inthe00s
The Pop Culture Information Society...

These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.

Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.

This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.




Check for new replies or respond here...

Subject: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: snozberries on 07/30/08 at 6:02 pm


This thread is inspired by the Lost Boys 2 being released on DVD. 


I admit I am watching the Two Coreys  :-[  (A pretty bad reality show on A&E or is it Bravo?)  But I don't know if I want to see a sequel to the lost boys.


Also  Beverly Hills Cop 3 really two BHC movies were plenty entertaining thanks.

Superman 3 and 4 (Except for one scene in IV the whole movie is crap)


and since this is my thread I am banning any bashing of Grease II.... if you didn't like the movie you probably already said so in the G2 thread. I LOVE this film and therefore find it to be a valuable sequel.  >:(


Dirty Dancing Havana Nights....now that's another thing entirely.  ;D



Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Bobby on 07/30/08 at 6:37 pm

Dare I say it, I enjoyed Superman III, lol. I think it was because Richard Pryor was in it.

Good thread this and here are my nominations off the top of my head . . .

Mannequin 2: On the move
Speed II
Anything after the Star Wars trilogy (Star Wars, Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi)
Anything before or after Friday the 13th part VI: Jason Lives
Ghostbusters II
Saw II - IV (so far)
Anything after Halloween I
Splash II
Anything after Dirty Dancing

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: loki 13 on 07/30/08 at 6:44 pm

Jaws 3-D.....The second one was watchable but after that it was just garbage.

Rocky 4..... and any subsequent Rockies.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 07/30/08 at 7:06 pm

There have been plenty of bad sequels over the years but one stands out above the rest:

http://www.thetechnodrome.com/images/ovhs/tmnt3.jpg

Worst. Sequel. Ever. If only they had stopped at the second one. ::)

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: snozberries on 07/30/08 at 7:07 pm


Dare I say it, I enjoyed Superman III, lol. I think it was because Richard Pryor was in it.

Good thread this and here are my nominations off the top of my head . . .

Mannequin 2: On the move
Speed II
Anything after the Star Wars trilogy (Star Wars, Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi)
Anything before or after Friday the 13th part VI: Jason Lives
Ghostbusters II
Saw II - IV (so far)
Anything after Halloween I
Splash II
Anything after Dirty Dancing


I'll give you Richard Pryor in Superman III

I don't know I Friday the 13th VII was my favorite one...it was the sleeping bag against the tree that got me!




Jaws 3-D.....The second one was watchable but after that it was just garbage.

Rocky 4..... and any subsequent Rockies.




AW... I liked Rocky IV.... "I must break you!"  ;)  Plus there's that whole US beats Russia angle



For myself I forgot to mention...

Die Hard 2  (It's the only movie in the franchise I dislike)



Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: snozberries on 07/30/08 at 7:09 pm


There have been plenty of bad sequels over the years but one stands out above the rest:

http://www.thetechnodrome.com/images/ovhs/tmnt3.jpg

Worst. Sequel. Ever. If only they had stopped at the second one. ::)



although the pic didn't show up I gather from the link http://www.thetechnodrome.com/images/ovhs/tmnt3.jpg  that you pick Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 3  ;D


I agree


Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 07/30/08 at 7:16 pm



although the pic didn't show up I gather from the link http://www.thetechnodrome.com/images/ovhs/tmnt3.jpg  that you pick Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 3   ;D


I agree






That would be the one. ;)

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Reynolds1863 on 07/30/08 at 7:25 pm

The Thornbirds (The Missing Years)  Give me the first one anyday.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: snozberries on 07/30/08 at 7:31 pm


The Thornbirds (The Missing Years)  Give me the first one anyday.


lol I didn't even know they made a sequel to that.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: whistledog on 07/30/08 at 8:16 pm

Superman III yes.  But I liked Superman IV.  Nuclear Man was a great opponent for Superman


♦ Mannequin II:  On the Move
♦ Addams Family Reunion
♦ National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation 2:  Cousin Eddie's Island Adventure
♦ Arthur 2: On the Rocks
♦ Dumber and Dumberer:  When Harry Met Lloyd
♦ American Psycho 2
♦ Glass House:  The Good Mother
♦ Home Alone 3
♦ Home Alone 4: Taking Back the House
♦ Like Mike 2:  Streetball
♦ The Next Karate Kid (No Ralph Macchio, no thanks)
♦ Problem Child 3:  Junior in Love
♦ Encino Woman
♦ Teen Wolf Too
♦ Walking Tall:  Payback
♦ Walking Tall:  Lone Justice

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Jeffpcmt on 07/30/08 at 8:41 pm

Let us not forget the worst sequel ever to a comedy classic:

CADDYSHACK 2

'nuff said

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: whistledog on 07/30/08 at 8:45 pm

^ I am probably the only person in the world who thought Caddyshack II was better than the original.  I liked 'em both, but the sequel is my all-time favourite sequel of any movie

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: snozberries on 07/30/08 at 8:48 pm


Encino Woman? You sure that wasn't just one of those titles they give those movies you love to watch Jason?  ;)

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Foo Bar on 07/30/08 at 8:57 pm

Highlander 2: There Should Have Been Only One.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: snozberries on 07/30/08 at 9:06 pm


Alien 3 and 4 (there should have only been two)

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: whistledog on 07/30/08 at 9:28 pm


Encino Woman? You sure that wasn't just one of those titles they give those movies you love to watch Jason?   ;)



LOL

Encino Woman was a made-for-tv remake to Encino Man

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: NbC on 07/31/08 at 11:38 am

Lost Boys: The Tribe  (well, to be honest I haven't seen it but I am sure I won't be wrong by saying it is Bad)

Poltergeist III

Exorcist II:  The Heretic

Blair Witch II:  The Book of Shadows (This is a movie that never should have been made.  First and Second part)

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Paul on 07/31/08 at 2:48 pm

Gulf War II - the first one was bad enough!  ::)

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Bobby on 07/31/08 at 4:25 pm


AW... I liked Rocky IV.... "I must break you!"  ;)  Plus there's that whole US beats Russia angle


Even though it's the most ridiculous one of the lot, I enjoyed Rocky IV too.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: snozberries on 08/01/08 at 10:01 pm


LOL

Encino Woman was a made-for-tv remake to Encino Man



where'd it air? Skin-e-max?  Just kidding...thanks for the warning tho I will be sure to avoid it at all costs.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: snozberries on 08/01/08 at 10:03 pm


Gulf War II - the first one was bad enough!  ::)


;D



okay that was nice....karma for sneaking that one in... sadly I had to think about it (but just for a second) before I got it.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: MaxwellSmart on 08/02/08 at 9:44 pm


Lost Boys: The Tribe  (well, to be honest I haven't seen it but I am sure I won't be wrong by saying it is Bad)

Poltergeist III

Exorcist II:  The Heretic

Blair Witch II:  The Book of Shadows (This is a movie that never should have been made.  First and Second part)


I agree on all counts, except I'm a fan of the original BWP.  It's main drawback is the college kids are annoying.  I went to see the sequel without reading any reviews.  I didn't realize the original guys had nothing to do with it.

This category is too broad for me because most sequels are extraneous.  The worst ones are the ones that were never intended to be a series, but they're trying to cash in on a blockbuster. 

The "Revenge of the Nerds," "Beverly Hills Cop," and "Home Alone" sequels are prime examples.

Franchises such as Freddy and Jason have been jokes for 20 years.  Heck, the "Friday the 13th" series was laughable in 1981!
::)

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: greenjello74 on 08/02/08 at 10:00 pm

Any rocy movies after the first one. Whats next Rocky in a wheelchairZ?
All Star wars movies made after the original three.
Star Trek 3

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: ralfy on 09/27/16 at 8:28 am

"‘Blair Witch’ Producer Explains Why Sequels and Remakes Aren’t Going Anywhere"

http://www.slashfilm.com/blair-witch-producer-talks-sequels/

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Reynolds1863 on 09/29/16 at 3:31 pm

Doctor Dolittle :P

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Howard on 09/29/16 at 3:46 pm


Doctor Dolittle :P


I know, I agree with that.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Philip Eno on 09/29/16 at 5:51 pm


Doctor Dolittle :P

Thanks for the warning, I have not seen it yet.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Baltimoreian on 09/29/16 at 7:03 pm

"Candyman 3: Day of the Dead" is one of the most unwanted sequels I've ever seen. The 2nd movie was interesting, but the 3rd one didn't show any purpose on existing.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Philip Eno on 09/29/16 at 7:32 pm


"‘Blair Witch’ Producer Explains Why Sequels and Remakes Aren’t Going Anywhere"

http://www.slashfilm.com/blair-witch-producer-talks-sequels/

Never seen the original, and I may keep it that way.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Philip Eno on 09/29/16 at 7:37 pm

Over the years I have never got to see the Psycho sequels, and definitely the remake, I hope to keep it that way.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: ralfy on 09/30/16 at 1:59 am


Never seen the original, and I may keep it that way.


It's OK, and in some ways reminds me of films like 84 Charlie Mopic.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Philip Eno on 09/30/16 at 2:45 am


It's OK, and in some ways reminds me of films like 84 Charlie Mopic.

I bear that in mind.

Subject: Re: Sequels they never should have made

Written By: Knew Wave on 10/02/16 at 10:03 pm

The Star Wars movies come to mind. The first trilogy is just fine. It doesn't need prequels or sequels. Frankly, "four" franchise films should be the limit in the best of cases.

Check for new replies or respond here...