inthe00s
The Pop Culture Information Society...

These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.

Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.

This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.




Check for new replies or respond here...

Subject: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie + Lady Bird lol)

Written By: John Titor on 09/04/18 at 12:12 pm

Perfect example that Ana Marie 2002 song that was charting earlier making refrences to Nysnc and things that
weren't really popping in 2002

In fact here is a 2002 challange with Ane Marie and she is getting a lot of Songs Wrong,
Cant even remember Pink or Shakira's song names !

7MINL_DAuao

The fact that she created a song called 2002 and can not name any songs is disgusting



Another one is when kids label things from the early 2000s as 90's went they are not, or when someone on youtube
comments on a 2004 video and calls it 90's.


I think the worst offender is the movie Lady Bird, there were things in the shopping store that were all 2016 versions of themselves
including the 2009 Pepsi logo, Need I mind you this movie is suppose to take place in the 2002-2003 school year. Many cars in the movie
are the 2004 models as well. There is a scene where she is in her bedroom and you can see a blu ray player (The blue ray logo is covered)
A quick search on IMDB for the movie sees it being torn apart with these inconsistencies 


Does anyone else hate this

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie lol)

Written By: 2001 on 09/04/18 at 1:33 pm

The Anne Marie example is less offensive than the Lady Bird example, since some of those bands still had cultural relevancy in 2002.

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie lol)

Written By: violet_shy on 09/04/18 at 1:49 pm

I know right! What gives!?

It's annoying ::)

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie lol)

Written By: John Titor on 09/04/18 at 1:59 pm


The Anne Marie example is less offensive than the Lady Bird example, since some of those bands still had cultural relevancy in 2002.


Lady Bird's IMDB had me dying laughing at how bad they got it wrong

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie lol)

Written By: Dundee on 09/05/18 at 5:34 am

She made "2002" as a personal nostalgic trip with references to some stuff she liked around that time, can we stop overthinking it ??? ? Not everyone has to have a perfect grasp of every aspect of Pop culture at any time.

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie lol)

Written By: Longaotian00 on 09/05/18 at 6:00 am


She made "2002" as a personal nostalgic trip with references to some stuff she liked around that time, can we stop overthinking it ??? ? Not everyone has to have a perfect grasp of every aspect of Pop culture at any time.


Yes exactly. Other people were complaining about is aswell. Its not like songs from 2017 aren't still popular or common to hear.

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie lol)

Written By: John Titor on 09/05/18 at 12:26 pm


She made "2002" as a personal nostalgic trip with references to some stuff she liked around that time, can we stop overthinking it ??? ? Not everyone has to have a perfect grasp of every aspect of Pop culture at any time.


99 problems didnt come out until 2003 how did she like that song if it wasnt even out lol

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie lol)

Written By: piecesof93 on 09/05/18 at 12:38 pm

It's still a fail

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie lol)

Written By: John Titor on 09/05/18 at 1:49 pm


It's still a fail


Yup, esp to us, people who remember the early 2000s so vividly, to see movies and other dipctions get it wrong is laughable.

This is a scene from the movie lady bird, the movie takes place in the fall of 2002, Everything in this scene is mostly 2016's items.
If I was the director I would have just used fake items, you can buy props of soda and what not.

http://www.notodo.com/web/wp-content/uploads/ladybird.jpg

The magazines on the left handside are actually some from 2011 2012 and 2014 all mixed and mashed


Here another scene, highlights, An outfit that was being sold at Urban Outtfitters in 2015, note: No one was shopping
at Urban in 2002 lol

https://www.franciscanmedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/20171120T1223-12719-CNS-MOVIE-REVIEW-LADY-BIRD.jpg

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie lol)

Written By: Dundee on 09/05/18 at 1:53 pm

This Nitpicking

https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*XeftokbpKDkJhlcYn3QaDg.gif

What's next? The lightening is not early 2000s enough?

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie lol)

Written By: John Titor on 09/05/18 at 1:55 pm


This Nitpicking

https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*XeftokbpKDkJhlcYn3QaDg.gif

What's next? The lightening is not early 2000s enough?


There have been movies set in the 80's that have done a better job at depicting  that respective decade.
Even Back to the Future did a better job of doing the 50s



Its an embarrassment this director did not do the proper research

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie + Lady Bird lol)

Written By: John Titor on 09/05/18 at 1:56 pm

Nice Blu ray player


https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSMZXtt8iXql3f7ySSCBPYqp49bw7eHGukulUvQIvqYk_Faep1x

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie + Lady Bird lol)

Written By: Dundee on 09/06/18 at 4:41 am

https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*XeftokbpKDkJhlcYn3QaDg.gif
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*XeftokbpKDkJhlcYn3QaDg.gif
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*XeftokbpKDkJhlcYn3QaDg.gif

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie lol)

Written By: 2001 on 09/06/18 at 6:45 am


This Nitpicking

https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*XeftokbpKDkJhlcYn3QaDg.gif

What's next? The lightening is not early 2000s enough?


I was actually thinking that that magazine rack looked too bright.

Subject: Re: When things try to emulate the 2000's and FAIL (Anne Marie lol)

Written By: John Titor on 09/06/18 at 12:22 pm


I was actually thinking that that magazine rack looked too bright.


and also the paneling with the wood, its more of a  mid 2010s thing, that was clearly a stop & shop or something
here is how its really suppose to look

All taken from 2001/2002

One hour photo came out in Aug 2002,  with scenes being filmed around 2001/2002
http://intheseats.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/One-Hour-Photo-Review.jpg
lighting for super markets back then were more whiter in light than now, supermarkets now have a more
yellowish tint to them


http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/dailypix/2002/Oct/06/business20_b.jpg
Supermarkets or even walmart back then would have signs hanging above everything

This goes for even stores like Best Buy

Check for new replies or respond here...