inthe00s
The Pop Culture Information Society...

These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.

Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.

This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.




Check for new replies or respond here...

Subject: No Decadeology?

Written By: Donnie Darko on 07/10/06 at 8:59 pm

Chucky wants no more decadeology threads!  :o  You won't be seeing as much of me  :\'(

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Rice_Cube on 07/10/06 at 9:04 pm

Sorry dude.  Maybe you should confine it to like one topic that already exists.

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Davester on 07/10/06 at 9:05 pm

  You can contribute in other ways.  I mean, Chucky hasn't banned you...

  There's much ground to cover concerning any decade...

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Donnie Darko on 07/10/06 at 9:06 pm

We can still talk about bands and TV shows  :-\\

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: quirky_cat_girl on 07/10/06 at 9:07 pm

can't you just be happy posting in the already existing decadeology threads? Why must you not be content unless you can create 10 new ones a day?

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: whistledog on 07/10/06 at 9:08 pm


Chucky wants no more decadeology threads!


The way it should be

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: MidKnightDarkness on 07/10/06 at 9:11 pm

Aww, no more Decadeology Threads, eh? That's too bad.



...(>:-}D)

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Sister Morphine on 07/10/06 at 9:15 pm

It's not the end of the world.  There are plenty of other threads here for you to post in and get involved with.  This is not a valid reason to "quit" the board. 

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: bbigd04 on 07/10/06 at 9:16 pm

I think you were going too overboard on the decadeology topics and Chucky just got sick of it. It gets to be too much of the same thing posted over and over again. I think that the decade boards should be about the pop culture within the specific decades (1980-1989, 1990-1999, etc) and not tons of topics about when the so-called feel of a decade began and ended. It's time to move on to something else.

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Roadgeek on 07/10/06 at 9:29 pm

I'm a semi decadeologist. But I'm not upset about this. I originally joined to talk about anything '90s and my experiences in the '90s. The surface of the decade (Decadeology) is just one of the many ways you can study the '90s or any other decade. I'll do just that.

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Dominic L. on 07/10/06 at 9:30 pm

WOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

I mean... Aw, I'm sorry, I suppose my reason for coming here is gone!

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: bbigd04 on 07/10/06 at 9:30 pm

What exactly constitutes a decadeology topic anyway? Is there a specific set of criteria? lol

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: velvetoneo on 07/10/06 at 9:58 pm

Is pop culture analysis all right, like as when the general image of things changed on MTV, why artists became more/less popular, etc.? That's what I'm into, and those tend to field alot of responses.

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: bbigd04 on 07/10/06 at 10:00 pm


Is pop culture analysis all right, like as when the general image of things changed on MTV, why artists became more/less popular, etc.? That's what I'm into, and those tend to field alot of responses.


Yes I would imagine so. The type of topics being banned are the "is 1990 the '80s?" type topics.

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: velvetoneo on 07/10/06 at 10:01 pm


Yes I would imagine so. The type of topics being banned are the "is 1990 the '80s?" type topics.


Yeah...those turned into spam LONG AGO.

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Trimac20 on 07/10/06 at 10:05 pm


Yeah...those turned into spam LONG AGO.


Yet you still relished replying to them?  ;D

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Tia on 07/10/06 at 10:19 pm

i think the late 90s were the best decade for decadeology threads.

and by the late 90s, i mean, of course, the early to mid-2000s, which were way more 90s than the 90s.

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Sister Morphine on 07/10/06 at 10:19 pm


i think the late 90s were the best decade for decadeology threads.

and by the late 90s, i mean, of course, the early to mid-2000s, which were way more 90s than the 90s.




;D  ;D  ;D

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Davester on 07/10/06 at 10:26 pm


i think the late 90s were the best decade for decadeology threads.

and by the late 90s, i mean, of course, the early to mid-2000s, which were way more 90s than the 90s.


   *beats Tia repeatedly about the head and shoulders with a rubber chicken*

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: DJ Midas on 07/10/06 at 10:27 pm


i think the late 90s were the best decade for decadeology threads.

and by the late 90s, i mean, of course, the early to mid-2000s, which were way more 90s than the 90s.


So does that mean the early 90's were like the 80's or were the 80's like early 90's?  ???

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Dagwood on 07/10/06 at 10:29 pm

I think the early 80's were like the late 90's. ;)

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: whistledog on 07/10/06 at 10:33 pm


So does that mean the early 90's were like the 80's or were the 80's like early 90's?  ???


1980s B.C. were great times.  Cavemen bashing dinosaurs over the head with clubs, then dragging it home to cook dinner for their cavegals ;D

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Dominic L. on 07/10/06 at 10:34 pm


i think the late 90s were the best decade for decadeology threads.

and by the late 90s, i mean, of course, the early to mid-2000s, which were way more 90s than the 90s.


No, the mid 2000s were more 2000s. The early 2000s were more 90s. And the 90s didn't start until '96.

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: velvetoneo on 07/10/06 at 11:13 pm


Yet you still relished replying to them?  ;D


Meh...

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: DJ Midas on 07/10/06 at 11:17 pm


1980s B.C. were great times.  Cavemen bashing dinosaurs over the head with clubs, then dragging it home to cook dinner for their cavegals ;D


I remember that!  TOGA!!  :D

Did you prefer houndstooth-patterned garments back then or was that more 1990's B.C. ?  ???

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Marty McFly on 07/10/06 at 11:50 pm


Is pop culture analysis all right, like as when the general image of things changed on MTV, why artists became more/less popular, etc.? That's what I'm into, and those tend to field alot of responses.


That's more along the lines of how I've always prefered doing it, too (discussion stuff).

IMO, the list/chart type threads are okay in a limited amount, but perhaps there should be one sticky thread for that (no more "new" ones), and/or just bump an existing one if you have any new thoughts on the "is 1991 the 80s" styled topics.

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 07/10/06 at 11:59 pm


I'm a semi decadeologist. But I'm not upset about this. I originally joined to talk about anything '90s and my experiences in the '90s. The surface of the decade (Decadeology) is just one of the many ways you can study the '90s or any other decade. I'll do just that.



That's the same reason I joined. I don't think this is necessarily the end of "Decadeology".IMO there's still plenty of ways to talk about/anylize a decade than just disscussing where it "began" or "ended"

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: bbigd04 on 07/11/06 at 12:01 am



That's the same reason I joined. I don't think this is necessarily the end of "Decadeology".IMO there's still plenty of ways to talk about/anylize a decade than just disscussing where it "began" or "ended"


Yeah I didn't come here to discuss whethere 1999 is '90s or '00s, I came to talk about the 1990-1999 and 2000-2009 decades.

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: whistledog on 07/11/06 at 12:37 am


I remember that!   TOGA!!  :D

Did you prefer houndstooth-patterned garments back then or was that more 1990's B.C. ?   ???


The houndstooth pattern was more 1970s B.C. but it carried well into 2010 B.C.

Man, those were the times O0

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Sister Morphine on 07/11/06 at 12:39 am


The houndstooth pattern was more 1970s B.C. but it carried well into 2010 B.C.

Man, those were the times O0



Yeah, but was 1970 B.C more like 1969 B.C or 1971 B.C.?

Subject: Re: No Decadeology?

Written By: Donnie Darko on 07/11/06 at 12:43 am

Have all the fun you want :D

Check for new replies or respond here...