The Pop Culture Information Society...
These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.
Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.
This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.
	Check for new replies or respond here...
	
	Subject: Nude Portrait of Bea Arthur Sells for $1.9MM
	Written By: LyricBoy on 05/16/13 at 5:39 pm
	
No, that was not a typo.
A circa-1991 topless portrait of "Maude" actress Bea Arthur was auctioned off at Christie's yesterday for a cool $1,900,000.  American.
And that result was a disappointment.  The auction house was expecting to get $2.5 million.  :o
Makes me wonder if they have a nude Ernest Borgnine in the wings.   ;D
	
	 
	
	Subject: Re: Nude Portrait of Bea Arthur Sells for $1.9MM
	Written By: whistledog on 05/16/13 at 6:07 pm
	
I didn't know such a thing even existed.
I let my curiosity get the better of me, and I have just one question:  Did Bea legitimately pose for that, cause if so, not bad for a woman of her age at the time
	 
	
	Subject: Re: Nude Portrait of Bea Arthur Sells for $1.9MM
	Written By: CatwomanofV on 05/16/13 at 6:28 pm
	
So what if she did pose? She was very comfortable in her own skin and she proved that you didn't have to be a "perfect 10" to exude femininity and sexually. I had always admired her and this just adds to my admiration. 
Cat
	 
	
	Subject: Re: Nude Portrait of Bea Arthur Sells for $1.9MM
	Written By: ladybug316 on 05/16/13 at 6:31 pm
	
I agree with Jason - I want to know if she posed for it also, or if it's someone's rendition of her.  Not because I give a sheesh if she posed nude, only if it's legitimate.
	 
	
	Subject: Re: Nude Portrait of Bea Arthur Sells for $1.9MM
	Written By: MaxwellSmart on 05/16/13 at 7:34 pm
	
I agree with Jason - I want to know if she posed for it also, or if it's someone's rendition of her.  Not because I give a sheesh if she posed nude, only if it's legitimate.
It's all in the eye of the bea-holder!
 :)
	 
	
	Subject: Re: Nude Portrait of Bea Arthur Sells for $1.9MM
	Written By: Howard on 05/16/13 at 7:40 pm
	
Is it the Bea Arthur version from Golden Girls? :o
	 
	
	Subject: Re: Nude Portrait of Bea Arthur Sells for $1.9MM
	Written By: Howard on 05/16/13 at 7:42 pm
	
http://aconservativelesbian.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/beaarthur-dont-you-wish-your-girlfriend-was-hot-like-bea.jpg
	 
	
	Subject: Re: Nude Portrait of Bea Arthur Sells for $1.9MM
	Written By: CatwomanofV on 05/16/13 at 7:47 pm
	
I didn't know such a thing even existed.
I let my curiosity get the better of me, and I have just one question:  Did Bea legitimately pose for that, cause if so, not bad for a woman of her age at the time
I agree with Jason - I want to know if she posed for it also, or if it's someone's rendition of her.  Not because I give a sheesh if she posed nude, only if it's legitimate.
I was going on the assumption that it was legit. 
Just did a little research and she did not sit for it. 
Saw the painting and it really isn't that impressive-as a piece of art. I have seen much better nude portraits. 
Oh, here is another interesting story about it-and yes, this article does include a pic of the portrait if anyone is interested. 
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/16/bea-arthur-s-boobs-got-us-booted-from-facebook.html
Gotta love facebook-NOT!!!!!!
Cat 
	 
	
	Subject: Re: Nude Portrait of Bea Arthur Sells for $1.9MM
	Written By: whistledog on 05/16/13 at 8:04 pm
	
Is it the Bea Arthur version from Golden Girls? :o
No, it's Bea Arthur, vacuum cleaner salesman ::)
	 
	
	Subject: Re: Nude Portrait of Bea Arthur Sells for $1.9MM
	Written By: Howard on 05/17/13 at 6:45 am
	
Wow I'd buy it! (If I had the money)
	 
Check for new replies or respond here...
 
Copyright 1995-2020, by Charles R. Grosvenor Jr.