» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Screwball54 on 06/24/02 at 10:28 p.m.

Granted I know nothiing about creating a message board, Or how difficult It would be to do, but now that some people are approaching 2000 posts, 500 just doesn't seem so Royal anymore.  

Of course it not up to me, but maybe a few more ranks could be added in between, so we could have ranks at:

2000
1500
1000
500
250
100
50
1

Am I totally wrong, or does anyone like the Idea

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Bobo on 06/24/02 at 10:39 p.m.

I'm not sure if the numbers can be changed so that they still register at higher values - Hairspray and RNR are long past them.

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: southernspitfire on 06/24/02 at 10:42 p.m.

Bobo your ugly album is not working!! :'(

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Bobo on 06/24/02 at 10:45 p.m.

Well, it's Guns 'n' Roses' Spaghetti Incident, the world's ugliest album. Can't stand spaghetti. Eww, ugly stuff. I'm going to revert back today, though.

Quoting:
Bobo your ugly album is not working!! :'(
End Quote

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Screwball54 on 06/24/02 at 10:46 p.m.


Quoting:
Bobo your ugly album is not working!! :'(
End Quote



It works for me, it just takes a long time to download, Bobo why not use this image:
http://gs.cdnow.com/graphics/COVERART/local/L/90/08/00009008.jpg

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Indy Gent on 06/24/02 at 10:47 p.m.

Is that why their count is always "A whole lot"? ;)

Quoting:
I'm not sure if the numbers can be changed so that they still register at higher values - Hairspray and RNR are long past them.
End Quote

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: RockandRollFan on 06/24/02 at 11:09 p.m.


Quoting:
Is that why their count is always "A whole lot"? ;)

End Quote


:-X

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Bobo on 06/24/02 at 11:16 p.m.

Thanks Screwball, it's better quality than mine was anyway. Back on topic.

Quoting:


It works for me, it just takes a long time to download, Bobo why not use this image:
http://gs.cdnow.com/graphics/COVERART/local/L/90/08/00009008.jpg
End Quote



I know JC, I just thought that "A Whole Lot" meant that the post count overloaded at some point and couldn't cope with the high numbers any more.

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: southernspitfire on 06/24/02 at 11:23 p.m.

chucky gave them "a whole lot" for a reason...but like RNR I am  :-X on why...you will have to ask Chuck why!!!

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Jonman on 06/25/02 at 01:12 a.m.


Quoting:
Granted I know nothiing about creating a message board, Or how difficult It would be to do, but now that some people are approaching 2000 posts, 500 just doesn't seem so Royal anymore.....  

End Quote



Oh sure...I finally reach 500 this weekend and now that's not good enough......sheesh....story of my life...

;)

J/K! I couldn't really care less...I just love this board!

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Mystery Woman on 06/25/02 at 01:17 a.m.


Quoting:


Oh sure...I finally reach 500 this weekend and now that's not good enough......sheesh....story of my life...

;)

J/K! I couldn't really care less...I just love this board!
End Quote



Awww, Jonman, we love you too!!!  :-*

(Look out guys, they're baaaaaaaaaaack... ;) )

Congrats on 500, baybee!  ;D



ON TOPIC:

Personally, I don't care if the ranks change.  Perhaps there should be different levels as higher milestones are reached.  Does it really matter, though?  I don't know of anyone here who posts for the sake of boosting his rank.

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Jonman on 06/25/02 at 01:19 a.m.


Quoting:


Awww, Jonman, we love you too!!!  :-*

(Look out guys, they're baaaaaaaaaaack... ;) )

Congrats on 500, baybee!  ;D



ON TOPIC:

Personally, I don't care if the ranks change.  Perhaps there should be different levels as higher milestones are reached.  Does it really matter, though?  I don't know of anyone here who posts for the sake of boosting his rank.
End Quote



I know I certainly wouldn't do that...oh no...no no no...

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: CeramicsFanatic on 06/25/02 at 01:28 a.m.

Honestly, I really don't care about the ranks.  I'd be happy even if we didn't have numbers under our names.  Afterall, it's only a number.  I just like to participate in the fun on this site!

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Jonman on 06/25/02 at 01:31 a.m.


Quoting:
Honestly, I really don't care about the ranks.  I'd be happy even if we didn't have numbers under our names.  Afterall, it's only a number.  I just like to participate in the fun on this site!
End Quote



Ditto Karen! Just my name and my avatar..that's all I need...and this lamp....and this Thermos...and this chair...

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Hairspray on 06/25/02 at 05:48 a.m.

Quoting:
...I just thought that "A Whole Lot" meant that the post count overloaded at some point and couldn't cope with the high numbers any more.
End Quote




Yeah, that's it.   :)

Edited to add: I have no cares about rankings remaining the same or being changed. I hardly pay attention to numbers and titles anymore. I just care about you and your posts.  :)

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Crazy Don on 06/25/02 at 07:01 a.m.

I really never cared for the number of posts nor the rankings and when I did make note of it, I did it in a sarcastic fashion.  Hairspray has "a whole lot" of posts because (s)he (Hairspray does not reveal gender; we assume female) is one of the moderators and the first to ring up 1,000 posts since this board began; Rock&RollFan also has "a lot of posts" because he had well over 1,000 posts before the crash but was reverted to his original screen name and 12 posts when the board came back; he restarted his account with his current screen name, became a webpage editor and Chucky credited him with all those missing posts by giving him "a whole lot."

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: ChuckyG on 06/25/02 at 08:37 a.m.


Quoting:
I really never cared for the number of posts nor the rankings and when I did make note of it, I did it in a sarcastic fashion.  Hairspray has "a whole lot" of posts because (s)he (Hairspray does not reveal gender; we assume female) is one of the moderators and the first to ring up 1,000 posts since this board began; Rock&RollFan also has "a lot of posts" because he had well over 1,000 posts before the crash but was reverted to his original screen name and 12 posts when the board came back; he restarted his account with his current screen name, became a webpage editor and Chucky credited him with all those missing posts by giving him "a whole lot."
End Quote



wow.. you could be like board historian there crazydon..

I actually asked the question about adding new ranks a while ago when the board first started, but most people felt 500 was good enough.. the average member takes at least three or four months to reach that many.. one of the boards I visit has two ranks, one is for everyone, one is for people who have hit 1,500.. you get a lot of stupid crap posted when you have a system like that (rewards stupidity, and in this case, the board has a lot of stupid crap)

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Tarzan Boy (Guest) on 06/25/02 at 11:03 a.m.

...and I delete my posts so I don't change rank. There's no Chilly Willy penguin rank - what gives ??? If the numbers and ranks were gone, I'd log in and post away like crazy. I usually do that anyway without logging in though ::) Oh, and I did a search on the archives on me and I found out I can find some of my "unofficial" posts, which takes away the novelty of not logging in for the sake that when the thread disappears any past stupid posts of mine will not be found :-/

Tarzan Boy

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: ChuckyG on 06/25/02 at 11:47 a.m.


Quoting:
...and I delete my posts so I don't change rank. There's no Chilly Willy penguin rank - what gives ??? If the numbers and ranks were gone, I'd log in and post away like crazy. I usually do that anyway without logging in though ::) Oh, and I did a search on the archives on me and I found out I can find some of my "unofficial" posts, which takes away the novelty of not logging in for the sake that when the thread disappears any past stupid posts of mine will not be found :-/

Tarzan Boy
End Quote



the archive search finds all evil.. follow the archive link at the top of the messageboard pages, and use the primative search function, you'll find all your posts (except for the past week or two, and the couple of months lost due to the hacker)

Subject: Re: Do you think the ranks should change?

Written By: Tarzan Boy (Guest) on 06/25/02 at 11:54 a.m.


Quoting:


the archive search finds all evil...
End Quote



GASP! :-X I could change my post name from now on and continue my evil doing and saying stupid things without being being afraid of getting caught infraganti...hehehe 8)

Tarzan Boy