
» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society
Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.
If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.
Subject: A Question of grammar
Written By: K1chyd on 08/15/04 at 9:35 am
Hi! Can you native-swirling-tounges help this poor Swede out before his brain becomes a mashed potatoe or something like that? It´s about the term "next of kin", will that in plural be "nexts of kin" or is "next of kin" both singular and plural?
 // Peter
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: EthanM on 08/15/04 at 10:59 am
i don't think i've heard of next of kin ever being plural but i'm pretty sure nexts of kin is not right since nexts is never a word in english
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: K1chyd on 08/15/04 at 11:35 am
Thanx Ethan. That´s what I thought and as far as I remember also what I was tought in school. For reasons that would be a long, long story to explain I had to check it (the phrase) out and Google gave me 25 hits for "nexts of kin" so I became confuzzled. :-)
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: Rick D on 08/15/04 at 12:23 pm
Mari says same for plural and singular, as "kin" is both.
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: philbo on 08/15/04 at 12:46 pm
I'd go with Mari on this.
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: Arwen on 08/15/04 at 6:14 pm
Yeah...my worthless degree in English didn't get me much of a job...but I do know that there's no plural for next...=)
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: K1chyd on 08/16/04 at 10:05 am
Next question:
If a ward in a hospital has more patients than beds, do you referre to it as being "overcrowded", or is there a special medical term for owercrowded wards?
One more:
Is "Senior Physician in charge" the correct way to referre to the "Top Dog" among the Senior Physicians on a ward? Or, again, is there some special medical term for that position?
Sorry for taking up place with this that has nothing directly to do with parodying, but knowing myself all too well these terms etc will probably end up used that way too, sooner or later. :-)
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: philbo on 08/16/04 at 5:21 pm
If a ward in a hospital has more patients than beds, do you referre to it as being "overcrowded", or is there a special medical term for owercrowded wards?
Overcrowded will do... unless you're a NHS manager, then it's probably something like "120% utilisation of resources"
Is "Senior Physician in charge" the correct way to referre to the "Top Dog" among the Senior Physicians on a ward? Or, again, is there some special medical term for that position?
In the UK you wouldn't refer to the "senior physician" (it has a bit of a transatlantic ring to it); typically "Senior Consultant" or some such, I guess - you could always refer to "Sir Lancelot Sprat" (for anyone who's seen Doctor in the House, that is)
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: Peregrin on 08/16/04 at 6:06 pm
Next question:
If a ward in a hospital has more patients than beds, do you referre to it as being "overcrowded", or is there a special medical term for owercrowded wards?
Tongue in cheek, I would say the term is "Typical" :P
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: K1chyd on 08/18/04 at 2:49 pm
In the UK you wouldn't refer to the "senior physician" (it has a bit of a transatlantic ring to it); typically "Senior Consultant" or some such, I guess - you could always refer to "Sir Lancelot Sprat" (for anyone who's seen Doctor in the House, that is)
I think they are either American or Australians or Dutch (speaking english). :-)
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: Luke Brattoni on 08/20/04 at 1:29 am
I think they are either American or Australians or Dutch (speaking english). :-)
Hey! I take offense to 1/3 of that comment! ;)
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: FussBudgetVanPelt on 08/20/04 at 8:01 am
Hey! I take offense to 1/3 of that comment! ;)
I take offense to 2/3 of it, if you get my drift Luke ;D ;)
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: DoRitos on 08/21/04 at 9:31 pm
Is "Senior Physician in charge" the correct way to referre to the "Top Dog" among the Senior Physicians on a ward? Or, again, is there some special medical term for that position?
If this were a military hospital the SPIC (Senior Physician in Charge) would probably be refered to the HMFWIC.  ;D
Whereas a department head would likely be referred to as the MFWIC. ::)
Subject: Re: A Question of grammar
Written By: K1chyd on 08/22/04 at 7:40 am
If this were a military hospital the SPIC (Senior Physician in Charge) would probably be refered to the HMFWIC.  ;D
Whereas a department head would likely be referred to as the MFWIC. ::)
Care to expand on those abbreviations?