» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Google
  Web inthe00s.com



Subject: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: quirky_cat_girl on 02/20/07 at 9:57 pm

Is the Confederate Flag a symbol of proud heritage, or racism?

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/scp_v3/viewer/index.php?pid=16598&rn=49750&cl=1924981&ch=49799&src=news

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Red Ant on 02/20/07 at 10:13 pm

I wish I could view the clip, but the ad crashes my IE and Firefox won't open it for me.

Got another link by chance?

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Sister Morphine on 02/20/07 at 10:16 pm

I hate looking at that ugly thing.  I see people around here plastering that damn thing to everything and anything they can stick it on and I hate it. 

The swastika was an Indian symbol meaning good luck.  In the hands of the Nazi Party, it came to stand for genocide and murder and hatred and bigotry and evil.  It doesn't matter anymore about what it USED to stand for.  It's what it became that sticks in people's memories and why it is illegal to this day to fly it in Germany. 

I see nothing positive when I see the Southern Cross.  I see that, I see racism, slavery, hatred, war.....nothing worth reminiscing about.    I live in the South, and I've yet to have one native Southerner tell me what "Southern heritage" is.  I know what happened here, I know what continues to happen here in some places.....is that something we should be glorifying? 

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Brian06 on 02/20/07 at 10:25 pm

Can't stand it, for several reasons. I think it's totally unamerican and traitorous. Glorifying the slavery supporters and confederate treasonists is disgusting to me. It's all over the place down south, I know from the many times I've been there. It's a bad relic from the past that just won't go away. However this is America, and I think people of course have the right to display it if they want.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: velvetoneo on 02/20/07 at 10:27 pm

People have the right to display it (it's America.) Sometimes, I tend to think making a big deal over it just makes people more entrenched about it. However, as with Electrophile and Brian...it is un-American and the flag of the enemy, that stands against all that America and allegiance to America means. I think it's highly unpatriotic in spirit to display it. Yet, America is a free country! That's what makes America.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: quirky_cat_girl on 02/20/07 at 11:24 pm


I wish I could view the clip, but the ad crashes my IE and Firefox won't open it for me.

Got another link by chance?



sorry...I checked for another link...but I can't seem to find one. :-\\

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: quirky_cat_girl on 02/20/07 at 11:24 pm


I hate looking at that ugly thing.  I see people around here plastering that damn thing to everything and anything they can stick it on and I hate it. 

The swastika was an Indian symbol meaning good luck.  In the hands of the Nazi Party, it came to stand for genocide and murder and hatred and bigotry and evil.  It doesn't matter anymore about what it USED to stand for.  It's what it became that sticks in people's memories and why it is illegal to this day to fly it in Germany. 

I see nothing positive when I see the Southern Cross.  I see that, I see racism, slavery, hatred, war.....nothing worth reminiscing about.    I live in the South, and I've yet to have one native Southerner tell me what "Southern heritage" is.  I know what happened here, I know what continues to happen here in some places.....is that something we should be glorifying? 



ya, we have a lot of "rednecks" in our area, who love to plaster them all over the back of their big trucks...I hate seeing them as well.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Rice_Cube on 02/20/07 at 11:32 pm

Hmmm, the Stars and Bars...

Well, there's all that stuff they taught in US History about how the Civil War wasn't fought just because of slavery, but because of the differing cultures of the North vs. the South and various socioeconomic factors...which is how some of the good ol' boys I've met explained their use of the Stars and Bars to me. 

I'm not as bothered by this as some people and whether the flag stays or goes, I think I'm indifferent...

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: ADH13 on 02/20/07 at 11:36 pm


Hmmm, the Stars and Bars...

Well, there's all that stuff they taught in US History about how the Civil War wasn't fought just because of slavery, but because of the differing cultures of the North vs. the South and various socioeconomic factors...which is how some of the good ol' boys I've met explained their use of the Stars and Bars to me. 

I'm not as bothered by this as some people and whether the flag stays or goes, I think I'm indifferent...


Me too.... and I was also gonna point out that our elderly population may very well remember grandparents, etc. who fought in the Civil War...if they are flying the confederate flag to honor Confederate soldiers, I don't see anything wrong with that.. it doesn't mean they condone slavery.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: quirky_cat_girl on 02/20/07 at 11:40 pm


Me too.... and I was also gonna point out that our elderly population may very well remember grandparents, etc. who fought in the Civil War...if they are flying the confederate flag to honor Confederate soldiers, I don't see anything wrong with that.. it doesn't mean they condone slavery.



I agree with that. I honestly don't think that those individuals are flying it in means of representing racism...however, I seem to think differently whenever some big ol' country boy with a truck that sits atop huge tires flies by, and they have the huge confederate flag attached to the back of their window...that is irritating to me.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Sister Morphine on 02/20/07 at 11:40 pm


Hmmm, the Stars and Bars...

Well, there's all that stuff they taught in US History about how the Civil War wasn't fought just because of slavery, but because of the differing cultures of the North vs. the South and various socioeconomic factors...which is how some of the good ol' boys I've met explained their use of the Stars and Bars to me. 

I'm not as bothered by this as some people and whether the flag stays or goes, I think I'm indifferent...



The Civil War wasn't fought as much over slavery as it was over States' Rights.  I get that.  However, they were fighting for a state's right to enforce and allow slavery....which leads into the other reason the war started.  The South threatened to secede if Lincoln was elected, as he was anti-slavery, and they knew that if he was President, he'd take measures to end it.  Which he did.  And they seceded, South Carolina first.  So the war was essentially the South defending their right to own slaves.  That flag represents their "country" and what they viewed as the way things should be. 

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Sister Morphine on 02/20/07 at 11:41 pm


Me too.... and I was also gonna point out that our elderly population may very well remember grandparents, etc. who fought in the Civil War...if they are flying the confederate flag to honor Confederate soldiers, I don't see anything wrong with that.. it doesn't mean they condone slavery.



No, but they are honoring soldiers who fought and died for the rights of their fellow Southerners to own slaves.  That's not any better.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Rice_Cube on 02/20/07 at 11:48 pm



The Civil War wasn't fought as much over slavery as it was over States' Rights.  I get that.  However, they were fighting for a state's right to enforce and allow slavery....which leads into the other reason the war started.  The South threatened to secede if Lincoln was elected, as he was anti-slavery, and they knew that if he was President, he'd take measures to end it.  Which he did.  And they seceded, South Carolina first.  So the war was essentially the South defending their right to own slaves.  That flag represents their "country" and what they viewed as the way things should be. 




Yeah, that's the way it played out, but Lincoln didn't start out to abolish slavery, just keeping the country in one piece.  So the issue of the Confederate flag is not so simple.  I'm sure historians could argue this case better than I but as long as the person brandishing the flag doesn't also wear white sheets for fun I personally don't see what the big deal is.  It is a flag, and the only reason it becomes more than a flag is because some people perceive it that way.  It is the same with the American flag...some people hold it in reverence and a symbol of patriotism while some people burn it for totally different reasons. 

State flags

Most states have already adopted non-Confederate flags in an effort to be more politically correct anyway.  You may notice that Florida and Alabama kept traces of the Confederate cross in their emblems though.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Sister Morphine on 02/20/07 at 11:51 pm


Yeah, that's the way it played out, but Lincoln didn't start out to abolish slavery, just keeping the country in one piece.  So the issue of the Confederate flag is not so simple.  I'm sure historians could argue this case better than I but as long as the person brandishing the flag doesn't also wear white sheets for fun I personally don't see what the big deal is.  It is a flag, and the only reason it becomes more than a flag is because some people perceive it that way.  It is the same with the American flag...some people hold it in reverence and a symbol of patriotism while some people burn it for totally different reasons. 

State flags

Most states have already adopted non-Confederate flags in an effort to be more politically correct anyway.  You may notice that Florida and Alabama kept traces of the Confederate cross in their emblems though.



Georgia recently went back to their older flag.  It was a concession made by the new Governor after the old one left.  There's no Stars and Bars on it, though....which annoyed people, but they can just get over it.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: ADH13 on 02/20/07 at 11:53 pm



No, but they are honoring soldiers who fought and died for the rights of their fellow Southerners to own slaves.  That's not any better.


That may be true, but if it is their family, I can still understand that...  using my abortion example again, right now the nation is divided on it... in another 100 years it may be completely unfathomable to have an abortion... but i dont think our grandchildren will hold it against those who had one... times and values were alot different then...

I'm not too sure of how the military worked back then, but can only guess that even in those days when you were called to fight, you went, you didn't get to decide if you agreed with the leaders or not...

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Rice_Cube on 02/20/07 at 11:55 pm

They do a lot of Civil War re-enactments in the South, I'm sure some of them have the North winning and some of them have the South winning...it seems more of a tradition than a symbol of hatred nowadays.

But what do I know, I'm just a carpetbagger ;D

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Sister Morphine on 02/20/07 at 11:55 pm


I'm not too sure of how the military worked back then, but can only guess that even in those days when you were called to fight, you went, you didn't get to decide if you agreed with the leaders or not...



The North and South was split just like that.  Most of the Southern army were slave owners and the sons of slave owners.  You didn't see abolitionists fighting on the side of the pro-slavery crowd.  If you were in "border" states, that might be different.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: ADH13 on 02/20/07 at 11:57 pm



I agree with that. I honestly don't think that those individuals are flying it in means of representing racism...however, I seem to think differently whenever some big ol' country boy with a truck that sits atop huge tires flies by, and they have the huge confederate flag attached to the back of their window...that is irritating to me.


Oh yeah, it would irritate me too, unless it was displayed on Veterans day or Memorial Day, etc... but then, alot of "freedom of expression" from all standpoints irritate me... so i'm not a good judge of it :D

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Brian06 on 02/20/07 at 11:58 pm

It's not just the slavery issue like I said, it's the enemy flag. The secessionists committed treason and violated the constitution. Secession was ruled unconstitutional by the supreme court after the war, actually it was ruled that legally the states never left the Union because they were not able to unilaterally like that.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Rice_Cube on 02/21/07 at 12:07 am

^ I'm pretty sure they didn't care back then or now ;)  The one that sticks in everyone's mind is slavery and racism because that was so deeply intertwined with the Confederacy, but like I said, social and economic differences were also a huge factor.  Secession was in the air way before the abolitionist movement was set up.

Not that I would ever display the Stars and Bars, mind you, but I don't begrudge people who do...like you said, it is a free country, which means that we have to somehow rise above the bigots and ignoramuses and let them spew their vitriol :P  But I don't think displaying that flag is as bad as people make it out to be.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Red Ant on 02/21/07 at 12:09 am

Since I can't view the original article/news clip, I can't comment on that.

But, to answer Quirk's question, in most cases is neither. The Confederate flag is also known as the Rebel flag, and most of the people I've known to display it think of themselves as rebellious, nothing more, nothing less.

There are no doubt those who wish the South had won, and that display it as some sort of racial 'mark'. They're probably the same people who think their sisters are viable mates and have an IQ of 67.

Displaying the Confederate/Rebel flag in and of itself isn't offensive to me, but states (if any) that still have it as an official flag should think of something better to represent themselves.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Red Ant on 02/21/07 at 2:00 am


Neither.

TREASON

As Ant pointed out, it's the Confederate Battle Flag, not the national flag of the short-lived Confederate States.

When American Southerners regard the Stars and Bars the way Germans today regard the Swastika, the U.S. will be a healthier place.

We have a lot of conservative politicians in this country who still have what Julian Bond called "a canine loyalty to the Confederacy."

I'm not into this right-wing fashion PC that mandates we all say nice stuff about the Confederacy.  Fog that sheet!
::)


Treason? TREASON?? Yes, the Confederacy is a major threat to national security. They have men, muskets, cannons, etc. Too bad that everyone living in reality realizes the Confederacy was crushed nearly 150 years ago. Even worse is that some think we still live in 1863.

If we were living in 1863, I can see where displaying the Confederate flag would be contrued as a sign of treason. But now? Come on...

I suppose displaying a skull and cross bones flag, Canandian, Mexican, Gay Pride flag, etc. would be considered "treason" too. After all, treason is:

"... betraying, treachery, or breach of allegiance.

The Constitution of the United States, Art. III, defines treason against the United States to consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid or comfort. This offence is punished with death. By the same article of the Constitution, no person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court."

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: velvetoneo on 02/21/07 at 2:06 am


LOL!  Not current treason, you silly-billy, historical treason.  I'm nost suggesting we hang them Duke boys for treason!
:D


http://www.tomecek.com/jay/Hanging.gif

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Sister Morphine on 02/21/07 at 2:07 am

^^I remember that scene in the Dukes of Hazzard.  That was right after they saved Daisy from something.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: whistledog on 02/21/07 at 2:27 am

I only ever really associate the flag with The Dukes of Hazzard

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: witchain on 02/21/07 at 4:08 am


...it is un-American and the flag of the enemy, that stands against all that America and allegiance to America means. I think it's highly unpatriotic in spirit to display it. Yet, America is a free country! That's what makes America.


Huh?


http://www.tomecek.com/jay/Hanging.gif


It's just a farking flag, people. Jebus.
Treason? Don't get me started...

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: LyricBoy on 02/21/07 at 7:02 am


Is the Confederate Flag a symbol of proud heritage, or racism?

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/scp_v3/viewer/index.php?pid=16598&rn=49750&cl=1924981&ch=49799&src=news


For some I suppose it could be either heritage or racism, but in the vast majority of cases I think it is simple childishness.

Now... all of that said... our society has gone WAAAAAAAAY overboard on all of this "ban the confederate flag" stuff.  If some 17-year-old wants to drive his General Lee bondo car to a school parking lot, why should the school district etc get all bent out of shape and want to ban the student.  Friggin' freedom of speech, I say.

Last time I read the constitution there was something called freedom of speech.  So if whites use the n-word in public, or blacks use the C-word, tough noogies I say.  Freedom of speech lets them say those things as long as those words are not being used to incite an imminent riot.  Now on private property I am free to say who can or cannot say what on my premises and that is as it should be too.

We live in a country where the authorities applaud and protect the burning of the American flag and condemn the even casual display of the conferderate flag.  One is defended as "free speech" and the other is defended as "racial sensitivity".  It is all a crock.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Rice_Cube on 02/21/07 at 10:12 am


I only ever really associate the flag with The Dukes of Hazzard


But the Dukes loved black folk. 

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Ashkicksass on 02/21/07 at 11:21 am



The Civil War wasn't fought as much over slavery as it was over States' Rights.  I get that.  However, they were fighting for a state's right to enforce and allow slavery....which leads into the other reason the war started.  The South threatened to secede if Lincoln was elected, as he was anti-slavery, and they knew that if he was President, he'd take measures to end it.  Which he did.  And they seceded, South Carolina first.  So the war was essentially the South defending their right to own slaves.  That flag represents their "country" and what they viewed as the way things should be. 




This is exactly what comes to mind when I see the confederate flag.  I have debated the issue with several Southerners and not one of them has been able to convince me that 150 years of hatred and racism are not wrapped up in those bars and stars.  Saying it's about being a rebel or it's about state's rights is a crock and we all know it.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: witchain on 02/21/07 at 11:44 am

You are absolutely correct, Ash.
But they are allowed to display any colors they choose.
I am not a Southerner, a racist, or childish.
I am a rebel I guess, but their flag can fly.
It doesn't mean a damn thing any more...

Does the Apology thread ring a bell?

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Ashkicksass on 02/21/07 at 11:55 am


You are absolutely correct, Ash.
But they are allowed to display any colors they choose.
I am not a Southerner, a racist, or childish.
I am a rebel I guess, but their flag can fly.
It doesn't mean a damn thing any more...

Does the Apology thread ring a bell?




I know, I know, you're right.  And it's not like I'm going to go around tearing them off of flag poles.  Of course they have the right to fly them, and I will respect their freedom of speech.  I just wish they'd fess up and admit why they really hang them, or at least think it through. 

And I will use my freedom of speech to say that I think it sucks.  ;)

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Rice_Cube on 02/21/07 at 1:10 pm


And I will use my freedom of speech to say that I think it sucks.  ;)


As you should!  :)

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Rice_Cube on 02/21/07 at 1:20 pm

Random thought:

Some have brought up the part about how the Confederates committed treason by seceding from the Union.  Technically, the US of A committed mad treason when they rebelled against the Brits and formed this country, and the US flag is a symbol not only of liberty and justice but of that fight for independence from oppression and taxation without representation (now we have taxation WITH representation, HAHAHA!) blah de blah...only difference is, US of A won, South lost, so history can happily say that the South sucks for waving their flag.

Carry on.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: La Roche on 02/21/07 at 6:30 pm

I have no problem with the flying of the Confederate Flag.

Not only does it represent a period of history that we shouldn't forget any time soon, it also stands to honor the soldiers and civilians who laid down their life for something they believe in.
I don't really care what it was that they believed in specifically, the fact that they embodied the same spirit the revolutionary soldiers did say's more than their thoughts on any issue.

Wave On Flag!

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Sister Morphine on 02/21/07 at 7:34 pm


I have no problem with the flying of the Confederate Flag.

Not only does it represent a period of history that we shouldn't forget any time soon, it also stands to honor the soldiers and civilians who laid down their life for something they believe in.
I don't really care what it was that they believed in specifically, the fact that they embodied the same spirit the revolutionary soldiers did say's more than their thoughts on any issue.

Wave On Flag!



So would you then say it would be okay for Germans to fly the Swastika?

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Rice_Cube on 02/21/07 at 7:43 pm



So would you then say it would be okay for Germans to fly the Swastika?


It's not "okay" but they can do it anyway because we have a progressive society  :-\\

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: La Roche on 02/21/07 at 8:02 pm


So would you then say it would be okay for Germans to fly the Swastika?


Well, no, because that's against the law in Germany. But if it wasn't. Sure.

People walk around wearing shirts with the hammer and sickle. More people have been killed in the name of communism than the nazi party ever killed.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Rice_Cube on 02/21/07 at 8:33 pm


Well, no, because that's against the law in Germany. But if it wasn't. Sure.

People walk around wearing shirts with the hammer and sickle. More people have been killed in the name of communism than the nazi party ever killed.


Yeah, and then there are all those Che shirts too!

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: La Roche on 02/21/07 at 8:41 pm


Yeah, and then there are all those Che shirts too!


Exactly - Celebrating a mercenary.

Once again, double standards from the left.

If I wore a t-shirt with Josef Mengele on it, I'd probably be arrested. (Although I doubt 90% of the population could pick out Mengele from a lineup.)

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: La Roche on 02/21/07 at 10:00 pm


I think if someone wants to fly it, they should be allowed to.  I'd bet that quite a few of the people who fly it have no clue what it symbolizes and just think it's "cool."

AFA it being in honor of the ancestors who fought for the South in the Civil war, it doesn't matter WHY they were fighting or whether or not they "agreed" with it.  Especially with the current situation our military is in....I'm sure there are plenty of soldiers in the Middle East right now who don't "agree" with the reason they're there, but they signed up to serve our country and are holding true to that promise.  Like it or not, the "stars and bars" is an important symbol in our history.....


My bro Pete's got a confederate flag airbrushed on his guitar. It just looks sweet. Dude's from Wales.. he wouldn't know the south if it jumped up and bit him on the ass.  ;D

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: La Roche on 02/23/07 at 5:36 pm


Perspective:

Soviet Union: 1917--1991
Red China: 1949--

Nazi Germany: 1933--1945

So imagine the death toll if Nazi Germany had been able to carry on as it was for 60 or 75 years rather than a mere 12!
:o

My ancestors fought in the American Revolution.  Ethan Allen wasn't just a furniture store y'know!  Same spirit, I don't think so!  The American Revolution was fought on behalf of a few...super-rich white male land-owners....who...uh...who didn't want to pay....taxes...

Nah, scratch that!
;D

Nonetheless, here's another key difference.  Pre-revoluton America was made up of imperial colonies.  The Confederacy seceded from the United States of America.  What if West Anglia tried to secede from Britain?


West Anglia? What a bizare idea. Countys don't have any real power. There are county councils that can allocate funds and such like, but there's no policy decision, it's a totally different thing to states rights.
Now, if Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland were to secede I'd be perfectly happy. I'd rather not have a load of taffs, feenians and kilt-nastys polluting the country.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: spaceace on 02/23/07 at 5:50 pm

I suppose no one wants to hear the opinion of A Civil War buff, but here goes.  Most of the soldiers who fought for the Confederacy were too poor to own slaves.  So what were they fighting for?  Take the Confederate flag down some dirt poor Confederate soldier will be rolling over in his grave.  Seeing the Confederate flag does not bother me a bit because of this fact.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Sister Morphine on 02/23/07 at 5:59 pm


I suppose no one wants to hear the opinion of A Civil War buff, but here goes.  Most of the soldiers who fought for the Confederacy were too poor to own slaves.  So what were they fighting for?  Take the Confederate flag down some dirt poor Confederate soldier will be rolling over in his grave.  Seeing the Confederate flag does not bother me a bit because of this fact.



My father is a Civil War buff too, so I grew up learning a lot about the war, the people involved in the war, the reasons for the war....so I know that your average Confederate soldier didn't own slaves.  The richer men who could avoid service did.  However, that doesn't excuse the reason they were fighting, and it doesn't excuse what the flag stands for.  As was pointed out earlier, this wasn't like the Revolutionary War and the South was rebelling against tyrannical imperial rule.  This was states in the USA taking it upon themselves to leave the USA and attack their fellow states and countrymen because they didn't like a) who was President and b) what he might do, policy-wise. 


Just because they might not have personally owned slaves, doesn't mean they weren't fighting for the right for OTHERS to own them. 

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: spaceace on 02/23/07 at 6:05 pm



My father is a Civil War buff too, so I grew up learning a lot about the war, the people involved in the war, the reasons for the war....so I know that your average Confederate soldier didn't own slaves.  The richer men who could avoid service did.  However, that doesn't excuse the reason they were fighting, and it doesn't excuse what the flag stands for.  As was pointed out earlier, this wasn't like the Revolutionary War and the South was rebelling against tyrannical imperial rule.  This was states in the USA taking it upon themselves to leave the USA and attack their fellow states and countrymen because they didn't like a) who was President and b) what he might do, policy-wise. 


Thank you for your understanding. (karma )  Did the average Confederate soldier know the whole politics behind "The Cause" that they were fighting for no most didn't.  Most read the horrifying Yellow Journalism handed to them by the big shots.  Basically you had dirt poor misguided armed farmers fighting a dying for a tick off "Aristocracy" that didn't really care about them.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Sister Morphine on 02/23/07 at 6:11 pm


Thank you for your understanding. (karma )  Did the average Confederate soldier know the whole politics behind "The Cause" that they were fighting for no most didn't.  Most read the horrifying Yellow Journalism handed to them by the big shots.  Basically you had dirt poor misguided armed farmers fighting a dying for a tick off "Aristocracy" that didn't really care about them.



That's true.  And you see that in many other wars, as well.  Rich men start wars, poor mens' sons have to fight and die in them.  It's a sad fact in our history.  I guess the difference between you and I is that you see the flag and recognize that the majority of the men fighting under it didn't really know why they were fighting and I see it as a symbol of what the South was about at the time, and what the South felt like the way of life should be.  It was a flag representing their desire to leave the USA and their hatred for the Union and for President Lincoln.  Our learning experiences re: the Civil War gave us two different interpretations or views of it.  Which is fine.  That's what makes debate interesting. 



(and karma back  :)  )

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: spaceace on 02/23/07 at 10:49 pm


Yeah, I said in another thread we get our image of slavery from "Gone With the Wind."  Planter families as exemplified by the fictional Wilkeses and O'Haras were like the industrial baron families of the North--very few and very rich.  Of the small percentage of Southern families who "owned" slaves, most "owned" between one and four.  As others have pointed out, it was poor boys fighting a rich man's war.  Same old same old.  I disagree on that last bit.  Given 140 years to think it over, your ghost of a poor confederate soldier would curse that rebel flag.  He and his brother and his father died trying to make the rich richer and when it was over, his wife, his sister, and his mother had no money, no home, and a mountain of debt!
::)


Wow Max, how thoughtful of you to pretty much rehash what Electrophile and I were saying.  Had the dirt poor Confederate soldier gotten the whole story at the time, you're right he would curse the rebel flag.  Unfortunately no one has a crystal ball.  :)

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: MaxwellSmart on 02/24/07 at 12:06 am


Wow Max, how thoughtful of you to pretty much rehash what Electrophile and I were saying.  Had the dirt poor Confederate soldier gotten the whole story at the time, you're right he would curse the rebel flag.  Unfortunately no one has a crystal ball.  :)


I've deleted previous posts on this thread.  With the whip-smart wit and scholarship of you and Electrophile, simple-minded rubes such I stand no chance.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: annonymouse on 02/24/07 at 12:16 am


Can't stand it, for several reasons. I think it's totally unamerican and traitorous. Glorifying the slavery supporters and confederate treasonists is disgusting to me. It's all over the place down south, I know from the many times I've been there. It's a bad relic from the past that just won't go away. However this is America, and I think people of course have the right to display it if they want.


i lived in georgia for 5 years. and down there, you mostly only see those confederate flags up in the hills where all the real southerners (you know, the scary, kill you in your sleep kind?) live. 

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: spaceace on 02/24/07 at 1:10 am


I've deleted previous posts on this thread.  With the whip-smart wit and scholarship of you and Electrophile, simple-minded rubes such I stand no chance.



Max, U.S. Grant owned 3 slaves. (Actually they were his wife's but you know the "property rights" deal back then.)  My question to you is this.  How can a Pro-Union, Republican, high ranking General have no moral dilemma towards slavery?  Most Union soldiers were not fighting to end slavery, but to end a treasonous rebelion and preserve the Union.  Just something to think about. (B.T.W. Grant only freed his slaves when the 14 amendment was enacted.)

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Sister Morphine on 02/24/07 at 1:46 am


I've deleted previous posts on this thread.  With the whip-smart wit and scholarship of you and Electrophile, simple-minded rubes such I stand no chance.




Save the condescension for someone else.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: spaceace on 02/24/07 at 9:51 am



Save the condescension for someone else.


Max believe everyone is entitled to his condensation.  Wheather we take it is up to us.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: danootaandme on 02/24/07 at 10:19 am


Max, U.S. Grant owned 3 slaves. (Actually they were his wife's but you know the "property rights" deal back then.)  My question to you is this.  How can a Pro-Union, Republican, high ranking General have no moral dilemma towards slavery?  Most Union soldiers were not fighting to end slavery, but to end a treasonous rebelion and preserve the Union.  Just something to think about. (B.T.W. Grant only freed his slaves when the 14 amendment was enacted.)


Grants wife had 3 slaves and he allowed it.  He was given one, but freed him at a time when he(Grant) was in dire financial straits, even though he could have sold him, and wouldn't allow his wife to sell the ones that she had, away.  That may be balm on an open sore, but still it doesn't forgive.  Just as troubling was he virulent anti semitism.  Still I have been to his tomb and thanked him for winning the war, for where would I have been if not for that.

Oh yeah, on a side note, I had a great grand uncle and aunt who were butler and maid to the Grant family (James and Elizabeth Vanderzee) .  Family history has Grant was spoken of very highly(no word on his wife), as having treated them with respect and consideration. 

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: spaceace on 02/24/07 at 11:22 am


Grants wife had 3 slaves and he allowed it.  He was given one, but freed him at a time when he(Grant) was in dire financial straits, even though he could have sold him, and wouldn't allow his wife to sell the ones that she had, away.  That may be balm on an open sore, but still it doesn't forgive.  Just as troubling was he virulent anti Semitism.  Still I have been to his tomb and thanked him for winning the war, for where would I have been if not for that.

Oh yeah, on a side note, I had a great grand uncle and aunt who were butler and maid to the Grant family (James and Elizabeth Vanderzee) .  Family history has Grant was spoken of very highly(no word on his wife), as having treated them with respect and consideration. 


How very true.  Let's just say he wasn't an abolitionist.  As for the antisemitism he did like to force Jews out of an area.  As for be a General, they don't make them any better.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: skittlesking on 02/27/07 at 12:00 am


Yeah, that's the way it played out, but Lincoln didn't start out to abolish slavery, just keeping the country in one piece.  So the issue of the Confederate flag is not so simple.  I'm sure historians could argue this case better than I but as long as the person brandishing the flag doesn't also wear white sheets for fun I personally don't see what the big deal is.  It is a flag, and the only reason it becomes more than a flag is because some people perceive it that way.  It is the same with the American flag...some people hold it in reverence and a symbol of patriotism while some people burn it for totally different reasons. 

State flags

Most states have already adopted non-Confederate flags in an effort to be more politically correct anyway.  You may notice that Florida and Alabama kept traces of the Confederate cross in their emblems though.


Living in Florida, I can tell you that the flag of Florida also represents the fact that Florida still thinks that way. . .Racism and segregation are still big down here.  Homosexuality has more acceptance here than different races do. . .and it's not just blacks. . .hispanics and other minorities are targeted as well.  That cross and the aforementioned nazi symbol are things that tell a lot about a person to me.  They, in my expierence, let me know about people who usually end up being biggoted, stubborn and just not friendly, so to me it's like a "Star of David" in that it shows me what they are. . .ignorant just like the person who decided the "Star of David" should represent Jewish people and a "Pink Triangle" should represent gay people.  I'm not a big patriotic guy, I have said many times I want out of America, but I would stand by an American flag before I would stand by a Confederate one. . .I think of course as mentioned by everyone, it should be legal, but I don't plan on changing my views of those who use it anytime soon.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Rice_Cube on 02/27/07 at 12:03 am

^ The beauty and irony of freedom of speech...you can say whatever you want for the most part, but be prepared to face the repercussions!

On the topic of symbols...I think that if people stopped discussing the Stars & Bars controversy, it will lose its significance and become just another flag.  Then again, I never thought much of it one way or the other so my opinion is decidedly ambivalent.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: danootaandme on 02/27/07 at 5:29 am




  It is a flag, and the only reason it becomes more than a flag is because some people perceive it that way.  It is the same with the American flag...some people hold it in reverence and a symbol of patriotism while some people burn it for totally different reasons. 

State flags

Most states have already adopted non-Confederate flags in an effort to be more politically correct anyway.  You may notice that Florida and Alabama kept traces of the Confederate cross in their emblems though.


The reason it has been so contentious is because during the Civil Rights era of the fifties the Stars and Bars saw a resurgence.  It had been pretty much put in mothballs until then.  The Segregationists brought it out as a show of defiance to the federals. It is/was statement that they would control "their negroes" not the federal government.  South Carolina raised it over the capitol then, it hadn't been flying there all along.  The  Stars and Bars is the battle flag, there is a flag of the Confederate States, if it was about patriotism to that useless cause they would fly that, they don't, they fly the battle flag, and those in the know know what they are fighting.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: La Roche on 02/27/07 at 8:04 am


The reason it has been so contentious is because during the Civil Rights era of the fifties the Stars and Bars saw a resurgence.  It had been pretty much put in mothballs until then.  The Segregationists brought it out as a show of defiance to the federals. It is/was statement that they would control "their negroes" not the federal government.  South Carolina raised it over the capitol then, it hadn't been flying there all along.  The  Stars and Bars is the battle flag, there is a flag of the Confederate States, if it was about patriotism to that useless cause they would fly that, they don't, they fly the battle flag, and those in the know know what they are fighting.


So let em have a dissenting view and raise the battle flag.

Kind of like how I put up my union jack on St. Patricks day.. it's a slap in the face to people, but it's not physically hurting anybody.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/27/07 at 11:54 pm


The reason it has been so contentious is because during the Civil Rights era of the fifties the Stars and Bars saw a resurgence.  It had been pretty much put in mothballs until then.  The Segregationists brought it out as a show of defiance to the federals. It is/was statement that they would control "their negroes" not the federal government.  South Carolina raised it over the capitol then, it hadn't been flying there all along.  The  Stars and Bars is the battle flag, there is a flag of the Confederate States, if it was about patriotism to that useless cause they would fly that, they don't, they fly the battle flag, and those in the know know what they are fighting.
Actually, the "Stars and Bars" was the original flag, the "battle flag" was the "Navy(-al) Jack" or "Southern Cross".  The "Stars and Bars" flag consisted of 7 stars in a circular pattern on a blue background in the upper left corner with 2 red stripes with a white one in the middle (originally, as more states seceded, more stars were added until -I think- it ended with a total of 11 with a larger one in the middle)......it was replaced because it was often confused with the "Stars and Stripes".  The "Southern Cross" is the one at issue (well, technically, it's the Navy Jack because the SC was square and the NJ was rectangular) and the design was based on the Cross of St. Andrew, which also happens to be the national flag of Scotland (although with a different color scheme and no stars).

If we're going to be debating it, I thought we should at least be calling the flag at issue the correct name ::)

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Rice_Cube on 02/27/07 at 11:56 pm

^ Good call!

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Davester on 02/28/07 at 4:57 am

  http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-6/1193336/scross.gif

  The Southern Cross, above...

  Mama_K's talking about the one below:

  http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-6/1193336/1stnatl.gif

  The first adopted flag of the CSA...

  http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-6/1193336/2ndnatl.gif

  Later revised...

  http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-6/1193336/3rdnatl.gif

  The second, and final, revision...

  I am 26% more offended by the third flag as opposed to the first.  The second flag only registers mild disgust, but no offensiveness. The fourth flag, however, I find strangely erotic...go ;)...

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Davester on 02/28/07 at 7:11 am

  Dammit Max, stop condensating...

  You're getting everything all wet, heh...

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 02/28/07 at 8:23 am


  http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-6/1193336/scross.gif

  The Southern Cross, above...

  Mama_K's talking about the one below:

  http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-6/1193336/1stnatl.gif

  The first adopted flag of the CSA...

  http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-6/1193336/2ndnatl.gif

  Later revised...

  http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2006-6/1193336/3rdnatl.gif

  The second, and final, revision...

  I am 26% more offended by the third flag as opposed to the first.  The second flag only registers mild disgust, but no offensiveness. The fourth flag, however, I find strangely erotic...go ;)...

Thanks for the visual, I was too tired to google the images.....but, technically, the first one you show is not actually the Southern Cross, it is the Navy Jack.....the Southern Cross is square ;D

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Davester on 02/28/07 at 6:17 pm

  From what I can find, the flag in question is specifically known as the "Confederate Navy Jack" or "Army of Tennessee" flag, with its rectangular shape.  Any flag which bears the cross design with superimposed stars (called a saltire, which I didn't know...) is generally known as "Southern Cross", be it battle flag, navy jack, artillery ensign, regimental colors &etc...

  I think...

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Sister Morphine on 02/28/07 at 6:21 pm

This is the battle flag:

http://www.masks-wigs-and-costumes.com/Costumes/images/Copy_of_confederate.JPG


The "Rebel" flag, the Naval Jack or The Southern Cross is rectangular:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/58/Conf_Navy_Jack_%28light_blue%29.svg/275px-Conf_Navy_Jack_%28light_blue%29.svg.png


The Naval Jack was the precursor to the Battle Flag. 


Any flag which bears the cross design with superimposed stars (called a saltire, which I didn't know...) is generally known as "Southern Cross", be it battle flag, navy jack, artillery ensign, regimental colors &etc...



The Southern Cross is in reference to the Navy Jack only.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: skittlesking on 02/28/07 at 10:03 pm


This is the battle flag:

http://www.masks-wigs-and-costumes.com/Costumes/images/Copy_of_confederate.JPG


The "Rebel" flag, the Naval Jack or The Southern Cross is rectangular:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/58/Conf_Navy_Jack_%28light_blue%29.svg/275px-Conf_Navy_Jack_%28light_blue%29.svg.png


The Naval Jack was the precursor to the Battle Flag. 



The Southern Cross is in reference to the Navy Jack only.


Thanks for that, I learned a lot of stuff I didn't know from that comment.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Davester on 03/01/07 at 3:56 am


This is the battle flag:

The "Rebel" flag, the Naval Jack or The Southern Cross is rectangular:

The Naval Jack was the precursor to the Battle Flag. 

The Southern Cross is in reference to the Navy Jack only.


  Okay, we have a decision.  Naval Jack=Southern Cross and none other...

  I've learned a little from this thread, too.  Never before have I heard the Confederate "stars and bars" referred to as "Southern Cross".  I've known the southern cross as a star constellation (which I don't think I've ever seen...) with some historical significance...

  That and a good Crosby, Stills & Nash song...  :P

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: La Roche on 03/01/07 at 9:43 am

I realise this dosen't have anything to do with the thread really but I thought it was funny.

The other night I was out having a drink with my pal, we stop in to a bar and figure we'll play some pool. On the wall behind the bar.. Big ass Confederate Flag. Now, this is in England a little ways north of London.  ;D

People just think it looks cool.. and it does, it's one of the best flags around.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: Ashkicksass on 03/01/07 at 3:27 pm


it's one of the best flags around.


Sometimes I can't believe I'm friends with you...  ::) ;D ::)

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: danootaandme on 03/01/07 at 4:17 pm


Sometimes I can't believe I'm friends with you...   ::) ;D ::)


Stars and Bars, Union Jack, Swastika, all waged war against Old Glory.      LOSERS  ;D

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: spaceace on 03/01/07 at 4:36 pm


Stars and Bars, Union Jack, Swastika, all waged war against Old Glory.      LOSERS  ;D


Don't mean to be pressing my luck her but I read an article about a 15 year old being suspended from school for wearing a tee shirt with the stars and bars.  I also remember a picture of a small protest march in her honor.  One of the men in that protest, wearing a Confedrate uniform, with the flag was .  Why would a man of  decent be active in this sort of protest?

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: danootaandme on 03/01/07 at 4:38 pm


Don't mean to be pressing my luck her but I read an article about a 15 year old being suspended from school for wearing a tee shirt with the stars and bars.  I also remember a picture of a small protest march in her honor.  One of the men in that protest, wearing a Confedrate uniform, with the flag was .  Why would a man of  decent be active in this sort of protest?


Freedom of expression, even if you don't agree doesn't mean you can't defend the right.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: spaceace on 03/01/07 at 4:42 pm


Freedom of expression, even if you don't agree doesn't mean you can't defend the right.


As I recall some African-Americans fought for the Confederacy too. (Towards the end.)  Maybe be it bad or good it is a shared history. :-\\

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: danootaandme on 03/01/07 at 5:18 pm


As I recall some African-Americans fought for the Confederacy too. (Towards the end.)  Maybe be it bad or good it is a shared history. :-\\


There is a question of if they did it willingly, or if they did it out of fear.  I have Confederates in my family tree, I am not exactly sure who they are, but they are there because they owned the women who gave birth to their children, but blood is blood and although they denied it I won't.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: La Roche on 03/01/07 at 6:21 pm


Sometimes I can't believe I'm friends with you...  ::) ;D ::)


It looks cool.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: spaceace on 03/01/07 at 6:26 pm


There is a question of if they did it willingly, or if they did it out of fear.  I have Confederates in my family tree, I am not exactly sure who they are, but they are there because they owned the women who gave birth to their children, but blood is blood and although they denied it I won't.


I guess you heard about the Rev. Sharpton being related to Strom Thrurmond.  I don't know much about the history or genealogy of slaves and slave owners in the south.  Wasn't there some sort of spat about Thomas Jefferson?  B.T.W. my guess is they did it out of fear.  There was twice if not three times the amount of African-Americans in the Union army than in the Confederate.  Some were even called Colored troops.  As I recall a few won medals for bravery.  I don't recall anything like that happening in the South.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: 80s_cheerleader on 03/01/07 at 11:55 pm


I guess you heard about the Rev. Sharpton being related to Strom Thrurmond.  I don't know much about the history or genealogy of slaves and slave owners in the south.  Wasn't there some sort of spat about Thomas Jefferson?  B.T.W. my guess is they did it out of fear.  There was twice if not three times the amount of African-Americans in the Union army than in the Confederate.  Some were even called Colored troops.  As I recall a few won medals for bravery.  I don't recall anything like that happening in the South.
There were also some "colored troops" in the Confederate Army as well.  I think a majority of them came from Louisiana and there were some who earned medals.  Of course, skeptics will say that they were forced to "fake" pictures and documents, but that's going a little far IMO.....

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: spaceace on 03/02/07 at 4:41 pm


There were also some "colored troops" in the Confederate Army as well.  I think a majority of them came from Louisiana and there were some who earned medals.  Of course, skeptics will say that they were forced to "fake" pictures and documents, but that's going a little far IMO.....


New Orleans did have a big population of freeman, so that doesn't surprise me.  It was pretty hard to fake photo and documents back then.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: danootaandme on 03/02/07 at 6:36 pm


New Orleans did have a big population of freeman, so that doesn't surprise me.  It was pretty hard to fake photo and documents back then.


My fathers family were part of that large population of freemen from Louisiana, and that is a whole story in itself "Gens du Colour Libre".  I will not say there weren't any that supported the southern cause, but they were far, far, from the norm. When thinking of the Colored Troops for the South during the Civil War think of the villages the Nazis set up with Jews.  They have films of how well they were treated and all that crap.  Just a facade of course, but there are those who believed it then and believe it now. 

The Story of Thomas Jefferson has been told, now with DNA it is very hard to deny.  He had a slave Sally Hemings who was the same age as his daughter.  Sally was also daughter of Jeffersons wifes father and a slave, Betty Hemings, making her his wifes half sister.  They like to call it an affair but it began when she was in her teens(14 or 15) and he was in his thirties, today we call it rape of a child.  She had six children, the only slaves freed by Jefferson.  Google the story, much has been written.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: LyricBoy on 03/04/07 at 8:22 am


I realise this dosen't have anything to do with the thread really but I thought it was funny.

The other night I was out having a drink with my pal, we stop in to a bar and figure we'll play some pool. On the wall behind the bar.. Big ass Confederate Flag. Now, this is in England a little ways north of London.  ;D

People just think it looks cool.. and it does, it's one of the best flags around.


Politics aside, it does have sort of a decorative coolness about it.  I mean, Bo and Luke Duke would not have been the same if the General Lee had a pink ribbon painted on the roof.

Symbolism is a big thig though.  I saw a movie where they explained that early on in the Nazi movement, Hitler did not get very far until he took somebody's advice and had the Swastika red-and-black logo and matching uniform designed.  Apparently at the time that had "cool value" and his movement flourished.

I have some keepsakes from my Dad and grandfather that carry the Swastika... well before the Nazi era and when it was still a traditional symbol of good luck.  Hitler and his cronies forever made the swastika uncool.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: La Roche on 03/04/07 at 11:05 am


Politics aside, it does have sort of a decorative coolness about it.  I mean, Bo and Luke Duke would not have been the same if the General Lee had a pink ribbon painted on the roof.

Symbolism is a big thig though.  I saw a movie where they explained that early on in the Nazi movement, Hitler did not get very far until he took somebody's advice and had the Swastika red-and-black logo and matching uniform designed.  Apparently at the time that had "cool value" and his movement flourished.

I have some keepsakes from my Dad and grandfather that carry the Swastika... well before the Nazi era and when it was still a traditional symbol of good luck.  Hitler and his cronies forever made the swastika uncool.



I think the swastika is cool. I have quite a lot of items from the reich. The one thing I'm really after is the SS death's head ring. I'd love one. They knew how to pick cool symbols.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: nicki_morrissey on 03/04/07 at 1:02 pm


I think the swastika is cool. I have quite a lot of items from the reich. The one thing I'm really after is the SS death's head ring. I'd love one. They knew how to pick cool symbols.


Sometimes I don't understand you, Andy.

Subject: Re: Confederate Flag Controversy

Written By: La Roche on 03/04/07 at 1:47 pm


Sometimes I don't understand you, Andy.


Thinking something LOOKS good, is not the same as saying "I believe everything this stands for." Know what I mean?

I fly the Union Jack, does that mean I support everything that Britain stood, stands and will stand for? Noooooo.

For instance, I think a Chevy Camaro is a real cool lookin' car. I don't want one though. When I got the use of one for three months it costs so damn much to insure I'd rather not have it.
Same principal applys.

Check for new replies or respond here...