» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Google
  Web inthe00s.com



Subject: Britpop vs. Grunge, Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam vs. Oasis vs. Blur

Written By: Trimac20 on 04/23/06 at 5:40 am

Which do you listen to more/like more? What do you think about the four main players in the Grunge and Brit-pop movements?


Subject: Re: Britpop vs. Grunge, Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam vs. Oasis vs. Blur

Written By: chaka on 04/23/06 at 5:50 am

I certainly prefer "grunge".
Well what should I say of the "Big Four"?
They're amazing  :D
You can't beat Alice In Chains,Layne's voice is crazy,it's amazing.
Pearl Jam are still going strong with a new album out the 2nd May (1st here in Europe  :D )
Soungarden rock so hard,it's a shame people only remember the Superunknown album because their previous stuff are amazing.
And Nirvana...well what can I say.

I think it's a shame that alot of other great bands of the time are forgotten like Mother Love Bone, Screaming Trees, Mad Season, Green River and MUDHONEY! They rock and they're also still around with a new album (Under A Billion Suns) that was released in March.

Grunge may be dead but it certainly lives on..somehow.
Just forget this post-grunge rubbish like Nickelback etc..

Subject: Re: Britpop vs. Grunge, Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam vs. Oasis vs. Blur

Written By: Red Ant on 04/23/06 at 6:57 am


I certainly prefer "grunge".



Me too.



Well what should I say of the "Big Four"?
They're amazing  :D
You can't beat Alice In Chains,Layne's voice is crazy,it's amazing.



Layne's voice is one of the best I've ever heard, and certainly the best in the genre, though Chris Cornell's voice is a very close second.



Pearl Jam are still going strong with a new album out the 2nd May (1st here in Europe  :D )



Haven't followed Pearl Jam much in recent years, but I look foward to their new album.



Soungarden rock so hard,it's a shame people only remember the Superunknown album because their previous stuff are amazing.



I always thought Down On The Upside was their best work, and Badmotorfinger better than Superunknown. I have all 3 of these CDs, and Superunknown isn't bad, but isn't their best. I'd love to get some of their pre-Badmotorfinger CDs.



And Nirvana...well what can I say.



Everyone is gay?  ;D All Apologies lyrics, not my own words there, but I couldn't resist.



I think it's a shame that alot of other great bands of the time are forgotten like Mother Love Bone, Screaming Trees, Mad Season, Green River and MUDHONEY! They rock and they're also still around with a new album (Under A Billion Suns) that was released in March.



Mad Season's "Above" is a killer CD. Barret Martin Baker from Screaming Trees and Mike McCready from Pearl Jam are on it along with Layne. Mark Arm (from Mudhoney) can be heard on "Right Turn" on the Sap CD. Also, I've found a fairly rare Alice in Chains/Pearl Jam collaboration called "Alone", not to be confused with the Pearl Jam song by the same name. Don't forget Temple of the Dog, and Mark Lanegan from Screaming Trees also did "Long Gone Day".

In other words, they aren't forgotten.



Grunge may be dead but it certainly lives on..somehow.
Just forget this post-grunge rubbish like Nickelback etc..


Audioslave isn't bad, and some of Godsmack's stuff is really good. I like a lot of Tool's and KoRn's works too, though I'm not sure if they are considered post-grunge. Days Of The New, Big Wreck and The Nixons had promise, well, not really - they had one or two songs that were great anyway.

Subject: Re: Britpop vs. Grunge, Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam vs. Oasis vs. Blur

Written By: whistledog on 04/23/06 at 1:25 pm

Blur and other Brit-Pop like bands were good

Subject: Re: Britpop vs. Grunge, Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam vs. Oasis vs. Blur

Written By: Trimac20 on 04/23/06 at 8:26 pm

[quote author=wһіѕ

Subject: Re: Britpop vs. Grunge, Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam vs. Oasis vs. Blur

Written By: Ged on 06/13/06 at 7:41 pm

Cornell was a better singer than Staley.

Blur were also better than Oasis, though Oasis benefit from some disgracefully blatant anti-Blur media coverage.

Subject: Re: Britpop vs. Grunge, Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam vs. Oasis vs. Blur

Written By: Ged on 06/14/06 at 6:38 am

I also meant to say that I prefer the grunge movement. The bands were simply more talented than the britpop brigade generally (barring the obvious Radiohead - though I don't consider them britpop). Ironically, Nirvana were probably the least talented of the big four of grunge. 

Subject: Re: Britpop vs. Grunge, Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam vs. Oasis vs. Blur

Written By: chaka on 06/14/06 at 8:22 am


Ironically, Nirvana were probably the least talented of the big four of grunge. 

Yeah,I agree.If you compare them to the other 3 you see there's much more creativity in those bands but hey,if Kurt wasn't dead,Nirvana would have also moved on in another direction.

Subject: Re: Britpop vs. Grunge, Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam vs. Oasis vs. Blur

Written By: GoodRedShirt on 06/14/06 at 10:01 pm

I prefer Britpop. But I consider myself more of a British music fan than American. The only grunge bands that I thought were outstanding were Soundgarden and Alice in Chains. Nirvana and Pearl Jam are highly overrated.

Subject: Re: Britpop vs. Grunge, Nirvana vs. Pearl Jam vs. Oasis vs. Blur

Written By: Trimac20 on 06/14/06 at 11:37 pm


Yeah,I agree.If you compare them to the other 3 you see there's much more creativity in those bands but hey,if Kurt wasn't dead,Nirvana would have also moved on in another direction.


No one can doubt Kurt's prodigious talent as a songwriter - even if alot of his songs did sound the same, but yes, I agree Nirvana were perhaps the least creative of the four in terms of versatility, variety.etc. Blur were the most 'arty' of the four bands.

Check for new replies or respond here...