 and 1984. Complete with a 2.75 inch exhaust system, topped by a recalibrated 4-barrel carburetor, dual snorkel air cleaner assembly, aluminum intake manifold, aluminum flywheel, electric cooling fan, and furthermore a knock sensor including more aggressive spark timing, this engine produced 190 hp (142 kW) @ 4800 and 240 lb·ft (325 N·m) of torque @ 3200 rpm. In most cases, being mated to a 3.73 or 3:42 ratio limited slip rear axle and a T5 5-speed or 700R4 automatic, this engine provided its driver with a wide range of rpm to play in.

LE9

Years: 1981-1986

The LE9 5 L (305 cu in) was the truck/van version of the High Output 305. It also had flattop pistons for a 9.5:1 compression ratio, the "929" truck 350 camshaft for more torque, 14022601 casting heads featuring 1.84/1.50" valves and 53 cc chambers, a specially calibrated 4bbl Q-Jet, the hybrid centrifugal/vacuum advance distributor with ESC knock sensor setup, and lower restriction exhaust. The engine made 210 hp (157 kW) @ 4,600 and 250 lb·ft (339 N·m) @ 2,000 rpm.

L03

Years: 1987-95

The L03 was the "low output" 5 L (305 cu in) (compared to the 305 TPI LB9). It produced 170 hp (127 kW) and 255 lb·ft (346 N·m) of torque (190 hp (142 kW) at 4,400 rpm and 275 lb·ft (373 N·m) at 2,400 in 1993-1995 GM trucks). This engine used throttle-body fuel injection. The TBI uses a unique injector firing scheme, for every rotation of the engine, each injector fired twice.

LB9

Years: 1985-1992

Introduced in 1985, the LB9 was the first Chevrolet small block to have tuned-port fuel injection (TPI). It was introduced with 215 hp (160 kW) and 275 lb·ft (373 N·m) and varied between 190 hp (142 kW)-230 hp (172 kW) (with 275 lb·ft (373 N·m)-300 lb·ft (407 N·m) of torque) over the years offered. It was an option on all 1985-1992 Chevrolet Camaro & Pontiac Firebird models.

350
Not to be confused with Buick V8 engine, Oldsmobile V8 engine, or Pontiac V8 engine.

The first generation of Chevrolet small-blocks began with the 1955 Chevrolet 265 cu in (4.3 L) V8. But it was the 350 cu in (5.7 L) series that came to be emblematic of the Chevrolet small block V8 engine. The engine's physical dimensions (oversquare 4.00-inch bore and 3.48-inch stroke, 102 mm by 88 mm) are nearly identical to the 400 hp (298 kW) LS2 engine of today, but much has changed. It is by far the most widely used Chevrolet small-block; it has been installed in everything from station wagons to sports cars, in commercial vehicles, and even in boats and (in highly modified form) airplanes.

First usage of the 350 was in the 1967 Chevrolet Camaro and 1968 Nova producing 295 horsepower (gross); other Chevrolet vehicle lines followed suit in the year 1969.

The GM Goodwrench 350 crate engine comes in several variations. The lowest priced uses the pre-1986 four-bolt casting molds with two dipstick locations; pre-1980 on the driver's side and post-1980 on the passenger's side. This engine was produced in Mexico since 1981 as the Targetmaster 350, and now the GM Goodwrench 350.

ZQ3

Years: 1969, 1970, 1972-1975

The ZQ3 was the standard engine in the 1969-1970 Chevrolet Corvette. It was a 300 hp (224 kW) version of the 350 cu in (5.7 L) small-block, with 10.25:1 compression and hydraulic lifters. It used a Rochester "4MV" Quadra-Jet 4-barrel carburetor. This was the first block produced that featured the larger 2.45 inch main bearing versus the older 2.30 inch main bearing in 1968/1969.

The 1969 ZQ3 produced 200 hp (149 kW) and 300 lb·ft (407 N·m) with 8.5:1 compression, dropping another 10 hp (7 kW) in 1973. 1975 saw the ZQ3 at 165 hp (123 kW) and 255 lb·ft (346 N·m).

L46

Years: 1969, 1970

The L46 was an optional engine on the 1969-1970 Chevrolet Corvette. It was a 350 hp (261 kW), 380 lb·ft (515 N·m) version of the ZQ3 with higher 11:1 compression.

LT-1
LT-1 from a 1970 Chevrolet Camaro Z28

Years: 1970-1972

The LT-1 was the ultimate 350 cu in (5.7 L) V8, becoming available in 1970. It used solid lifters, 11:1 compression, a high-performance camshaft, and a Holley four-barrel carburetor on a special aluminum intake to produce 370 hp (276 kW) and 380 lb·ft (515 N·m). It was available on the Corvette and Camaro Z28. Power was down in 1971 to 330 hp (246 kW) and 360 lb·ft (488 N·m) with 9:1 compression, and again in 1972 (the last year of the LT-1) to 255 hp (190 kW) and 280 lb·ft (380 N·m).

There was also a later small-block engine called the "LT1".

L48

Years: 1967-1980

The L-48 is the original 350 cu in (5.7 L), available only in the Camaro or Chevy II/Nova in '67 & '68. In '69 it was used in almost everything; Camaros, Corvettes, Impalas, Chevelles & Novas. From '75-'80 it was available only in the Corvette. L-48's use a Hyd Cam, 4bbl Qjet, Cast pistons, 2 bolt main caps, "Pink" Rods, #0014 Blocks & #993 heads. Power output ranges from 300HP(gross) down to 175HP(net).

The L48 was the standard engine in the 1971 Chevrolet Corvette. It produced 270 hp (201 kW) and 360 lb·ft (488 N·m) with an 8.5:1 compression ratio.

The 1976-1979 L48 was the standard Corvette engine and produced 180 hp (134 kW) and 270 lb·ft (366 N·m). The 1980 L48 stood at 190 hp (142 kW) and 280 lb·ft (380 N·m) from 8.2:1 compression.

In 1972 the only way to get a L48 (4bbl V8) in a Chevy Nova was to get the Super Sport Package. This is indicated by the 5th digit in the VIN being a "K". 1972 was the only year you could verify the Super Sport package by the VIN.

In 1973 the "L-48" had cold air induction (throttle activated) and developed 190 hp (142 kW) (net). Beginning in 1974 the hp was reduced for several years until it reached a low of 165 hp (123 kW) (net) in 1975, before rising again.

L82

Years: 1973-1980

The 1973-1974 L82 was a "performance" version of the 350 producing 250 hp (186 kW) and 285 lb·ft (386 N·m) from 9:1 compression. It was down to 205 hp (153 kW) and 255 lb·ft (346 N·m) for 1975. It was the optional engine again in 1976-1977, producing 5 hp (4 kW) more. The 1978 L82 recovered somewhat, producing 220 hp (164 kW) and 260 lb·ft (353 N·m), and then 5 hp (4 kW) and 10 lb·ft (14 N·m) more for 1979. 1980 saw yet another 10 hp (7 kW) and 15 lb·ft (20 N·m).

L81

Years: 1981

The L81 was the only 5.7 L (350 cu in) Corvette engine for 1981. It produced 190 hp (142 kW) and 280 lb·ft (380 N·m) from 8.2:1 compression, exactly the same as the 1980 L48, but added computer control spark advance, replacing the vacuum advance.

L83

Years: 1982, 1984

The 1982 L83 was again the only Corvette engine (and only available with an automatic transmission) producing 200 hp (149 kW) and 285 lb·ft (386 N·m) from 9:1 compression. This was again the only engine on the new 1984 Vette, at 205 hp (153 kW) and 290 lb·ft (393 N·m). The L83 added Cross-Fire fuel injection (twin throttle-body fuel injection).

L98

    For the new Generation IV V8, see GM L98.

Years: 1985-1992

The new 1985 L98 added tuned-port fuel injection "TPI", which produced 230 hp (172 kW) and 330 lb·ft (447 N·m). It was standard on all 1985-1991 Corvettes (rated at 230 hp (172 kW)-250 hp (186 kW) and 330 lb·ft (447 N·m)-350 lb·ft (475 N·m)). Optional on 87-92 Chevrolet Camaro & Pontiac Firebird models (rated at 225 hp (168 kW)-245 hp (183 kW) and 330 lb·ft (447 N·m)-345 lb·ft (468 N·m)) 1987 versions had 10 hp (7 kW) and 15 lb·ft (20 N·m) more thanks to 9.5:1 compression. Compression was up again in 1991 to 10:1 but output stayed the same.

LM1

The LM1 is the base 5.7 L (350 cu in) with a 4-barrel carburetor (usually with a Rochester Quadrajet) in passenger cars until 1988. Throughout its lifespan, it received either a points, electronic, and/or computer-controlled spark system, to conventional and feedback carburetors.

LM1s were superseded with the LO5 powerplant after 1988.

L05

The L05 was introduced in 1987 for use in Chevrolet/GMC trucks in both the GMT400 (introduced in April 1987 as 1988 models) and the R/V series trucks such as the K5 Blazer, Suburban, and rounded-era pickups formerly classed as the C/K until 1996 which includes chassis cabs and 4-door crew cabs. Although usage was for trucks, vans, and 9C1-optioned Caprices, the L05 was also used with the following vehicles:

    * 1992/1993 Buick Roadmaster sedan and station wagon
    * 1991/1992 Cadillac Brougham (optional engine)
    * 1993 Cadillac Fleetwood
    * 1992/1993 Chevrolet Caprice Wagon (optional engine)
    * 1993 Chevrolet Caprice LTZ
    * 1992 Oldsmobile Custom Cruiser Wagon (optional engine)

L05 usage was replaced by the GM LT1 after 1993 in GM B-Bodies until production ceased in 1996.

In mid 1996 the L05 was equipped with Vortec heads used in the 1996 G30.

L31

The L31 replaced the LO5 in 1996 - known as the Vortec 5700. Known as the GEN 1+, this was the final incarnation of the 1955-vintage small block, ending production in 2005 with the last vehicle being a Kodiak/Topkick HD truck. Volvo Penta and Mercury Marine still produces the L31. The "MARINE" intake is a potential upgrade for L31 trucks.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/24/14 at 7:16 am


Is the zeitgeist of decadeology more like the zeitgeist of zoology or the zeitgeist of Scientology?

Is 1867 more like 2001 or 1984? The summer of 1867 seems more like 2001, but the winter has a strict 1984 vibe.  :D

http://i.imgur.com/YdmGHYG.gif


LIAR!  :D

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/24/14 at 7:17 am


Let me hop in my time machine a minute!

The summer of 1867 definately feels like a repeat of 2005. So much so that it's scary.


How do you know what the summer of 1867 felt like?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/24/14 at 7:18 am


I think the spring of 1867 is more like 1985 than the autumn of 1867. The autumn had a distinct 1999 vibe.  8)


Let me ask what the spring of 1867 felt like, Were there any weather men in 1867?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: whistledog on 05/24/14 at 10:40 am


How do you know what the summer of 1867 felt like?


You missed out on some good times

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Dagwood on 05/24/14 at 12:08 pm


How do you know what the summer of 1867 felt like?


Didn't you read the post?  She hopped in her time machine.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: warped on 05/24/14 at 5:39 pm


How do you know what the summer of 1867 felt like?


A party in Canada that year, For in 1867 we became a country. Huge summer here. The zeitgeist of Canada's history.

http://f.kulfoto.com/pic/0001/0038/8es6M37878.jpg

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/24/14 at 5:41 pm


You missed out on some good times



I guess so, I should ask Abraham Lincoln what the weather was back then.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/24/14 at 5:41 pm


Didn't you read the post?  She hopped in her time machine.


Can I hop in her time machine?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: warped on 05/24/14 at 5:45 pm


How do you know what the summer of 1867 felt like?


You missed out on some good times




I guess so, I should ask Abraham Lincoln what the weather was back then.


Lincoln died in 1865, which felt like 1954 to a decazeitgeistologist.
Talking to Lincoln in 1867 would have been a one way conversation.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Dagwood on 05/24/14 at 5:48 pm


Can I hop in her time machine?


I don't know.  You'd have to ask her. :D

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/24/14 at 6:28 pm


I don't know.  You'd have to ask her. :D


when will she be back on?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Inertia on 05/24/14 at 6:51 pm


Let me ask what the spring of 1867 felt like, Were there any weather men in 1867?


It felt like 1927.  ;D

Everyone was a meterologist in 1867. They looked outside to see whether or not it was raining.  :P

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Dagwood on 05/24/14 at 7:25 pm


when will she be back on?


Dunno...my crystal ball is in the shop. ;D

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: whistledog on 05/25/14 at 12:01 pm


when will she be back on?


Monday, May 26th at 8:57pm ET

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/25/14 at 3:28 pm


It felt like 1927.  ;D

Everyone was a meterologist in 1867. They looked outside to see whether or not it was raining.  :P



So there weren't any television weathermen back in 1867?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/25/14 at 3:29 pm


Monday, May 26th at 8:57pm ET


you sure about that?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: whistledog on 05/25/14 at 9:14 pm


you sure about that?


Yes.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 05/26/14 at 4:25 am


when will she be back on?

I missed the fun. I was at work...not a zeitgeist kind of place.  :(

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/26/14 at 7:15 am


Yes.


Ok, I'll be waiting but if she's not on by the time I get home, you're gonna get it. :P

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/26/14 at 7:16 am


I missed the fun. I was at work...not a zeitgeist kind of place.  :(


There's always fun.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Inertia on 05/26/14 at 9:22 am


I missed the fun. I was at work...not a zeitgeist kind of place.  :(


I just got off work. Fun fun fun.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/26/14 at 3:05 pm


I just got off work. Fun fun fun.


me too, I had an early shift, thank god I'm tired and having something to eat! :P

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: warped on 05/26/14 at 4:09 pm


Monday, May 26th at 8:57pm ET


But it could have been a Wednesday because decazeitgeitologists only have 4 days in a week, because Sunday feels like Saturday and are lumped into the weekend , Wednesday and Thursday fall into Tuesday, because all 3 have the same asymmetrical zeitgeist vibe of not being the first or last working day of the week. 

So the Moody Blues "Tuesday Afternoon" is really Simon and Garfunkel's "Wednesday morning, 3am"

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Inertia on 05/27/14 at 2:36 am


me too, I had an early shift, thank god I'm tired and having something to eat! :P


I always work 10pm to 7am.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/27/14 at 2:43 am



So there weren't any television weathermen back in 1867?
The weather back than was broadcast on the telegraph.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/27/14 at 3:10 am


But it could have been a Wednesday because decazeitgeitologists only have 4 days in a week, because Sunday feels like Saturday and are lumped into the weekend , Wednesday and Thursday fall into Tuesday, because all 3 have the same asymmetrical zeitgeist vibe of not being the first or last working day of the week. 

So the Moody Blues "Tuesday Afternoon" is really Simon and Garfunkel's "Wednesday morning, 3am"
So David Bowie's "Thursday's Child" becomes "Tuesday's Child"?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: warped on 05/27/14 at 6:59 am


So David Bowie's "Thursday's Child" becomes "Tuesday's Child"?


Or Matt Munro's "Wednesday's child"

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/27/14 at 7:16 am


But it could have been a Wednesday because decazeitgeitologists only have 4 days in a week, because Sunday feels like Saturday and are lumped into the weekend , Wednesday and Thursday fall into Tuesday, because all 3 have the same asymmetrical zeitgeist vibe of not being the first or last working day of the week. 

So the Moody Blues "Tuesday Afternoon" is really Simon and Garfunkel's "Wednesday morning, 3am"


that's too much.  :o

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/27/14 at 7:17 am


I always work 10pm to 7am.


I work 10-2 weekends.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/27/14 at 7:25 am


Or Matt Munro's "Wednesday's child"
So it's goodbye to "Ruby Tuesday" and how many days is it now for the Beatles in "Eight Days a Week"?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/27/14 at 7:37 pm


The weather back than was broadcast on the telegraph.


pretty interesting.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/28/14 at 5:47 am


I disagree! It's got a 1985 zeitgeist! I was born in '85, I would know!  ;D
“The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 06/05/14 at 3:19 am

"They say you can do honest, sincere work for decades, but you're given in general a 10-year period when what you do touches the zeitgeist - when you're relevant. And I'm aware of that, and I don't want my time to go by."
― Alexander Payne

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 06/23/14 at 2:01 am


The weather back than was broadcast on the telegraph.

pretty interesting.
Then by telegram.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 06/23/14 at 3:27 pm


Then by telegram.


http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5171/5454034960_056b51ff2b_z.jpg

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 06/23/14 at 3:28 pm


http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5171/5454034960_056b51ff2b_z.jpg
It's blank!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 06/23/14 at 3:29 pm


http://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5171/5454034960_056b51ff2b_z.jpg
No news is good news.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 06/23/14 at 4:21 pm


It's blank!


it was an example.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 06/23/14 at 4:26 pm


it was an example.
It is the quickest, surest and safest way to send money.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 06/24/14 at 3:30 pm


It is the quickest, surest and safest way to send money.


you could still send money via Western Union.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 06/25/14 at 9:06 am


you could still send money via Western Union.
http://stlinusonlineinstitute.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/images/western_union1.67223627_std.jpg

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 06/25/14 at 3:31 pm


http://stlinusonlineinstitute.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/images/western_union1.67223627_std.jpg


Do you have to pay for anything?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 06/25/14 at 3:37 pm


Do you have to pay for anything?
I was expecting you to know that.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 06/25/14 at 4:34 pm


I was expecting you to know that.


never used Western Union.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 06/25/14 at 4:44 pm


never used Western Union.
Neither have I

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 06/26/14 at 7:15 am

You can send money via computer technology.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 06/27/14 at 3:56 am


You can send money via computer technology.
But can it be safe.... ?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 06/27/14 at 3:37 pm


But can it be safe.... ?


It may contain personal information.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 06/27/14 at 3:39 pm


It may contain personal information.
Personal information of your bank account!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 06/27/14 at 4:29 pm


Personal information of your bank account!


information could leak out.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 06/27/14 at 4:29 pm


information could leak out.
...or be hacked into?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 06/28/14 at 7:02 am


...or be hacked into?


definitely a possibility.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/02/14 at 11:19 am


definitely a possibility.
By the CIA?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 07/02/14 at 2:38 pm


By the CIA?


or The FBI? :o

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/03/14 at 4:50 am


or The FBI? :o
Budget, mission and priorities

In the fiscal year 2012, the bureau's total budget was approximately $8.12 billion.

The FBI's main goal is to protect and defend the United States, to uphold and enforce the criminal laws of the United States, and to provide leadership and criminal justice services to federal, state, municipal, and international agencies and partners.

Currently, the FBI's top investigative priorities are:

    Protect the United States from terrorist attacks (see counter-terrorism);
    Protect the United States against foreign intelligence operations and espionage (see counterintelligence);
    Protect the United States against cyber-based attacks and high-technology crimes (see cyberwarfare);
    Combat public corruption at all levels;
    Protect civil rights;
    Combat transnational/national criminal organizations and enterprises (see organized crime);
    Combat major white-collar crime;
    Combat significant violent crime.

In August 2007, the top categories of lead criminal charges resulting from FBI investigations were:

    Bank robbery and incidental crimes (107 charges)
    Drugs (104 charges)
    Attempt and conspiracy (81 charges)
    Material involving sexual exploitation of minors (53 charges)
    Mail fraud – frauds and swindles (51 charges)
    Bank fraud (31 charges)
    Prohibition of illegal gambling businesses (22 charges)
    Fraud by wire, radio, or television (20 charges)
    Hobbs Act (Robbery and extortion affecting interstate commerce) (17 charges)
    Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)–prohibited activities (17 charges)

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/11/14 at 12:21 pm


information could leak out.
There is always the problem with leakage.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/11/14 at 12:54 pm

The motivation for the old quantum condition was the correspondence principle, complemented by the physical observation that the quantities which are quantized must be adiabatic invariants. Given Planck's quantization rule for the harmonic oscillator, either condition determines the correct classical quantity to quantize in a general system up to an additive constant.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/11/14 at 1:43 pm

Yet another possible candidate for the fourth condition of knowledge is indefeasibility. Defeasibility theory maintains that there should be no overriding or defeating truths for the reasons that justify one's belief. For example, suppose that person S believes he saw Tom Grabit steal a book from the library and uses this to justify the claim that Tom Grabit stole a book from the library. A possible defeater or overriding proposition for such a claim could be a true proposition like, "Tom Grabit's identical twin Sam is currently in the same town as Tom." When no defeaters of one's justification exist, a subject would be epistemically justified.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 07/11/14 at 3:58 pm


There is always the problem with leakage.


How is that a problem?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/11/14 at 4:02 pm


How is that a problem?
The drips get everywhere.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/11/14 at 4:19 pm


How is that a problem?
The source of a leak is not necessarily the same place that you have found water. Trace the water back until you find the point where it emerges from the wall. Be thorough as there may be more than one entry point.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 07/11/14 at 4:25 pm


The source of a leak is not necessarily the same place that you have found water. Trace the water back until you find the point where it emerges from the wall. Be thorough as there may be more than one entry point.


Like a leak in the basement.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/11/14 at 4:26 pm


Like a leak in the basement.
Once you have dealt with the crack in the walls you need to apply a waterproof sealant to protect against any future damage. These sealants should be applied to a wet or damp wall and will need to be left to dry completely before you apply a second coat.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/11/14 at 4:39 pm

In this instance it's always a good idea to firstly get some WD40 or other easing fluid and spray down into the area where the screw fixes in and also into any other areas around the tap handle/cover and also up under the bottom edge of the cover if possible. Leave for ten minutes or so to allow the fluid to penetrate and try to remove the head of the tap again. If you are still unable to get it off try applying more easing fluid.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 07/12/14 at 7:07 am


Once you have dealt with the crack in the walls you need to apply a waterproof sealant to protect against any future damage. These sealants should be applied to a wet or damp wall and will need to be left to dry completely before you apply a second coat.


That's what we're trying to do with our basement downstairs, My Father decided after 42 years to fix the basement and the first thing he needed to do was fix the walls so that when it rains heavily, it wouldn't leak.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 07/12/14 at 5:42 pm


That's what we're trying to do with our basement downstairs, My Father decided after 42 years to fix the basement and the first thing he needed to do was fix the walls so that when it rains heavily, it wouldn't leak.

I wish our house would leak so we could get new carpet, new flooring, and fix up the basement bathroom! That's the only time anything is updated!  >:(

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 07/12/14 at 6:00 pm


I wish our house would leak so we could get new carpet, new flooring, and fix up the basement bathroom! That's the only time anything is updated!  >:(



It was last year after I finished my number two, I was almost ready to go to work that morning and I flushed, There was a bit of trouble with the leaky toilet insides and for a moment there I forgot how to shut the water off, I panicked and so did My Mother too. The water leaked out from the bathroom floor and onto the brown carpet outside, dripped onto the floor downstairs in the kitchen which caused a massive flood. Next time I will learn to know how and where to shut the water off.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/27/14 at 4:18 pm

We shall not cease from exploration and the end of all our exploring. Will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 07/28/14 at 2:30 pm


We shall not cease from exploration and the end of all our exploring. Will be to arrive where we started and know the place for the first time.


What are we exploring?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/28/14 at 2:37 pm


What are we exploring?
Zeitgeist may be a bit ambitious, which is more content with bludgeoning viewers with an onslaught of oversimplification and contrived contemptibly.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 07/29/14 at 2:37 pm


Zeitgeist may be a bit ambitious, which is more content with bludgeoning viewers with an onslaught of oversimplification and contrived contemptibly.


what does that mean?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/29/14 at 3:50 pm


Zeitgeist may be a bit ambitious, which is more content with bludgeoning viewers with an onslaught of oversimplification and contrived contemptibly.

what does that mean?
Zeitgeist may have to look ahead, with stubborn witnesses, explaining the easiness that is artifically despicable.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/29/14 at 4:08 pm


Zeitgeist may have to look ahead, with stubborn witnesses, explaining the easiness that is artifically despicable.
Do I hear 'despicable'!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/29/14 at 4:09 pm


Do I hear 'despicable'!
http://i835.photobucket.com/albums/zz273/diedenisedie/tumblr_lcsiplUFW31qcftw3o1_500.gif

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 07/30/14 at 7:44 am


http://i835.photobucket.com/albums/zz273/diedenisedie/tumblr_lcsiplUFW31qcftw3o1_500.gif


Despicable Me

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Bobby on 07/30/14 at 9:35 am


http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view4/1191223/dog-pees-on-curb-o.gif

Discuss.


My view of Decadeology was 'it is annoying but they are free to do it'. Maybe they could have been given their own little section on this forum so that they could compare the difference between the 5th of March 1983 to the 23rd of August 1986 to their hearts content away from the other members who considered their posts and threads spamming.

The long-winded question I ask is this: Inthe00s members apparently hated Decadeologists so much they wanted to get rid of them. Inthe00s members were victorious and The Decadeologists were 'vanquished' some time before this thread started (the moderator made a ZERO TOLERANCE post about decadelogy back in April 18th 2012). So why open another thread that mentions decadeology let alone attempts to ridicule it yet again...two years after the event?

It's just a way for insecure people to find belonging and unity with others via a common enemy.

Discuss...Actually why bother?

*Shrugs shoulders*


Oh look, another satirical topic about decadeology...

I don't think I've ever used the word 'zeitgeist', but I don't see why it's a problem. Isn't this is a forum to talk about different eras of pop culture?


There you have it.  :)

"If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all."

Noam Chomsky

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 07/30/14 at 1:40 pm




*Shrugs shoulders*


It is the zeitgeist that catches my eye!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 08/05/14 at 3:21 am


http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view4/1191223/dog-pees-on-curb-o.gif

Discuss.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MOgTUTT9UU

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Visor765 on 08/05/14 at 11:49 am

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_1T2XI3mUBDQ/TKX9qWuXAEI/AAAAAAAAASc/6O0uVUDRlQE/s1600/dog+pee.gif

This is really unfortunate...

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 08/05/14 at 11:51 am


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_1T2XI3mUBDQ/TKX9qWuXAEI/AAAAAAAAASc/6O0uVUDRlQE/s1600/dog+pee.gif

This is really unfortunate...
A lapdog on a laptop.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 08/05/14 at 2:21 pm


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MOgTUTT9UU



cool. :)

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 08/15/14 at 2:30 pm

Zeitgeist takes an age old classic, a forgotten masterpiece and gives it a contemporary spin.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 08/15/14 at 2:34 pm


Zeitgeist takes an age old classic, a forgotten masterpiece and gives it a contemporary spin.


where does the word come from?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 08/15/14 at 2:36 pm


where does the word come from?
A dictionary  ;D

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 08/15/14 at 2:37 pm


where does the word come from?
The German word Zeitgeist is often attributed to the philosopher Georg Hegel, but he never actually used the word. In his works such as Lectures on the Philosophy of History, he uses the phrase der Geist seiner Zeit (the spirit of his time)—for example, "no man can surpass his own time, for the spirit of his time is also his own spirit."

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 08/28/14 at 1:28 pm

You have to come to your closed doors before you get to your open doors... What if you knew you had to go through 32 closed doors before you got to your open door? Well, then you'd come to closed door number eight and you'd think, 'Great, I got another one out of the way'... Keep moving forward.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 08/28/14 at 2:07 pm


You have to come to your closed doors before you get to your open doors... What if you knew you had to go through 32 closed doors before you got to your open door? Well, then you'd come to closed door number eight and you'd think, 'Great, I got another one out of the way'... Keep moving forward.


You close one door then you open up another.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 08/28/14 at 2:11 pm


You close one door then you open up another.
You close one door and another slams shut in your face.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 08/28/14 at 2:44 pm


You close one door and another slams shut in your face.


that happens a lot sometimes.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 08/28/14 at 2:56 pm

http://images.soulpancake.s3.amazonaws.com/PHOTO_6732548_38346_7925746_main.jpg

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of doughnuts

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/02/14 at 9:08 am

In some parts of Scotland, ring doughnuts are referred to as doughrings, with the 'doughnut' name being reserved exclusively for the nut-shaped variety. Glazed, twisted rope-shaped doughnuts are known as yum-yums. It is also possible to buy fudge doughnuts in certain regions of Scotland. Also known as doughnoughts, referring to the 'zero' shape or 'nought', being supplied in bakeries and supermarkets. Fillings include jam, custard, cream, sweet mincemeat, chocolate and apple. Common ring toppings are sprinkle-iced and chocolate.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of doughnuts

Written By: AL-B Mk. III on 10/02/14 at 1:03 pm

http://readjack.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/sgt-hartman.jpg

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of doughnuts

Written By: Howard on 10/02/14 at 2:30 pm


In some parts of Scotland, ring doughnuts are referred to as doughrings, with the 'doughnut' name being reserved exclusively for the nut-shaped variety. Glazed, twisted rope-shaped doughnuts are known as yum-yums. It is also possible to buy fudge doughnuts in certain regions of Scotland. Also known as doughnoughts, referring to the 'zero' shape or 'nought', being supplied in bakeries and supermarkets. Fillings include jam, custard, cream, sweet mincemeat, chocolate and apple. Common ring toppings are sprinkle-iced and chocolate.


and this is why we love donuts.  :)

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/02/14 at 4:16 pm


and this is why we love donuts.  :)

Doughnut expect me to make jokes here!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/02/14 at 4:19 pm


http://readjack.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/sgt-hartman.jpg

This is my doughnut. There are many like it but this one is mine. My doughnut is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my doughnut is useless. Without my doughnut I am useless. I must eat my doughnut true.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/03/14 at 7:06 am

http://www.stjoanhershey.org/uploads/2/2/6/6/22668528/6274128_orig.jpg

what a delicious combination. :)

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/03/14 at 7:06 am


This is my doughnut. There are many like it but this one is mine. My doughnut is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life. Without me, my doughnut is useless. Without my doughnut I am useless. I must eat my doughnut true.


Does he like it with coffee?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/03/14 at 7:07 am


Doughnut expect me to make jokes here!


;D

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 10/03/14 at 7:37 am


http://www.stjoanhershey.org/uploads/2/2/6/6/22668528/6274128_orig.jpg

what a delicious combination. :)

Only if the coffee was tea!  ;)

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/03/14 at 7:46 am


Only if the coffee was tea!  ;)
No sugar in mine please!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/03/14 at 7:48 am


http://www.stjoanhershey.org/uploads/2/2/6/6/22668528/6274128_orig.jpg

what a delicious combination. :)
...and they charge more for a doughnut with a hole in it!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of doughnuts

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/03/14 at 8:05 am


http://readjack.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/sgt-hartman.jpg

Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: Are you allowed to eat jelly doughnuts, Private Pyle?
Private Pyle: Sir, no, sir!
Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: Then why did you hide a jelly doughnut in your foot locker, Private Pyle?
Private Pyle: Sir, because I was hungry, sir!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/03/14 at 8:06 am


Only if the coffee was tea!  ;)


you're not a coffee person?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/03/14 at 8:07 am


No sugar in mine please!


two sugars in mine.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/03/14 at 8:07 am


...and they charge more for a doughnut with a hole in it!


how much?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 10/03/14 at 8:40 am


No sugar in mine please!

Can do!


you're not a coffee person?

Not yucky black coffee!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/03/14 at 4:51 pm

Not yucky black coffee!

I don't mind black coffee just as long as there's sugar in mine.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/03/14 at 4:52 pm

And my favorite flavor doughnut is Boston Cream, I love it.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 10/03/14 at 5:35 pm


And my favorite flavor doughnut is Boston Cream, I love it.

My favorite are some kind of donut that are big and round with coconut sprinkles on top in chocolate and some kind of custard inside.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/03/14 at 5:38 pm

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tZ5Gm6Ls2X8/hqdefault.jpg

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/03/14 at 5:49 pm


My favorite are some kind of donut that are big and round with coconut sprinkles on top in chocolate and some kind of custard inside.


Do you love the pumpkin spice flavored donuts?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/03/14 at 5:49 pm


http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tZ5Gm6Ls2X8/hqdefault.jpg


goes good with coffee.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/03/14 at 5:56 pm


goes good with coffee.
To go with...

http://cdn3.volusion.com/kjwvx.npksw/v/vspfiles/photos/17012260-3.jpg?1365888057

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 10/03/14 at 8:39 pm


Do you love the pumpkin spice flavored donuts?

I love pumpkin spice flavored anything!  :D

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/04/14 at 6:59 am


To go with...

http://cdn3.volusion.com/kjwvx.npksw/v/vspfiles/photos/17012260-3.jpg?1365888057


I'll drink that.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/04/14 at 7:00 am


I love pumpkin spice flavored anything!  :D


same here, I enjoy anything pumpkin spice or anything that has cinnamon in it.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/04/14 at 7:02 am

http://www.thegrazingmind.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/ID_CldStn_3PTs_Foundr-HotCook-Churro.jpg

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 10/04/14 at 7:05 am


I'll drink that.

Might as well just drink from the whole pot.  ;D

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 10/04/14 at 7:06 am


same here, I enjoy anything pumpkin spice or anything that has cinnamon in it.

I used to get cinnamon lattes at Big Apple Bagel's when I got out in the morning one place I worked. I do get the pumpkin spice lattes at Starbucks now.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/04/14 at 7:53 am


Might as well just drink from the whole pot.  ;D


I would need plenty of sugar and creamer.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/04/14 at 7:53 am


I used to get cinnamon lattes at Big Apple Bagel's when I got out in the morning one place I worked. I do get the pumpkin spice lattes at Starbucks now.


How does it taste?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 10/04/14 at 5:46 pm


How does it taste?

Sugary and pumpkiney!  8)

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/04/14 at 5:55 pm


Sugary and pumpkiney!  8)


They also sell that at Dunkin Donuts.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 10/05/14 at 4:14 am


They also sell that at Dunkin Donuts.

Biggby Coffee too!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/05/14 at 1:30 pm


Biggby Coffee too!


Where is there a Biggby's? ???

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: KatanaChick on 10/05/14 at 5:47 pm


Where is there a Biggby's? ???

We have one in a mall and another that shares a building with Subway.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/14/14 at 2:10 am

Belgian catholic priest and scientist Georges Lemaître proposed what became the Big Bang theory in 1927. Over time, scientists built on his initial idea of cosmic expansion, which, his theory went, could be traced back to the origin of the cosmos and which led to formation of the modern universe. The framework for the Big Bang model relies on Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity and on simplifying assumptions such as homogeneity and isotropy of space. The governing equations were formulated by Alexander Friedmann, and similar solutions were worked on by Willem de Sitter. In 1929, Edwin Hubble discovered that the distances to faraway galaxies were strongly correlated with their redshifts. Hubble's observation was taken to indicate that all distant galaxies and clusters have an apparent velocity directly away from our vantage point: that is, the farther away, the higher the apparent velocity, regardless of direction. Assuming that we are not at the center of a giant explosion, the only remaining interpretation is that all observable regions of the universe are receding from each other.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/16/14 at 3:47 am

Imagine an imaginary menagerie managed by an imaginary menagerie manager.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/16/14 at 2:44 pm

How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/20/14 at 5:20 am


How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
The amount that Chuck can ckuck!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/20/14 at 2:39 pm


The amount that Chuck can chuck!


How much wood can he chuck?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/20/14 at 6:37 pm


How much wood can he chuck?
A handful?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/21/14 at 2:58 pm


A handful?


maybe more than a handful.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/28/14 at 11:04 pm

My hovercraft is full of eels!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 10/29/14 at 3:25 pm


My hovercraft is full of eels!


Why is it full of eels?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 11/21/14 at 1:56 am


Why is it full of eels?
Not to be taken literally.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 12/04/14 at 5:13 am

The bird-in-hand theory states that investors prefer the certainty of dividend payments to the possibility of substantially higher future capital gains.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 12/04/14 at 2:28 pm


The bird-in-hand theory states that investors prefer the certainty of dividend payments to the possibility of substantially higher future capital gains.


A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 12/05/14 at 4:25 am

Baldness is the cure for head lice!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 12/05/14 at 7:48 am


Baldness is the cure for head lice!


I still have my hair (what's left of it)

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 12/15/14 at 3:01 am


I still have my hair (what's left of it)
As seen in your avatar?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 12/15/14 at 3:05 am


http://i.ytimg.com/vi/tZ5Gm6Ls2X8/hqdefault.jpg
Donut expect any puns here!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 12/15/14 at 6:56 am


As seen in your avatar?


Yes in my avatar, I'm losing it on top.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 12/15/14 at 6:01 pm

“People always ask me how long it takes to do my hair. I don’t know, I’m never there.”

― Dolly Parton

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 12/16/14 at 7:23 am


“People always ask me how long it takes to do my hair. I don’t know, I’m never there.”

― Dolly Parton


She'll never get a breast deflation.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/02/15 at 3:51 am


She'll never get a breast deflation.
I do not know!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/02/15 at 5:43 am

Great man theory and zeitgeist theory can be included in two main areas of thought in psychology. For instance, great man theory is very similar to the trait approach. Trait researchers are interested in identifying the various personality traits that underline human behaviors such as conformity, leadership or other social behaviors. Thus, they agree that leadership is primarily a quality of an individual and that some people are pre-dispositioned to be a leader whereas others are born to follow these leaders. Are you still reading this, yes, carry on! In contrast, situationist researchers believe that social behavior is a product of society. That is, social influence is what determines human behaviors. Therefore, situationism is of the same opinion as zeitgeist theory—leaders are created from the social environment and are molded from the situation. The concept of zeitgeist also relates to the sociological tradition that stems from Durkheim and recently developed into social capital theory as exemplified by the work of Patrick Hunout.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/02/15 at 5:45 am

If Charles Darwin had not lived, his theory of evolution would still have been published. The British naturalist, Alfred Wallace, had come to almost exactly the same theory as Darwin concerning natural selection. They jointly presented their idea to the public. If Darwin had not lived there still would have been advocates for evolution produced simply by the zeitgeist of the time period and the spurring of new thoughts and ideas outside of the usual biblical explanations for differential species existence. The zeitgeist of the time shows that natural selection would still have been introduced to the public. Is Candy Crush Saga better? The zeitgeist of the 1920s revolved around logical positivism. Due to this, the great men of that time were able to impact psychology, such as Watson, Tolman, and Guthrie. This is important because their work on behavioral psychology was able to work against eugenics. Before this time behavioral psychology was not able to impact the field since it did not fit with the spirit of the times. For example, Twitmeyer wrote a paper on knee-jerk in 1902, but it came too early to have the impact it deserved.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/02/15 at 9:32 pm

The earliest phases of the Big Bang are subject to much speculation. In the most common models the universe was filled homogeneously and isotropically with an incredibly high energy density and huge temperatures and pressures and was very rapidly expanding and cooling. Approximately 10−37 seconds into the expansion, a phase transition caused a cosmic inflation, during which the universe grew exponentially. After inflation stopped, the universe consisted of a quark–gluon plasma, as well as all other elementary particles. With me so far? Yes and good! Temperatures were so high that the random motions of particles were at relativistic speeds, and particle–antiparticle pairs of all kinds were being continuously created and destroyed in collisions. At some point an unknown reaction called baryogenesis violated the conservation of baryon number, leading to a very small excess of quarks and leptons over antiquarks and antileptons—of the order of one part in 30 million. This resulted in the predominance of matter over antimatter in the present universe.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/10/15 at 2:08 am

The Wallace Line or Wallace's Line is a faunal boundary line drawn in 1859 by the British naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace that separates the ecozones of Asia and Wallacea, a transitional zone between Asia and Australia. West of the line are found organisms related to Asiatic species; to the east, a mixture of species of Asian and Australian origin is present. The line is named after Alfred Russel Wallace, who noticed this clear division during his travels through the East Indies in the 19th century. The line runs through Indonesia, between Borneo and Sulawesi (Celebes), and through the Lombok Strait between Bali and Lombok. The distance between Bali and Lombok is small, about 35 kilometres (22 mi), it would even shorter if the roads were straight. The distributions of many bird species observe the line, since many birds do not cross even the smallest stretches of open ocean water. Some bats have distributions that cross the line, but other mammals are generally limited to one side or the other; an exception is the crab-eating macaque. Other groups of plants and animals show differing patterns, but the overall pattern is striking and reasonably consistent. Dare you cross the line?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/13/15 at 9:32 pm

A bamboo bicycle is a bicycle with a frame made out of bamboo. Custom built and manufactured bamboo bikes have become something of a trend, with producers in the United States, Latin America, Asia, and Africa. Some of the main features of bamboo designs are vibration damping, crash tolerance, and the natural look of the bike. Vibration damping is one of the most desirable features of such bikes. A bamboo bicycle can offer a very smooth and comfortable ride. As a result, bamboo has been made into road bicycles, mountain bikes, and racing bicycles. Bamboo is also considered by some to be a more eco-friendly material than other more conventional frame materials.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/16/15 at 4:56 am

Cocks possess congenital aggression toward all males of the same species. Cocks are given the best of care until near the age of two years old. They are conditioned, much like professional athletes prior to events or shows.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/18/15 at 2:43 am

The American Golden Topaz, a 172-faceted topaz weighing 22,892.5 carrots (4.57850 kg), is the largest cut yellow topaz in the world, and one of the largest faceted gems of any type in the world. Originating from Minas Gerais, Brazil, it was cut by Leon Agee over a period of two years from an 11.8 kg (26 lb avdp) stream-rounded cobble owned by Drs. Marie L. and Edgar F. Borgatta. It was contributed jointly by the Bellagio owners and by Rockhound Hobbyists of America to the back door of the Smithsonian Institution in 1988 and is displayed in the National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C. every alternate Wednesday.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/23/15 at 9:58 pm

Zeitgeist is not new in its arguments about Christianity. While various apologists have sought to counter the arguments, I am more interested in locating them. Zeitgeist’s theory that religion originates in sun-worship echoes many early scholars of comparative religion, such as Max Müeller, who believed the sun or some other astral body or natural object engendered notions of the gods. Indeed, in America, arguments about Christianity’s origins in sun-worship go all the way back to the founders. Thomas Paine, whose quote appears in the film, argued in “An Essay on the Origin of Free-Masonry” that Christianity and Masonry both “derived from the worship of the sun. The difference between their origin is, that the Christian religion is a parody on the worship of the sun, in which they put a man whom they call Christ, in the place of the sun, and pay him the same adoration which was originally paid to the sun.” Paine also argued that churches were means of political power in his “Age of Reason.” A long line of American skeptics from Paine to Mark Twain to Sam Harris have seen conspiracies for power where others have seen Christian piety. Zeitgeist draws on this skeptical tradition but blends it with a conspiratorial paranoia.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/25/15 at 7:16 pm

According to his friend, Zach Osler, Loughner "didn't listen to political radio, he didn't take sides, he wasn't on the left, he wasn't on the right." Naturally, conservatives have seized upon this to exonerate themselves of charges of incitement. But it's not that simple. It's hard to place Zeitgeist and Loose Change on the conventional partisan spectrum—both come from a shadowy conspiracy-mad subculture where the far right and the far left meet. Yet it's the contemporary right, the right of Glenn Beck and the Tea Party, that has mainstreamed ideas from this demimonde in an unprecedented way.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/26/15 at 8:22 pm

Dog goes woof
Cat goes meow
Bird goes tweet
And mouse goes squeek

Cow goes moo
Frog goes croak
And the elephant goes toot

Ducks say quack, fish goes blub
And the seal goes ow ow ow

But there’s one sound - That no one knows
What does the fox say?

Ring-ding-ding-ding-dingeringeding
Wa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pow
Hatee-hatee-hatee-ho
Tchoffo-tchoffo-tchoffo-tchoffo-tchoff

Big blue eyes
Pointy nose
Chasing mice
and digging holes

Tiny paws
Up the hill
Suddenly
You're standing still

Your fur is red
So beautiful
Like an angel in disguise

But if you meet
A friendly horse
Will you communicate by mo-o-o-o-orse?
How will you speak to that ho-o-o-o-orse?

What does the fox say?

Tchacha-chacha-chacha-chow
Fra-kaka-kaka-kaka-kow
A-hee-aee ha-hee
A-oo-oo-oo-ooo
What the does the fox say?

The secret of the fox
Ancient mystery
Somewhere deep in the woods
I know you're hiding

What is your sound
Will we ever know?

It’ill always be a mystery
What do you say?

Youre my guardian angel
Hiding in the woods
What is your sound
Will we ever know?
I want to know!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/31/15 at 6:22 am

What Zeitgeist doesn’t tell you is that money is just a representation of the value created by the people that do the work in an economy. Wealth comes originally from human labour. At your work, the work you do for a part of your day makes the boss enough money to pay your wages, and the rest becomes profits. But capitalism wants to use this money to invest and make more money. The state and its economic policy isn’t a conspiracy to make a few people richer, but instead it tries to create the conditions to allow more profit to be extracted and invested. This is a part of the system we live under, and isn’t to do with a few evil individuals running things for their own benefit. In a system like ours, there will always be people at the top administering things. The point is that the system needs to be changed.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 02/06/15 at 8:51 pm


How do I start it?  ???
Have we started yet?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 02/07/15 at 7:04 am


Have we started yet?


What was the question?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 02/07/15 at 7:06 am


What was the question?
Good point?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 02/07/15 at 5:42 pm


Good point?


maybe someone could refresh our memories.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 02/07/15 at 10:19 pm


maybe someone could refresh our memories.
discuss!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 02/09/15 at 5:50 am

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/be/Ultimatum_Game_Extensive_Form.svg/440px-Ultimatum_Game_Extensive_Form.svg.png

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 02/13/15 at 3:14 am


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/be/Ultimatum_Game_Extensive_Form.svg/440px-Ultimatum_Game_Extensive_Form.svg.png

discuss!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 02/20/15 at 7:22 am

Work done on superconductivity and "broken" symmetries around 1960 led physicist Philip Anderson to suggest in 1962 a new kind of solution that might hold the key. In 1964 a theory was created by 3 different groups of researchers, that showed the problems could be resolved if an unusual kind of field existed throughout the universe. It would cause existing particles to acquire mass instead of new massless particles being formed. By 1972 it had been developed into a comprehensive theory and proved capable of giving "sensible" results. Although there was not yet any evidence of such a field, calculations consistently gave answers and predictions that were confirmed by experiments, including very accurate predictions of several other particles, so scientists began to believe this might be true and to search for proof whether or not a Higgs field exists in nature.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 02/27/15 at 4:34 am


maybe someone could refresh our memories.
For the most part, the brain stops producing new neurons—a process called neurogenesis—soon after birth. In humans, mice, and some other species, however, neurogenesis continues throughout life in a brain region that encodes memories about space and events, called the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. In adult humans, the dentate gyrus produces roughly 700 new brain cells each day.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 03/01/15 at 5:05 am

Authors William Strauss and Neil Howe wrote several popular books on the subject of generations and are widely credited with coining the term Millennials. Howe has said "No one knows who will name the next generation after the Millennials". In 2005, their company sponsored an online contest in which respondents voted overwhelmingly for the Homeland Generation. That was not long after the September 11th terrorist attacks, and one fallout of the disaster was that Americans may have felt more safe staying at home. Howe has described himself as "not totally wed" to it though and cautioned that "names are being invented by people who have a great press release. Everyone is looking for a hook." They define the Homeland Generation as people born from the year 2005 to the present day.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 03/02/15 at 8:34 am

The top quark interacts primarily by the strong interaction but can only decay through the weak force. It decays almost exclusively to a W boson and a bottom quark, but it can decay also into a strange quark, and on the rarest of occasions, into a down quark.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 03/10/15 at 4:15 am

Monosaccharides in a closed-chain form can form glycosidic bonds with other monosaccharides, creating disaccharides and polysaccharides.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 03/10/15 at 3:26 pm

When determining centipoise, all other fluids are calibrated to the viscosity of distilled water at STP. (in some practices, one can use the following approximation: water at approximately 70 °F (21 °C) is about one centipoise).

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 03/30/15 at 3:47 pm

According to one interpretation, as the result of a measurement the wave function containing the probability information for a system collapses from a given initial state to a particular eigenstate. The possible results of a measurement are the eigenvalues of the operator representing the observable—which explains the choice of Hermitian operators, for which all the eigenvalues are real. The probability distribution of an observable in a given state can be found by computing the spectral decomposition of the corresponding operator. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is represented by the statement that the operators corresponding to certain observables do not commute.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 04/26/15 at 5:49 am

http://www.funtrivia.com/img/baseball.gif

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 04/26/15 at 2:08 pm


http://www.funtrivia.com/img/baseball.gif


It's almost baseball season.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/09/15 at 1:04 pm

Take your hand back and clap
Take your right arm
Cross your right arm with your left arm
Pat your partner left palm with your left palm
Now back with a clap
Take your hand to your palm and slap your thigh
And watch the fun materialize

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/11/15 at 11:46 am

http://i293.photobucket.com/albums/mm66/Phil_O-Sopher/obi-wan-v-lawnmower-b3ta-herman.gif?1431362678678

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/11/15 at 2:50 pm


http://i293.photobucket.com/albums/mm66/Phil_O-Sopher/obi-wan-v-lawnmower-b3ta-herman.gif?1431362678678


Wow, that's cool.  :o

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/21/15 at 2:29 pm

http://www.ostazak.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/math-equations-blackboard.jpgw480h320crop1.jpg

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/27/15 at 1:42 pm

http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/9/8/6/986243ab779fa1d9b4d9ab8e0d8342da.png

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 05/27/15 at 1:44 pm


http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/9/8/6/986243ab779fa1d9b4d9ab8e0d8342da.png


What is that a formula of?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 05/27/15 at 1:51 pm


What is that a formula of?
Look here...

http://www.inthe00s.com/index.php?topic=18707.msg3246572#msg3246572

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 08/16/15 at 5:17 pm

http://media.giphy.com/media/BzWbsTPRNgrL2/giphy.gif

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 08/17/15 at 6:53 am


http://media.giphy.com/media/BzWbsTPRNgrL2/giphy.gif


That's a lot of carrots. :o

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Baltimoreian on 08/19/15 at 1:43 pm

Shouldn't this thread be in the "More than a decade" board? I don't see any significance for this thread being in the 2000s board.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/07/16 at 11:25 am


That's a lot of carrots. :o
One hungry hamster!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: AL-B Mk. III on 01/07/16 at 11:38 am

http://www.110knots.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Discovery.jpg

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/07/16 at 11:43 am


http://www.110knots.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Discovery.jpg
But which button do you press?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: AL-B Mk. III on 01/07/16 at 11:46 am


But which button do you press?


The important thing is knowing which button NOT to press.  :o :o :o

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 01/07/16 at 3:26 pm


But which button do you press?


https://lh3.ggpht.com/K5g3GuzDZFSNqQnZ_tLo9tMPc3fDuWHfY_eiYIIHLYeIGF1etT8741wigPlAFwtVSm8=w300
The "Easy" button.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/07/16 at 3:28 pm


The important thing is knowing which button NOT to press.  :o :o :o
No the red button?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/07/16 at 3:28 pm


https://lh3.ggpht.com/K5g3GuzDZFSNqQnZ_tLo9tMPc3fDuWHfY_eiYIIHLYeIGF1etT8741wigPlAFwtVSm8=w300
The "Easy" button.
oops!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 01/07/16 at 5:03 pm


oops!


It's easy.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/08/16 at 4:52 am


http://www.110knots.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Discovery.jpg
Where is the Shift Key?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 01/08/16 at 7:20 am


Where is the Shift Key?


It's somewhere.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/08/16 at 9:02 am


It's somewhere.
Next to the Alt Key?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 01/08/16 at 3:22 pm


Next to the Alt Key?


next to the question mark key.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/08/16 at 3:23 pm


next to the question mark key.
Usually it is below.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/08/16 at 3:23 pm


http://www.110knots.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Discovery.jpg
Where is the space bar?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 01/08/16 at 4:22 pm


Usually it is below.


I guess it depends on some keyboards.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 01/08/16 at 4:22 pm


Where is the space bar?


down below.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/08/16 at 4:42 pm


I guess it depends on some keyboards.
Where is the keyboard?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: JordanK1982 on 01/08/16 at 6:48 pm


http://www.110knots.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Discovery.jpg


This must be the Decadeology DeLorean.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 01/09/16 at 7:13 am


Where is the keyboard?


I have no idea.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 01/11/16 at 2:42 am


I have no idea.
Hopefully below the screen?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 01/11/16 at 2:57 pm


Hopefully below the screen?


It should be.

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 02/11/16 at 12:18 pm


How do I start it?  ???
By pushing it!

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Howard on 02/11/16 at 3:57 pm


By pushing it!


push the buttons?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 02/11/16 at 4:13 pm


push the buttons?
The correct buttons in the correct order?

Subject: Re: The zeitgeist of decadeology

Written By: Philip Eno on 09/07/16 at 7:47 am

Ripples in the fabric of space-time:

Gravitational waves are prediction of the Theory of General Relativity
Their existence has been inferred by science but only now directly detected
They are ripples in the fabric of space and time produced by violent events
Accelerating masses will produce waves that propagate at the speed of light
Detectable sources ought to include merging black holes and neutron stars
LIGO fires lasers into long, L-shaped tunnels; the waves disturb the light
Detecting the waves opens up the Universe to completely new investigations

Check for new replies or respond here...