??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) I was just wondering about the cruteria for new song name.The everly brothers have a song called "Stick With me,Baby'which is the flip side of "Temptation".I submitted "Stick IT IN me ,Baby" as the new name for the song---get the joke???as the flip side to "Temptation.My question is--is this for some reason considered too raunchy???Because some of the new names have the f-word or are just plain gross.I was just wondering what the criteria is--I'll take your r it.I just thought my submission was pretty clever.Cheers!;)

I've been having the same problem too.  I want to submit "B i t c h y Woman" for the Eagles' "Witchy Woman" myself but I haven't seen it listed, and I know I put it up at least twice.

Yeah,if there is really something wrong with it,I'll go along with it--the question is WHAT??Because when submissions have f#*k or gross references in them,it's hard to determine why one is OK and one isn't.If they just don't think it's that clever,well,I'll have to accept their opinion--I just thought mine was more clever than a lot of them,and the new title i made up really goes with the A-side,IMHO.Cheers!

I think that section is very far behind in approving new entries.. it gets swamped with submissions, so it could be a few months before anything appears..

Same here...  ::)