inthe00s
The Pop Culture Information Society...

These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.

Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.

This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.




Check for new replies or respond here...

Subject: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: nintieskid999 on 10/20/13 at 12:04 am

What do you think?

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: danootaandme on 10/20/13 at 5:47 am

For who?  Where?

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: 80sfan on 10/20/13 at 5:51 am

Economically, we've been stagnating for 5 years or so. Who knows what economic data to believe in the news anymore!

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: danootaandme on 10/20/13 at 5:56 am

That reminds me, time to check my 401k

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: warped on 10/20/13 at 7:37 am

Better or worse than 10 years ago?

"And then one day you find ten years have got behind you
No one told you when to run, you missed the starting gun

And you run and you run to catch up with the sun but it's sinking
Racing around to come up behind you again
The sun is the same in a relative way, but you're older
Shorter of breath and one day closer to death"


Pink Floyd - Time


I'm 10 years closer to death. Is that better or worse?

http://antonyjohn.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/thinking-cap.gif

Dunno.

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: danootaandme on 10/20/13 at 8:12 am

Time isn't holding us, time isn't after us
Time isn't holding us, time doesn't hold you back
Time isn't holding us, time isn't after us
Time isn't holding us...
Letting the days go by, letting the days go by, letting the days go by, once in a lifetime
Letting the days go by, letting the days go by, letting the days go by, once in a lifetime


Once in a Lifetime - Talking heads

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: Howard on 10/20/13 at 3:38 pm

I think, worse.

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: Philip Eno on 10/20/13 at 4:37 pm

About the same, economically speaking.

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: whistledog on 10/20/13 at 5:24 pm


For who?  Where?


what? when? why?

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: warped on 10/20/13 at 6:20 pm


For who?  Where?



what? when? why?


These questions—and many others—will be answered in the next episode of...SOAP.

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: 80sfan on 10/20/13 at 6:38 pm


That reminds me, time to check my 401k


Glad I could remind you!  ;D

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: danootaandme on 10/21/13 at 5:06 am

The 2000s weren't bad until the debacle of 2008, after that there were a couple of rough years, but, luckily, I am at the end of my working career and wasn't stupid with money, so now I can retire in gentile poverty and hope that the baggers don't warp and twist the social programs that allow me to eat and remain in my small, comfortable home.

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: LyricBoy on 10/21/13 at 5:57 am

Well in the 2010's we now have a liberated Miley Cyrus, which would have to count for something.

On the other hand, the emancipation of the Olsen Twins in 2004 turned out to be pretty much a bust.

So I say advantage: 2010's.    ;D

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: Howard on 10/21/13 at 6:29 am


These questions—and many others—will be answered in the next episode of...SOAP.


;D

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: Howard on 10/21/13 at 6:31 am

I think, money-wise it's still the same.

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: gibbo on 10/21/13 at 8:50 pm


For who?  Where?

what? when? why?


I think I know the answer ... Who was on 1st, What was on 2nd ... Why was Left Field ... and Where wasn't even playing!  How and when this happened? ... I can't answer that one.  :-\\

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: 1993 on 10/23/13 at 8:20 am

Seems to me we've been in an economic rut since 2000 or so, with brief teases of things getting better

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: danootaandme on 10/23/13 at 4:44 pm


Seems to me we've been in an economic rut since 2000 or so, with brief teases of things getting better
.

Since 2008...well the working persons real wages have been stagnant since the '80s, but in 2008 they really took a dive.

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: 80sfan on 10/25/13 at 9:53 pm

The American economy was great from 1983 to 1989, then 1992 to 2000, then it was okay from 2002 to 2007. And then came September of 2008!!

We've had it good for about three decades, that's a pretty long period of economic growth.

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: Emman on 10/26/13 at 10:06 am


The American economy was great from 1983 to 1989, then 1992 to 2000, then it was okay from 2002 to 2007. And then came September of 2008!!

We've had it good for about three decades, that's a pretty long period of economic growth.


Yeah the long boom stretches from 1982 through 2008, the post war boom was long as well, running from the late '40s to 1973.

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: XYkid on 10/29/13 at 12:08 am

I'd say better simply because there isn't as much paranoia as there was during the first years of the Iraq War. Plus music and TV seem to be getting better, I'm also enjoying the whole 90s revival in fashion as well as the 70s/80s revival in music. The economy is better than it was 4 years ago, but not by much.

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: 80sfan on 10/29/13 at 1:35 am


Yeah the long boom stretches from 1982 through 2008, the post war boom was long as well, running from the late '40s to 1973.


After WWII eh?  ;)

Subject: Re: Are things better or worse in the 2010s than they were in the 2000s?

Written By: MarioDaDon on 11/03/13 at 11:43 am

Economically wise since 2008 , it's been gradually get worse with no indication of improvement , before that we were neutral . Social wise , it's been a downward spiral since Facebook & twitter have been the two main sources of communication since the late 00's people seem to be becoming more anti social 

Check for new replies or respond here...