» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Google
  Web inthe00s.com



Subject: Texas state supreme court rules property tax unconstitutional

Written By: GWBush2004 on 11/23/05 at 12:23 am

Link

Subject: Re: Texas state supreme court rules property tax unconstitutional

Written By: MaxwellSmart on 11/23/05 at 1:53 am


http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2005/11/22/texas_supreme_court_rules_property_tax_unconstitutional/

NO activist court there; no "judicial activism," no sirree bob!
I don't like property taxes used to fund education either.

Subject: Re: Texas state supreme court rules property tax unconstitutional

Written By: ChuckyG on 11/23/05 at 12:02 pm



I know there's a secessionist movement in Texas, but maybe it's time for the Feds to try something novel: Expulsion.  Congratulations Texas, you're now the Lone Star Republic of Tejas, good night, and good luck!



only if they agree to take their former govenor back...

Subject: Re: Texas state supreme court rules property tax unconstitutional

Written By: Skippy on 11/23/05 at 2:07 pm

I can see why the school districts sued. If every property owner is taxed at the same $1.50 per $100 of property value there has to be a wide gap between the poor communities and rich communities. The poor communities, which would have the lowest property value would be underfunded, at the same time I would think those in the rich communities would be overfunded. So, per Max, why not spread the funds around?
About two-thirds of my property tax goes toward funding the school, but I couldn't tell you how much goes to my schools district.

Subject: Re: Texas state supreme court rules property tax unconstitutional

Written By: Don Carlos on 11/23/05 at 5:02 pm

A few years ago the Vermont Supreme Court decided that school property tax rates had to generate the same # of $$$ for the local schools around the state, and therefore that property rich towns, like ski resort Killington, had to subsidize property poor communities like Bevlidier.  The legislature came up with a plan to do that, and then modified it a bit to relieve the "gold towns".  Killington still doesn't like it and has voted to leave Vermont and become part of New Hampshire.  Fat chance (Vermont would have to agree, as would Congress).

Personally, I think the property tax is very regressive, even in Vermont, and the funding of public education should be handled through a state income tax, with the proceeds allocated to school districts on a pre capita basis, allowing towns to tax themselves additionally to pay for extras, but only if a part of that "extra" goes into the general fund for school support.  Why should Killington be able to buy a first class system with a 50 cent/$100 tax rate and Belvidier struggle to maintain minimum standards with a $1.50/$100 rate?  What makes Killington's kids better than Belvidier's?

Subject: Re: Texas state supreme court rules property tax unconstitutional

Written By: MaxwellSmart on 11/23/05 at 7:53 pm


A few years ago the Vermont Supreme Court decided that school property tax rates had to generate the same # of $$$ for the local schools around the state, and therefore that property rich towns, like ski resort Killington, had to subsidize property poor communities like Bevlidier.

Check for new replies or respond here...