inthe00s
The Pop Culture Information Society...

These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.

Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.

This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.




Check for new replies or respond here...

Subject: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/07/17 at 12:29 am

I often think about what are the biggest differences between people my age and those 10 years my junior. What do you guys think are the biggest key differences? Which year would you rather be born in?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 80sfan on 08/07/17 at 12:31 am

1987 born got to experience a few years before the internet exploded in popularity!  :o

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/07/17 at 12:32 am

One are 90s kids, other are mid 00s kids.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/07/17 at 12:41 am


1987 born got to experience a few years before the internet exploded in popularity!  :o


Yeah that's big I remember when the Internet just came out and was some big deal, 1997 were essentially born with the internet. I mean 9/11 is obviously huge too, while I remember it very well and can recall the day exactly and also life before 9/11, a 1997 might barely remember 9/11 at best. Our teens were very different, social media didn't even really exist mainstream until I was in my 20s, while they would have went through their teens with social media. In my teens we did AIM or we even passed handwritten notes in class.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/07/17 at 12:44 am


Yeah that's big I remember when the Internet just came out and was some big deal, 1997 were essentially born with the internet. I mean 9/11 is obviously huge too, while I remember it very well and can recall the day exactly and also life before 9/11, a 1997 might barely remember 9/11 at best. Our teens were very different, social media didn't even really exist mainstream until I was in my 20s, while they would have went through their teens with social media. In my teens we did AIM or we even passed handwritten notes in class.

Agreed

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 08/07/17 at 1:45 am

1987, for reasons which most of you are probably aware of. Considering the fact that the youngest 1997 borns are only 14 and a half months older than me, it wouldn't really interest me to have been born in 1997, because the differences would be very small.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/07/17 at 2:38 pm

1987 borns

*Core childhood was from 1992-1997.
*Graduated from high school in either 2005 or 2006.
*Graduated from college in either 2009 or 2010.
*First presidential election: 2008
*13-14 when 9/11 happened.
*Can remember life before the Web became commonplace.
*Oldest person they attended mandatory schooling with was born in 1969.

1997 borns

*Core childhood was from 2002-2007.
*Graduated from high school in either 2015 or 2016.
*Graduating from college in either 2019 or 2020.
*First presidential election: 2016.
*3-4 when 9/11 happened.
*Can't remember life before the Web became commonplace.
*Oldest person they attended mandatory schooling with was born in 1979.


NOTE: This list is U.S.-centric

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: nintieskid999 on 08/07/17 at 10:26 pm


1987 borns

*Core childhood was from 1992-1997.
*Graduated from high school in either 2005 or 2006.
*Graduated from college in either 2009 or 2010.
*First presidential election: 2008
*13-14 when 9/11 happened.
*Can remember life before the Web became commonplace.
*Oldest person they attended mandatory schooling with was born in 1969.

1997 borns

*Core childhood was from 2002-2007.
*Graduated from high school in either 2015 or 2016.
*Graduating from college in either 2019 or 2020.
*First presidential election: 2016.
*3-4 when 9/11 happened.
*Can't remember life before the Web became commonplace.
*Oldest person they attended mandatory schooling with was born in 1979.


NOTE: This list is U.S.-centric


Where do you get 1969 and 1979?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: nintieskid999 on 08/07/17 at 10:28 pm


I often think about what are the biggest differences between people my age and those 10 years my junior. What do you guys think are the biggest key differences? Which year would you rather be born in?


I think a big difference is people born in 1987 are the last people to have strong memories of the early 90s, the last of the true 20th century. Also the last to have a largely social media free high school if they graduated in 2005.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/07/17 at 10:33 pm


Where do you get 1969 and 1979?


Yeah that's off, I think it's more like late 1974 for 1987 and late 1984 for 1997. Unless he really meant the oldest that were still in K-12 school when each were born, then that's basically accurate (really that would be late 1968 and late 1978 who were the oldest to graduate in 1987 and 1997 respectively).

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/07/17 at 10:34 pm


I think a big difference is people born in 1987 are the last people to have strong memories of the early 90s, the last of the true 20th century. Also the last to have a largely social media free high school if they graduated in 2005.


That is true.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/07/17 at 11:00 pm


Yeah that's off, I think it's more like late 1974 for 1987 and late 1984 for 1997. Unless he really meant the oldest that were still in K-12 school when each were born, then that's basically accurate (really that would be late 1968 and late 1978 who were the oldest to graduate in 1987 and 1997 respectively).

That's what I meant.

What do you guys think mandatory schooling is? ;D

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/07/17 at 11:09 pm


That's what I meant.

What do you guys think mandatory schooling is? ;D


It read more like the oldest that was in school when I started school as opposed to oldest in school at time of birth.

*Oldest person they attended mandatory schooling with was born in 1969.

I didn't attend mandatory schooling at the same time as someone born in 1969, but they were still in school when I was born.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/07/17 at 11:52 pm


I didn't attend mandatory schooling at the same time as someone born in 1969, but they were still in school when I was born.

That's what I meant. Anyways, the differences between you and a 1997 born is enormous.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 08/08/17 at 1:52 am


I often think about what are the biggest differences between people my age and those 10 years my junior. What do you guys think are the biggest key differences? Which year would you rather be born in?


What about 2007 borns! ;D

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 2001 on 08/08/17 at 5:19 pm

Ooo, a co-worker whom I'd consider a good friend is born mid-1986, and my boyfriend is born 1997, so maybe I'm an "expert" on this topic LOL.

1987ers are 29/30 and 1997ers are 19/20. Sorry to start off with the obvious, but those are two very different life stages, and that's a huge maturity gap. That's the first difference that stands out. 97ers still have a lot of growing up to do and a lot to learn. Their behaviour is not set in stone.

''87ers grew up with the greatest gaming gen (4th Gen), with 2D and '90s gaming in general. Street Fighter 2 never gets old. '97ers grew up with Gamecube/PS2 and the like but they were also kids when the DS/Wii were out. So if you want to feel like you aged a thousand years, just talk to a grown ass adult who has childhood nostalgia for the Wii.  :o

https://media.giphy.com/media/GrUhLU9q3nyRG/giphy.gif

'87ers grew up without the Internet and they'll remind you of that often. '97ers grew up with an iPhone in the womb and that will also be painfully obvious.

Related to the above, most 87ers don't do the Snapchat thing and a sizeable amount don't have Instagram. In my nerdy industry, many don't even have Facebook! '97ers are involved in all these things. It's like email to them, how can you not have it? :o

'87ers were of age and remember almost the entire political 2000s. Don't bother talking about how the Great Recession period was the most depressing period of your life, cause all a '97er will tell you was that that was the winter they learnt ice skating. They don't remember major world events from the early 2000s at all, so don't even go there. My friend didn't even know about the 2004 Asian Tsunami!

Related to that, '87ers were kids for the entire '90s, while '97ers were kids for the entire 2000s. Two very different decades to grow up in!

Expanding on that, most '87ers finished high school in 2005, and '97ers finished high school in 2015. If you think about all the cultural, social and technological changes that took place between 2005 and 2015, those are two very different periods to be coming of age.

I don't know if this is just the two '97ers that I know well, and one is my bf so he probably doesn't count, but they're very open about their emotions and are not afraid to cry in front of people. With other Millennials, I think talking about your emotions so openly would be considered unmanly and strange, but the '97ers I know are very comfortable in spilling their guts. Maybe it's mentally healthy in the long run, but I'm not really used to it so it can be emotionally exhausting for me. ;D

'97ers have better hair and fashion sense.  :-X :-X :-X

That's all that immediately comes to mind. I'll probably post more later.

As for whether I'd rather be an '87er or a '97er, '87ers grew up with my favourite kid culture. Being at that age in 1993-2000 must've been amazing. I'd like to have vivid childhood memories of 1990-1992 as well but I shouldn't be too greedy ;D I don't like the mid-late 2000s when the '97ers grew up, but I'm sure if I was their age back then I'd think differently. As for teen culture, I'd give the edge to growing up in the early-mid 2010s over the early-mid 2000s. The music is so much more danceable! And like I said, I'm not at a big fan of the mid-2000s. I love early 2000s music and video games though.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/08/17 at 5:32 pm


Ooo, a co-worker whom I'd consider a good friend is born mid-1986, and my boyfriend is born 1997, so maybe I'm an "expert" on this topic LOL.

1987ers are 29/30 and 1997ers are 19/20. Sorry to start off with the obvious, but those are two very different life stages, and that's a huge maturity gap. That's the first difference that stands out. 97ers still have a lot of growing up to do and a lot to learn. Their behaviour is not set in stone.

''87ers grew up with the greatest gaming gen (4th Gen), with 2D and '90s gaming in general. Street Fighter 2 never gets old. '97ers grew up with Gamecube/PS2 and the like but they were also kids when the DS/Wii were out. So if you want to feel like you aged a thousand years, just talk to a grown ass adult who has childhood nostalgia for the Wii.  :o

https://media.giphy.com/media/GrUhLU9q3nyRG/giphy.gif

'87ers grew up without the Internet and they'll remind you of that often. '97ers grew up with an iPhone in the womb and that will also be painfully obvious.

Related to the above, most 87ers don't do the Snapchat thing and a sizeable amount don't have Instagram. In my nerdy industry, many don't even have Facebook! '97ers are involved in all these things. It's like email to them, how can you not have it? :o

'87ers were of age and remember almost the entire political 2000s. Don't bother talking about how the Great Recession period was the most depressing period of your life, cause all a '97er will tell you was that that was the winter they learnt ice skating. They don't remember major world events from the early 2000s at all, so don't even go there. My friend didn't even know about the 2004 Asian Tsunami!

Related to that, '87ers were kids for the entire '90s, while '97ers were kids for the entire 2000s. Two very different decades to grow up in!

Expanding on that, most '87ers finished high school in 2005, and '97ers finished high school in 2015. If you think about all the cultural, social and technological changes that took place between 2005 and 2015, those are two very different periods to be coming of age.

I don't know if this is just the two '97ers that I know well, and one is my bf so he probably doesn't count, but they're very open about their emotions and are not afraid to cry in front of people. With other Millennials, I think talking about your emotions so openly would be considered unmanly and strange, but the '97ers I know are very comfortable in spilling their guts. Maybe it's mentally healthy in the long run, but I'm not really used to it so it can be emotionally exhausting for me. ;D

'97ers have better hair and fashion sense.  :-X :-X :-X

That's all that immediately comes to mind. I'll probably post more later.

As for whether I'd rather be an '87er or a '97er, '87ers grew up with my favourite kid culture. Being at that age in 1993-2000 must've been amazing. I'd like to have vivid childhood memories of 1990-1992 as well but I shouldn't be too greedy ;D I don't like the mid-late 2000s when the '97ers grew up, but I'm sure if I was their age back then I'd think differently. As for teen culture, I'd give the edge to growing up in the early-mid 2010s over the early-mid 2000s. The music is so much more danceable! And like I said, I'm not at a big fan of the mid-2000s. I love early 2000s music and video games though.


That is a great analysis! Great post!  8)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 80sfan on 08/08/17 at 5:36 pm


Ooo, a co-worker whom I'd consider a good friend is born mid-1986, and my boyfriend is born 1997, so maybe I'm an "expert" on this topic LOL.

1987ers are 29/30 and 1997ers are 19/20. Sorry to start off with the obvious, but those are two very different life stages, and that's a huge maturity gap. That's the first difference that stands out. 97ers still have a lot of growing up to do and a lot to learn. Their behaviour is not set in stone.

''87ers grew up with the greatest gaming gen (4th Gen), with 2D and '90s gaming in general. Street Fighter 2 never gets old. '97ers grew up with Gamecube/PS2 and the like but they were also kids when the DS/Wii were out. So if you want to feel like you aged a thousand years, just talk to a grown ass adult who has childhood nostalgia for the Wii.  :o

https://media.giphy.com/media/GrUhLU9q3nyRG/giphy.gif

'87ers grew up without the Internet and they'll remind you of that often. '97ers grew up with an iPhone in the womb and that will also be painfully obvious.

Related to the above, most 87ers don't do the Snapchat thing and a sizeable amount don't have Instagram. In my nerdy industry, many don't even have Facebook! '97ers are involved in all these things. It's like email to them, how can you not have it? :o

'87ers were of age and remember almost the entire political 2000s. Don't bother talking about how the Great Recession period was the most depressing period of your life, cause all a '97er will tell you was that that was the winter they learnt ice skating. They don't remember major world events from the early 2000s at all, so don't even go there. My friend didn't even know about the 2004 Asian Tsunami!

Related to that, '87ers were kids for the entire '90s, while '97ers were kids for the entire 2000s. Two very different decades to grow up in!

Expanding on that, most '87ers finished high school in 2005, and '97ers finished high school in 2015. If you think about all the cultural, social and technological changes that took place between 2005 and 2015, those are two very different periods to be coming of age.

I don't know if this is just the two '97ers that I know well, and one is my bf so he probably doesn't count, but they're very open about their emotions and are not afraid to cry in front of people. With other Millennials, I think talking about your emotions so openly would be considered unmanly and strange, but the '97ers I know are very comfortable in spilling their guts. Maybe it's mentally healthy in the long run, but I'm not really used to it so it can be emotionally exhausting for me. ;D

'97ers have better hair and fashion sense.  :-X :-X :-X

That's all that immediately comes to mind. I'll probably post more later.

As for whether I'd rather be an '87er or a '97er, '87ers grew up with my favourite kid culture. Being at that age in 1993-2000 must've been amazing. I'd like to have vivid childhood memories of 1990-1992 as well but I shouldn't be too greedy ;D I don't like the mid-late 2000s when the '97ers grew up, but I'm sure if I was their age back then I'd think differently. As for teen culture, I'd give the edge to growing up in the early-mid 2010s over the early-mid 2000s. The music is so much more danceable! And like I said, I'm not at a big fan of the mid-2000s. I love early 2000s music and video games though.


I'm not an 87er, but I'm close (88er). It was a fun time to be alive.  :(

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/08/17 at 5:43 pm

Childhood nostalgia for the Wii that is freaky, that seems not that long ago to me when that was big. I was what in my early 20s then. My childhood centered around the SNES and Genesis but I also remember the tail end of NES being popular and was still a kid during the PS1/N64 days. My first own system was SNES in 1992 and I remember Super Mario World. My teens were XBOX/PS2/Gamecube gen, that was probably the last generation of gaming I really cared about though I was a bit into the 360/PS3/Wii generation.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/08/17 at 5:53 pm

Now, what are the biggest differences between people born in 1997 and 1999? ;) ;D

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/08/17 at 6:00 pm


Now, what are the biggest differences between people born in 1997 and 1999? ;) ;D


That's only 2 years so not so much though a little. 1997 has more memory of the early '00s and is sort of a borderline early-mid '10s teen as opposed to a more solidly mid '10s teen like 1999. 1997 possibly have a slight memory of 9/11 especially those born early 1997, depends on person. 1999 is very very unlikely to remember anything at all about 9/11.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/08/17 at 6:01 pm


That's only 2 years so not so much though a little. 1997 has more memory of the early '00s and is sort of a borderline early-mid '10s teen as opposed to a more solidly mid '10s teen like 1999. 1997 possibly have a slight memory of 9/11 especially those born early 1997, depends on person. 1999 is very very unlikely to remember anything at all about 9/11.

I know. I was just being silly.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/08/17 at 6:02 pm


I know. I was just being silly.


1997 and 2007 will be interesting, but 2007 is really too young to compare to yet being only 10 years old.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/08/17 at 6:04 pm


1997 and 2007 will be interesting, but 2007 is really too young to compare to yet being only 10 years old.

What are the biggest differences between 1993 borns (Slowpoke, UltraGameDog, etc) and 1999 borns (me, SharksFan99, etc)?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/08/17 at 6:16 pm


What are the biggest differences between 1993 borns (Slowpoke, UltraGameDog, etc) and 1999 borns (me, SharksFan99, etc)?


'93 and '99...umm well 1993 remembers a bit of the late '90s while 1999 obviously doesn't. They remember the PS1/N64 generation of gaming, you almost certainly don't. They had late '00s/early '10s teenage years, you mid '10s. So their teens umm still weren't completely dominated by smartphones and social media in the same way as a 1999 born even though it was coming out at that time. 1993ers could remember Clinton being president, they probably don't remember a lot of details of his presidency but likely recall him being the president. 1999 obviously would not. They could vote for president in 2012, 1999 won't cast a vote for president until 2020. That's just some things I can think of right now.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/08/17 at 6:23 pm


'93 and '99...umm well 1993 remembers a bit of the late '90s while 1999 obviously doesn't. They remember the PS1/N64 generation of gaming, you almost certainly don't. They had late '00s/early '10s teenage years, you mid '10s. So their teens umm still weren't completely dominated by smartphones and social media in the same way as a 1999 born even though it was coming out at that time. 1993ers could remember Clinton being president, they probably don't remember a lot of details of his presidency but likely recall him being the president. 1999 obviously would not. They could vote for president in 2012, 1999 won't cast a vote for president until 2020. That's just some things I can think of right now.

Great list!

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/09/17 at 10:10 am

1987 borns:
*First voted in 2008.
*100% chance of remembering 9/11.
*12 when Y2K happened, therefore also giving them a 100% chance of remembering it.
*Last not to be a big part of the emo crowd (main emo crowd, to me, is 1988-1993 borns).
*Will remember life before the Internet (or to some extent, life before Windows 95).
*First video game console was likely either the Sega Genesis or the Super Nintendo.
*First memories may have likely been around 1989-1990, but they certainly won't remember any of those years' news events.
*Peak childhood took place in around 1994.
*Peak adolescence took place in around 2003.
*Legally became adults in 2005, legally able to consume alcohol since 2008, could rent a car since 2012.
*5th or 6th grade when the Columbine shooting took place
*Very likely to remember Princess Diana's death.
*Chinese Zodiac sign is Fire Rabbit (It is still Fire Tiger if they were born between January 1 and January 28, 1987)

1997 borns:
*First voted in 2016
*Unlikely to remember 9/11.
*Literally very little or no chance of remembering Y2K.
*Big part of the Instagram/Trap/EDM crowd.
*May remember dial-up, but certainly not an Internetless world.
*First video game console was likely either the PlayStation 2 or the Gamecube.
*First memories may have likely been around 1999-2000, but they certainly won't remember any of those years' news events.
*Peak childhood took place in around 2004.
*Peak adolescence took place in around 2013.
*Legally became adults in 2015, could legally consume alcohol in the US by next year, and could rent a car in 2022.
*Not even in preschool yet when the Columbine shooting took place, given that they were only one or two.
*Also zero chance on remembering Princess Diana's death - most were only babies, some people born in 1997 were not even born yet.
*Chinese Zodiac sign is Fire Ox (It is Fire Rat if they were born between January 1 and February 6, 1997 - like Cody Simpson for example)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/09/17 at 10:32 am


1987 borns:
*First voted in 2008.
*100% chance of remembering 9/11.
*12 when Y2K happened, therefore also giving them a 100% chance of remembering it.
*Last not to be a big part of the emo crowd (main emo crowd, to me, is 1988-1993 borns).
*Will remember life before the Internet (or to some extent, life before Windows 95).
*First video game console was likely either the Sega Genesis or the Super Nintendo.
*First memories may have likely been around 1989-1990, but they certainly won't remember any of those years' news events.
*Peak childhood took place in around 1994.
*Peak adolescence took place in around 2003.
*Legally became adults in 2005, legally able to consume alcohol since 2008, could rent a car since 2012.
*5th or 6th grade when the Columbine shooting took place
*Very likely to remember Princess Diana's death.
*Chinese Zodiac sign is Fire Rabbit (It is still Fire Tiger if they were born between January 1 and January 28, 1987)

1997 borns:
*First voted in 2016
*Unlikely to remember 9/11.
*Literally very little or no chance of remembering Y2K.
*Big part of the Instagram/Trap/EDM crowd.
*May remember dial-up, but certainly not an Internetless world.
*First video game console was likely either the PlayStation 2 or the Gamecube.
*First memories may have likely been around 1999-2000, but they certainly won't remember any of those years' news events.
*Peak childhood took place in around 2004.
*Peak adolescence took place in around 2013.
*Legally became adults in 2015, could legally consume alcohol in the US by next year, and could rent a car in 2022.
*Not even in preschool yet when the Columbine shooting took place, given that they were only one or two.
*Also zero chance on remembering Princess Diana's death - most were only babies, some people born in 1997 were not even born yet.
*Chinese Zodiac sign is Fire Ox (It is Fire Rat if they were born between January 1 and February 6, 1997 - like Cody Simpson for example)

Nice job and great list!

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/09/17 at 12:54 pm


Ooo, a co-worker whom I'd consider a good friend is born mid-1986, and my boyfriend is born 1997, so maybe I'm an "expert" on this topic LOL.

1987ers are 29/30 and 1997ers are 19/20. Sorry to start off with the obvious, but those are two very different life stages, and that's a huge maturity gap. That's the first difference that stands out. 97ers still have a lot of growing up to do and a lot to learn. Their behaviour is not set in stone.

''87ers grew up with the greatest gaming gen (4th Gen), with 2D and '90s gaming in general. Street Fighter 2 never gets old. '97ers grew up with Gamecube/PS2 and the like but they were also kids when the DS/Wii were out. So if you want to feel like you aged a thousand years, just talk to a grown ass adult who has childhood nostalgia for the Wii.  :o

https://media.giphy.com/media/GrUhLU9q3nyRG/giphy.gif

'87ers grew up without the Internet and they'll remind you of that often. '97ers grew up with an iPhone in the womb and that will also be painfully obvious.

Related to the above, most 87ers don't do the Snapchat thing and a sizeable amount don't have Instagram. In my nerdy industry, many don't even have Facebook! '97ers are involved in all these things. It's like email to them, how can you not have it? :o

'87ers were of age and remember almost the entire political 2000s. Don't bother talking about how the Great Recession period was the most depressing period of your life, cause all a '97er will tell you was that that was the winter they learnt ice skating. They don't remember major world events from the early 2000s at all, so don't even go there. My friend didn't even know about the 2004 Asian Tsunami!

Related to that, '87ers were kids for the entire '90s, while '97ers were kids for the entire 2000s. Two very different decades to grow up in!

Expanding on that, most '87ers finished high school in 2005, and '97ers finished high school in 2015. If you think about all the cultural, social and technological changes that took place between 2005 and 2015, those are two very different periods to be coming of age.

I don't know if this is just the two '97ers that I know well, and one is my bf so he probably doesn't count, but they're very open about their emotions and are not afraid to cry in front of people. With other Millennials, I think talking about your emotions so openly would be considered unmanly and strange, but the '97ers I know are very comfortable in spilling their guts. Maybe it's mentally healthy in the long run, but I'm not really used to it so it can be emotionally exhausting for me. ;D

'97ers have better hair and fashion sense.  :-X :-X :-X

That's all that immediately comes to mind. I'll probably post more later.

As for whether I'd rather be an '87er or a '97er, '87ers grew up with my favourite kid culture. Being at that age in 1993-2000 must've been amazing. I'd like to have vivid childhood memories of 1990-1992 as well but I shouldn't be too greedy ;D I don't like the mid-late 2000s when the '97ers grew up, but I'm sure if I was their age back then I'd think differently. As for teen culture, I'd give the edge to growing up in the early-mid 2010s over the early-mid 2000s. The music is so much more danceable! And like I said, I'm not at a big fan of the mid-2000s. I love early 2000s music and video games though.


Well, this pretty much sums up most of what I was going to say. Technology, I do agree, is the biggest difference between late '80s babies and late '90s babies. Regardless of the fact that we all thought that the '90s was this technological marvel of a decade when we were growing up, the truth is that '90s were actually still quite primitive. VHS, 2D and early 3D video games, less than half the country even having a computer, I mean being a kid during the '90s truly was quite a bit different than being a kid during the '00s.

The question of the difference between 1987ers and 2007ers is interesting, too. Now that's a generation gap. Quite a few of my cousins are around that age and you should see the looks they give me when I break out my old NES or watch an old VHS tape. When I was playing Contra a little while back a cousin about that age actually started making fun of me for being old when I told him that I grew up playing that game on NES.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/09/17 at 1:19 pm

About 2007 borns one thing you could definitely say is they were born right into the smartphone and social media world, quite literally actually being born the same year the iPhone was released! They will take those things completely for granted and definitely not be able to imagine that not existing. 1997 at least you could say they have some childhood memories of the pre social media smartphone world.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/09/17 at 1:42 pm

1997 borns and 2007 borns are like 99% similar to each other. C'mon people...they're both just dumb wussy Millennials ::).

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 2001 on 08/09/17 at 1:57 pm


1997 borns and 2007 borns are like 99% similar to each other. C'mon people...they're both just dumb wussy Millennials ::).


https://media0.giphy.com/media/RFOS7y7W4b4qY/200_s.gif

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/09/17 at 2:13 pm

Yeah, it's too bad you guys couldn't have just been cool badass Gen Xers like us late '80s people, but that's just the way the ball bounces sometimes.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/09/17 at 2:28 pm


Yeah, it's too bad you guys couldn't have just been cool badass Gen Xers like us late '80s people, but that's just the way the ball bounces sometimes.

I cry every time I think about that :(.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/09/17 at 2:59 pm

Yeah it would be interesting to see the major differences between 1997 & 2007 borns in say 10 years time. It begs the question, how do you guys think the 2020's will be like?

I remember seeing this video a few years ago and thinking how futuristic the 20's looked like:

1Lmd3l0W5JI

Now that we're about 2 & 1/2 years away from the dawn of the 2020's its crazy how close to think we are to it :o

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/09/17 at 3:30 pm


Yeah it would be interesting to see the major differences between 1997 & 2007 borns in say 10 years time. It begs the question, how do you guys think the 2020's will be like?

I remember seeing this video a few years ago and thinking how futuristic the 20's looked like:

1Lmd3l0W5JI

Now that we're about 2 & 1/2 years away from the dawn of the 2020's its crazy how close to think we are to it :o

I think that the 2020s will be very similar to now. I don't see much changing...the world won't become like the 21st century version of The Jetsons in the 2020s. Maybe, VR will become more popular and smartphones either remain pretty much the same or something revolutionary comes out.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Howard on 08/09/17 at 3:53 pm


Now, what are the biggest differences between people born in 1997 and 1999? ;) ;D


a difference of 2 years.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Howard on 08/09/17 at 3:55 pm


Yeah it would be interesting to see the major differences between 1997 & 2007 borns in say 10 years time. It begs the question, how do you guys think the 2020's will be like?

I remember seeing this video a few years ago and thinking how futuristic the 20's looked like:

1Lmd3l0W5JI

Now that we're about 2 & 1/2 years away from the dawn of the 2020's its crazy how close to think we are to it :o



I'm looking forward to the 2020's.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/09/17 at 6:36 pm

The difference between 1999 borns and 2002 borns? ???

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 08/10/17 at 3:17 am


They had late '00s/early '10s teenage years, you mid '10s.


To be honest, I think of myself as being somewhat of an Early 2010s teen as well. I started High School in February 2012 and turned 13 the following month. I'm definitely more of a Mid '10s teen, but I consider the Early 2010s to have been apart of my adolescence as well.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/10/17 at 3:16 pm


Yeah, it's too bad you guys couldn't have just been cool badass Gen Xers like us late '80s people, but that's just the way the ball bounces sometimes.

Oh machine we know you want to a part of the late 90s babies crowd. Just keep pretending you're 20 and maybe they won't notice  :P

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 2001 on 08/10/17 at 7:01 pm


To be honest, I think of myself as being somewhat of an Early 2010s teen as well. I started High School in February 2012 and turned 13 the following month. I'm definitely more of a Mid '10s teen, but I consider the Early 2010s to have been apart of my adolescence as well.


I can see what you mean, since I feel like the mid-2000s were a part of my early adolescence (but also a part of my childhood as well), since I was 13 in 2006. The late 2000s/early 2010s are still the main part, but I did soak in some mid-2000s as well. But I'm pretty sure Brian was talking about American high school, so that would have been 2013-2017 for you and 2007-2011 for me. :P

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/10/17 at 8:34 pm


I can see what you mean, since I feel like the mid-2000s were a part of my early adolescence (but also a part of my childhood as well), since I was 13 in 2006. The late 2000s/early 2010s are still the main part, but I did soak in some mid-2000s as well. But I'm pretty sure Brian was talking about American high school, so that would have been 2013-2017 for you and 2007-2011 for me. :P


Would you have rather have been an early 10's teen? Its funny cause I was a freshman in H.S. when you was a senior, and it always seemed liked you guys were the last 'symbolic' 2000's teens if that makes any sense. The classes of 2012-2014 all became teens in the Late 2000's, but we spent most of our core years (ages 14/15-17/18) in the early 10's, with them peaking between the years of 2010-2012.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/13/17 at 10:47 am


Oh machine we know you want to a part of the late 90s babies crowd. Just keep pretending you're 20 and maybe they won't notice  :P


Sorry, but there's no way I could hang with the younger crowd without standing out. After they found out that my favorite video game is Super Mario Bros. and that I barely ever use my Facebook, not to mention Snapchat or any of that other stuff, late '90s babies would figure me out quick.


I can see what you mean, since I feel like the mid-2000s were a part of my early adolescence (but also a part of my childhood as well), since I was 13 in 2006. The late 2000s/early 2010s are still the main part, but I did soak in some mid-2000s as well. But I'm pretty sure Brian was talking about American high school, so that would have been 2013-2017 for you and 2007-2011 for me. :P


Yeah, I agree with both you guys on that. That's the exact same way I've always felt about the late '90s, even though I was a kid still, I do consider 1998 and 1999 as a key part of my adolescence, as I was already starting to get more engaged with pop culture and music at that time. Also, I've always considered myself a partial early '00s teen as well, even though I didn't start high school until late 2001. Most of my peers born 1988 consider themselves partial early '00s teens, too.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/13/17 at 11:38 am


Now, what are the biggest differences between people born in 1997 and 1999? ;) ;D


Experiences are about the same, 1997 borns may have a little more Millennial influence.

*1997 borns are unlikely to remember 9/11. For 1999 borns, it's one in a thousand or less.
*1997 borns first vote in 2016. 1999 borns first vote in 2020.
*1997 borns are early/mid 2010's teen hybrids. 1999 borns are purely mid 2010's teens.
*1997 borns are purely mid 00's children. 1999 borns are mid/late 00's children hybrids.
*1997 borns may have some solid memories from the early 00's. 1999 borns are not that likely to remember the early 00's (depends on how you define "early 2000's").

I use this system (it may seem a little odd):

Neonate = Newborn-28 days
Infant = 29 days-12 months
Toddler = 1-3 years of age
Child = 3-10 years of age
Tween/Preteen = 10-12 years of age
Teen = 13-17 years of age (or 13-19 years of age)
Legal Youth (legal, but still in college) = 18-21 years of age
Adult = 22 years of age or older (got Bachelor's Degree)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/13/17 at 2:59 pm


Experiences are about the same, 1997 borns may have a little more Millennial influence.

*1997 borns are unlikely to remember 9/11. For 1999 borns, it's one in a thousand or less.
*1997 borns first vote in 2016. 1999 borns first vote in 2020.
*1997 borns are early/mid 2010's teen hybrids. 1999 borns are purely mid 2010's teens.
*1997 borns are purely mid 00's children. 1999 borns are mid/late 00's children hybrids.
*1997 borns may have some solid memories from the early 00's. 1999 borns are not that likely to remember the early 00's (depends on how you define "early 2000's").

I use this system (it may seem a little odd):

Neonate = Newborn-28 days
Infant = 29 days-12 months
Toddler = 1-3 years of age
Child = 3-10 years of age
Tween/Preteen = 10-12 years of age
Teen = 13-17 years of age (or 13-19 years of age)
Legal Youth (legal, but still in college) = 18-21 years of age
Adult = 22 years of age or older (got Bachelor's Degree)

Good points and nice list.

I was being silly though...hence the emoticons. It doesn't matter to me ;D.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 2001 on 08/13/17 at 3:58 pm


Would you have rather have been an early 10's teen? Its funny cause I was a freshman in H.S. when you was a senior, and it always seemed liked you guys were the last 'symbolic' 2000's teens if that makes any sense. The classes of 2012-2014 all became teens in the Late 2000's, but we spent most of our core years (ages 14/15-17/18) in the early 10's, with them peaking between the years of 2010-2012.


I actually graduated in 2010, so I wouldn't have been in school the same time as you, unfortunately. ;D I would've enjoyed being in high school in the early 2010s, but I enjoyed it more being in university. It was definitely better than being a teen in the late 2000s though.

Are you picking being 16 years old as the 'peak' of your teen years? I think that works for me. 2009 was a very interesting year, it was the transition from the late 2000s into the early 2010s in a nutshell and describes my teen years well.

At the beginning of the year, the iPod Classic was still the coolest device on the block, I talked to my friends on MSN everyday, I still had an SDTV in my room, my computer was on Windows XP, George Bush was still president, MySpace was still more popular than Facebook in the US, only 2 or 3 people had an iPhone in my grade out of ~400 or so students, about 20% had a Blackberry, the other 40% some sort of slider or feature phone, and the other 40% didn't even have a phone (I grew up around working class neighbourhoods though). Britney Spears, Usher, All-American Rejects, Linkin Park, Beyoncé had presence on the charts.  I remember in the summer on the last day of school, I and most people brought a digital camcorder to record and take pictures of the event, instead of using their phones like most would today.

By the end of the year though, the iPhone 3GS, iPod Touch and iPod Nano/Shuffle were clearly the hottest thing, MSN was far less active, Facebook was clearly established and even Twitter was gaining ground, there were no more SDTVs in my house (and 3DTVs were the next big thing ;D), I had a netbook on Windows 7, Obama was firmly entrenched, about 10-15% of people in my grade had an iPhone (sounds little, but 15% is almost 1 in every 6 people, so somewhat common and a part of daily life), and far more had a Blackberry at that point. Lady Gaga, Katy Perry, Justin Bieber, and Kesha (at the beginning of 2010) were clearly the biggest pop stars now, and everyone was going to the theatres to watch Avatar. The early 2010s had clearly arrived. It was a very long year with a lot of changes. :D

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/13/17 at 8:11 pm

Somebody mentioned Columbine, which I remember very vividly. It sticks out so much because I was having my appendix taken out that day and I'll never forget it. I was just about to go into surgery and in a hospital bed and there was Columbine happening on TV in front of my eyes. When I went back to school I found out there was actually a kid that made death threats in my grade shortly after Columbine and he was expelled. It's like one of the moments I'll never forget like the OJ verdict when our teacher told my class of 3rd graders that OJ was found not guilty and we were all shocked or 9/11 when my teacher told us when we were walking out of first period that "life just got a little interesting".

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: wixness on 08/13/17 at 9:23 pm

1997 boys never got to wear their hair long for a long time compared with 1987 boys.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 2001 on 08/13/17 at 10:57 pm


Somebody mentioned Columbine, which I remember very vividly. It sticks out so much because I was having my appendix taken out that day and I'll never forget it. I was just about to go into surgery and in a hospital bed and there was Columbine happening on TV in front of my eyes. When I went back to school I found out there was actually a kid that made death threats in my grade shortly after Columbine and he was expelled. It's like one of the moments I'll never forget like the OJ verdict when our teacher told my class of 3rd graders that OJ was found not guilty and we were all shocked or 9/11 when my teacher told us when we were walking out of first period that "life just got a little interesting".


A '97er wouldn't remember any of those. :o

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/13/17 at 11:03 pm


Somebody mentioned Columbine, which I remember very vividly. It sticks out so much because I was having my appendix taken out that day and I'll never forget it. I was just about to go into surgery and in a hospital bed and there was Columbine happening on TV in front of my eyes. When I went back to school I found out there was actually a kid that made death threats in my grade shortly after Columbine and he was expelled. It's like one of the moments I'll never forget like the OJ verdict when our teacher told my class of 3rd graders that OJ was found not guilty and we were all shocked or 9/11 when my teacher told us when we were walking out of first period that "life just got a little interesting".


That was me.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/13/17 at 11:14 pm

The Columbine perpetrators Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were both born in 1981. Would you consider them to have been Gen Xers or very early Millennials? It's an interesting question to ponder.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/13/17 at 11:16 pm


That was me.


Yeah that was you T-Rex!

Another where was I moment I'll tell you guys was when Bill Clinton was impeached by the house. Now I remember vividly the Starr Report coming out before this too, and this is like when I really learned about sex too LOL. I remember when that Starr Report was published and reading that as an 11 year old!  ;D So things like stains on blue dresses and cigars are FOREVER etched in my mind.  ;D On the day President Clinton was impeached I was out on a boy scout camping trip and we had the radio on and they were covering the vote live. I was mad too because I liked President Clinton and saw the whole thing as a witch hunt. I knew the senate would never convict him though. Late nite TV was HILARIOUS back then too with the endless Clinton sex jokes. Man I'll never forget those days.  :)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/13/17 at 11:17 pm


The Columbine perpetrators Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were both born in 1981. Would you consider them to have been Gen Xers or very early Millennials? It's an interesting question to ponder.


Honestly they are very early Millennials and nowhere near real Gen X.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/14/17 at 5:52 am


Honestly they are very early Millennials and nowhere near real Gen X.

Its hard to consider anybody with an 80s birthday as Gen X. I know the early 80s babies are on the cusp and have some gen x traits but it dosent seem right saying they're full on Gen x

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/14/17 at 8:00 am


Somebody mentioned Columbine, which I remember very vividly. It sticks out so much because I was having my appendix taken out that day and I'll never forget it. I was just about to go into surgery and in a hospital bed and there was Columbine happening on TV in front of my eyes. When I went back to school I found out there was actually a kid that made death threats in my grade shortly after Columbine and he was expelled. It's like one of the moments I'll never forget like the OJ verdict when our teacher told my class of 3rd graders that OJ was found not guilty and we were all shocked or 9/11 when my teacher told us when we were walking out of first period that "life just got a little interesting".


Yeah, I was at school when Columbine happened, but didn't find out about it until I got back to my house. Honestly, school was never quite the same after that. Yes, school shootings had happened before, but they had never truly been serious enough to get the same huge amount of media coverage. Before Columbine, I'd never even conceived of the idea that a student would go to school with a gun and start shooting. Another thing that I remember is my mom actually not letting me and my younger brother go to school on the last day of the 1998-99 school year because a rumor spread around that there was going to be a shooting on the last day at our school. The next year when I started 7th grade for the 1999-00 school year, we had a cop at school and a mandate to have clear bookbags.

On the O.J. thing, I actually vaguely remember the O.J. chase even though I was just shy of 7 at the time. My grandfather was watching it on TV and I remember sitting there and watching it with him trying to figure who the hell this O.J guy was since his football career was before I was born.

And I found about 9/11 similar to how you did as well. Our 1st period was over at about 8:50, which was just after the first plane hit the North Tower. We didn't know anything had happened when I left that class. But, after walking down the hall to get my books, by the time I walked to my 2nd period Language class, my teacher had already turned her TV on to the news coverage, so that was the first thing I noticed when I entered the class. She told everybody that a plane hit the World Trade Center, but at that time we all still thought it was an accident. The class started at 9:00 and she turned the TV off to start the day's lesson, just a matter of minutes before the second plane hit. Because of that, I didn't find out the full story of the event until later that day.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/14/17 at 10:02 am


Honestly they are very early Millennials and nowhere near real Gen X.



It's hard to consider anybody with an 80s birthday as Gen X. I know the early 80s babies are on the cusp and have some gen x traits but it doesn't seem right saying they're full on Gen x
I totally agree! Those people are pretty much Millennials despite them saying they are Xennials. I mean, they were all still in school when events such as Columbine, 9/11 and even Y2K took place.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/14/17 at 11:19 am


I totally agree! Those people are pretty much Millennials despite them saying they are Xennials. I mean, they were all still in school when events such as Columbine, 9/11 and even Y2K took place.

I was specifically talking about the Columbine perpetrators who were both born in 1981.

Also, if you guys don't think that early '80s borns are very late Gen Xers....then when does Gen X end and Gen Y begin? ???

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/14/17 at 11:43 am


I was specifically talking about the Columbine perpetrators who were both born in 1981.

Also, if you guys don't think that early '80s borns are very late Gen Xers....then when does Gen X end and Gen Y begin? ???


The border is simply around 1980. 1977/78 or so to 1981 is a little fuzzy, but once you get into the '80s you are leaning Millennial. Late '70s probably leans X, but they are only just barely X. 1982 is when you are solidly Millennial period.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/14/17 at 11:58 am


I was specifically talking about the Columbine perpetrators who were both born in 1981.

Also, if you guys don't think that early '80s borns are very late Gen Xers....then when does Gen X end and Gen Y begin? ???
Oh, they are definitely Millennials although one of the oldest.

Yeah, I agree with Brian. The time frame around 1980 is the cusp while anything before and after that period is clearly Gen X or Millennial. The transition between both generations should not be long like I see in some current articles.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/14/17 at 1:22 pm


I totally agree! Those people are pretty much Millennials despite them saying they are Xennials. I mean, they were all still in school when events such as Columbine, 9/11 and even Y2K took place.


1980 is the ultimate cusp year to me. Class of '98 ones probably lean more X, and class of '99 ones probably lean more Y.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/14/17 at 2:03 pm


The border is simply around 1980. 1977/78 or so to 1981 is a little fuzzy, but once you get into the '80s you are leaning Millennial. Late '70s probably leans X, but they are only just barely X. 1982 is when you are solidly Millennial period.

OK, I understand your point.


Oh, they are definitely Millennials although one of the oldest.

Yeah, I agree with Brian. The time frame around 1980 is the cusp while anything before and after that period is clearly Gen X or Millennial. The transition between both generations should not be long like I see in some current articles.

So do you believe that Gen Y starts in 1981?


1980 is the ultimate cusp year to me. Class of '98 ones probably lean more X, and class of '99 ones probably lean more Y.

So where do you think Gen Y starts? 1981?

Most people use 1982 as the official start of Gen Y/Millennials...some use 1980. However, I have seen 1981-1997 being used.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/14/17 at 2:18 pm


So do you believe that Gen Y starts in 1981?
Around there. It could be earlier than we think. I don't see it starting much later though.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/14/17 at 2:34 pm


OK, I understand your point.
So do you believe that Gen Y starts in 1981?
So where do you think Gen Y starts? 1981?

Most people use 1982 as the official start of Gen Y/Millennials...some use 1980. However, I have seen 1981-1997 being used.


Another point to add is that 1981ers were some of the first true people to have experienced major Y moments.

For instance they were the first to have been in their peak childhood (ages 7-8) in the 1988-1989 when Y kid culture was overtaking X kid culture (peak in pop for TMNT, NES, Back To The Future, Ghostbusters TAS, Disney revival starting with Roger Rabit, etc.).

They were also the peak in their youth period during the first year to be more Y in youth culture in 1997-98' (Teen pop hitting its peak in pop, 5th generation of gaming now solidly more popular than 4th, hip hop going in a more popish direction, post grunge/NJ metal getting big, Premiere of South Park starting the Gen Y Era of Dark animation and ending the Gen X era of dark animation with the end of Beavis & Butthead).

Just some things I've noticed.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/14/17 at 3:02 pm


Another point to add is that 1981ers were some of the first true people to have experienced major Y moments.

For instance they were the first to have been in their peak childhood (ages 7-8) in the 1988-1989 when Y kid culture was overtaking X kid culture (peak in pop for TMNT, NES, Back To The Future, Ghostbusters TAS, Disney revival starting with Roger Rabit, etc.).

They were also the peak in their youth period during the first year to be more Y in youth culture in 1997-98' (Teen pop hitting its peak in pop, 5th generation of gaming now solidly more popular than 4th, hip hop going in a more popish direction, post grunge/NJ metal getting big, Premiere of South Park starting the Gen Y Era of Dark animation and ending the Gen X era of dark animation with the end of Beavis & Butthead).

Just some things I've noticed.

Those things are Gen Y kid culture? ???

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/14/17 at 4:10 pm


Those things are Gen Y kid culture? ???

Aside from TMNT and the NES, which is both Gen x and Gen y kid culture, the the others mentioned I feel are more Gen x kid culture rather than Gen y kid culture. Only reason TMNT and the NES stradle both cultures is because they were still popular well into the early 90s. All the other things he mentioned were no longer popular when the 90s started. That's how I see it.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/14/17 at 4:19 pm


Aside from TMNT and the NES, which is both Gen x and Gen y kid culture, the the others mentioned I feel are more Gen x kid culture rather than Gen y kid culture. Only reason TMNT and the NES stradle both cultures is because they were still popular well into the early 90s. All the other things he mentioned were no longer popular when the 90s started. That's how I see it.

I think that I agree.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/14/17 at 6:09 pm


Those things are Gen Y kid culture? ???


I guess it's all perfection but to me earlier 80's childhood trends (Atari, He-Man, Richie Rich, etc.) seem more X while later 80's Childhood trends (NES, Transformers, TMNT, etc.) seem to be more X/Y cusp, although many childhood trends that emerged in the late 80's like the Disney Renaissance for instance are early Y, and 1981ers were some of the first to spend most of their childhoods during those years

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/14/17 at 6:21 pm


I guess it's all perfection but to me earlier 80's childhood trends (Atari, He-Man, Richie Rich, etc.) seem more X while later 80's Childhood trends (NES, Transformers, TMNT, etc.) seem to be more X/Y cusp, although many childhood trends that emerged in the late 80's like the Disney Renaissance for instance are early Y, and 1981ers were some of the first to spend most of their childhoods during those years

Oh OK, I see.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: af2010 on 08/14/17 at 6:49 pm

The biggest differences I can think of:

- 87ers spent a good chunk of thier childhood in the pre-internet world; 97ers don't know a life without internet
- 87ers vividly remember 9/11; 97ers probably don't remember it at all (and in the off chance they vaguely remember, definitely didn't understand it)
- Relating to 9/11, 87ers remember a time when the US wasn't at war and the word "terrorism" was seldomly heard
- For most (if not all) of an 87ers upbringing, homosexuality was not generally accepted among the American public
- Lastly (and this might be an uncomfortable, but valid subject), 87ers didn't have access to unlimited pornography as tweens/teens

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/14/17 at 7:50 pm


- Lastly (and this might be an uncomfortable, but valid subject), 87ers didn't have access to unlimited pornography as tweens/teens

Thats actually a good thing for us 80s babies though. I think all the free access to porn anytime you want it isn't very healthy for an adolescent's selfesteem when it cones to sexual growth.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/14/17 at 8:05 pm


Thats actually a good thing for us 80s babies though. I think all the free access to porn anytime you want it isn't very healthy for an adolescent's selfesteem when it cones to sexual growth.

What does that mean?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 2001 on 08/14/17 at 8:06 pm

'97ers were 13 in 2010. That's such a young age to be at such a changeful time. That also means they were never teens in the 2000s.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/14/17 at 8:52 pm


Another point to add is that 1981ers were some of the first true people to have experienced major Y moments.

For instance they were the first to have been in their peak childhood (ages 7-8) in the 1988-1989 when Y kid culture was overtaking X kid culture (peak in pop for TMNT, NES, Back To The Future, Ghostbusters TAS, Disney revival starting with Roger Rabit, etc.).

They were also the peak in their youth period during the first year to be more Y in youth culture in 1997-98' (Teen pop hitting its peak in pop, 5th generation of gaming now solidly more popular than 4th, hip hop going in a more popish direction, post grunge/NJ metal getting big, Premiere of South Park starting the Gen Y Era of Dark animation and ending the Gen X era of dark animation with the end of Beavis & Butthead).

Just some things I've noticed.


What is NJ metal?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/14/17 at 8:53 pm


OK, I understand your point.
So do you believe that Gen Y starts in 1981?
So where do you think Gen Y starts? 1981?

Most people use 1982 as the official start of Gen Y/Millennials...some use 1980. However, I have seen 1981-1997 being used.


I see Gen Y as being 1982-1996 primarily - can't remember the explosion of the Challenger, but can remember 9/11.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/14/17 at 9:02 pm


I see Gen Y as being 1982-1996 primarily - can't remember the explosion of the Challenger, but can remember 9/11.

So you view 1997 as the start of Gen Z? Also, you see yourself as being a member of Gen Z?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tony82 on 08/14/17 at 9:41 pm


Another point to add is that 1981ers were some of the first true people to have experienced major Y moments.

For instance they were the first to have been in their peak childhood (ages 7-8) in the 1988-1989 when Y kid culture was overtaking X kid culture (peak in pop for TMNT, NES, Back To The Future, Ghostbusters TAS, Disney revival starting with Roger Rabit, etc.).

They were also the peak in their youth period during the first year to be more Y in youth culture in 1997-98' (Teen pop hitting its peak in pop, 5th generation of gaming now solidly more popular than 4th, hip hop going in a more popish direction, post grunge/NJ metal getting big, Premiere of South Park starting the Gen Y Era of Dark animation and ending the Gen X era of dark animation with the end of Beavis & Butthead).

Just some things I've noticed.


Speaking as someone born in 1982--TMNT, NES, and The Real Ghostbusters were all some of the biggest parts of my childhood in the late 80s/early 90s.

The entire time frame of my childhood nostalgia is 87/88 to 92/93. Starting in 1993 (when I turned 11), my interest in anything targeted
to kids was already waning. Shows like The X-Files and Beavis and Butt-head (yes, '82 borns were teenagers for a good portion of its original run) were more my cup of tea at that point.

Late X and early Y share some of the same childhood/adolescent pop culture touchstones. I have more in common with my '80 born friend than my '87 born sister.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/14/17 at 10:37 pm


So you view 1997 as the start of Gen Z? Also, you see yourself as being a member of Gen Z?


I view 1997-1999 borns as cusps, but Z leaning.

1994-1996 is cusp, but Y leaning to me:
*Likely to remember 9/11
*Born in the mid 90's
*Might vaguely remember Y2K
*Spent absolute peak of childhood before Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network's big changes
*Graduated high school before the decade started to get really, really cynical (mid/late 2014)
*Spent peak adolescence before Snapchat, Vine, Hashtags, and Instagram started rising rapidly.
*Based on what I have noticed in the past, none of them really got in to things like Bieber and One Direction.
*All of them were already "tweens" by the time the first iPhone came out.
*All of them became teenagers by the end of the 00's.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/14/17 at 11:03 pm


I view 1997-1999 borns as cusps, but Z leaning.

1994-1996 is cusp, but Y leaning to me:
*Likely to remember 9/11
*Born in the mid 90's
*Might vaguely remember Y2K
*Spent absolute peak of childhood before Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network's big changes
*Graduated high school before the decade started to get really, really cynical (mid/late 2014)
*Spent peak adolescence before Snapchat, Vine, Hashtags, and Instagram started rising rapidly.
*Based on what I have noticed in the past, none of them really got into things like Bieber and One Direction.
*All of them were already "tweens" by the time the first iPhone came out.
*All of them became teenagers by the end of the 00's.
This is a great list for the Y/Z generational cusps. I think we can all agree with that until there is a definite ending to the Millennial generation and start for the Plurals (Gen Z)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/14/17 at 11:15 pm


I view 1997-1999 borns as cusps, but Z leaning.

1994-1996 is cusp, but Y leaning to me:
*Likely to remember 9/11
*Born in the mid 90's
*Might vaguely remember Y2K
*Spent absolute peak of childhood before Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network's big changes
*Graduated high school before the decade started to get really, really cynical (mid/late 2014)
*Spent peak adolescence before Snapchat, Vine, Hashtags, and Instagram started rising rapidly.
*Based on what I have noticed in the past, none of them really got in to things like Bieber and One Direction.
*All of them were already "tweens" by the time the first iPhone came out.
*All of them became teenagers by the end of the 00's.

1994-1996 borns (almost primarily females) most certainly got into the Bieber and One Direction craze. However, I agree with the rest of your points. I'm still not sure if mid '90s borns lean Gen Y though.

Also, you didn't answer the question on if you consider yourself to be apart of Gen Z?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/15/17 at 12:55 am


What is NJ metal?


I meant to say Nu Metal my bad ;D

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/15/17 at 6:15 am


What does that mean?

It means watching too much isn't good for you, especially when start to sexually mature during your tween/early teens. It's a proving fact.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/15/17 at 7:02 am


I guess it's all perfection but to me earlier 80's childhood trends (Atari, He-Man, Richie Rich, etc.) seem more X while later 80's Childhood trends (NES, Transformers, TMNT, etc.) seem to be more X/Y cusp, although many childhood trends that emerged in the late 80's like the Disney Renaissance for instance are early Y, and 1981ers were some of the first to spend most of their childhoods during those years


Yeah, I agree that late '80s kid trends certainly do lean more Y.  Though most people would consider kids my age to be 'Peak Y', we liked quite a few late '80s kid things ourselves.

Though I was born 1987, there were a number of kid trends from the late '80s that I liked first hand.

Alvin and the Chipmunks was a cartoon I really liked and owned several VHS tapes of.
My parents got me a Teddy Ruxpin for Christmas 1989.
Can remember a lot of the ''60s revival' shows like A Pup Named Scooby Doo and Flintstones Kids.
TMNT was the first major kid trend I loved.
Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters II were some of my favorite movies growing up and I loved the Saturday morning cartoon.
The NES was the first console I ever played.

These are all things that late '80s babies share with mid '80s and even early '80s babies, even though they were more at the peak childhood stage when these things were popular, late '80s babies did like many of them as well. That's something that's quite different from earlier '80s kid stuff like Atari and Pac-Man, which were already well past their mainstream prime by the time we started paying attention to TV and video games around 1989 or 1990.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Howard on 08/15/17 at 7:08 am


Thats actually a good thing for us 80s babies though. I think all the free access to porn anytime you want it isn't very healthy for an adolescent's selfesteem when it cones to sexual growth.


Now that I'm an older man I can have access to all the free porn that I want. ;)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Philip Eno on 08/15/17 at 9:00 am


Now that I'm an older man I can have access to all the free porn that I want. ;)
Do we wish to know that?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/15/17 at 9:07 am


It means watching too much isn't good for you, especially when start to sexually mature during your tween/early teens. It's a proving fact.
When you say that, do you mean on any device or just in general? I'm asking because the only way adolescents could access porn even a decade ago was to either search them on a PC with broadband internet (If they had it) or unexpectedly find a magazine and/or a DVD.


1994-1996 borns (almost primarily females) most certainly got into the Bieber and One Direction craze. However, I agree with the rest of your points. I'm still not sure if mid-'90s borns lean Gen Y though.

Do you think they could most likely be Full Y towards the end?


Yeah, I agree that late '80s kid trends certainly do lean more Y.  Though most people would consider kids my age to be 'Peak Y', we liked quite a few late '80s kid things ourselves.

Though I was born 1987, there were a number of kid trends from the late '80s that I liked first hand.

Alvin and the Chipmunks was a cartoon I really liked and owned several VHS tapes of.
My parents got me a Teddy Ruxpin for Christmas 1989.
Can remember a lot of the ''60s revivals' shows like A Pup Named Scooby Doo and Flintstones Kids.
TMNT was the first major kid trend I loved.
Ghostbusters and Ghostbusters II were some of my favorite movies growing up and I loved the Saturday morning cartoon.
The NES was the first console I ever played.

These are all things that late '80s babies share with mid-'80s and even early '80s babies, even though they were more at the peak childhood stage when these things were popular, late '80s babies did like many of them as well. That's something that's quite different from earlier '80s kid stuff like Atari and Pac-Man, which were already well past their mainstream prime by the time we started paying attention to TV and video games around 1989 or 1990.
After reading your entire post, it gave me a vibe that this could apply to other groups as well. What I mean by that is you said you liked some of the late 80s kid things that were popular at that time. That also means that mid-90s folks could have enjoyed the popular things from the same period they were born in being Power Rangers, SNES/Genesis, GA Nick, and the Disney Renaissance films.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 10:17 am


Do you think they could most likely be Full Y towards the end?

No. Based on knowing people born in 1994-1996...most of them (if not all) aren't Full Gen Y at all. If they do lean to Gen Y then it's only very slightly.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/15/17 at 10:42 am


1994-1996 borns (almost primarily females) most certainly got into the Bieber and One Direction craze. However, I agree with the rest of your points. I'm still not sure if mid '90s borns lean Gen Y though.

Also, you didn't answer the question on if you consider yourself to be apart of Gen Z?


I didn't know that. Where I lived, not many people born in 1994-1996 really cared about them.

Cusp in reality, but both of us along with DesiredUsernameNotTaken and Baltimorean are probably ultimately Z leaning because many sources start Z in 1995-1997, probably more than the ones that start it in 2000 and 2001.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/15/17 at 11:01 am


No. Based on knowing people born in 1994-1996...most of them (if not all) aren't Full Gen Y at all. If they do lean to Gen Y then it's only very slightly.
What's the last full Gen Y year to you?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/15/17 at 11:21 am


After reading your entire post, it gave me a vibe that this could apply to other groups as well. What I mean by that is you said you liked some of the late 80s kid things that were popular at that time. That also means that mid-90s folks could have enjoyed the popular things from the same period they were born in being Power Rangers, SNES/Genesis, GA Nick, and the Disney Renaissance films.


Yeah, it's certainly possible. My younger brother is a 1991 born and he has nostalgia for a lot of early '90s stuff like Aladdin, which is perhaps his favorite childhood movie even though it debuted before he was even 2.

When it comes to you guys born around 1993, I could certainly see you having liked some mid '90s kid things that were still popular by 1996 or even 1997. Power Rangers was still fairly popular through late 1996 so you guys might remember that, and the Super Nintendo and Sega Genesis were still producing popular games up through 1997. There's even a few kids born around 1992 or 1993 I know who's first console was a Super Nintendo or Sega Genesis. Golden Age Nick and Disney Renaissance were still major factors up through 1997, so you guys could probably remember that too.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 11:54 am


I didn't know that. Where I lived, not many people born in 1994-1996 really cared about them.

Justin Bieber became big in 2009 & 2010 and One Direction became big in 2011. 1994-1996 borns were 12-17 years old during that time....of course you had 12-17 year old girls that were fan girling over One Direction and Justin Bieber.


Cusp in reality, but both of us along with DesiredUsernameNotTaken and Baltimorean are probably ultimately Z leaning because many sources start Z in 1995-1997, probably more than the ones that start it in 20010 and 2001.

I think that I'm a Y/Z cusper as well. I guess that us 1997-1999 borns do lean towards Gen Z. Being Gen Z currently seems to be better than being a Millennial. The only thing I don't like though is that many people think that us late '90s borns and people born in 2006, for example, are one in the same.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 11:55 am


What's the last full Gen Y year to you?

1991.

I believe that core Millennials were born from 1986/1987-1991.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/15/17 at 12:37 pm


Yeah, it's certainly possible. My younger brother is a 1991 born and he has nostalgia for a lot of early '90s stuff like Aladdin, which is perhaps his favorite childhood movie even though it debuted before he was even 2.

When it comes to you guys born around 1993, I could certainly see you having liked some mid-'90s kid things that were still popular by 1996 or even 1997. Power Rangers was still fairly popular through late 1996 so you guys might remember that, and the Super Nintendo and Sega Genesis were still producing popular games up through 1997. There are even a few kids born around 1992 or 1993 I know who's first console was a Super Nintendo or Sega Genesis. Golden Age Nick and Disney Renaissance were still major factors up through 1997, so you guys could probably remember that too.
Yeah, that's very true. I've seen comments from people in my age range saying they remember watching Power Rangers before Pokemon appeared as a major kid fad, and having either a Genesis or SNES as their first console in gaming. In fact, I recall seeing PR toys at home and in stores, and the SNES was my first home console. As for other two, that's true as well. I've read that both GA Nick and Disney Renaissance ended in 1998 and 1999 respectively giving us enough time to witness them.


The only thing I don't like though is that many people think that us late '90s borns and people born in 2006, for example, are one in the same.
That could change soon as they will sperate Gen Z into older and younger groups where you will be considered one of the older ones.


1991.

I believe that core Millennials were born from 1986/1987-1991.
Oh. I see. That's because you're using the three section grouping of a generation, and not the two I have been using for some time. Where do you start the Millennial generation?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Howard on 08/15/17 at 1:32 pm


Do we wish to know that?


No, sorry about that.  :-[

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 2:06 pm


That could change soon as they will sperate Gen Z into older and younger groups where you will be considered one of the older ones.

That not going to be the case for at least another decade or so. Maybe even...never.


Oh. I see. That's because you're using the three section grouping of a generation, and not the two I have been using for some time. Where do you start the Millennial generation?

1982.

In my opinion:

*1982-1985/1986 borns are early Millennials.
*1986/1987-1991 borns are core Millennials.
*1992-1994 borns are Millennials but not full Gen Y.
*1995-2000 borns are cuspers of Y/Z. Depends on the individual on whether they lean towards Y or Z.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/15/17 at 2:53 pm


That not going to be the case for at least another decade or so. Maybe even...never.
1982.

In my opinion:

*1982-1985/1986 borns are early Millennials.
*1986/1987-1991 borns are core Millennials.
*1992-1994 borns are Millennials but not full Gen Y.
*1995-2000 borns are cuspers of Y/Z. Depends on the individual on whether they lean towards Y or Z.


Me personally:

1982-1987: First half of Millennials (likely the ones that got into the teen pop and nu-metal stuff the most)
1988-1993: Latter half of Millennials (likely the ones that got into emo the most)
1994-1996: Y/Z cusp with more Y (likely the ones that got into scene, electropop,and dubstep the most)
1997-1999: Y/Z cusp with more Z (likely the ones that got into trap and the 1D/5SOS craze the most)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 08/15/17 at 4:21 pm


Me personally:

1982-1987: First half of Millennials (likely the ones that got into the teen pop and nu-metal stuff the most)
1988-1993: Latter half of Millennials (likely the ones that got into emo the most)
1994-1996: Y/Z cusp with more Y (likely the ones that got into scene, electropop,and dubstep the most)
1997-1999: Y/Z cusp with more Z (likely the ones that got into trap and the 1D/5SOS craze the most)


What do you think about people born in 2000 then?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 08/15/17 at 4:36 pm


What do you think about people born in 2000 then?


I personally think that people born in 2000 are Gen Y/Z cusps as well. There's more things in favour of 2000'ers being Y/Z cusps then solely being Early Gen Z, in my opinion.

*  Were the last to experience their childhood during the Early, Mid & Late 2000's (using the 3-12 definition).
*  Can remember as far back as 2002.
*  Were born in the 20th Century.
*  Were in their core childhood in the Late 2000's, which was apart of peak Gen Y culture.
*  They only experienced one year of their core childhood in the 2010's.
*  Many are in the same class as 1999 babies.
*  Even if some of them are in the Class of 2019, they still started school when only '90s babies were in the higher year groups.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/15/17 at 4:47 pm


1991.

I believe that core Millennials were born from 1986/1987-1991.

I would say 1988 to 1991

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 4:48 pm


Me personally:

1982-1987: First half of Millennials (likely the ones that got into the teen pop and nu-metal stuff the most)
1988-1993: Latter half of Millennials (likely the ones that got into emo the most)
1994-1996: Y/Z cusp with more Y (likely the ones that got into scene, electropop,and dubstep the most)
1997-1999: Y/Z cusp with more Z (likely the ones that got into trap and the 1D/5SOS craze the most)

That's not bad at all.


I personally think that people born in 2000 are Gen Y/Z cusps as well. There's more things in favour of 2000'ers being Y/Z cusps then solely being Early Gen Z, in my opinion.

*  Were the last to experience their childhood during the Early, Mid & Late 2000's (using the 3-12 definition).
*  Can remember as far back as 2002.
*  Were born in the 20th Century.
*  Were in their core childhood in the Late 2000's, which was apart of peak Gen Y culture.
*  They only experienced one year of their core childhood in the 2010's.
*  Many are in the same class as 1999 babies.
*  Even if some of them are in the Class of 2019, they still started school when only '90s babies were in the higher year groups.

Going by your definition of childhood (3-12) then, 2000 borns didn't have their childhoods end until 2012. That's 3 years into the 2010s (2010, 2011, 2012).


I would say 1988 to 1991

Eh, not that different from mine.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/15/17 at 4:52 pm


Me personally:

1982-1987: First half of Millennials (likely the ones that got into the teen pop and nu-metal stuff the most)
1988-1993: Latter half of Millennials (likely the ones that got into emo the most)
1994-1996: Y/Z cusp with more Y (likely the ones that got into scene, electropop,and dubstep the most)
1997-1999: Y/Z cusp with more Z (likely the ones that got into trap and the 1D/5SOS craze the most)

This is the most accurate and makes the most sense. Those of us actually born from those periods know the difference.

Even 88ers and 89ers caught the tail end of the nu metal, pop punk trends of the late 90s and early 00s.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/15/17 at 4:55 pm


Eh, not that different from mine.

Twos year difference. And the most accurate you can get.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 4:58 pm

A couple months ago, I ended up seeing a thread about people debating the boundaries of Gen X. The thread linked to a Google Groups from some Web debate from September 1993 and it featured people born from the mid '60s to early '70s and the people born in the mid '60s felt like people born after 1974 or people born in the late '70s aren't truly Gen X or aren't Gen X at all.

It's fascinating how we are having such debates like that almost 24 years later but now we're debating the boundaries of Gen Y aka Millennials. Somethings NEVER change.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 5:00 pm


Twos year difference. And the most accurate you can get.

Just a year. I'll just simplify it to 1987-1991 as core Millennials :P.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 08/15/17 at 5:25 pm



Going by your definition of childhood (3-12) then, 2000 borns didn't have their childhoods end until 2012. That's 3 years into the 2010s (2010, 2011, 2012).


*he said core childhood years

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 5:39 pm


*he said core childhood years

Oh sh*t...yeah, you're right. My mistake.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/15/17 at 6:01 pm


Just a year. I'll just simplify it to 1987-1991 as core Millennials :P.

I wouldn't consider 87ers core either

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 6:23 pm


I wouldn't consider 87ers core either

Well, I do :P.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/15/17 at 6:59 pm


Well, I do :P.

You can but it's not accurate  ;)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/15/17 at 9:35 pm


That not going to be the case for at least another decade or so. Maybe even...never.
1982.

In my opinion:

*1982-1985/1986 borns are early Millennials.
*1986/1987-1991 borns are core Millennials.
*1992-1994 borns are Millennials but not full Gen Y.
*1995-2000 borns are cuspers of Y/Z. Depends on the individual on whether they lean towards Y or Z.
Oh. Trust me, it WILL happen soon. If the Boomers, Gen X and Millennials can be split, then so can Gen Z.

I take in the bold that they are late Millennials pretty much, and your span seems a little off. Why is there more in the early group than the late?


A couple months ago, I ended up seeing a thread about people debating the boundaries of Gen X. The thread linked to a Google Groups from some Web debate from September 1993 and it featured people born from the mid-'60s to early '70s and the people born in the mid-'60s felt like people born after 1974 or people born in the late '70s aren't truly Gen X or aren't Gen X at all.

It's fascinating how we are having such debates like that almost 24 years later but now we're debating the boundaries of Gen Y aka Millennials. Some things NEVER change.
At that time, it did seem endless; however, it was finally determined in 1999. The debates about the boundaries of Gen Y will be over soon, and that we'll finally also see where the boundaries of Gen Z form. This can't go on forever.


Me personally:

1982-1987: First half of Millennials (likely the ones that got into the teen pop and nu-metal stuff the most)
1988-1993: Latter half of Millennials (likely the ones that got into emo the most)
1994-1996: Y/Z cusp with more Y (likely the ones that got into scene, electropop, and dubstep the most)
1997-1999: Y/Z cusp with more Z (likely the ones that got into trap and the 1D/5SOS craze the most)
I can agree with this list, and it does seem accurate. We'll have to see if this stays true in the future.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 9:48 pm


Oh. Trust me, it WILL happen soon. If the Boomers, Gen X and Millennials can be split, then so can Gen Z.

I hope you're right.


I take in the bold that they are late Millennials pretty much, and your span seems a little off. Why is there more in the early group than the late?

I didn't say that they weren't late Millennials per se...just not full Millennials.


At that time, it did seem endless; however, it was finally determined in 1999. The debates about the boundaries of Gen Y will be over soon, and that we'll finally also see where the boundaries of Gen Z form. This can't go on forever.

Debates on the boundaries of generations will go on FOREVER.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/15/17 at 9:51 pm


I didn't say that they weren't late Millennials per se...just, not full Millennials.
Debates on the boundaries of generations will go on FOREVER.
I know what you mean

No. I meant that debates about the boundaries of Gen Y and Gen Z won't go on forever, not that there won't be any more generational debates.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 10:14 pm


No. I meant that debates about the boundaries of Gen Y and Gen Z won't go on forever, not that there won't be any more generational debates.

Oh OK, you're right :P.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/15/17 at 10:18 pm


Oh OK, you're right :P.
I was just looking at an old thread from 2006, and they had the same generational debates we're having now where Gen Y ends at 1994 or '95 and Gen Z starts at around the same time. What do you think about it?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 10:31 pm


I was just looking at an old thread from 2006, and they had the same generational debates we're having now where Gen Y ends at 1994 or '95 and Gen Z starts at around the same time. What do you think about it?

We haven't moved very far from that position in 2017 :P.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/15/17 at 10:48 pm


We haven't moved very far from that position in 2017 :P.
Pretty much. I honestly think that's what most Millennials have said over the years going back to 2006 and possibly earlier. If you wanna know, I actually read a textbook in 2008 stating that Gen Y ended in 1994. It's pretty crazy how that is somewhat still true today. Oh, and I'll link the topic I found the discussion although were more from that year overall.

http://www.inthe00s.com/index.php?topic=17997.0

Some of the reasons why they believed that 1994 would be of Gen Y is because they thought 1995 folks wouldn't remember the 20th century too well at all or the analog days. They discussed 9/11 where they would probably remember the event but not enough to comprehend it. The third aspect we never talk about could be that 1995 people would have liked the pop culture when they were 18 rather when they were in 10 or in middle school.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 10:54 pm


Pretty much. I honestly think that's what most Millennials have said over the years going back to 2006 and possibly earlier. If you wanna know, I actually read a textbook in 2008 stating that Gen Y ended in 1994. It's pretty crazy how that is somewhat still true today. Oh, and I'll link the topic I found the discussion although were more from that year overall.

http://www.inthe00s.com/index.php?topic=17997.0

Some of the reasons why they believed that 1994 would be of Gen Y is because they thought 1995 folks wouldn't remember the 20th century too well at all or the analog days. They discussed 9/11 where they would probably remember the event but not enough to comprehend it. The third aspect we never talk about could be that 1995 people would have liked the pop culture when they were 18 rather when they were in 10 or in middle school.

One person used the 1979-1994 definition of Gen Y. It's interesting how today almost no one views late '70s borns as being Millennials.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/15/17 at 10:59 pm


One person used the 1979-1994 definition of Gen Y. It's interesting how today almost no one views late '70s borns as being Millennials.
Yeah, that's totally true. Now, it's usually 1980 or '81 with the 1994/95 cutoff; however, I wouldn't completely throw that away just yet. The late 70s as the start could be the majority again.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 11:08 pm


Yeah, that's totally true. Now, it's usually 1980 or '81 with the 1994/95 cutoff; however, I wouldn't completely throw that away just yet. The late 70s as the start could be the majority again.

Have you seen articles or whatever else that have done this?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/15/17 at 11:14 pm


Have you seen articles or whatever else that have done this?
I have seen some in the last few months.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/15/17 at 11:18 pm


I have seen some in the last few months.

Links?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 12:03 am


Links?


https://aestheticdistance.com/blog//do-you-really-hate-milennials

http://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/021914/money-habits-millennials.asp

http://www.newsweek.com/30-20-millennials-grown-2017-adults-573148

http://www.innovairre.com/3634-2/

http://www.reporternewspapers.net/2017/04/30/business-groups-work-bring-millennials-boardroom/

https://www.glassdoor.com/employers/blog/gen-z-v-millennials-key-differences-recruiters-need-to-understand/

http://business.inquirer.net/233846/how-different-are-the-millennials

http://blog.aicpa.org/2017/05/11-things-you-need-to-know-about-your-millennial-co-workers.html#sthash.1H7TsQ7S.0T2QxIIK.dpbs

https://theemployergroup.com/millennials-and-generation-z-employees-in-the-workplace-hire-us/

https://helloalvin.com/millennials-and-gen-z-teens-want-and-get-healthcare-in-the-palm-of-their-hands/

http://outdoorpowerequipment.com/2017/05/23/upfront-millennial-movement/

https://www.iacet.org/news/iacet-blog/blog-articles/do-you-know-the-difference-between-generation-x-y-z/

http://bradley.edu/offices/student/scc/students/soft-skills-resources/soft-skills-presentations/understanding_generational_differences.pdf

http://www.workforce.com/2017/05/16/mental-health-takes-new-meaning-millennials-work/

https://www.standard.com/financial-professional/idi-connect/what-millennials-value-most-and-how-advise-them

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 12:52 am


https://aestheticdistance.com/blog//do-you-really-hate-milennials

http://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/021914/money-habits-millennials.asp

http://www.newsweek.com/30-20-millennials-grown-2017-adults-573148

http://www.innovairre.com/3634-2/

http://www.reporternewspapers.net/2017/04/30/business-groups-work-bring-millennials-boardroom/

https://www.glassdoor.com/employers/blog/gen-z-v-millennials-key-differences-recruiters-need-to-understand/

http://business.inquirer.net/233846/how-different-are-the-millennials

http://blog.aicpa.org/2017/05/11-things-you-need-to-know-about-your-millennial-co-workers.html#sthash.1H7TsQ7S.0T2QxIIK.dpbs

https://theemployergroup.com/millennials-and-generation-z-employees-in-the-workplace-hire-us/

https://helloalvin.com/millennials-and-gen-z-teens-want-and-get-healthcare-in-the-palm-of-their-hands/

http://outdoorpowerequipment.com/2017/05/23/upfront-millennial-movement/

https://www.iacet.org/news/iacet-blog/blog-articles/do-you-know-the-difference-between-generation-x-y-z/

http://bradley.edu/offices/student/scc/students/soft-skills-resources/soft-skills-presentations/understanding_generational_differences.pdf

http://www.workforce.com/2017/05/16/mental-health-takes-new-meaning-millennials-work/

https://www.standard.com/financial-professional/idi-connect/what-millennials-value-most-and-how-advise-them

Well....this is further proves that there is absolutely NO consensus on the boundaries of Gen Y.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/16/17 at 2:13 am


https://aestheticdistance.com/blog//do-you-really-hate-milennials

http://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/021914/money-habits-millennials.asp

http://www.newsweek.com/30-20-millennials-grown-2017-adults-573148

http://www.innovairre.com/3634-2/

http://www.reporternewspapers.net/2017/04/30/business-groups-work-bring-millennials-boardroom/

https://www.glassdoor.com/employers/blog/gen-z-v-millennials-key-differences-recruiters-need-to-understand/

http://business.inquirer.net/233846/how-different-are-the-millennials

http://blog.aicpa.org/2017/05/11-things-you-need-to-know-about-your-millennial-co-workers.html#sthash.1H7TsQ7S.0T2QxIIK.dpbs

https://theemployergroup.com/millennials-and-generation-z-employees-in-the-workplace-hire-us/

https://helloalvin.com/millennials-and-gen-z-teens-want-and-get-healthcare-in-the-palm-of-their-hands/

http://outdoorpowerequipment.com/2017/05/23/upfront-millennial-movement/

https://www.iacet.org/news/iacet-blog/blog-articles/do-you-know-the-difference-between-generation-x-y-z/

http://bradley.edu/offices/student/scc/students/soft-skills-resources/soft-skills-presentations/understanding_generational_differences.pdf

http://www.workforce.com/2017/05/16/mental-health-takes-new-meaning-millennials-work/

https://www.standard.com/financial-professional/idi-connect/what-millennials-value-most-and-how-advise-them


Judging by the cutoff points for these articles it safe to say that if you were born in 1993 & earlier (as early as the late 70's obviously) you'd be Y, while if you were born after 1997 you'd be Z. It seems like most sources cutoff Y in 1994/5 & 7, so those born from 1994-1997 are in some sort of weird cusp zone.

This is actually very intriguing, because on a different forum site I made a thread about a couple of years ago asking people on the board if they considered 1994-1997 borns as Y or Z.

http://personalitycafe.com/generation-y-forum/519226-do-you-consider-those-born-1994-1997-gen-y-gen-z.html

As you could see in the answers via the poll, most people voted mid 90's babies as Late Yers, however there was a decent amount that voted them as early Zers (the percentage was 64% Y, 35% Z). There was about 170 voters, so while just a handful of people (100 people is still a lot though), it is an important variable to take into consideration, the reasonably scientific analysis that I was able to discern.

One reason many people (including myself) vouched for 1994-1997 borns being Y was mainly due to the fact that we were the last to have any memories of the 20th century, 9/11, the early 2000's in general, The Internet (or should I say World Wide Web ;D) during Web 1.0 before Web 2.0, analog & transitional technologies like cassettes, CDs, VHS, Disposable Cameras, Camcorders, etc. among other reasons.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 08/16/17 at 2:43 am

It's still too early to determine when Gen Z starts. Once Early 2000's babies all reach the age of 18, I think the boundaries for the Millennials will be much more precise. Until then, it's really just a guessing game as to when the generation starts and finishes. If someone born in 1999 or 2000 identifies themselves as being a Millennial, they have the right to. At this stage, you can't just draw a line and say, "right, you were born after 1997, you're not a Millennial".

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/16/17 at 7:38 am

Honestly, I just cant fathom mid '90s babies as being Gen Z. They're only like 6-9 years younger than me, which is way too close age wise to seem like a totally different generation. Mid '90s babies were the little kids of the late '90s when I was still a kid myself. My neighbor during the late '90s was a boy born 1993 and used to come over and play with me and my brother during that time even though we were older. We still have fond memories of playing Super Nintendo and Nintendo 64, trading Pokemon cards, and watching Toonami during the late '90s. He certainly seems too close to me age wise to be Gen Z.

Perhaps I could possibly see late '90s babies as Gen Z because there's a much larger age gap there, but even they still seem to have enough Gen Y traits that I can relate to. As I've said before, early '00s babies are the oldest people that truly seem like a different generation to me.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/16/17 at 10:01 am


Honestly, I just cant fathom mid '90s babies as being Gen Z. They're only like 6-9 years younger than me, which is way too close age wise to seem like a totally different generation. Mid '90s babies were the little kids of the late '90s when I was still a kid myself. My neighbor during the late '90s was a boy born 1993 and used to come over and play with me and my brother during that time even though we were older. We still have fond memories of playing Super Nintendo and Nintendo 64, trading Pokemon cards, and watching Toonami during the late '90s. He certainly seems too close to me age wise to be Gen Z.

Perhaps I could possibly see late '90s babies as Gen Z because there's a much larger age gap there, but even they still seem to have enough Gen Y traits that I can relate to. As I've said before, early '00s babies are the oldest people that truly seem like a different generation to me.


I agree man, this is how I personally see it:

Mid 90's Babies (B. 1993/1994-1996) = Late Y, with some Z tendencies

Late 90's Babies (B. 1996/1997-1999) = Core Y/Z Cusps, some lean more Y, others lean more Z

Early 00's Babies (B. 1999/2000-2002) = Early Z, with some Y tendencies

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/16/17 at 11:30 am


Honestly, I just cant fathom mid '90s babies as being Gen Z. They're only like 6-9 years younger than me, which is way too close age wise to seem like a totally different generation. Mid '90s babies were the little kids of the late '90s when I was still a kid myself. My neighbor during the late '90s was a boy born 1993 and used to come over and play with me and my brother during that time even though we were older. We still have fond memories of playing Super Nintendo and Nintendo 64, trading Pokemon cards, and watching Toonami during the late '90s. He certainly seems too close to me age wise to be Gen Z.

Perhaps I could possibly see late '90s babies as Gen Z because there's a much larger age gap there, but even they still seem to have enough Gen Y traits that I can relate to. As I've said before, early '00s babies are the oldest people that truly seem like a different generation to me.


When talking about Gen Y kid culture I generally see it as anywhere from 1988 to about 2004 or, any whereabouts. 1985-1988 was the X/Y Kid cultural transition, while 2004-2007 was the Y/Z kid cultural transition. The Z kid culture came in full force by the 2007-2008 school year, similar to how Y kid culture came in full force by the 1988-1989 school year.


I see the different Y periods in kid culture like this:



Early Y Kid Culture being from 1988-1993, this commercial break from back in the Spring of 1990 is a good representation:

hrphfp5kVNY

At this point those born from 1978-1987 were in their childhoods, those born from 1981-1984 were in their core childhoods aka 'Cold War Era Y'




Core Y Kid Culture from 1993-1999, this commercial break from back in the Summer of 1996 is a good representation:

a4g8iFwJ514

At this point those born from 1984-1993 were in their core childhoods, with those born from 1987-1990 being in their core childhoods aka 'NAFTA Era Y'




Late Y Kid Culture from 1999-2004, this commercial break from back in the Autumn of 2002 is a good representation:

m6br6V99bLI

At this point those born from 1990-1999 were in their core childhoods, with those born from 1993-1996 being in their core childhoods aka '9/11 Era Y'

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 12:46 pm


Well....this further proves that there is absolutely NO consensus on the boundaries of Gen Y.
Well, like I said before there will finally be a consensus on the boundaries of Gen Y sooner or later. This won't last forever like it has been for the past 11-13 years.


Judging by the cutoff points for these articles it safe to say that if you were born in 1993 & earlier (as early as the late 70's obviously) you'd be Y, while if you were born after 1997 you'd be Z. It seems like most sources cut off Y in 1994/5 & 7, so those born from 1994-1997 are in some sort of weird cusp zone.

This is actually very intriguing because on a different forum site I made a thread about a couple of years ago asking people on the board if they considered 1994-1997 borns as Y or Z.

http://personalitycafe.com/generation-y-forum/519226-do-you-consider-those-born-1994-1997-gen-y-gen-z.html

As you could see in the answers via the poll, most people voted mid 90's babies as Late Yers, however, there was a decent amount that voted them as early Zers (the percentage was 64% Y, 35% Z). There were about 170 voters, so while just a handful of people (100 people is still a lot though), it is an important variable to take into consideration, the reasonable scientific analysis that I was able to discern.

One reason many people (including myself) vouched for 1994-1997 borns being Y was mainly due to the fact that we were the last to have any memories of the 20th century, 9/11, the early 2000's in general, The Internet (or should I say World Wide Web ;D) during Web 1.0 before Web 2.0, analog & transitional technologies like cassettes, CDs, VHS, Disposable Cameras, Camcorders, etc. among other reasons.
Yeah, pretty much. Every article I encounter seems to have the cutoffs between 1994-1997, and not anywhere later that some others are saying.  As I said before, the debates on Gen Y WILL be ending soon especially since this had been going on for the past 11-13 years.

As for your second statement, I agree with everything you said except for one thing. The only problem with the analog technologies is that are we going by when they were common or when they were still available before becoming obsolete?


Honestly, I just can't fathom mid-'90s babies as being Gen Z. They're only like 6-9 years younger than me, which is way too close age wise to seem like a totally different generation. Mid-'90s babies were the little kids of the late '90s when I was still a kid myself. My neighbor during the late '90s was a boy born 1993 and used to come over and play with me and my brother during that time even though we were older. We still have fond memories of playing Super Nintendo and Nintendo 64, trading Pokemon cards, and watching Toonami during the late '90s. He certainly seems too close to me age wise to be Gen Z.

Perhaps I could possibly see late '90s babies as Gen Z because there's a much larger age gap there, but even they still seem to have enough Gen Y traits that I can relate to. As I've said before, early '00s babies are the oldest people that truly seem like a different generation to me.
Yeah, it's a tough decision man. Everything you said pretty much qualifies mid-90s people as Gen Y, but the problem is that sources are not using childhood fads to determine the cutoffs rather they are going on technology, events, characteristics and so on.


It's still too early to determine when Gen Z starts. Once Early 2000's babies all reach the age of 18, I think the boundaries for the Millennials will be much more precise. Until then, it's really just a guessing game as to when the generation starts and finishes. If someone born in 1999 or 2000 identifies themselves as being a Millennial, they have the right to. At this stage, you can't just draw a line and say, "right, you were born after 1997, you're not a Millennial".
Well, the Gen Z debate has been going on for the past 11-13 years now. This is unfortunately nothing new. Back in 2004 to '06, there were people on here and on other sites saying that Gen Y ended in 1994-95, and even sometimes much earlier. Like ReignMan said, that position today still hasn't changed. Hell, I even went back in time to search for old articles, and I this is what I found.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/13/opinion/13herbert.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/business/21shelf.html

http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2008/04/the_millennials.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-greenberg-and-karl-weber/the-millennials-americas_b_126205.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/01/AR2008020102826.html

https://www.cpcc.edu/millennial

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-millennials-are-coming/

http://web.csulb.edu/divisions/students2/intouch/archives/2007-08/vol16_no1/01.htm

http://www.northwestern.edu/magazine/summer2006/cover/millenials.html

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/how-will-millennials-manage

http://www.pewresearch.org/topics/millennials/2007/

http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/series/the-millennial-generation/

http://www.bolde.com/8-defining-experiences-millennials-have-been-through/

http://adage.com/article/news/generation/55731/

http://www.newsweek.com/now-its-time-generation-next-162866

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=90798

http://www.sociologia.unimib.it/DATA/Insegnamenti/17_4331/materiale/bigicorving.pdf

http://adage.com/article/american-demographics/inside-gen-y/43704/

https://www.c-span.org/video/?161021-1/millennials-rising

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owwM6FpWWoQ


I agree with you man, this is how I personally see it:

Mid 90's Babies (B. 1993/1994-1996) = Late Y, with some Z tendencies

Late 90's Babies (B. 1996/1997-1999) = Core Y/Z Cusps, some lean more Y, others lean more Z

Early 00's Babies (B. 1999/2000-2002) = Early Z, with some Y tendencies
Where do you see the beginning of the generation?


When talking about Gen Y kid culture I generally see it as anywhere from 1988 to about 2004 or, any whereabouts. 1985-1988 was the X/Y Kid cultural transition, while 2004-2007 was the Y/Z kid cultural transition. The Z kid culture came in full force by the 2007-2008 school year, similar to how Y kid culture came in full force by the 1988-1989 school year.


I see the different Y periods in kid culture like this:



Early Y Kid Culture being from 1988-1993, this commercial break from back in the Spring of 1990 is a good representation:

hrphfp5kVNY

At this point those born from 1978-1987 were in their childhoods, those born from 1981-1984 were in their core childhoods aka 'Cold War Era Y'




Core Y Kid Culture from 1993-1999, this commercial break from back in the Summer of 1996 is a good representation:

a4g8iFwJ514

At this point, those born from 1984-1993 were in their core childhoods, with those born from 1987-1990 being in their core childhoods aka 'NAFTA Era Y'




Late Y Kid Culture from 1999-2004, this commercial break from back in the Autumn of 2002 is a good representation:

m6br6V99bLI

At this point, those born from 1990-1999 were in their core childhoods, with those born from 1993-1996 being in their core childhoods aka '9/11 Era Y'
This is a great analysis of the Gen Y childhood culture, and those videos are a good representation of which era of Gen Y is was. The only problem so far is when does the Millennial generation start and end? Out of all articles I have read (including the old ones), the consensus seems to be between about 1977/78 and 1994/95. That means that childhood of Gen Y could have begun sometime in 1986 and ended around the time you said.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 1:04 pm

I'm currently straddling the thought that I will be classified as an older member of Gen Z.

I guess that us born in the late '90s have to just accept it and realize that a lot of the characteristics of Gen Z does not completely define us and our childhoods.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 1:06 pm


I'm currently straddling the thought that I will be classified as an older member of Gen Z.

I guess that us born in the late '90s have to just accept it and realize that a lot of the characteristics of Gen Z does not completely define us and our childhoods.
Don't worry man. The traits of Gen Z will change soon. They're going to realize that not everyone in the generation grew up with smartphones and social media.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 1:12 pm


Don't worry man. The traits of Gen Z will change soon. They're going to realize that not everyone in the generation grew up with smartphones and social media.

Not everyone but those are the defining characteristics of Gen Z and by and large those characteristics are true.

That's why I was saying that us late '90s borns just have to tough it out and realize that many of those characteristics don't really pertain us.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/16/17 at 1:17 pm


Yeah, pretty much. Every article I encounter seems to have the cutoffs between 1994-1997, and not anywhere later that some others are saying.  As I said before, the debates on Gen Y WILL be ending soon especially since this had been going on for the past 11-13 years.
Where do you see the beginning of the generation?


Personally I see the generation spanning from 1980-1998 or so. 1980 is the ultimate X/Y Cusp year, 1998 is the ultimate Y/Z Cusp year. However, I'm okay with the generation being from 1982-2000, 1980-1994, or 1981-1996, as they are all pretty reasonable and provide the best insight on what the Millennial generation is about:


2000 is a good cutoff since they were the last to be born in the 20th century, it coincides nicely with the Chinese zodiac, last to be born during the demographic 'Echo Boom', to spend most of their childhoods prior to the 2008 crash, maybe the last to easily remember life before social media became common, last to spend most of their youth prior to the 2016 election

1994 is a good cutoff since they were the last to be born in the first half of the 90's, to vividly remember the 90's & Y2K, last to be in their teens in the core 2000's, last to graduate high school before the Y/Z transition

1996 is a good cutoff since they were the last to be born in the mid 90's, last to vividly remember 9/11 & a pre 9/11 world, last to be at their peak childhood in the Y era of Kid Culture, Last to be in their teens in the 2000's, last to graduate high school in the first half of the 10's


When it pertains to starting the Millennial generation, I'm not the biggest fan of starting the generation in the Late 70's as they had too many experiences of childhood in the early-mid 80's, and youthood in the late 80's/early-mid 90's to be Y. Also, most sources these days seem to start the generation in the early 80's anyway.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennials

Quotes from wikipedia:

"Millennials (also known as Generation Y) are the demographic cohort following Generation X. There are no precise dates for when this cohort starts or ends; demographers and researchers typically use the early 1980s as starting birth years and the mid-1990s to early 2000s as ending birth years."


"A minority of demographers and researchers start the generation in the mid-to-late 1970s, such as Synchrony Financial which describes Millennials as starting as early as 1976, Mobilize.org which uses 1976–1996, MetLife which uses birth dates ranging from 1977–1994, and Nielsen Media Research which uses 1977–1995."


"The majority of researchers and demographers start the generation in the early 1980s, with many ending the generation in the mid-1990s. Australia's McCrindle Research regards 1980–1994 as Generation Y birth years. A 2013 PricewaterhouseCoopers report and Edelman Berland use 1980–1995. Gallup Inc., Eventbrite and Dale Carnegie Training and MSW Research all use 1980–1996. Ernst and Young uses 1981–1996. Manpower Group uses 1982–1996."


"Others end the generation in the late 1990s or early 2000s. A 2017 viral video from BuzzFeed, detailing the seven living generations of Americans, described Millennials as those born between 1981–1997. On the American television program Survivor, for their 33rd season, subtitled Millennials vs. Gen X, the "Millennial tribe" consisted of individuals born between 1984 and 1997. Goldman Sachs, Resolution Foundation, and a 2013 Time magazine cover story all use 1980–2000. SYZYGY, a digital service agency partially owned by WPP, uses 1981–1998, and the United States Census Bureau uses 1982–2000. Pew Research Center defines Millennials as being born from 1981 onwards, with no chronological end point set yet."


As you can see, only a few sources these days begin Y in the 70's. Most seem to start Y in the early 80's, usually around 1980 or 1981, and end Y in the mid 90's 1994-1997, or the early 2000's, the year 2000 itself.

I think the issue with your analysis is that the sources your referencing are using older information (primarily from 10 or more years ago), when in fact theres been more studies in recent years to suggest that those born in the Late 70's & VERY Early 80's are Late Gen X, or at best are on a cusp between X & Millennials.

While I agree that the ending date for Millennials seems to have stayed consistent for the last 10 years (that being 1994/5-1996/7), the start date has most certainly been pushed further. Now whether you personally agree with that is subjective and is your own opinion, but regardless most researches, demographers, & sociologists seem to start the generation in the early 80's.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 1:49 pm


1996 is a good cutoff since they were the last to be born in the mid 90's, last to vividly remember 9/11 & a pre 9/11 world, last to be at their peak childhood in the Y era of Kid Culture, Last to be in their teens in the 2000's, last to graduate high school in the first half of the 10's

Vividly? ??? I'm not so sure about that.

I know that you're a 1996 born but still...the last to have OK or decent memories before 9/11 but vividly...nope.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 2:00 pm


Not everyone but those are the defining characteristics of Gen Z and by large, those characteristics are true.

That's why I was saying that us late '90s borns just have to tough it out and realize that many of those characteristics don't really pertain us.
and some mid-90s people as well considering they were still in HS when post-Facebook social media became popular and smartphones were in demand.


Personally, I see the generation spanning from 1980-1998 or so. 1980 is the ultimate X/Y Cusp year, 1998 is the ultimate Y/Z Cusp year. However, I'm okay with the generation being from 1982-2000, 1980-1994, or 1981-1996, as they are all pretty reasonable and provide the best insight on what the Millennial generation is about:


2000 is a good cutoff since they were the last to be born in the 20th century, it coincides nicely with the Chinese zodiac, last to be born during the demographic 'Echo Boom', to spend most of their childhoods prior to the 2008 crash, maybe the last to easily remember life before social media became common, last to spend most of their youth prior to the 2016 election

1994 is a good cutoff since they were the last to be born in the first half of the 90's, to vividly remember the 90's & Y2K, last to be in their teens in the core 2000's, last to graduate high school before the Y/Z transition

1996 is a good cutoff since they were the last to be born in the mid 90's, last to vividly remember 9/11 & a pre 9/11 world, last to be at their peak childhood in the Y era of Kid Culture, Last to be in their teens in the 2000's, last to graduate high school in the first half of the 10's


When it pertains to starting the Millennial generation, I'm not the biggest fan of starting the generation in the Late 70's as they had too many experiences of childhood in the early-mid 80's, and youthhood in the late 80's/early-mid 90's to be Y. Also, most sources these days seem to start the generation in the early 80's anyway.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennials

Quotes from Wikipedia:

"Millennials (also known as Generation Y) are the demographic cohort following Generation X. There are no precise dates for when this cohort starts or ends; demographers and researchers typically use the early 1980s as starting birth years and the mid-1990s to early 2000s as ending birth years."


"A minority of demographers and researchers start the generation in the mid-to-late 1970s, such as Synchrony Financial which describes Millennials as starting as early as 1976, Mobilize.org which uses 1976–1996, MetLife which uses birth dates ranging from 1977–1994, and Nielsen Media Research which uses 1977–1995."


"The majority of researchers and demographers start the generation in the early 1980s, with many ending the generation in the mid-1990s. Australia's McCrindle Research regards 1980–1994 as Generation Y birth years. A 2013 PricewaterhouseCoopers report and Edelman Berland use 1980–1995. Gallup Inc., Eventbrite and Dale Carnegie Training and MSW Research all use 1980–1996. Ernst and Young use 1981–1996. Manpower Group uses 1982–1996."


"Others end the generation in the late 1990s or early 2000s. A 2017 viral video from BuzzFeed, detailing the seven living generations of Americans, described Millennials as those born between 1981–1997. On the American television program Survivor, for their 33rd season, subtitled Millennials vs. Gen X, the "Millennial tribe" consisted of individuals born between 1984 and 1997. Goldman Sachs, Resolution Foundation, and a 2013 Time magazine cover story all use 1980–2000. SYZYGY, a digital service agency partially owned by WPP, uses 1981–1998, and the United States Census Bureau uses 1982–2000. Pew Research Center defines Millennials as being born from 1981 onwards, with no chronological end point set yet."


As you can see, only a few sources these days begin Y in the 70's. Most seem to start Y in the early 80's, usually around 1980 or 1981, and end Y in the mid 90's 1994-1997, or the early 2000's, the year 2000 itself.

I think the issue with your analysis is that the sources your referencing are using older information (primarily from 10 or more years ago), when in fact there have been more studies in recent years to suggest that those born in the Late 70's & VERY Early 80's are Late Gen X, or at best are on a cusp between X & Millennials.

While I agree that the ending date for Millennials seems to have stayed consistent for the last 10 years (that being 1994/5-1996/7), the start date has most certainly been pushed further. Now whether you personally agree with that is subjective and is your own opinion, but regardless most researchers, demographers, & sociologists seem to start the generation in the early 80's.
Yeah, I totally agree. Those 3 years are good cutoffs for the Millennial generation with details provided. Oh, and have you seen the talk page? Someone on there got mad and said including the early 00s was BS.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AMillennials

Here's the quote:

Remove the "early 2000s" bullsheesh from the intro

People born in the early 80s-mid 90s do not associate with those born in the late 90s/early 2000s. Those born in the late 90s/early 2000s weren't in K-12 during 9/11 and thus can't relate to Millennials; they would be Gen Z


That's true. I'm not denying that the late 70s are mainly Xers. It's just that it could be the start of Gen Y again one day, and blow us away. Oh, and I have seen those sources in the last two months or so, and while I agree with the cusp, it's too big. Besides, I also have seen articles where Old Millennials simply just want to be Xennials because of the negative stereotypes against the entire generation that are simply not true.

http://www.avclub.com/article/old-millennials-re-brand-more-palatable-xennials-257643

https://www.bustle.com/p/older-millennials-are-so-salty-about-being-millennials-they-made-up-a-new-name-for-themselves-67215

https://pizzabottle.com/38612-older-millennials-brand-new-name-theyre-not-millennials/

http://mashable.com/2017/06/30/xennials-versus-other-generations/#MPMInLV_Baqc

Then all of a sudden, I came across these two articles.

http://www.kylemcmahon.me/theres-no-thing-xennials/

https://www.institutefortomorrow.com/ift-views/2017/7/19/xennial-schmennial-why-xennials-are-not-a-thing


Vividly? ??? I'm not so sure about that.

I know that you're a 1996 born but still...the last to have OK or decent memories before 9/11 but vividly...nope.
Yeah, remembering vividly doesn't seem right to people who were 5 when 9/11 happened.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 2:26 pm


and some mid-90s people as well considering they were still in HS when post-Facebook social media became popular and smartphones were in demand.

Yep.


Yeah, remembering vividly doesn't seem right to people who were 5 when 9/11 happened.

Yeah, it was a poor word choice by ZeldaFan20 :P.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/16/17 at 2:30 pm


Vividly? ??? I'm not so sure about that.

I know that you're a 1996 born but still...the last to have OK or decent memories before 9/11 but vividly...nope.


Perhaps vivid isn't the right word, but last have been in compulsory school when it happened, thus the last to have a substantive memory of that day, and events immediately after, and events prior to it, well then yes. Even if some mid 90's people can't remember much of 9/11, I bet that most could easily remember prior to 9/11, be it major news events or events that happened in their own personal lives (vacations, birthdays, family reunions, heck some may remember going on a plane before 9/11, etc.).



Yeah, I totally agree. Those 3 years are good cutoffs for the Millennial generation with details provided. Oh, and have you seen the talk page? Someone on there got mad and said including the early 00s was BS.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AMillennials

Here's the quote:

That's true. I'm not denying that the late 70s are mainly Xers. It's just that it could be the start of Gen Y again one day, and blow us away. Oh, and I have seen those sources in the last two months or so, and while I agree with the cusp, it's too big. Besides, I also have seen articles where Old Millennials simply just want to be Xennials because of the negative stereotypes against the entire generation that are simply not true.


Yeah I read the articles, and like I've said countless times is that you have to look at what the masses are saying. It says clearly in the wikipedia article that only a minority of researches begin Y in the Late 70's. Type in 'Millennial years' on Google, and I guarantee you the first thing that comes up is a source claiming the generation to be born in 1981+.

Of course you have to take the sources that begin Y in the late 70's into consideration, but likewise you have to also take into consideration the later starting dates, I think the absolute latest start date I've seen was 1985. So theoretically anybody born from 1977-1985 could be considered X or Y, depending on the source.

However, similar to 'The Bell Curve', when you look at where the average start date seems to be where most sources start Y, its somewhere around the 1980-1982 range.

However, FWIW 1977 has higher value as a start date, than 1984/1985 is, as thats WAY TOO LATE to be considered X, let alone X/Y Cusp.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 2:35 pm

The general consensus is that 1994 borns are the last to be "safely" Millennial. 1995 borns and after is where it gets murky.

I define core childhood as being the ages of 5-10. In the US, smartphone usage passed 50% in late 2012. That means that people born 1995-2001 spent their entire core childhoods without smartphone usage being higher than 50% and 2002 borns spent almost all of their core childhoods without smartphone usage being higher than 50%. Now all of that means that if 1994 is the end of Gen Y/Millennials, then early Gen Zers born in 1995-2002 should have their own special separate cohort to denote that they didn't grow up in a world consumed by smartphones. 2003 borns are the first group be be "100%" Gen Z.

Now when does Gen Z end? Hmmm...???

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/16/17 at 2:38 pm


Perhaps vivid isn't the right word, but last have been in compulsory school when it happened, thus the last to have a substantive memory of that day, and events immediately after, and events prior to it, well then yes. Even if some mid 90's people can't remember much of 9/11, I bet that most could easily remember prior to 9/11, be it major news events or events that happened in their own personal lives (vacations, birthdays, family reunions, heck some may remember going on a plane before 9/11, etc.).


Yeah I read the articles, and like I've said countless times is that you have to look at what the masses are saying. It says clearly in the wikipedia article that only a minority of researches begin Y in the Late 70's. Type in 'Millennial years' on Google, and I guarantee you the first thing that comes up is a source claiming the generation to be born in 1981+.

Of course you have to take the sources that begin Y in the late 70's into consideration, but likewise you have to also take into consideration the later starting dates, I think the absolute latest start date I've seen was 1985. So theoretically anybody born from 1977-1985 could be considered X or Y, depending on the source.

However, similar to 'The Bell Curve', when you look at where the average start date seems to be where most sources start Y, its somewhere around the 1980-1982 range.

However, FWIW 1977 has higher value as a start date, than 1984/1985 is, as thats WAY TOO LATE to be considered X, let alone X/Y Cusp.


I personally view Generation Y as being 1981-1996.

Basically any guy that wasn't in school yet when the Challenger exploded (but at school when the Columbine shooting took place) along with mid 90's borns (might have recollections of Y2K - but not that likely, last group to likely remember 9/11).

Another thing you may have to look at is people's names (as dumb as it sounds).

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 2:38 pm


Perhaps vivid isn't the right word, but last have been in compulsory school when it happened, thus the last to have a substantive memory of that day, and events immediately after, and events prior to it, well then yes. Even if some mid 90's people can't remember much of 9/11, I bet that most could easily remember prior to 9/11, be it major news events or events that happened in their own personal lives (vacations, birthdays, family reunions, heck some may remember going on a plane before 9/11, etc.).

Eh, do those really count especially since most of those memories would be vague to extremely vague?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/16/17 at 2:42 pm


The general consensus is that 1994 borns are the last to be "safely" Millennial. 1995 borns and after is where is gets murky.

I define core childhood as being the ages of 5-10. In the US, smartphone usage passed 50% in late 2012. That means that people born 1995-2001 spent their entire core childhoods without smartphone usage being higher than 50% and 2002 borns spent almost all of their core childhoods without smartphone usage being higher than 50%. Now all of that means that if 1994 is the end of Gen Y/Millennials, then early Gen Zers born in 1995-2002 should have their own special separate cohort to denote that they didn't grow up in a world consumed by smartphones. 2003 borns are the first group be be "100%" Gen Z.

Now when does Gen Z end? Hmmm...???


10 isn't really "core childhood". You're in you're double digits, and many sources consider 10-year-olds tweens.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 2:52 pm


10 isn't really "core childhood". You're in you're double digits, and many sources consider 10-year-olds tweens.

10 is your core childhood...it's just the very last year of it.

Anyways, I still think that my point is valid. Unless, you can refute otherwise.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/16/17 at 2:56 pm

In general, I don't even get why we're on with these useless arguments about when a certain generation ends. All they are going to do is gain controversy and anger in this forum.

These arguments are like the type of arguments you'd see on The Apricity or the white nationalist forums with their "who is white" threads. This is why I quit PersonalityCafe (I was geisterhund) and the YouTube comments (I went by the pseudonym "The Burger King").

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 3:01 pm


In general, I don't even get why we're on with these useless arguments about when a certain generation ends. All they are going to do is gain controversy and anger in this forum.

These arguments are like the type of arguments you'd see on The Apricity or the white nationalist forums with their "who is white" threads. This is why I quit PersonalityCafe (I was geisterhund) and the YouTube comments (I went by the pseudonym "The Burger King").

You have a point but it's just something that is apart of society.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 3:16 pm


Yeah, I read the articles, and like I've said countless times is that you have to look at what the masses are saying. It says clearly in the Wikipedia article that only a minority of researchers begin Y in the Late 70's. Type in 'Millennial years' on Google, and I guarantee you the first thing that comes up is a source claiming the generation to be born in 1981+.

Of course you have to take the sources that begin Y in the late 70's into consideration, but likewise, you have to also take into consideration the later starting dates, I think the absolute latest start date I've seen was 1985. So theoretically anybody born from 1977-1985 could be considered X or Y, depending on the source.

However, similar to 'The Bell Curve', when you look at where the average start date seems to be where most sources start Y, it's somewhere around the 1980-1982 range.

However, FWIW 1977 has a higher value as a start date than 1984/1985 is, as that's WAY TOO LATE to be considered X, let alone X/Y Cusp.
I completely understand that. No question there that the early 80s are the majority. I'm just saying that the late 70s could make a comeback as that out of nowhere one day, and surprise us.

Yeah, I agree that it's clearly late for 1984/1985 to be the start. To me, that sounds like millennial denial which most of the Old Millennials have been doing for the last few years. I wish they would acknowledge that there's nothing wrong with being a Millennial. It seems they are embarrassed.


The general consensus is that 1994 borns are the last to be "safely" Millennial. 1995 borns and after is where it gets murky.

I define core childhood as being the ages of 5-10. In the US, smartphone usage passed 50% in late 2012. That means that people born 1995-2001 spent their entire core childhoods without smartphone usage much higher than 50% and 2002 borns spent almost all of their core childhoods without smartphone usage much higher than 50%. Now all of that means that if 1994 is the end of Gen Y/Millennials, then early Gen Zers born in 1995-2002 should have their own special separate cohort to denote that they didn't grow up in a world consumed by smartphones. 2003 borns are the first group be "100%" Gen Z.

Now when does Gen Z end? Hmmm...???
I have read that Gen Z ends between 2009 and 2015, but the latter year is way too late, to be honest. I think the best is either 2009 or '10 especially since that Gen Alpha begun a few years ago in 2011.

Oh, and Gen Z isn't just defined by technology and social media, but also events and their traits as well. If you think about it, Gen Z is seen as pragmatic because they witnessed their parents lose jobs in the Great Recession. Their political views seem to be either liberal or libertarian (I don't buy that conservative BS mentioned in some sources), and they are more likely to be non-white (references show that Caucasian is on the decline and has been for some years). All they have known is the world with terrorism (thanks to 9/11 and the two unnecessary wars); less likely to remember the 20th century and even the new millennium as it happened, and witnessed the first black president (even if they could never vote for him)


I personally view Generation Y as being 1981-1996.

Basically, any guy that wasn't in school yet when the Challenger exploded (but at school when the Columbine shooting took place) along with mid 90's borns (might have recollections of Y2K - but not that likely, the last group to likely remember 9/11).

1994-1996 along with 1999-2000 seem stable for cutoff dates and are also very common to find. 1997 and 1998 seem too controversial and in some ways unstable to use as end dates. Now forwarding on to what ReignMan said, I don't believe that Gen Y should go on for that long (2002).
I agree with your entire description. 1994-1996 and 1999-2000 are definitely the most likely endings of Millenials, and I agree that the generation should not end any later than 2000.


10 isn't really "core childhood". You're in you're double digits, and many sources consider 10-year-olds tweens.
I agree with this as well. On top of that, 10 is sometimes even considered the last year for childhood. By the time someone hits 11 and 12, they're pretty much an adolescent although it's the beginning.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 3:20 pm


In general, I don't even get why we're on with these useless arguments about when a certain generation ends. All they are going to do is gain controversy and anger in this forum.

These arguments are the type of arguments you'd see on The Apricity or the white nationalist forums with their "who is white" threads. This is why I quit PersonalityCafe (I was geisterhund) and the YouTube comments (I went by the pseudonym "The Burger King").



You have a point but it's just something that is part of society.
You guys are right. These discussions do cause controversy and anger on here, and even everywhere else; however, as ReignMan said, it's part of the world. I mean, just look what happened over the weekend in Charlottesville, VA, and Seattle, WA. The entire protest was about racism.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 3:34 pm


I have read that Gen Z ends between 2009 and 2015, but the latter year is way too late, to be honest. I think the best is either 2009 or '10 especially since that Gen Alpha begun a few years ago in 2011.

If you think that Gen Z should end in 2009 or 2010...then when do you think Gen Z starts?


Oh, and Gen Z isn't just defined by technology and social media, but also events and their traits as well. If you think about it, Gen Z is seen as pragmatic because they witnessed their parents lose jobs in the Great Recession. Their political views seem to be either liberal or libertarian (I don't buy that conservative BS mentioned in some sources), and they are more likely to be non-white (references show that Caucasian is on the decline and has been for some years). All they have known is the world with terrorism (thanks to 9/11 and the two unnecessary wars); less likely to remember the 20th century and even the new millennium as it happened, and witnessed the first black president (even if they could never vote for him)

I know that but social media is the biggest factor.


I agree with your entire description. 1994-1996 and 1999-2000 are definitely the most likely endings of Millenials, and I agree that the generation should not end any later than 2000.

I agree.


I agree with this as well. On top of that, 10 is sometimes even considered the last year for childhood. By the time someone hits 11 and 12, they're pretty much an adolescent although it's the beginning.

Being 10 is like being 13...most people at 13 aren't really teenagers even though they are officially a teen (thirTEEN) just like most 10 year olds aren't really tweens even though they are officially tweens. You're really a tween when you're 11-13 and really a teen when you're 15-17.

Also, most people regard 5-10 as being the ages of your core childhood. Childhood is from the ages of 3-12.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 3:38 pm

An interesting thing I have noted is that a lot of 1999 and 2000 borns view themselves as the very last of Gen Y. Meanwhile, a lot of 2001 and 2002 borns view themselves as very early Gen Zers, lol.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 3:56 pm


If you think that Gen Z should end in 2009 or 2010...then when do you think Gen Z starts?
I know that but social media is the biggest factor.
I agree.
Being 10 is like being 13...most people at 13 aren't really teenagers even though they are officially a teen (thirTEEN) just like most 10-year-olds aren't really tweens even though they are officially tweens. You're really a tween when you're 11-13 and really a teen when you're 15-17.

Also, most people regard 5-10 as being the ages of your core childhood. Childhood is from the ages of 3-12.
What most sources are saying. My opinion is still that it should be 2000, but I can't refute that at all.

Yeah, true. I agree with what BChris said. While Millennials DO use Instagram and Snapchat, they are social media platforms that lean more towards Gen Z along with Vine (before it died), Whisper, Musical.ly, and Kik.

Yeah, that's definitely true; however, sources say that 10 is the first for adolescence (or tween) with 17 being the last. Besides, the word "teen" doesn't actually translate very well into other languages. I used to think I wasn't a teenager until I hit 13; however, I was pretty much one much earlier than that considering none of my friends, peers and I were participating in childhood fads by then.

It's why I think childhood ends at 10 rather than 12 especially since puberty starts around that age (a little earlier for girls and non-whites)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 4:00 pm


What most sources are saying. My opinion is still that it should be 2000, but I can't refute that at all.

Huh? ??? Re-read my first question again


Yeah, that's definitely true; however, sources say that 10 is the first for adolescence (or tween) with 17 being the last. Besides, the word "teen" doesn't actually translate very well into other languages. I used to think I wasn't a teenager until I hit 13; however, I was pretty much one much earlier than that considering none of my friends, peers and I were participating in childhood fads by then.

It's why I think childhood ends at 10 rather than 12 especially since puberty starts around that age (a little earlier for girls and non-whites)

That's precisely why your core childhood ends at 10. Everyone is still a kid at 12, lol. At 12, I thought that I was "an adult" but I most certainly wasn't. Just because we're in puberty full swing at 12 doesn't mean much.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 4:25 pm


Huh? ??? Re-read my first question again
That's precisely why your core childhood ends at 10. Everyone is still a kid at 12, lol. At 12, I thought that I was "an adult" but I most certainly wasn't. Just because we're in puberty full swing at 12 doesn't mean much.
The question was where do I see the start of Gen Z, and I said what most sources say; however, my opinion is 2000.

Well, everyone is still a kid at any age. I mean, we can all be immature at times. ;)

I'm not saying that 12 is an adult, but I wish people would realize from sources that 10-12/13 is not necessarily a kid anymore. If you think about it, people around that age range are doing their own thing with friends, and are forming their own likes and dislikes.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 2001 on 08/16/17 at 4:28 pm


In general, I don't even get why we're on with these useless arguments about when a certain generation ends. All they are going to do is gain controversy and anger in this forum.

These arguments are like the type of arguments you'd see on The Apricity or the white nationalist forums with their "who is white" threads. This is why I quit PersonalityCafe (I was geisterhund) and the YouTube comments (I went by the pseudonym "The Burger King").


Ah, so you were the old user who went by "The Burger King" on here. ;)

I agree, the debate is nonsense and pseudoscientific. :-X

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 4:30 pm


The question was where do I see the start of Gen Z, and I said what most sources say; however, my opinion is 2000.

So you think Gen Z is 2000-2009/2010? That's pretty short.


Well, everyone is still a kid at any age. I mean, we can all be immature at times. ;)

True but you know what I mean ;) :P.


I'm not saying that 12 is an adult, but I wish people would realize from sources that 10-12/13 is not necessarily a kid anymore. If you think about it, people around that age range are doing their own thing with friends, and are forming their own likes and dislikes.

I know that you didn't say that 12 is an adult...I DID, I was quoting myself and I was saying how wrong I was, lol.

Anyways, most people realize that 10-13 year olds aren't elementary school aged children but they still aren't as mature as many of them think they are.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 4:31 pm


I agree, the debate is nonsense and pseudoscientific. :-X

Not really but if you don't want to take part in it or if you don't believe in generations...then that's totally fine.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/16/17 at 4:34 pm


Perhaps vivid isn't the right word, but last have been in compulsory school when it happened, thus the last to have a substantive memory of that day, and events immediately after, and events prior to it, well then yes. Even if some mid 90's people can't remember much of 9/11, I bet that most could easily remember prior to 9/11, be it major news events or events that happened in their own personal lives (vacations, birthdays, family reunions, heck some may remember going on a plane before 9/11, etc.).


Yeah I read the articles, and like I've said countless times is that you have to look at what the masses are saying. It says clearly in the wikipedia article that only a minority of researches begin Y in the Late 70's. Type in 'Millennial years' on Google, and I guarantee you the first thing that comes up is a source claiming the generation to be born in 1981+.

Of course you have to take the sources that begin Y in the late 70's into consideration, but likewise you have to also take into consideration the later starting dates, I think the absolute latest start date I've seen was 1985. So theoretically anybody born from 1977-1985 could be considered X or Y, depending on the source.

However, similar to 'The Bell Curve', when you look at where the average start date seems to be where most sources start Y, its somewhere around the 1980-1982 range.

However, FWIW 1977 has higher value as a start date, than 1984/1985 is, as thats WAY TOO LATE to be considered X, let alone X/Y Cusp.

No, not even theoretically can anybody born in the mid 80s say they're X. That is laugable. 1977 to 1982 yes, 1985 no. That's a solid Gen Y year.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 4:35 pm


No, not even theoretically can anybody born in the mid 80s say they're X. That is laugable. 1977 to 1982 yes, 1985 no. That's a solid Gen Y year.

I agree.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 4:39 pm


So you think Gen Z is 2000-2009/2010? That's pretty short.
True but you know what I mean ;) :P.
I know that you didn't say that 12 is an adult...I DID, I was quoting myself and I was saying how wrong I was, lol.

Anyways, most people realize that 10-13-year-olds aren't elementary school aged children but they still aren't as mature as many of them think they are.
No. With 2000 as the start, that means the generation ends around 2015. With 1995 as the beginning, 2010 is the end.

Yeah, that's true; however, we can say the same thing with other age groups. Look how many people out there say that those under 30 or 35 are not mature enough.


No, not even theoretically can anybody born in the mid-80s say they're X. That is laughable. 1977 to 1982 yes, 1985 no. That's a solid Gen Y year.
I agree with you and ReignMan. Honestly, Gen X ends around 1980. The rest after are Millenials.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 08/16/17 at 4:40 pm


An interesting thing I have noted is that a lot of 1999 and 2000 borns view themselves as the very last of Gen Y. Meanwhile, a lot of 2001 and 2002 borns view themselves as very early Gen Zers, lol.


That's what happened with the results of my questionnaire as well! Here is how people identified themselves:

1999 (13): Millennials - 1
                Generation Z - 6
                Not Sure - 3
                Cannot identify with a Generation - 3

Even though only one person identified themselves as a Millennial, almost half of the respondents voted that they couldn't identify themselves with the Millennials or Gen Z. Due to this confusion, this could suggest that 99'ers are Y/Z cusps.

2000 (3) Millennials - 1
              Not Sure - 1
              Cannot identify with a Generation - 1

I also have two friends who were born in 2000 and they consider themselves to be the tail-end of Gen Y. Also, Longaotian00 has commented that he considers himself to be the tail-end of the Millennials as well.

2001 (6) Millennials - 0
              Generation Z - 6
              Not Sure - 0
              Cannot identify with a Generation - 0

2002 (2) Millennials - 0
              Generation Z - 2
              Not Sure - 0
              Cannot identify with a Generation - 0

2008 (1) Millennials - 0
              Generation Z - 1
              Not Sure - 0
              Cannot identify with a Generation - 0

Also, all of the users born after 2000 on Personality Cafe identify themselves as being "Gen Z" as well. It seems like there is some sort of generational divide between people born in 2000 and 2001. People born in 2000 seem to be the last cohort of people who are Gen Y/Z cusps.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 4:44 pm


No. With 2000 as the start, that means the generation ends around 2015. With 1995 as the beginning, 2010 is the end.

OK.


Yeah, that's true; however, we can say the same thing with other age groups. Look how many people out there say that those under 30 or 35 are not mature enough.

Yeah but very few 30-35 year olds are immature and far too many 10-13 year olds think that they are "grown up".

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 4:45 pm


That's what happened with the results of my questionnaire as well! Here is how people identified themselves:

1999 (13): Millennials - 1
                Generation Z - 6
                Not Sure - 3
                Cannot identify with a Generation - 3

Even though only one person identified themselves as a Millennial, almost half of the respondents voted that they couldn't identify themselves with the Millennials or Gen Z. Due to this confusion, this could suggest that 99'ers are Y/Z cusps.

2000 (3) Millennials - 1
              Not Sure - 1
              Cannot identify with a Generation - 1

I also have two friends who were born in 2000 and they consider themselves to be the tail-end of Gen Y. Also, Longaotian00 has commented that he considers himself to be the tail-end of the Millennials as well.

2001 (6) Millennials - 0
              Generation Z - 6
              Not Sure - 0
              Cannot identify with a Generation - 0

2002 (2) Millennials - 0
              Generation Z - 2
              Not Sure - 0
              Cannot identify with a Generation - 0

2008 (1) Millennials - 0
              Generation Z - 1
              Not Sure - 0
              Cannot identify with a Generation - 0

Also, all of the users born after 2000 on Personality Cafe identify themselves as being "Gen Z" as well. It seems like there is some sort of generational divide between people born in 2000 and 2001. People born in 2000 seem to be the last cohort of people who are Gen Y/Z cusps.

Nice!

I totally agree with this finding.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 4:57 pm


Yeah but very few 30-35-year-olds are immature and far too many 10-13-year-olds think that they are "grown up".
No question there. The reason the latter believes that way is because of what they see on TV. The whole 10-13-year-olds that think that they are "grown up" didn't start happening until a few years ago.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/16/17 at 5:00 pm


No question there. The reason the latter believes that way is because of what they see on TV. The whole 10-13-year-olds that think that they are "grown up" didn't start happening until a few years ago.

I think it began around LATE 2006 (seriously) or 2007 with Early Gen Z Culture like iCarly and Hannah Montana. From then on there was a surge of young girls who wanted to be a popstar, or wanted a boyfriend, a cell phone, or a credit card, or thought it was "hip" and "cool" to backtalk their parents and treat them rudely.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 5:16 pm


No question there. The reason the latter believes that way is because of what they see on TV. The whole 10-13-year-olds that think that they are "grown up" didn't start happening until a few years ago.



I think it began around LATE 2006 (seriously) or 2007 with Early Gen Z Culture like iCarly and Hannah Montana. From then on there was a surge of young girls who wanted to be a popstar, or wanted a boyfriend, a cell phone, or a credit card, or thought it was "hip" and "cool" to backtalk their parents and treat them rudely.

I guess that you both are somewhat correct. However, I also think that this sentiment has always existed among 10-13 year olds...maybe just amplified in recent years.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 5:28 pm


I think it began around LATE 2006 (seriously) or 2007 with Early Gen Z Culture like iCarly and Hannah Montana. From then on there was a surge of young girls who wanted to be a popstar, or wanted a boyfriend, a cell phone, or a credit card, or thought it was "hip" and "cool" to back talk their parents and treat them rudely.
Now that you mentioned it, I think so too. I remember watching iCarly (during its early days)  and Hannah Montana (when my younger cousins were seeing it) and the characters would be like that. That's why you see photos like this nowadays.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeWZKZ8WIAACTn7.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B1i8usCCcAA8i27.jpg

https://pics.me.me/middle-schoolers-then-vs-now-1660040.png

https://www.kidsinthehouse.com/sites/default/files/tayler12.png

http://www.awesomeinventions.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/13-year-olds.jpg

https://pics.onsizzle.com/13-year-olds-now-vs-me-at-13-ima-get-3630153.png

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/bf/7b/20/bf7b208d97f2a2b44e7139d783d0a751.jpg

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 2001 on 08/16/17 at 8:06 pm

As someone who was in 7th Grade in 2004-05 school year, doing this with your pants was very popular at my school (NSFW)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CMAzxpXWEAAf5LE.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/702457916562010112/rSogf9cn.jpg

It was called 'the whale tail' and there were specific thongs to get a good one.

Boys weren't innocent either. Watching porno on those new-fangled PSPs was all the hot rage. Not to mention kids buying like GTA: San Andreas or God of War and other games they shouldn't be playing, and listening to music like Candy Shop and Satisfaction. ;D

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 8:23 pm

7th grade for me was 2011-12 (September 2011 - June 2012)...that school season the New York Giants won Super Bowl XLVI against the New England Patriots, 21-17 on February 5, 2012 at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, Indiana.

As a NY Giants fan, that was an amazing and jubilant night. The Giants won their 4th Super Bowl title (2nd in my lifetime) and beat the Patriots on top of it (we HATE the Pats 8-P).

However, other than that, 7th grade was mostly a drab for me.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/16/17 at 9:49 pm


7th grade for me was 2011-12 (September 2011 - June 2012)...that school season the New York Giants won Super Bowl XLVI against the New England Patriots, 21-17 on February 5, 2012 at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, Indiana.

As a NY Giants fan, that was an amazing and jubilant night. The Giants won their 4th Super Bowl title (2nd in my lifetime) and beat the Patriots on top of it (we HATE the Pats 8-P).

However, other than that, 7th grade was mostly a drab for me.


Yeah I remember when the Giants beat the Pats in the 08' Superbowl, I was in 6th grade at the time. That was the superbowl that firmly made me a G-MEN FAN 8).

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/16/17 at 9:55 pm

For me 7th grade sucked. 8th grade was much, much better.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 10:21 pm


Yeah I remember when the Giants beat the Pats in the 08' Superbowl, I was in 6th grade at the time. That was the superbowl that firmly made me a G-MEN FAN 8).

Well, I wasn't talking about that Super Bowl :P. However, I watched that Super Bowl as well (that was Super Bowl XLII) and that was also great but I was only 8.5 years old then and barely understood football, lol.


For me 7th grade sucked. 8th grade was much, much better.

7th grade mostly sucked for me and 8th grade COMPLETELY sucked.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 11:15 pm


As someone who was in 7th Grade in 2004-05 school year, doing this with your pants was very popular at my school (NSFW)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CMAzxpXWEAAf5LE.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/702457916562010112/rSogf9cn.jpg

It was called 'the whale tail' and there were specific thongs to get a good one.

Boys weren't innocent either. Watching porno on those new-fangled PSPs was all the hot rage. Not to mention kids buying like GTA: San Andreas or God of War and other games they shouldn't be playing, and listening to music like Candy Shop and Satisfaction. ;D



7th grade for me was 2011-12 (September 2011 - June 2012)...that school season the New York Giants won Super Bowl XLVI against the New England Patriots, 21-17 on February 5, 2012, at Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis, Indiana.

As a NY Giants fan, that was an amazing and jubilant night. The Giants won their 4th Super Bowl title (2nd in my lifetime) and beat the Patriots on top of it (we HATE the Pats 8-P).

However, other than that, 7th grade was mostly a drab for me.



For me 7th grade sucked. 8th grade was much, much better.
Join the club. 7th grade was terrible for me as well. Oh, and while we're at it, how did we go from the photos I posted to talking about 7th grade?

Slowpoke: I think I may have seen that happen at my old middle school unless it was already banned before then. OTT, I don't recall seeing girls dress the way like they do now in those photos.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/16/17 at 11:21 pm

I've suggested this before, but the reason why people born in 1995-1997, also 1998-1999 to an extent,say they feel like Gen Y, even though they have been slotted into the start of Gen Z, is because the childhood culture they grew up with around 2000-2006 was still very Gen Y, I.e. Shows like Kim Possible, or consoles like the PS2, and growing up in a good economy, with families of that era often "pimping out" their lifestyles and spoiling their kids to the fullest, before the 00s excess imploded on itself during the 2007 financial crisis.

Before Gen Z culture like the Wii, iPhones, Hannah Montana, growing up in the shadow of the financial crisis, etc. took off around Late 2006/2007.

When you spend most of your childhood under the umbrella of one generation's culture, you may feel more like that generation than the one marketers who never met you say you are.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 11:25 pm


I've suggested this before, but the reason why people born in 1995-1997 say they feel like Gen Y, even though they have been slotted into the start of Gen Z, is because the childhood culture they grew up with around 2000-2006 was still very Gen Y, I.e. Shows like Kim Possible, or consoles like the PS2, and growing up in a good economy, with families of that era often "pimping out" their lifestyles and spoiling their kids to the fullest, before the 00s excess imploded on itself during the 2007 financial crisis.

Before Gen Z culture like the Wii, iPhones, Hannah Montana, growing up in the shadow of the financial crisis, etc. took off around Late 2006/2007.

When you spend most of your childhood under the umbrella of one generation's culture, you may feel more like that generation than the one marketers who never met you say you are.

That stuff applies to 1998 and 1999 borns as well.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 11:30 pm


I've suggested this before, but the reason why people born in 1995-1997 say they feel like Gen Y, even though they have been slotted into the start of Gen Z, is because the childhood culture they grew up with around 2000-2006 was still very Gen Y, I.e. Shows like Kim Possible, or consoles like the PS2, and growing up in a good economy, with families of that era often "pimping out" their lifestyles and spoiling their kids to the fullest, before the 00s excess imploded on itself during the 2007 financial crisis.

Before Gen Z culture like the Wii, iPhones, Hannah Montana, growing up in the shadow of the financial crisis, etc. took off around Late 2006/2007.

When you spend most of your childhood under the umbrella of one generation's culture, you may feel more like that generation than the one marketers who never met you say you are.
Yeah, that's totally true. I think that's why some of the older Millennials say they are Gen X rather than Gen Y since most of their childhood was under the umbrella of Gen X childhood culture before it transitioned into the Millennials.

Although, I wouldn't say that Gen Y's childhood culture ended in 2006 though. That would be more like 2004 then there was a transition into Gen Z.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/16/17 at 11:31 pm


That stuff applies to 1998 and 1999 borns as well.

Yeah I fixed it.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/16/17 at 11:37 pm


Yeah, that's totally true. I think that's why some of the older Millennials say they are Gen X rather than Gen Y since most of their childhood was under the umbrella of Gen X childhood culture before it transitioned into the Millennials.

Although, I wouldn't say that Gen Y's childhood culture ended in 2006 though. That would be more like 2004 then there was a transition into Gen Z.

2004-2006 was the transition I feel (we already had a long thread talking about this), that's what I mean when I say 2006 was the end. By 2007 kid culture clearly felt like the transition into Gen Z was completed.

Even though I am technically Gen Z, I remember the kids in 6th grade (this would be in 2007/2008) making fun of shows like Naked Brothers Band, Out of Jimmy's Head, Hannah Montana, season 4+ SpongeBob, and iCarly, claiming that Nick, CN, and Disney "got rid of all the good shows". I also remember watching some YouTube recordings of Nick from 2004 around this time and thinking how much more creative and bright it was "back then", even though "back then" was only three years ago. :o

So I'd say I'm an "old" Gen Z (similar to how people who were too old for Pokemon or Harry Potter were Old Millennials).

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/16/17 at 11:46 pm

Also you know how Buzzfeed likes to say "the 90s ended in 2004", right?

Well, I wasn't really a decadeologist in middle school, but watching those 2004 Nick clips, and thinking about all the culture and shows from my early childhood that ended in 2004, I did get a sneaking suspicion that 2000-2004 felt rather distinct from what was going on in 2007/2008, but I wasn't totally sure what that suspicion was until years later.

I also felt like 2007 was a clean break from the 2004-2006 era as the year was going on. I thought it was just me moving into middle school, but years later I learned of all the technological advances of 2007, the new kid culture and TV shows coming in, as well as the Recession towards the end of the year, and realized it wasn't just my personal life that was changing at the time. :o

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/16/17 at 11:52 pm


2004-2006 was the transition I feel (we already had a long thread talking about this), that's what I mean when I say 2006 was the end. By 2007 kid culture clearly felt like the transition into Gen Z was completed.

Even though I am technically Gen Z, I remember the kids in 6th grade (this would be in 2007/2008) making fun of shows like Naked Brothers Band, Out of Jimmy's Head, Hannah Montana, season 4+ SpongeBob, and iCarly, claiming that Nick, CN, and Disney "got rid of all the good shows". I also remember watching some YouTube recordings of Nick from 2004 around this time and thinking how much more creative and bright it was "back then", even though "back then" was only three years ago. :o

So I'd say I'm an "old" Gen Z (similar to how people who were too old for Pokemon or Harry Potter were Old Millennials).
Oh. Now I see your point. For some reason, I miss the part where you implied that 2006 was the end. I fail at implications sometimes.

Yeah, it's crazy how much changed in 3 years during that time. In 2004, the big 3 was still fantastic, but by 07' only CN was the boss.

Oh, and you're in the C/O 2014? All this time, I thought you were in the C/O 2013.


Also, you know how Buzzfeed likes to say "the 90s ended in 2004", right?

Well, I wasn't really a decadeologist in middle school, but watching those 2004 Nick clips, and thinking about all the kid culture and shows that ended in 2004, I did get a sneaking suspicion that 2000-2004 felt rather distinct from what was going on in 2007/2008, but I wasn't totally sure what that suspicion was until years later.

I also felt like 2007 was a clean break from the 2004-2006 era as the year was going on. I thought it was just me moving into middle school, but years later I learned of all the technological advances of 2007, as well as the Recession towards the end of the year, and realized it wasn't just my personal life that was changing at the time. :o
Yeah, I somewhat still see those articles on there.

Damn, that's crazy you had already thought about that long before anyone else did. How amazing your suspicions turned out to be true. :o

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/16/17 at 11:56 pm

All I know is that as a 1999 born....we are always the "punching bag" of '90s babies especially because we're the youngest :-\\.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/17/17 at 12:01 am


All I know is that as a 1999 born....we are always the "punching bag" of '90s babies especially because we're the youngest :-\\.
Yeah, that's weird. It seems like no one wants to be associated with 1999 folks; however, I have never seen this issue happening with 1989 people when it comes to 80s babies.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/17/17 at 12:05 am


Yeah, that's weird. It seems like no one wants to be associated with 1999 folks; however, I have never seen this issue happening with 1989 people when it comes to 80s babies.

Me either.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/17/17 at 12:06 am


Damn, that's crazy you had already thought about that long before anyone else did. How amazing your suspicions turned out to be true. :o

Well, I don't think I was the only one to have those thoughts at the time. The kids at my middle school felt similarly (as I said before they were making fun of the new shows at the time), and I remember reading similar comments on Retrojunk, YouTube, and some forums at the time around 07/08 (like "Rip Cartoon Network 1992-2004" or "2004 was the last good year, 2005 and beyond sucks").

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/17/17 at 12:07 am


All I know is that as a 1999 born....we are always the "punching bag" of '90s babies especially because we're the youngest :-\\.

You're a good guy ReignMan, as I've said before don't let those nostalgia Reddit/Buzzfeed fedora-tippers beat you down.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/17/17 at 12:13 am


Well, I don't think I was the only one to have those thoughts at the time. The kids at my middle school felt similarly (as I said before they were making fun of the new shows at the time), and I remember reading similar comments on Retrojunk, YouTube, and some forums at the time around 07/08 (like "Rip Cartoon Network 1992-2004" or "2004 was the last good year, 2005 and beyond sucks").
Well still, your school's suspicions came out to be true in the end. I would never have thought about those changes being huge until I began seeing comments about that in 2012.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/17/17 at 12:17 am


Well still, your school's suspicions came out to be true in the end. I would never have thought about those changes being huge until I began seeing comments about that in 2012.

True but as I said before, it wasn't just my classmates, there were also forum topics that I read around 2007-2009 where they talked about old 90s Nick/CN/Disney shows and had these "screw 2004 and beyond" or "2004 was the last official year of my childhood" sentiments. Years later these blossomed into more popular "the 90s didn't end until 2004" memes via Buzzfeed and Tumblr.

I got into Internet culture in middle school, mostly silly Flash videos and memes like Charlie the Unicorn, Rick Roll, Leroy Jenkins, or All Your Base (a meme that was popular from 1999 all the way till about 2009. Just goes to show that pre-2010 memes had a lot more longetivity :P ). This replaced the kids channels as my entertainment during the late 00s.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/17/17 at 12:28 am


True but as I said before, it wasn't just my classmates, there were also forum topics that I read around 2007-2009 where they talked about old 90s Nick/CN/Disney shows and had these "screw 2004 and beyond" or "2004 was the last official year of my childhood" sentiments.

I got into Internet culture in middle school, mostly silly Flash videos and memes like Charlie the Unicorn, Rick Roll, Leroy Jenkins, or All Your Base (a meme that was popular from 1999 all the way till about 2009. Just goes to show that pre-2010 memes had a lot more longevity :P ). This replaced the kids' channels as my entertainment during the late 00s.
Actually, I did encounter those comments back in 2012 even they were years old by the time I saw them. I remember in 2012 that I saw some comments from 2007 saying those statements mentioned. I don't know how I miss that cue.

I should have known when Nick had endless Spongebob, Disney being all HM (and its clones) and CN became post-CN City.

Yeah, I was almost the same way. While I still did watch Nick and CN (depending on the show), I would tune into Youtube, and watch random videos before it became a cringe-worthy fest like it is today.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/17/17 at 12:36 am


Actually, I did encounter those comments back in 2012 even they were years old by the time I saw them. I remember in 2012 that I saw some comments from 2007 saying those statements mentioned. I don't know how I miss that cue.

Yeah. Back around 2008/2009, I remember these poorly-done videos made in Windows Movie Maker saying "RIP Nickelodeon 1979-2004" with a slideshow of 90s/early 2000s Nick pictures, with a military march song in the background. Or these videos ranting about Fried Dynamite and the Jonas Brothers.

Though, I think that it's really all relative. We may think the kids channels went bad around'
2007, but there are all these 15 year olds I see now who are nostalgic for the shows that time, I.e. Phineas and Ferb, Chowder, Flapjack, Secret Sautrdays, etc. (they were good shows though, so the nostalgia is warranted). Everyone grows up with a certain version of something and thinks it stopped being good at a certain point.

I wonder how the people that made those rant videos around 2008 feel that the things they ranted about are now fondly remembered, lol.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/17/17 at 12:53 am


Yeah. Back around 2008/2009, I remember these poorly-done videos made in Windows Movie Maker saying "RIP Nickelodeon 1979-2004" with a slideshow of 90s/early 2000s Nick pictures, with a military march song in the background. Or these videos ranting about Fried Dynamite and the Jonas Brothers.

Though, I think that it's really all relative. We may think the kids channels went bad around'
2007, but there are all these 15 year olds I see now who are nostalgic for the shows that time, I.e. Phineas and Ferb, Chowder, Flapjack, Secret Sautrdays, etc. (they were good shows though, so the nostalgia is warranted).

Everyone grows up with a certain version of something and thinks it stopped being good at a certain point. For instance, I know of some people (mostly Boomers) who think A New Hope was the only good Star Wars movie, and they say the ones after (even Empire, believe it or not) tainted the standalone, self-contained feel of the original by turning it into an epic jam-packed with coincidences.

I wonder how the people that made those rant videos around 2008 feel that the things they ranted about are now fondly remembered, lol.
It's amazing how you caught on to that back then before the hatred of the late 00s exploded to where it is today.

Even though I was much older when the example shows mentioned were current, I actually did like them and with the exception of Phineas and Ferb, I couldn't believe how all of them were canceled after about 2 or 3 years.

Yeah, that's true for the most part. For me, I think the big 3 kids channels became terrible at different times even though my childhood was well over by then. Disney, it was 2006. CN, it was 2014. Nickelodeon, it was 2012.

Maybe they still either hate the time period or they realize that it wasn't that bad.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/17/17 at 12:57 am


Yeah, that's true for the most part. For me, I think the big 3 kids channels became terrible at different times even though my childhood was well over by then. Disney, it was 2006. CN, it was 2014. Nickelodeon, it was 2012..

I'd say that in terms of *variety*, Nick became bad in 2006/2007 (too much SpongeBob spamming), and CN in 2014 (even during the CN Real days they still had some great shows and variety, now they repeat TTGO way too much).

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/17/17 at 1:03 am


It's amazing how you caught on to that back then before the hatred of the late 00s exploded to where it is today.

The late 00s aren't as hated today from what I've seen. The hate for them subsided around 2014. Some people now have fond memories of that time, along with the early 10s, for example, "Fireflies" by Owl City and "Party Rock Anthem" by Lmfao resurged in popularity as of late, due to them becoming Internet memes.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/17/17 at 1:18 am


You're a good guy ReignMan, as I've said before don't let those nostalgia Reddit/Buzzfeed fedora-tippers beat you down.

Thanks for that Zelek3 :). You're a good guy as well.

I'm not even feeling down...I was just stating something that I have observed and it goes beyond even BuzzFeed and Reddit.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/17/17 at 1:23 am


I'd say that in terms of *variety*, Nick became bad in 2006/2007 (too much SpongeBob spamming), and CN in 2014 (even during the CN Real days they still had some great shows and variety, now they repeat TTGO way too much).
Agreed!


The late 00s aren't as hated today from what I've seen. The hate for them subsided around 2014. Some people now have fond memories of that time, along with the early 10s, for example, "Fireflies" by Owl City and "Party Rock Anthem" by Lmfao resurged in popularity as of late, due to them becoming Internet memes.
I see now.  The hate must have disappeared when we were no longer in the great recession era.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 08/17/17 at 2:00 am


All I know is that as a 1999 born....we are always the "punching bag" of '90s babies especially because we're the youngest :-\\.


Not to be rude lol, but maybe if you were born in the early years of a decade you might get the same kinda feeling, I mean I don't really want to be grouped with people born in 2009. I feel as if I had a completely different childhood, upbringing to them for obvious reasons. But then again I don't have anything against them, just because of when they were born.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/17/17 at 2:06 am


Not to be rude lol, but maybe if you were born in the early years of a decade you might get the same kinda feeling, I mean I don't really want to be grouped with people born in 2009. I feel as if I had a completely different childhood, upbringing to them for obvious reasons. But then again I don't have anything against them, just because of when they were born.

I'm not talking about being grouped in with 1990 borns. I'm just talking about in general...us 1999 borns are seen as the lowest among '90s babies. Even fellow late '90s borns like some 1997 & 1998 borns don't want to be associated with us. It's like a curse just because we were born in the last year of the '90s.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 08/17/17 at 2:28 am


I'm not talking about being grouped in with 1990 borns. I'm just talking about in general...us 1999 borns are seen as the lowest among '90s babies. Even fellow late '90s borns like some 1997 & 1998 borns don't want to be associated with us. It's like a curse just because we were born in the last year of the '90s.


Lol, I can see what you mean ;D just ignore them. Half of them are probably born in 1995 and think they are 90s kids and are therefore better than you ;D. Trust me you might get a lot of crap being born in the last year of the  90s, try being born in the 2000s damn it, people think I probably had a godamn iPad as a baby. >:(

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/17/17 at 2:54 am

Yeah People born in the 2000s get bashed a lot on the Internet. Mostly by nostalgiatards on Twitter who think 2000ers never saw the Incredibles or never used a VHS tape.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 08/17/17 at 2:59 am


Not to be rude lol, but maybe if you were born in the early years of a decade you might get the same kinda feeling, I mean I don't really want to be grouped with people born in 2009. I feel as if I had a completely different childhood, upbringing to them for obvious reasons. But then again I don't have anything against them, just because of when they were born.


Yeah, 2000'ers do tend to receive the rough end of the stick in terms of how they are viewed. From my experience, it's even worse than 99'ers. People automatically assume that just because they were the first group of people not born in the '90s, they had a smartphone at the age of 2 or they didn't have a 'proper childhood'. Of course, both of those things aren't true at all, yet many people seem to be adamant that is the case.

Also, a lot of people seem to have this mindset that 2000'ers are completely different from Late '90s babies. I've always viewed people born in 2000 as being "unofficial" Late '90s babies, because I believe they have more in common with people born in the Late '90s than they do with Mid 2000's babies and even other Early 2000's babies, to a certain extent. To be honest, I actually feel a bit sorry for people born in 2000, because I know for a fact that they had a very similar childhood to Late '90s babies, yet they are treated as if they had a completely social media dominated childhood. That would really annoy me.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/17/17 at 3:03 am


Yeah, 2000'ers do tend to receive the rough end of the stick in terms of how they are viewed. From my experience, it's even worse than 99'ers. People automatically assume that just because they were the first group of people not born in the '90s, they had a smartphone at the age of 2 or they didn't have a 'proper childhood'. Of course, both of those things aren't true at all, yet many people seem to be adamant that is the case.

Also, a lot of people seem to have this mindset that 2000'ers are completely different from Late '90s babies. I've always viewed people born in 2000 as being "unofficial" Late '90s babies, because I believe they have more in common with people born in the Late '90s than they do with Mid 2000's babies and even other Early 2000's babies, to a certain extent. To be honest, I actually feel a bit sorry for people born in 2000, because I know for a fact that they had a very similar childhood to Late '90s babies, yet they are treated as if they had a completely social media dominated childhood. That would really annoy me.

True. But most "normies" are just simple that way; for example 2000 is usually used as the benchmark for the "modern era" of pop culture and society, even though I'd argue 2007 is a better candidate for that with 2000-2006 looking more retro as time goes on (see my thread about 2007's tech advances as reported on by author Thomas Friedman).

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Howard on 08/17/17 at 7:44 am


For me 7th grade sucked. 8th grade was much, much better.


I started 8th grade in 1987.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/17/17 at 8:34 am


True but as I said before, it wasn't just my classmates, there were also forum topics that I read around 2007-2009 where they talked about old 90s Nick/CN/Disney shows and had these "screw 2004 and beyond" or "2004 was the last official year of my childhood" sentiments. Years later these blossomed into more popular "the 90s didn't end until 2004" memes via Buzzfeed and Tumblr.

I got into Internet culture in middle school, mostly silly Flash videos and memes like Charlie the Unicorn, Rick Roll, Leroy Jenkins, or All Your Base (a meme that was popular from 1999 all the way till about 2009. Just goes to show that pre-2010 memes had a lot more longetivity :P ). This replaced the kids channels as my entertainment during the late 00s.


Yeah, I'm old enough to remember when people used to bash '90s Nick and talk about how much better the network was back during the '80s. When I first started going online regularly around 1999 and 2000, you would see 20 and 25 year old guys talking about how Nick started to suck after 1991 and the debut of Nicktoons. And I would often get bashed online as a 13 or 14 year old kid for not being old enough to have seen the awesomeness of '80s Nick.

That type of stuff always annoyed me, so I have tried not to follow that same path. Regardless of the fact that I've always felt Nick started to suck around 2000 or so, I've accepted that I only see things that way because that was when I got to point that I was too old to watch the network, and have never bashed those who grew up with '00s Nick.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/17/17 at 9:59 am


Lol, I can see what you mean ;D just ignore them. Half of them are probably born in 1995 and think they are 90s kids and are therefore better than you ;D. Trust me you might get a lot of crap being born in the last year of the  90s, try being born in the 2000s damn it, people think I probably had a godamn iPad as a baby. >:(

Yeah, I know that you 2000 borns get bashed as well.

Interestingly enough, people also think that us 1999 borns grew up with an iPad and iPhone even though those things didn't even become popular until 2012.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/17/17 at 10:06 am

Starting next month, about half of high school students in the U.S. will have been born AFTER 9/11 :o.

*Seniors will have been born in late 1999-mid 2000
*Juniors will have been born in late 2000-mid 2001
*Sophomores will have been born in late 2001-mid 2002
*Freshman wil have been born in late 2002-mid 2003.

Also, the Juniors were only babies at the time 9/11 happened.

The passage of time is crazy :o. Early-mid 2003 borns are starting high school....they were born around the time the Iraq War was starting.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 08/17/17 at 1:27 pm


Starting next month, about half of high school students in the U.S. will have been born AFTER 9/11 :o.

*Seniors will have been born in late 1999-mid 2000
*Juniors will have been born in late 2000-mid 2001
*Sophomores will have been born in late 2001-mid 2002
*Freshman wil have been born in late 2002-mid 2003.

Also, the Juniors were only babies at the time 9/11 happened.

The passage of time is crazy :o. Early-mid 2003 borns are starting high school....they were born around the time the Iraq War was starting.


In New Zealand, at my High School, the youngest people are born in 2006!, with 2007 borns starting next Janury! :o it makes me feel really old that people who can not or barely remember the 2000s are starting high school already.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/17/17 at 1:35 pm

Wow, 2003 was when I got my drivers license, and now there's kids born then starting high school.

Honestly, before the next few years are done, pretty much all high school students will have never used VHS and will have no recollection of the era before smartphones.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/17/17 at 1:45 pm


In New Zealand, at my High School, the youngest people are born in 2006!, with 2007 borns starting next Janury! :o it makes me feel really old that people who can not or barely remember the 2000s are starting high school already.

Woah, that's crazy. High school in NZ must be totally different because 11 is 3 years too young to join HS here in the US.


Wow, 2003 was when I got my drivers license, and now there's kids born then starting high school.

They are as old as That's So Raven, Super Bowl XXXVII and like I said earlier....the Iraq War.


Honestly, before the next few years are done, pretty much all high school students will have never used VHS and will have no recollection of the era before smartphones.

I know right. It's all about the passage of time.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 2001 on 08/17/17 at 2:01 pm


Yeah, I'm old enough to remember when people used to bash '90s Nick and talk about how much better the network was back during the '80s. When I first started going online regularly around 1999 and 2000, you would see 20 and 25 year old guys talking about how Nick started to suck after 1991 and the debut of Nicktoons. And I would often get bashed online as a 13 or 14 year old kid for not being old enough to have seen the awesomeness of '80s Nick.

That type of stuff always annoyed me, so I have tried not to follow that same path. Regardless of the fact that I've always felt Nick started to suck around 2000 or so, I've accepted that I only see things that way because that was when I got to point that I was too old to watch the network, and have never bashed those who grew up with '00s Nick.


What I don't get is how anyone of any age could hate Spongebob. The show is hillarious!  :-X

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/17/17 at 2:06 pm


What I don't get is how anyone of any age could hate Spongebob. The show is hillarious!  :-X


Yeah, for the first several seasons it was a great show, and about the only that I would still watch on Nick even at ages 14 and 15. Now it's just been on way too long, though.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mqg96 on 08/17/17 at 2:15 pm


Yeah, for the first several seasons it was a great show, and about the only that I would still watch on Nick even at ages 14 and 15. Now it's just been on way too long, though.


I wanted you to answer my question about the old Toyota Corolla you used to have, cause I'm pretty sure it was a 4 cylinder, but I know it didn't have as much gas millage as the old Honda Civics from the early 90's. Was your Toyota Corolla really slow uphills with low horsepower?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/17/17 at 2:24 pm


I wanted you to answer my question about the old Toyota Corolla you used to have, cause I'm pretty sure it was a 4 cylinder, but I know it didn't have as much gas millage as the old Honda Civics from the early 90's. Was your Toyota Corolla really slow uphills with low horsepower?


Yeah, it was pretty crappy going uphill. Actually, my parents gave that 1993 Corolla to me because during the summer of 2003 they had to buy a new car because we were going to the mountains and they didn't think the car could scale the hills there.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 08/17/17 at 5:01 pm


Woah, that's crazy. High school in NZ must be totally different because 11 is 3 years too young to join HS here in the US.


Yeah ikr, some people like me actually started HS, a few months before we turned 11 so we were actually 10! Also, earlier this year the youngest person at my HS was 10 and the oldest person was 20! :o

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/17/17 at 5:05 pm


Yeah ikr, some people like me actually started HS, a few months before we turned 11 so we were actually 10! Also, earlier this year the youngest person at my HS was 10 and the oldest person was 20! :o

Woah...that's nuts.

At what age do you guys in New Zealand graduate from high school?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 08/17/17 at 5:53 pm


Woah...that's nuts.

At what age do you guys in New Zealand graduate from high school?


I'm graduating at the end of this year so I'll be 17. Most people here graduate around 17/18 -19 sometimes.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/17/17 at 8:09 pm


I'm graduating at the end of this year so I'll be 17. Most people here graduate around 17/18 -19 sometimes.

Ah, so it's the same here in the U.S.

However, you guys spend almost an entire decade in high school in New Zealand? That's a long time to be in high school :P.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/19/17 at 11:40 pm


Try being born in the 2000s damn it, people think I probably had a damn iPad as a baby. >:(



Yeah, I know that you 2000 borns get bashed as well.

Interestingly enough, people also think that we 1999 borns grew up with an iPad and iPhone even though those things didn't even become popular until 2012.
Well, the problem is that people have forgotten that the iPad was released in 2010. There's truly no way most 00s people could have had one as babies or even kids. Besides, they weren't even popular until around the same time smartphones were.


That type of stuff always annoyed me, so I have tried not to follow that same path. Regardless of the fact that I've always felt Nick started to suck around 2000 or so, I've accepted that I only see things that way because that was when I got to point that I was too old to watch the network, and have never bashed those who grew up with '00s Nick.
Same here. I remember encountering thousands of comments from "90s kids" saying that 00s Nick was awful a few years ago and they would even bash the kids saying they had a "terrible" childhood. I'm glad I didn't follow that path because it would have been difficult to escape.


Starting next month, about half of high school students in the U.S. will have been born AFTER 9/11 :o.

*Seniors will have been born in late 1999-mid 2000
*Juniors will have been born in late 2000-mid 2001
*Sophomores will have been born in late 2001-mid 2002
*Freshman will have been born in late 2002-mid 2003.

Also, the Juniors were only babies at the time 9/11 happened.

The passage of time is crazy :o. Early-mid 2003 borns are starting high school....they were born around the time the Iraq War was starting.
Well actually, there are already some students who begun school either this past week or last week. Aside from that, I agree with everything else though.


Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/20/17 at 12:15 am


Well actually, there are already some students who begun school either this past week or last week. Aside from that, I agree with everything else though.

Some states don't start until next month...so that's why I said starting next month.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/20/17 at 1:14 am


Same here. I remember encountering thousands of comments from "90s kids" saying that 00s Nick was awful a few years ago and they would even bash the kids saying they had a "terrible" childhood. I'm glad I didn't follow that path because it would have been difficult to escape.

Well, nowadays I see most people on other sites praise Early-mid 2000s Nick while bashing mid-late 2000s and 2010s/Cyma era Nick. On an IGN video about the best 90s Nick shows, for instance, there was a highly-up voted comment saying "Nick lost all their past fame and glory after 2006."

Early-mid 2000s shows like Ned's Declassified, Jimmy Neutron, early Fairly Oddparents, Avatar: The Last Airbender, Danny Phantom, Invader Zim, Drake and Josh, Chalkzone, and My Life as a Teenage Robot have been lumped into the "classic" conception, but mid-late 2000s shows like Back at the Barnyard and Fanboy and Chum Chum still seem to be considered part of the "modern garbage".

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/20/17 at 1:50 am

Of course a generation discussion developed from this.  ;D

I actually thought of this topic really as an earlier Millennial (1987) vs. late Millennial (1997) comparison actually. 1999 born isn't really TRULY Gen Z IMO (I think they should be the 1st 21st century born generation so including 1999 seems a little weird), but they're not really real Millennials either. Basically they maybe just barely squeeze into Millennials, but only just barely like a 1979er squeezing into Gen X. 2000 is right on the cusp, you could classify it either way. 2001 are basically Generation Z, of course they are very early Generation Z and they will probably have Millennial influences (thinking ahead like a decade when Generation Z is in full bloom) compared to say a 2010 born, but they're pretty much Z. I don't really have a problem with late '90s + maybe 2000 born people being called Millennials but the "late" qualifier should always be added in their case, they are the last of the generation. 2001-2004 born or so are very early Z, they may have some Millennial influences sure, especially 2001...but they are and should be the beginning of Generation Z.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/20/17 at 2:19 am


Of course a generation discussion developed from this.  ;D

I actually thought of this topic really as an earlier Millennial (1987) vs. late Millennial (1997) comparison actually. 1999 born isn't really TRULY Gen Z IMO (I think they should be the 1st 21st century born generation so including 1999 seems a little weird), but they're not really real Millennials either. Basically they maybe just barely squeeze into Millennials, but only just barely like a 1979er squeezing into Gen X. 2000 is right on the cusp, you could classify it either way. 2001 are basically Generation Z, of course they are very early Generation Z and they will probably have Millennial influences (thinking ahead like a decade when Generation Z is in full bloom) compared to say a 2010 born, but they're pretty much Z. I don't really have a problem with late '90s + maybe 2000 born people being called Millennials but the "late" qualifier should always be added in their case, they are the last of the generation. 2001-2004 born or so are very early Z, they may have some Millennial influences sure, especially 2001...but they are and should be the beginning of Generation Z.

I agree with this 8).

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/20/17 at 2:52 am


I wouldn't consider 87ers core either


I'm born in 1987, I'm borderline early-middle IMO. I think the absolute peak Millennial was probably born in 1990 or 1991 or so. I'd say the biggest argument for 1987ers being early Millennial is being in high school when 9/11 happened, and becoming teenagers during the Clinton administration and turning 21 during the Bush administration are also valid arguments. The best middle/core arguments would be still being college age still during the recession and still being under 30 for the 2016 election. Honestly it doesn't matter that much though.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/20/17 at 7:03 am


I'm born in 1987, I'm borderline early-middle IMO. I think the absolute peak Millennial was probably born in 1990 or 1991 or so. I'd say the biggest argument for 1987ers being early Millennial is being in high school when 9/11 happened, and becoming teenagers during the Clinton administration and turning 21 during the Bush administration are also valid arguments. The best middle/core arguments would be still being college age still during the recession and still being under 30 for the 2016 election. Honestly it doesn't matter that much though.

It really dosent matter because the fact is there's not much of a difference between "early" or "core" millennials, the "late" millennials is where the difference is. And the "under 30" at the 2016 elections is not much of an indicator. I know they put people in the 18 to 29 age group in a different catagory but I doubt a 29 year old and 30 year old are going to be different in how they vote.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/20/17 at 7:07 am

I think how you view the 2010s will be the key generational divide between the Millennials and post-Millennials, similar to how you view the '90s is the big divide between the Generation Xers and Millennials. I mean for example if you could vote in say 1996 or say play professional sports in the 1990s, you're really Generation X tbh as the Millennials were just children and young teenagers then at the most. The 2010s as us Millennials know and are experiencing is a time of deep political divisions in America, the '10s are key to our generation like the '90s for Generation X. I mean if you were say 8 during the 2016 election, you are absolutely NOT a Millennial. Yeah sure those 8 year olds will remember Trump some and some things about this time in history, but it won't affect them in anywhere near the same way, as they will be far more shaped by the events of the 2020s and the 2030s. If you were 18 and old enough to vote in 2016, I do think you are Millennial, albeit a very young one. 1997-1999 born people will have experienced the 2010s in a FAR deeper more young adult way instead of child like way than say a 2003-2004 born person for example in my eyes and that makes a huge difference to me. It's the same thing really as comparing a 1977-1979 born experiencing the '90s vs. a 1983-1984 born. The idea is 1977ers big "coming of age" milestones came more in the Generation X '90s, while 1983ers big "coming of age" milestones came more in the new millennium (2000s) and that makes them Millennials.

Out of the 21st century borns, I will say the 2001 and 2002ers that can vote in 2020 maybe can call themselves sort of "cusp" in a way though they are definitely Generation Z leaning cusp. But I mean if you can't even vote for president until freaking 2024 (2003+ crowd) when Millennials will be making the transition into middle age (1982ers will be 42 and I will be 37), you're definitely solidly Generation Z. I'm trying to be as gradual and objective as possible with this.

Don't you guys get what I'm saying?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 08/20/17 at 7:29 am



Out of the 21st century borns, I will say the 2001 and 2002ers that can vote in 2020 maybe can call themselves sort of "cusp" in a way though they are definitely Generation Z leaning cusp. But I mean if you can't even vote for president until freaking 2024 (2003+ crowd) when Millennials will be making the transition into middle age (1982ers will be 42 and I will be 37), you're definitely solidly Generation Z. I'm trying to be as gradual and objective as possible with this.


The interesting thing is that most people born in 2001 and 2002 already seem to identify very strongly with Gen Z. If you read the comments made by Early 2000s babies (with the exception of 2000) on Personality Cafe, not a single one of them view themselves as being a Millennial. This was also a trend I came across when I undertook the questionnaire for my research project.

It seems as though 2000'ers are the last real Gen Y/Z cuspers. They also seem to be the last group of people who are seriously torn between whether they are Millennials or members of Gen Z. There are threads on Personality Cafe made by 2000'ers, who want to know which generation they belong to. As I briefly mentioned above, two of my friends (who were born in 2000) personally view themselves as being the "tail-end" of Gen Y. Also, Longaotian00 has stated a few times that he thinks of himself as being either the "tail-end" of the Millennials or a Gen Y/Z cusper.

Why this is the case, I don't have an answer to that, but based on numerous observations, it seems as though 2000'ers, are in the fact, the last group of people who could possibly be a Millennial or a Gen Y/Z cusper. Also, just as a side note, I do agree and understand the points you raised! :)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Brian06 on 08/20/17 at 7:36 am


The interesting thing is that most people born in 2001 and 2002 already seem to identify very strongly with Gen Z. If you read the comments made by Early 2000s babies (with the exception of 2000) on Personality Cafe, not a single one of them view themselves as being a Millennial. This was also a trend I came across when I undertook the questionnaire for my research project.

It seems as though 2000'ers are the last real Gen Y/Z cuspers. They also seem to be the last group of people who are seriously torn between whether they are Millennials or members of Gen Z. There are threads on Personality Cafe made by 2000'ers, who want to know which generation they belong to. As I briefly mentioned above, two of my friends (who were born in 2000) personally view themselves as being the "tail-end" of Gen Y. Also, Longaotian00 has stated a few times that he thinks of himself as being either the "tail-end" of the Millennials or a Gen Y/Z cusper.

Why this is the case, I don't have an answer to that, but based on numerous observations, it seems as though 2000'ers, are in the fact, the last group of people who could possibly be a Millennial or a Gen Y/Z cusper. Also, just as a side note, I do agree and understand the points you raised! :)


Yeah I mean I'm not surprised as they are 15/16 and some Millennials are like 35 so they probably think "no way do identify with 30 somethings, I'm only a teenager!". I'm thinking more in the future in the 2020s though when the 2010 borns and stuff come of age, compared to them a 2001 born will probably have some Millennial "influences" (far deeper understanding of the 2010s for example) even if they are Generation Z as I do believe they are. The point should be made that they are very early in the Z generation, and most Generation Z are still little kids. It's a gradual little by little thing really, and we're early in this transition.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/20/17 at 8:28 am


Some states don't start until next month...so that's why I said starting next month.
Well, they start in 2 weeks from now, but I knew what you meant.


Well, nowadays I see most people on other sites praise Early-mid 2000s Nick while bashing mid-late 2000s and 2010s/Cyma era Nick. On an IGN video about the best 90s Nick shows, for instance, there was a highly-upvoted comment saying "Nick lost all their past fame and glory after 2006."

Early-mid 2000s shows like Ned's Declassified, Jimmy Neutron, early Fairly Oddparents, Avatar: The Last Airbender, Danny Phantom, Invader Zim, Drake and Josh, ChalkZone, and My Life as a Teenage Robot have been lumped into the "classic" conception, but the mid-late 2000s shows like Back at the Barnyard and Fanboy and Chum Chum still seem to be considered part of the "modern garbage".
Yeah, I still see those comments. I have a feeling that this won't change for at least another 5-10 more years. It really sucks how Cyma is still president of Nick after all these years. I wish she would have resigned several years ago.


Of course, a generation discussion developed from this.  ;D

I actually thought of this topic really as an earlier Millennial (1987) vs. late Millennial (1997) comparison actually. 1999 born isn't really TRULY Gen Z IMO (I think they should be the 1st 21st century born generation so including 1999 seems a little weird), but they're not really real Millennials either. Basically they maybe just barely squeeze into Millennials, but only just barely like a 1979er squeezing into Gen X. 2000 is right on the cusp, you could classify it either way. 2001 are basically Generation Z, of course, they are very early Generation Z and they will probably have Millennial influences (thinking ahead like a decade when Generation Z is in full bloom) compared to say a 2010 born, but they're pretty much Z. I don't really have a problem with the late '90s + maybe 2000 born people being called Millennials but the "late" qualifier should always be added in their case, they are the last of the generation. 2001-2004 born or so are very early Z, they may have some Millennial influences sure, especially 2001...but they are and should be the beginning of Generation Z.
Well, that depends on when the Millennial generation begins. While I still see 2000/01 as the start of Gen Z in articles, I mainly see 1995/96 in them too. I have even seen the ending of Gen Z which is 2010 making the generational span of 14-15 years.


I think how you view the 2010s will be the key generational divide between the Millennials and post-Millennials, similar to how you view the '90s is the big divide between the Generation Xers and Millennials. I mean for example if you could vote in say 1996 or say play professional sports in the 1990s, you're really Generation X tbh as the Millennials were just children and young teenagers then at the most. The 2010s as us Millennials know and are experiencing is a time of deep political divisions in America, the '10s are key to our generation like the '90s for Generation X. I mean if you were 8 during the 2016 election, you are absolutely NOT a Millennial. Yeah sure those 8-year-olds will remember Trump some and some things about this time in history, but it won't affect them in anywhere near the same way, as they will be far more shaped by the events of the 2020s and the 2030s. If you were 18 and old enough to vote in 2016, I do think you are Millennial, albeit a very young one. 1997-1999 born people will have experienced the 2010s in a FAR deeper more young adult way instead of childlike way than say a 2003-2004 born person for example in my eyes and that makes a huge difference to me. It's the same thing really as comparing a 1977-1979 born experiencing the '90s vs. a 1983-1984 born. The idea is 1977ers big "coming of age" milestones came more in the Generation X '90s, while 1983ers big "coming of age" milestones came more in the new millennium (2000s) and that makes them Millennials.

Out of the 21st-century borns, I will say the 2001 and 2002ers that can vote in 2020 maybe can call themselves sort of "cusp" in a way though they are definitely Generation Z leaning cusp. But I mean if you can't even vote for president until freaking 2024 (2003+ crowd) when Millennials will be making the transition into middle age (1982ers will be 42 and I will be 37), you're definitely solidly Generation Z. I'm trying to be as gradual and objective as possible with this.

Don't you guys get what I'm saying?
Yeah, I understand what you're saying. This era is definitely important to whether someone is a Millennial or Gen Z. I think the generational divide has already happened considering that this decade is almost over, and most Millennials are in their 20s or 30s with some near 40.

As for Gen Z voting, if the start generation begins at 2001 then they won't even be able to vote as a block until 2028 where the oldest will be 27 and the halfway point (depends on again when Gen Z ends) around 18.


Yeah I mean I'm not surprised as they are 15/16 and some Millennials are like 35 so they probably think "no way do identify with 30 somethings, I'm only a teenager!". I'm thinking more in the future in the 2020s though when the 2010 borns and stuff come of age, compared to them a 2001 born will probably have some Millennial "influences" (far deeper understanding of the 2010s for example) even if they are Generation Z as I do believe they are. The point should be made that they are very early in the Z generation, and most Generation Z are still little kids. It's a gradual little by little thing really, and we're early in this transition.
Well, the 2010s people won't be there for another 10 years. By then we'll be close to 2030 and according to articles, that's when Gen Alpha will be coming of age.

As for Gen Z being little kids, that still depends on where the generation starts and ends. I know most people see them that way, but half of them are already 10 and over at this point.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/20/17 at 12:05 pm


I think how you view the 2010s will be the key generational divide between the Millennials and post-Millennials, similar to how you view the '90s is the big divide between the Generation Xers and Millennials. I mean for example if you could vote in say 1996 or say play professional sports in the 1990s, you're really Generation X tbh as the Millennials were just children and young teenagers then at the most. The 2010s as us Millennials know and are experiencing is a time of deep political divisions in America, the '10s are key to our generation like the '90s for Generation X. I mean if you were say 8 during the 2016 election, you are absolutely NOT a Millennial. Yeah sure those 8 year olds will remember Trump some and some things about this time in history, but it won't affect them in anywhere near the same way, as they will be far more shaped by the events of the 2020s and the 2030s. If you were 18 and old enough to vote in 2016, I do think you are Millennial, albeit a very young one. 1997-1999 born people will have experienced the 2010s in a FAR deeper more young adult way instead of child like way than say a 2003-2004 born person for example in my eyes and that makes a huge difference to me. It's the same thing really as comparing a 1977-1979 born experiencing the '90s vs. a 1983-1984 born. The idea is 1977ers big "coming of age" milestones came more in the Generation X '90s, while 1983ers big "coming of age" milestones came more in the new millennium (2000s) and that makes them Millennials.

Out of the 21st century borns, I will say the 2001 and 2002ers that can vote in 2020 maybe can call themselves sort of "cusp" in a way though they are definitely Generation Z leaning cusp. But I mean if you can't even vote for president until freaking 2024 (2003+ crowd) when Millennials will be making the transition into middle age (1982ers will be 42 and I will be 37), you're definitely solidly Generation Z. I'm trying to be as gradual and objective as possible with this.

Don't you guys get what I'm saying?


You've bought another unique divide between early and later Gen Y up here that is worth acknowledging. The first half of Gen Y, those born during the '80s and up through the early '90s, came of age politically during the George W. Bush years. The Afghanistan and Iraq Wars, Hurricane Katrina, and the late '00s recession were all the key political factors that molded kids our age as we became more politically active during the course of the '00s. Meanwhile, later Gen Y kids, specifically those born after perhaps 1992 or so, came of age during more the Obama years, with the issues of the last 8 years being what mainly molded their political views. That's why some say that those of us born late '80s and early '90s are such a staunch Democratic voting group, while younger Yers are supposedly a bit more conservative.

There's a similar political gap between early Boomers and later Boomers, with early Boomers who could serve during the Vietnam War being much more liberal than later Boomers who were too young, and had a slightly more conservative voting record.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/20/17 at 12:27 pm


I think how you view the 2010s will be the key generational divide between the Millennials and post-Millennials, similar to how you view the '90s is the big divide between the Generation Xers and Millennials. I mean for example if you could vote in say 1996 or say play professional sports in the 1990s, you're really Generation X tbh as the Millennials were just children and young teenagers then at the most. The 2010s as us Millennials know and are experiencing is a time of deep political divisions in America, the '10s are key to our generation like the '90s for Generation X. I mean if you were say 8 during the 2016 election, you are absolutely NOT a Millennial. Yeah sure those 8 year olds will remember Trump some and some things about this time in history, but it won't affect them in anywhere near the same way, as they will be far more shaped by the events of the 2020s and the 2030s. If you were 18 and old enough to vote in 2016, I do think you are Millennial, albeit a very young one. 1997-1999 born people will have experienced the 2010s in a FAR deeper more young adult way instead of child like way than say a 2003-2004 born person for example in my eyes and that makes a huge difference to me. It's the same thing really as comparing a 1977-1979 born experiencing the '90s vs. a 1983-1984 born. The idea is 1977ers big "coming of age" milestones came more in the Generation X '90s, while 1983ers big "coming of age" milestones came more in the new millennium (2000s) and that makes them Millennials.

Out of the 21st century borns, I will say the 2001 and 2002ers that can vote in 2020 maybe can call themselves sort of "cusp" in a way though they are definitely Generation Z leaning cusp. But I mean if you can't even vote for president until freaking 2024 (2003+ crowd) when Millennials will be making the transition into middle age (1982ers will be 42 and I will be 37), you're definitely solidly Generation Z. I'm trying to be as gradual and objective as possible with this.

Don't you guys get what I'm saying?

I agree with you.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/20/17 at 12:41 pm

For some reason, I have always had a disconnect with people born in 2001. Even though they are 1-2 years younger than me...I have just never felt like we were that similar. I know that I'm not completely different from them but I've just never felt like we could relate that much, lol :P.

Even at my high school, my classmates and I who were born in 1998 and 1999...we felt mostly annoyed by students who born after 2000. They seemed to act like they are still 12 but they are 15-16 years old and some of them didn't know the shows that us '98 and '99 borns grew up watching which was surprising.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Encoder319 on 08/20/17 at 5:36 pm

A single generation should span about 17-20 years (basically accounting for birth to late adolescence/young adulthood). Core Y ends in the mid 90s, but not the generation itself. Those born in 1995-2000/1 are to Gen Y what Xennials are to Gen X and Gen Jones to the Baby Boomers. But we already knew that, right? ;)

Baby Boomers: 1946-1964
19 years

Generation X: 1965-1981/2
17-18 years

Generation Y: 1982/3-2000/1
18-20 years




Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/20/17 at 5:47 pm

It never ends. First it's a debate about when the millennial generation begins and ends. Then there has to be a debate about who is in the "early" "core" or "late" parts of the generation. Everybody has to put themselves or other people in their own separate"box" and its ridiculous. Yeah there's going to be difference within a generation when comparing the older end with the younger end. But this whole who is "early" or "core" debate is nonsense. Fact is you can draw your arbitrary lines between cohorts all you want, it doesn't make you different by any means. Late 80s babies and early 90s babies are the worst for that on this f

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/20/17 at 5:58 pm


A single generation should span about 17-20 years (basically accounting for birth to late adolescence/young adulthood). Core Y ends in the mid 90s, but not the generation itself. Those born in 1995-2000/1 are to Gen Y what Xennials are to Gen X and Gen Jones to the Baby Boomers. But we already knew that, right? ;)

Baby Boomers: 1946-1964
19 years

Generation X: 1965-1981/2
17-18 years

Generation Y: 1982/3-2000/1
18-20 years

I agree with all of those generation definitions.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/20/17 at 6:51 pm


You've bought another unique divide between early and later Gen Y up here that is worth acknowledging. The first half of Gen Y, those born during the '80s and up through the early '90s, came of age politically during the George W. Bush years. The Afghanistan and Iraq Wars, Hurricane Katrina, and the late '00s recession were all the key political factors that molded kids our age as we became more politically active during the course of the '00s. Meanwhile, later Gen Y kids, specifically those born after perhaps 1992 or so, came of age during more the Obama years, with the issues of the last 8 years being what mainly molded their political views. That's why some say that those of us born in the late '80s and early '90s are such a staunch Democratic voting group, while younger Yers are supposedly a bit more conservative.

There's a similar political gap between early Boomers and later Boomers, with early Boomers who could serve during the Vietnam War being much more liberal than later Boomers who were too young and had a slightly more conservative voting record.
Yeah, that's actually true. I have seen this with people in my age range considering we were all in HS when Bush Jr left office with all these disasters. I remember back in 2008 on MySpace, a friend of mine said "f**k him" in those surveys. I did know a few who were Republican at that time, but OTT it seemed most were Democrats.


For some reason, I have always had a disconnect with people born in 2001. Even though they are 1-2 years younger than me...I have just never felt like we were that similar. I know that I'm not completely different from them but I've just never felt like we could relate that much, lol :P.
What are some things that you couldn't relate to them by?


It never ends. First, it's a debate about when the millennial generation begins and ends. Then there has to be a debate about who is in the "early" "core" or "late" parts of the generation. Everybody has to put themselves or other people in their own separate"box" and it's ridiculous. Yeah, there's going to be a difference within a generation when comparing the older end with the younger end. But this whole who is "early" or "core" debate is nonsense. The fact is you can draw your arbitrary lines between cohorts all you want, it doesn't make you different by any means. Late 80s babies and early 90s babies are the worst for that on this f
Yeah, and this has been going on for the past decade, unfortunately. The Millennial generation should have already been determined by now. One thing however that has not changed at all since the debate began is that 1994/95 is the end of Gen Y, The only problem is that early 80s folks refuse to be seen or called Millennials (which they are), and think the generation starts much later.

I also agree. The whole early/core(mid)/late designations are frustrating, and then it escalates into endless arguments. I honestly think we all should go by the older and younger groupings. I have actually seen that used articles, and it's a better idea than the early/core/late BS we're used to.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/20/17 at 7:47 pm


What are some things that you couldn't relate to them by?

Did you not read the last paragraph? ???


For some reason, I have always had a disconnect with people born in 2001. Even though they are 1-2 years younger than me...I have just never felt like we were that similar. I know that I'm not completely different from them but I've just never felt like we could relate that much, lol :P.

Even at my high school, my classmates and I who were born in 1998 and 1999...we felt mostly annoyed by students who born after 2000. They seemed to act like they are still 12 but they are 15-16 years old and some of them didn't know the shows that us '98 and '99 borns grew up watching which was surprising.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/20/17 at 7:49 pm


Did you not read the last paragraph? ???

I did. I'm just asking was there anything else you couldn't relate to them aside from cartoons/TV shows?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/20/17 at 7:54 pm


I did. I'm just asking was there anything else you couldn't relate to them aside from cartoons/TV shows?

I don't really know. They seem to have a greater affinity for the early 2010s than I and most other late '90s borns do. Most of them view the '90s as being ancient and think that we are old for being born in the '90s. These are just a few things that I've noticed but then again I haven't been in contact with many 2001 borns.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/20/17 at 8:02 pm


I don't really know. They seem to have a greater affinity for the early 2010s than I and most other late '90s borns do. Most of them view the '90s as being ancient and think that we are old for being born in the '90s. These are just a few things that I've noticed but then again I haven't been in contact with many 2001 borns.
Ohhhh. Now i see. It's weird they think that despite that the 90s were barely over when they were born.

They might like the early 10s more most likely because they were either kids at the time or that they enjoyed it better than the late 00s.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/20/17 at 8:31 pm


Ohhhh. Now i see. It's weird they think that despite that the 90s were barely over when they were born.

The '90s were over by 2001.


They might like the early 10s more most likely because they were either kids at the time or that they enjoyed it better than the late 00s.

2001 borns were 5-10 from 2006-2011. That's compared to us 1999 borns who were 5-10 from 2004-2009.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/20/17 at 8:47 pm


The '90s were over by 2001.
2001 borns were 5-10 from 2006-2011. That's compared to us 1999 borns who were 5-10 from 2004-2009.
Still. It was barely over.

Well still. They might have enjoyed the early 10s than the late 00s.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/20/17 at 9:37 pm


Yeah, and this has been going on for the past decade, unfortunately. The Millennial generation should have already been determined by now. One thing however that has not changed at all since the debate began is that 1994/95 is the end of Gen Y, The only problem is that early 80s folks refuse to be seen or called Millennials (which they are), and think the generation starts much later.

I also agree. The whole early/core(mid)/late designations are frustrating, and then it escalates into endless arguments. I honestly think we all should go by the older and younger groupings. I have actually seen that used articles, and it's a better idea than the early/core/late BS we're used to.

Exactly! It doesn't matter what part of a decade you were born, early, mid, late, you're going to have the same exposer to cultural and major world events just like the cohort born just a few years before you were. Early and mid 80s babies had similar experiences coming up. Just like mid and late 80s babies had similar experiences coming up. There's no difference, no gap, no early core or late. You're either older or younger millennial. And if you have an 80s birthday then you're older, a 90s birthday then you're younger. This ridicules box people put their self in based on being an early or mid or late whatever baby and speaking on your cohort like its some exclusive club need to go. Its ridicules and pointless.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/20/17 at 9:39 pm


Well still. They might have enjoyed the early 10s than the late 00s.

I wasn't disputing that. In fact, I was adding evidence to your claim...2001 borns were still in their core childhoods in 2010 and 2011 and their childhoods didn't totally end until 2014....so naturally they would have enjoyed the early '10s more than the late '00s.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/20/17 at 11:26 pm


Exactly! It doesn't matter what part of a decade you were born, early, mid, late, you're going to have the same exposure to cultural and major world events just like the cohort born just a few years before you were. Early and mid 80s babies had similar experiences coming up. Just like mid and late 80s babies had similar experiences coming up. There's no difference, no gap, no early core or late. You're either older or younger millennial. And if you have an 80s birthday then you're older, a 90s birthday then you're younger. This ridicules box people put their self in based on being an early or mid or late whatever baby and speaking on your cohort like it's some exclusive club need to go. It's ridiculous and pointless.
Right on that! I can't even tell you how many early 80s folks will say they are Gen X when they don't remember a time before computers or other events that real Xers recall. On top of that, they'll even use the internet or cell phone excuse to claim they are the end of Gen X when they are clearly not. They just need to accept they are (and have always) been Millennials (or Gen Y). Not one-time were they ever considered Gen X.

As for the groups, the 90s birthdays are correct for younger Millenials depending on the end of the generation; however, 80s birthdays, not necessarily are they all older Millennials. I've read articles stating that late 80s folks are considered younger Millennials just as much as the 90s ones.


I wasn't disputing that. In fact, I was adding evidence to your claim...2001 borns were still in their core childhoods in 2010 and 2011 and their childhoods didn't totally end until 2014....so naturally they would have enjoyed the early '10s more than the late '00s.
Oh, my bad man. For some reason, I thought you were refuting my claim.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/20/17 at 11:55 pm


Right on that! I can't even tell you how many early 80s folks will say they are Gen X when they don't remember a time before computers or other events that real Xers recall. On top of that, they'll even use the internet or cell phone excuse to claim they are the end of Gen X when they are clearly not. They just need to accept they are (and have always) been Millennials (or Gen Y). Not one-time were they ever considered Gen X.

As for the groups, the 90s birthdays are correct for younger Millenials depending on the end of the generation; however, 80s birthdays, not necessarily are they all older Millennials. I've read articles stating that late 80s folks are considered younger Millennials just as much as the 90s ones.


I have seen some articles like that but it depends on which bitth years you're going for. Since I go for the 1980 to 1999/00 range I put the line between the 80s and 90s. I mean the youngest 80s born is 28 this year while the oldest is 37. The oldest 90s born is 27 this year while the youngest is 18. That's how I break it down. Either way its better then the "early" "core" or "late" break down ;)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/20/17 at 11:56 pm


Oh, my bad man. For some reason, I thought you were refuting my claim.

No worries :).

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 12:07 am


I have seen some articles like that but it depends on which birth years you're going for. Since I go for the 1980 to 1999/00 range I put the line between the 80s and 90s. I mean the youngest 80s born is 28 this year while the oldest is 37. The oldest 90s born is 27 this year while the youngest is 18. That's how I break it down. Either way, it's better than the "early" "core" or "late" breakdown ;)
That's fine with me. 1980-2000 is still a good span until the final determination.

Yeah, I know :). I actually switched over last year because not only did I see the "early" "core" or "late" breakdowns on here, I saw the same thing on other sites as well. The older and younger designations work very well with all generations. So far, I have seen it used with Millennials and Boomers, but not with the other generations. Hopefully, it catches on with the rest soon.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/21/17 at 12:11 am


Right on that! I can't even tell you how many early 80s folks will say they are Gen X when they don't remember a time before computers or other events that real Xers recall. On top of that, they'll even use the internet or cell phone excuse to claim they are the end of Gen X when they are clearly not. They just need to accept they are (and have always) been Millennials (or Gen Y). Not one-time were they ever considered Gen X.

Well, due to the poorly defined-ness of the generations, I've actually seen a number of articles that do indeed include early 80s, or even mid 80s, in Gen X. 1985 at the most, never seen 1986 included in Gen X ever.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 12:17 am


Well, due to the poorly defined-ness of the generations, I've actually seen a number of articles that do indeed include the early 80s, or even mid-80s, in Gen X. 1985 at the most, never seen 1986 included in Gen X ever.
Well, those articles are inaccurate because 80s people were never really considered Gen Xers. Going from back then to even today in many articles, they were always called Gen Y or Millennials.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/21/17 at 12:20 am


Well, those articles are inaccurate because 80s people were never really considered Gen Xers. Going from back then to even today in many articles, they were always called Gen Y or Millennials.

Well, you have to take into consideration that their parents or even teachers could've called them Gen X their entire lives, due to Gen X still being a generic term for "youths" in the early 2000s and "Gen Y" not really catching on as well yet, leading them to believe they are Gen X. It's like how "Millennial" is often used as a generic term for a young person of ANY age (though Gen Z is starting to become more distinct from Millennials via recent articles and think pieces).

I'm sure that in 20 years from now, current 16 year olds (by then 36) will say "Why am I a Plural? I was called a Millennial by my parents, friends, and teachers my whole life, but then I looked it up on the Internet and I've been lumped into Plurals? That doesn't make any sense; Plurals should be those born after 2010 imo, who don't remember a world before virtual reality and Trump's campaign." Or something to that affect.

Heck I see it nowadays, with people born in 1995 seeing an articles that says they're Gen Z and them responding with "I am? But my parents, coworkers, and the news said I was a Millennial!"

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 12:27 am


Well, you have to take into consideration that their parents or even teachers could've called them Gen X their entire lives, due to Gen X still being a generic term for "youths" in the early 2000s and "Gen Y" not really catching on as well yet, leading them to believe they are Gen X. It's like how "Millennial" is often used as a generic term for a young person of ANY age (though Gen Z is starting to become more distinct from Millennials via recent articles and think pieces).

I'm sure that in 20 years from now, current 16-year-olds (by then 36) will say "Why am I a Plural? I was called a Millennial by my parents, friends, and teachers my whole life, but then I looked it up on the Internet and I've been lumped into Plurals? That doesn't make any sense; Plurals should be those born after 2010 IMO, who don't remember the world before virtual reality and Trump's campaign." Or something to that effect.

Heck, I see it nowadays, with people born in 1995 seeing an article that says they're Gen Z and them responding with "I am? But my parents, coworkers, and Fox News said I was a Millennial snowflake!"
Yeah, that probably did happen when they were in school, so I somewhat understand why they would see themselves as Gen X.

Yeah, I could possibly see that happening in the future with some older Zers saying that. ;D

Yeah, I still see that too not only in articles but even on other forums as well. Honestly, all of that has to do with parents, friends, and teachers seeing one young generation, and not two; however, I think that will change soon as Gen Z now graduates HS (or college depending on the start)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/21/17 at 12:30 am


Well, due to the poorly defined-ness of the generations, I've actually seen a number of articles that do indeed include early 80s, or even mid 80s, in Gen X. 1985 at the most, never seen 1986 included in Gen X ever.

A FEW inaccurate articles by virtually hole-in-the-wall sources. That's really laughable for anybody to say Gen x goes to the mid 80s. That's why the mainstream media and generational sites like pew or generational researchers like Neil and Straus don't use that inaccurate range. And trust me I grew up in that era and we were never referred to as Gen x. That was strictly teens and young adults of the 90s who were Gen x. And everything marketed to Gen x included that age demographic, not ours.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/21/17 at 12:31 am


Yeah, I still see that too not only in articles but even on other forums as well. Honestly, all of that has to do with parents, friends, and teachers seeing one young generation, and not two; however, I think that will change soon as Gen Z now graduates HS (or college depending on the start)

Yeah, teachers and parents - or heck, "normies" in general, aren't nerds about the whole "generation" thing like us forum nerds are. They could honestly care less about when generation ends and the next begins.

My 45-year-old coworker, for instance, was shocked to learn Gen X went back to 1965, because the way people talked about it growing up seemed like it referred solely to her group (born in the 70s).

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 12:40 am


A FEW inaccurate articles by virtually hole-in-the-wall sources. That's really laughable for anybody to say Gen x goes to the mid-80s. That's why the mainstream media and generational sites like pew or generational researchers like Neil and Straus don't use that inaccurate range. And trust me I grew up in that era and we were never referred to as Gen x. That was strictly teens and young adults of the 90s who were Gen x. And everything marketed to Gen x included that age demographic, not mine.
Agreed! Every time I see those articles with that incorrect range, I laugh so much. It's like they want to keep the Millennial generation as young as possible and under 30 when that's inevitable.


Yeah, teachers and parents - or heck, "normies" in general, aren't nerds about the whole "generation" thing like us forum nerds are. They could honestly care less about when generation ends and the next begins.

My 45-year-old coworker, for instance, was shocked to learn Gen X went back to 1965 because the way people talked about it growing up seemed like it referred solely to her group (born in the 70s).
That's true. They really wouldn't know about generations unless they watched the news or read articles. Unfortunately, to them, most still don't know that Millennials are much older than they think.

As for your co-worker,  I wouldn't blame her as she wasn't following generations then (it was difficult anyway unless they watched the news, read newspapers or magazine articles)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/21/17 at 12:51 am

Like I said before...there is a thread on the Web from September 1993 that features people born from 1965-1970 discussing about "What is Gen X?" and many of them felt that people born in the late '70s or people born after 1973 or people born in 1980 aren't Gen Xers. Generational debates will never end...we're still doing the same sh*t 24 years later.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/21/17 at 12:53 am


Like I said before...there is a thread on the Web from September 1993 that features people born from 1965-1970 discussing about "What is Gen X?" and many of them felt that people born in the late '70s or people born after 1973 or people born in 1980 aren't Gen Xers. Generational debates will never end...we're still doing the same sh*t 24 years later.

And we'll still  :Dbe doing it 24 years from now

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 12:56 am


Like I said before...there is a thread on the Web from September 1993 that features people born from 1965-1970 discussing "What is Gen X?" and many of them felt that people born in the late '70s or people born after 1973 or people born in 1980 aren't Gen Xers. Generational debates will never end...we're still doing the same sh*t 24 years later.
Well, that's true they will go forever for each generation. At least, Gen X was somewhat finally determined a long time ago. Millennials, OTOH the debate should have been done years ago. Although, we still know the ending, in general, hasn't changed that much.


And we'll still :D be doing it 24 years from now
With Gen Z and Alpha unless the former gets determined beforehand.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/21/17 at 12:58 am


And we'll still  :Dbe doing it 24 years from now

Yep :D.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/21/17 at 12:58 am


With Gen Z and Alpha unless the former gets determined beforehand.

Not just Gen Z and Alpha but ALL the generations AFTER those.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/21/17 at 1:02 am

Its also worth noting that Gen X didn't have a long shelf life with the media. I don't think the media used the term much in the 80s as they were still focusing on the baby boomer or "yuppies". I don't think the Gen X term didn't get popular with the media until about 1990. And it was popular through the early to mid 90s but it seem that by the late 90s the term wasn't used as much. And by the early 2000s is pretty much none existent by the media. Millennial on the other hand, though it's the media's favorite topic in recent years, has been the media's focus for at least ten years now. In fact the TIME magazine issue about the Virginia Tech shootings in April of 2007 had the word millennial on the cover and referred to those who were 18 to 24 at that time as millennial.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 1:12 am


Not just Gen Z and Alpha but ALL the generations AFTER those.
Pretty much. ;)

As far as the determinations go, there need to be criteria for events, traits, and other misc when it comes to generations. It can't be based on one's opinion.


It's also worth noting that Gen X didn't have a long shelf life with the media. I don't think the media used the term much in the 80s as they were still focusing on the baby boomer or "yuppies". I don't think the Gen X term didn't get popular with the media until about 1990. And it was popular through the early to mid-90s but it seems that by the late 90s the term wasn't used as much. And by the early 2000s is pretty much none existent by the media. Millennial on the other hand, though it's the media's favorite topic in recent years, has been the media's focus for at least ten years now. In fact, the TIME magazine issue about the Virginia Tech shootings in April of 2007 had the word millennial on the cover and referred to this who were 18 to 24 at that time as millennial.
Yeah, that's very true. I found a time magazine from 1990 talking about Gen X which helped grow the discussion about them in popularity and then I found an article from 1999 saying that Gen X needs to step aside and make way for Gen Y.

In fact, I also found another article from 2001 (before 9/11), and it was about Gen Y (all kids, teens, and adults). Honestly, this generation has been in the media for at least over 15 years or about 20. It's why now I have seen articles saying that Millenials need to step aside and make way for Gen Z who is the up and coming generation at this point, and those go back to 2014/15. 

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/21/17 at 1:16 am


Pretty much. ;)

As far as the determinations go, there need to be criteria for events, traits, and other misc when it comes to generations. It can't be based on one's opinion.

Of course. However, people will ALWAYS have their own opinion.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 1:21 am


Of course. However, people will ALWAYS have their own opinion.
Right on that! Even if some won't change their opinion on generations, they need to accept the facts.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/21/17 at 1:26 am


Right on that! Even if some won't change their opinion on generations, they need to accept the facts.

Exactly! You can draw your lines wherever you want but it doesn't change the facts of what makes a certain generation.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/21/17 at 1:26 am


Right on that! Even if some won't change their opinion on generations, they need to accept the facts.

Yep.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 1:35 am


Exactly! You can draw your lines wherever you want but it doesn't change the facts of what makes a certain generation.



Yep.
Hopefully, the early 80s people realize that they are Millennials one day. They're the only group so far who refuses to be seen as one using their typical excuses regarding technology, social media etc. They're the biggest snowflakes I've ever seen! ;D ;D ;D

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/21/17 at 1:39 am


Hopefully, the early 80s people realize that they are Millennials one day. They're the only group so far who refuses to be seen as one using their typical excuses regarding technology, social media etc. They're the biggest snowflakes I've ever seen! ;D ;D ;D

Most early '80s borns would rather want to be physically harmed than consider themselves a Millennial ;D.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 1:41 am


Most early '80s borns would rather want to be physically harmed than consider themselves a Millennial ;D.
;D ;D ;D  ;D ;D  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Well, they need to face it. They can't be in denial forever.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/21/17 at 1:50 am


Hopefully, the early 80s people realize that they are Millennials one day. They're the only group so far who refuses to be seen as one using their typical excuses regarding technology, social media etc. They're the biggest snowflakes I've ever seen! ;D ;D ;D

I've said it before and ill it again. The most millennial thing you can do is deny being a millennial. ;)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 1:53 am


I've said it before and ill it again. The most millennial thing you can do is deny being a millennial. ;)
That's right man! And they do it all the time. It's so hilarious! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

And that reminds me. Here's an article I found a month about the xennials.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.kylemcmahon.me/theres-no-thing-xennials/&ved=0ahUKEwi_o6eT3-fVAhWHsFQKHa70AI4QFggmMAA&usg=AFQjCNHWsfld_dZxpi5PJgKkXfMrFuQQ5Q

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/21/17 at 2:15 am


That's right man! And they do it all the time. It's so hilarious! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

And that reminds me. Here's an article I found a month about the xennials.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.kylemcmahon.me/theres-no-thing-xennials/&ved=0ahUKEwi_o6eT3-fVAhWHsFQKHa70AI4QFggmMAA&usg=AFQjCNHWsfld_dZxpi5PJgKkXfMrFuQQ5Q

I like that article. Its the most accurate thing I've read about this topic

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/21/17 at 10:13 am

Here's a topic that was posted on the Gen X newsgroup back during 1994 debating the definitions of Gen X.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/alt.society.generation-x/gen$20x$20birth$20year%7Csort:relevance/alt.society.generation-x/uKle3QKhtp8/7rDYEuCTw70J

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 11:35 am


I like that article. It's the most accurate thing I've read about this topic.
Same here. Some of the older Millennials need to face value and accept that they were never Xers. I hope they get that message one day.


Here's a topic that was posted on the Gen X newsgroup back during 1994 debating the definitions of Gen X.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/alt.society.generation-x/gen$20x$20birth$20year%7Csort:relevance/alt.society.generation-x/uKle3QKhtp8/7rDYEuCTw70J
I just read the topic, and it's interesting how some people said that 1961-64 was the cusp of Boomers and Gen X. That's still somewhat true today. In addition, everyone on there had said that no 80s person is Gen X, and that's still true today as well! It's kind of amazing how they didn't make any predictions, but they implied the year spans.

Another thing that was discussed in the topic was divorce. Most of them stated that their parents were divorced which caused problems in their families although some did also say they turned out well. It's what caused them to be called latch-key children in the first place since their parents were now single and would have to work every day. All of this definitely sounds like the typical Gen X upbringing that even the oldest Millennials would have no clue about.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Encoder319 on 08/21/17 at 3:14 pm


;D ;D ;D  ;D ;D  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Well, they need to face it. They can't be in denial forever.


Why are they so clearly Millennials in your eyes? Do you even know anybody born in the early 80s? People born as late as 1982 were for the most part children of the 80s and early 90s, teenagers of the "real" 90s, and young adults of the 21st century.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Encoder319 on 08/21/17 at 3:17 pm


It never ends. First it's a debate about when the millennial generation begins and ends. Then there has to be a debate about who is in the "early" "core" or "late" parts of the generation. Everybody has to put themselves or other people in their own separate"box" and its ridiculous. Yeah there's going to be difference within a generation when comparing the older end with the younger end. But this whole who is "early" or "core" debate is nonsense. Fact is you can draw your arbitrary lines between cohorts all you want, it doesn't make you different by any means. Late 80s babies and early 90s babies are the worst for that on this f


Weren't you also the one who got into a petty back-and-forth with Reign about where the "core" Millennial cohort begins? He said 1987 and you insisted 1988.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/21/17 at 4:10 pm


Weren't you also the one who got into a petty back-and-forth with Reign about where the "core" Millennial cohort begins? He said 1987 and you insisted 1988.

IF you use that pointless sanario. Maybe I should have stress that in that post. But using the early core or late breakdown is pretty useless

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 5:49 pm


Why are they so clearly Millennials in your eyes? Do you even know anybody born in the early 80s? People born as late as 1982 were for the most part children of the 80s and early 90s, teenagers of the "real" 90s, and young adults of the 21st century.
If you think about it, the Gen Y childhood began in the late 80s after the transition from Gen X. The early 80s folks were definitely children during that timeframe. As for being a teenager in that decade, it's actually split in half. The first group is definitely Gen X while the second is truly more Gen Y than most people believe. I mean, the Millennial pop culture started as the cohort became adolescents, and got bigger over the years.

The reason is that most articles have put them as Millennials, and have done so for almost 20 years. It wasn't even until very recently they were considered the end of Gen X which is in very few articles. You have to think about the events, traits and other misc which are the facts. For one, even the oldest Millennials were still in school when Columbine and 9/11 took place. They are more Millennial than anyone else because they always seem to want to have their own special cohort. They don't remember a time before computers or the Challenger explosion. Almost all of them have Boomer parents compared to Gen X who the majority had Silent Gen parents. They were greatly affected by the two disastrous wars and the economic recession which prevented them from attaining certain milestones. Their typical excuses regarding technology, social media, and other things show that they refuse to be apart of this generation which they are generally considered.

Actually, I do know some but I haven't spoken with them in a while.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/21/17 at 6:12 pm


If you think about it, the Gen Y childhood began in the late 80s after the transition from Gen X. The early 80s folks were definitely children during that timeframe. As for being a teenager in that decade, it's actually split in half. The first group is definitely Gen X while the second is truly more Gen Y than most people believe. I mean, the Millennial pop culture started as the cohort became adolescents, and got bigger over the years.

The reason is that most articles have put them as Millennials, and have done so for almost 20 years. It wasn't even until very recently they were considered the end of Gen X which is in very few articles. You have to think about the events, traits and other misc which are the facts. For one, even the oldest Millennials were still in school when Columbine and 9/11 took place. They are more Millennial than anyone else because they always seem to want to have their own special cohort. They don't remember a time before computers or the Challenger explosion. Almost all of them have Boomer parents compared to Gen X who the majority had Silent Gen parents. They were greatly affected by the two disastrous wars and the economic recession which prevented them from attaining certain milestones. Their typical excuses regarding technology, social media, and other things show that they refuse to be apart of this generation which they are generally considered.

Actually, I do know some but I haven't spoken with them in a while.

Agreed. In light of Encoder319's condescending post I have to say I know a lot of early 80 babies an even though they have some Gen X traits, the Gen Y traits are there and are more prominent.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/21/17 at 6:27 pm


Agreed. In light of Encoder319's condescending post, I have to say I know a lot of early 80 babies and even though they have some Gen X traits, the Gen Y traits are there and are more prominent.
Yeah, I'm not totally denying they don't have Gen X traits. They definitely have a few, but the majority like you said are more Gen Y.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Encoder319 on 08/21/17 at 8:17 pm


IF you use that pointless sanario. Maybe I should have stress that in that post. But using the early core or late breakdown is pretty useless


These generation debates are useless, but we do them anyway... and you've been a participant. It doesn't matter what terminology is used... early/core/late, first/second/third waves, or older/younger. At the end of the day, it's all the same thing.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Setemstraight on 08/21/17 at 8:44 pm


These generation debates are useless, but we do them anyway... and you've been a participant. It doesn't matter what terminology is used... early/core/late, first/second/third waves, or older/younger. At the end of the day, it's all the same thing.

Yeah I participate in it because I Think generation labels are a good thing to have. Its breaking down years within a generation thats pointless and separates people. That I have a problem with.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mqg96 on 08/22/17 at 4:02 pm


10 isn't really "core childhood". You're in you're double digits, and many sources consider 10-year-olds tweens.


The majority of people on here and outside of here would agree that age 10 is more of a definite "core childhood" year than age 5. Most kids that are age 10 are still in elementary school very innocent and participating in kid culture. Their tastes in things might change from their earlier kid years but they are still in the peak of their childhood. Age 5 is borderline because like I said many times half of the time you're 5 you haven't started Kindergarten yet or learned enough basic material to be aware of the pop culture around you. 5 is still technically preschool age by many demographics but the last. Age 5 is just as borderline as age 11.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 08/22/17 at 4:20 pm


The majority of people on here and outside of here would agree that age 10 is more of a definite "core childhood" year than age 5. Most kids that are age 10 are still in elementary school very innocent and participating in kid culture. Their tastes in things might change from their earlier kid years but they are still in the peak of their childhood. Age 5 is borderline because like I said many times half of the time you're 5 you haven't started Kindergarten yet or learned enough basic material to be aware of the pop culture around you. 5 is still technically preschool age by many demographics but the last. Age 5 is just as borderline as age 11.


Imo, 3-4 is early childhood, 5-10 is core childhood and 11-12 is preteen/late childhood.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/23/17 at 9:03 am


The majority of people on here and outside of here would agree that age 10 is more of a definite "core childhood" year than age 5. Most kids that are age 10 are still in elementary school very innocent and participating in kid culture. Their tastes in things might change from their earlier kid years but they are still in the peak of their childhood. Age 5 is borderline because like I said many times half of the time you're 5 you haven't started Kindergarten yet or learned enough basic material to be aware of the pop culture around you. 5 is still technically preschool age by many demographics but the last. Age 5 is just as borderline as age 11.


Yeah, I agree. By 1997, which is when I turned 10, I was still watching Power Rangers and playing with pogs. But, I did get a stereo and start buying CD's that year, though.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/23/17 at 2:02 pm


Yeah, I still see that too not only in articles but even on other forums as well. Honestly, all of that has to do with parents, friends, and teachers seeing one young generation, and not two; however, I think that will change soon as Gen Z now graduates HS (or college depending on the start)

I think Gen Z will become more well known and stop being lumped with Millennials around the time of the 2020 election, when they will be definitively old enough to vote (going by the non-controversial 2000 starting date). The media won't be able to ignore the elephant in the room at that point.

Now that marketers are starting to talk about Gen Z, I wonder if we'll get millions of "Gen Z is killing..." articles, lol.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/24/17 at 11:57 am

Recently, I've had the opportunity to have some conversations with some younger cousins born around 2004 and 2005, and it was quite astounding. These kids truly grew up completely differently than me and others around my age. This must have been what it was like for my parents when they talked with me and my brother about their childhoods.

They've never seen a world where they couldn't look up anything they needed to look up for school or research at the touch of a button.
The concept of having to record a show on a VCR or even a DVR is foreign to them, as they've been streaming shows online since kindergarten.
To kids their age, my old Super Nintendo might as well be Pong.
They've had their own phones sine kindergarten.
When they were told that my first year of school was 1992, they laughed at me for being old.
When talking about the time that me and my brother traveled by car to Universal Studios without even a Game Boy to play, they snorted disapprovingly.

These conversations have left me with no doubt that 2004 and 2005 are clearly a different generation than me. At least a kid born during the late '90s could relate to some of those things.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/24/17 at 12:03 pm


Recently, I've had the opportunity to have some conversations with some younger cousins born around 2004 and 2005, and it was quite astounding. These kids truly grew up completely differently than me and others around my age. This must have been what it was like for my parents when they talked with me and my brother about their childhoods.

They've never seen a world where they couldn't look up anything they needed to look up for school or research at the touch of a button.
The concept of having to record a show on a VCR or even a DVR is foreign to them, as they've been streaming shows online since kindergarten.

To kids their age, my old Super Nintendo might as well be Pong.
They've had their own phones sine kindergarten.
When they were told that my first year of school was 1992, they laughed at me for being old.
When talking about the time that me and my brother traveled by car to Universal Studios without even a Game Boy to play, they snorted disapprovingly.

These conversations have left me with no doubt that 2004 and 2005 are clearly a different generation than me. At least a kid born during the late '90s could relate to some of those things.


Damn that crazy, especially the ones I have in bold. Even though these kids are only 8-9 years younger than me, my life experiences would be pretty alien compared to them as well.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/24/17 at 12:54 pm


Damn that crazy, especially the ones I have in bold. Even though these kids are only 8-9 years younger than me, my life experiences would be pretty alien compared to them as well.

Even though? ???

8-9 years older OR younger than you is a significant difference....no matter the person.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/24/17 at 1:15 pm


Even though? ???

8-9 years older OR younger than you is a significant difference....no matter the person.


I guess what I was trying to get at was that theres a similar age difference between me & MachineHead (among other guys like 90'sBreath & Looney Toon), as there is with me & guys born in 2004 & 2005. I didn't really expect the difference to be that massive with those born in the mid 2000's. Even those born in the late 80's, while is a huge difference, I could possibly relate on some things like the lack of online gaming, Saturday morning cartoons still being a thing, kid fads like Pokemon, having to rent movies at brick and mortar video stores, etc.

In short, the differences on both ends are huge, but I feel that the difference between myself (a 96' born) and a 87'/88' born is not as big as myself and a 04'/05' born.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/24/17 at 1:18 pm


I guess what I was trying to get at was that theres a similar age difference between me & MachineHead (among other guys like 90'sBreath & Looney Toon), as there is with me & guys born in 2004 & 2005. I didn't really expect the difference to be that massive with those born in the mid 2000's. Even those born in the late 80's, while is a huge difference, I could possibly relate on some things like the lack of online gaming, Saturday morning cartoons still being a thing, kid fads like Pokemon, having to rent movies at brick and mortar video stores, etc.

In short differences on both ends are huge, but I feel that the difference between myself (a 96' born) and a 87'/88' born is not as big as myself and a 04'/05' born.

Well, I agree with that.

It's the same with me....I'm much closer to '90 and '91 borns that I am to a '07 and '08 born. However, obviously on both ends there are big differences from me...a '99 born.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/24/17 at 1:24 pm


Well, I agree with that.

It's the same with me....I'm much closer to '90 and '91 borns that I am to a '07 and '08 born. However, obviously on both ends there are big differences from me...a '99 born.


Good point. Also I have a lot of cousins, from both sides of my family, born from the late 80's via the mid 90's (along with a few older siblings born in the mid 80's to the early 90's), and I don't many cousins born in the 2000's, so I'm a tad bit biased in that regard as well.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/24/17 at 1:28 pm


Good point. Also I have a lot of cousins, from both sides of my family, born from the late 80's via the mid 90's (along with a few older siblings born in the mid 80's to the early 90's), and I don't many cousins born in the 2000's, so I'm a tad bit biased in that regard as well.

I have about 2 cousins born in the '00s.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/24/17 at 1:30 pm

Yeah, I was wondering about this the other day. A 1996 born probably could relate a little better to a late '80s born than a mid '00s born regardless of the similar age difference. To me, this is likely because of the huge shift we saw with technology during the second half of the '00s. An early '00s childhood, which 1996ers largely would've had, is much more similar to a '90s childhood than even being a kid by 2009.

Honestly, it's kinda the same way with me and early '80s babies. We grew up with similar things, like the NES and a largely pre-web childhood, so most late '80s borns could probably relate to early '80s folk better than mid '90s borns could relate to mid '00s borns, too.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/24/17 at 1:32 pm


Good point. Also I have a lot of cousins, from both sides of my family, born from the late 80's via the mid 90's (along with a few older siblings born in the mid 80's to the early 90's), and I don't many cousins born in the 2000's, so I'm a tad bit biased in that regard as well.



I have about 2 cousins born in the '00s.
I have 3 from the 00s as well.


Yeah, I was wondering about this the other day. A 1996 born probably could relate a little better to a late '80s born than a mid '00s born regardless of the similar age difference. To me, this is likely because of the huge shift we saw with technology during the second half of the '00s. An early '00s childhood, which 1996ers largely would've had, is much more similar to a '90s childhood than even being a kid by 2009.

Honestly, it's kinda the same way with me and early '80s babies. We grew up with similar things, like the NES and a largely pre-web childhood, so most late '80s borns could probably relate to early '80s folk better than mid '90s borns could relate to mid '00s borns, too.
That's very true. Both 90s and 00s childhoods were similar since technology was not rapid at the time compared to now.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/24/17 at 1:35 pm

Being a 1999 born and using a 12 year difference:

Similarity in childhoods to a 1999 born

*1987 born: 30% similarity.
*2011 born: 1% similarity

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 08/24/17 at 1:36 pm


I have about 2 cousins born in the '00s.


I have 25 cousins but not one of them was born in the 00's :P

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/24/17 at 1:38 pm


I have 25 cousins but not one of them was born in the 00's :P

That's crazy :o.

My two 2000s borns cousins were born in 2000 and 2004.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/24/17 at 1:39 pm

As someone born in 95, a lot of people (mostly Twitter and Facebook, but they're full of narcissistic jackasses on average so I'm not surprised) seem to use my year as "the year where everything went to sh*t", the first year where spoiled kids were born, or the first year where people who don't know about floppy disks, rotary phones, and VHS tapes were born,

I've heard many times from people born in the late 80s say "If you were born 95 and up...", "95 and up ain't got no common sense", blah blah blah. It's very annoying because I most certainly did experience the old tech they did; not everyone was rich enough to throw out their old tech by the time we hit 2000.

Most of the time I see 2000 marked as the "year of doom" by nostalgia posters, but sometimes 95 gets it a lot too. It's very ANNOYING to me.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/24/17 at 1:41 pm


As someone born in 95, a lot of people (mostly Twitter and Facebook, but they're full of narcissistic jackasses on average so I'm not surprised) seem to use my year as "the year where everything went to sh*t", the first year where spoiled kids were born, or the first year where people who don't know about floppy disks, rotary phones, and VHS tapes were born,

I've heard many times from people born in the late 80s say "If you were born 95 and up...", "95 and up ain't got no common sense", blah blah blah. It's very annoying because I most certainly did experience the old tech they did; no it everyone was rich enough to throw out their old tech by the time we hit 2000.

Most of the time I see 2000 marked as the "year of doom" by nostalgia posters, but sometimes 95 gets it a lot too. It's very ANNOYING too me.

I totally feel you and it's even worse being a '99 born.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/24/17 at 1:51 pm


As someone born in 95, a lot of people (mostly Twitter and Facebook, but they're full of narcissistic jackasses on average so I'm not surprised) seem to use my year as "the year where everything went to sh*t", the first year where spoiled kids were born, or the first year where people who don't know about floppy disks, rotary phones, and VHS tapes were born,

I've heard many times from people born in the late 80s say "If you were born 95 and up...", "95 and up ain't got no common sense", blah blah blah. It's very annoying because I most certainly did experience the old tech they did; not everyone was rich enough to throw out their old tech by the time we hit 2000.

Most of the time I see 2000 marked as the "year of doom" by nostalgia posters, but sometimes 95 gets it a lot too. It's very ANNOYING to me.


The only thing you have to do is wait a few years, and you guys won't be the target anymore. There was an era not so long ago when 1987 was given as the year where all the spoiled brats were born because we didn't have Ataris growing up or something stupid like that.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Zelek3 on 08/24/17 at 1:56 pm


There was an era not so long ago when 1987 was given as the year where all the spoiled brats were born because we didn't have Ataris growing up or something stupid like that.

That's a dumb (and false) thing for nostalgics to say. You guys had the Atari 5200 didn't you? ;)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Howard on 08/24/17 at 2:06 pm


That's a dumb (and false) thing for nostalgics to say. You guys had the Atari 5200 didn't you? ;)



I had an Atari.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/24/17 at 2:24 pm


That's a dumb (and false) thing for nostalgics to say. You guys had the Atari 5200 didn't you? ;)


And we had the Atari 800XL, too, or at least I knew some kids that did.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 2001 on 08/24/17 at 2:33 pm


The only thing you have to do is wait a few years, and you guys won't be the target anymore. There was an era not so long ago when 1987 was given as the year where all the spoiled brats were born because we didn't have Ataris growing up or something stupid like that.


As someone who had an Atari growing up... where is the lie?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/24/17 at 4:44 pm


And we had the Atari 800XL, too, or at least I knew some kids that did.


Does Atari licensed games count?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/25/17 at 8:45 am

1987

Were already teenagers by the time online access hit 50%.
May have memories of the 1993 WTC Bombing.
Began gaming during the NES era.
Grew up with Commodore Amigas, Apple Macs, and computers with MS-DOS.

1997

Were teens around the era that smartphones exploded.
May have memories of the 2004 election.
Grew up with late Web 1.0 and computers with Windows XP.
Began gaming during the PS1 era.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/25/17 at 9:38 am


1987

Were already teenagers by the time online access hit 50%.
May have memories of the 1993 WTC Bombing.
Began gaming during the NES era.
Grew up with Commodore Amigas, Apple Macs, and computers with MS-DOS.

1997

Were teens around the era that smartphones exploded.
May have memories of the 2004 election.
Grew up with late Web 1.0 and computers with Windows XP.
Began gaming during the PS1 era.

You mean the PS2 era right? :o

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/25/17 at 9:49 am


You mean the PS2 era right? :o


No, most kids, going by my own history, usually start playing games when they are around 3 or 4 years old, particularly if they have older siblings or cousins. Though I was born while the NES was peaking, it was still my first console because my cousin had an older sister born 1984 and we used to play his console when I was 3 or 4 before I got a Super Nintendo. Though it's probably not everybody, there's more than a few 1997 borns, and probably even some of you 1999 borns, who's first console was a PS1.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/25/17 at 10:06 am


No, most kids, going by my own history, usually start playing games when they are around 3 or 4 years old, particularly if they have older siblings or cousins. Though I was born while the NES was peaking, it was still my first console because my cousin had an older sister born 1984 and we used to play his console when I was 3 or 4 before I got a Super Nintendo. Though it's probably not everybody, there's more than a few 1997 borns, and probably even some of you 1999 borns, who's first console was a PS1.

Pretty much NO 1997 born I know first started playing video games with the PS1...it's always the PS2, Xbox or GameCube. Where did you get that idea? :o

Also, the PS2 and Xbox came out when 1997 borns were (about) 3-4 years old. Your math failed you anyways ;).

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 08/25/17 at 10:17 am


Pretty much NO 1997 born I know first started playing video games with the PS1...it's always the PS2, Xbox or GameCube. Where did you get that idea? :o

Also, the PS2 and Xbox came out when 1997 borns were (about) 3-4 years old. Your math failed you anyways ;).


But kids don't always get new consoles as their first when they are that young. Maybe it's because I grew up around a lot of poor folks, but parents here didn't always buy their kids the hottest new console. My parents got my Super Nintendo and Sega Genesis around 1992 or 1993, but that was early, with some kids I knew not getting an SNES until 1995. Also, I didn't get my NES until 1995, which was 10 years after it's American launch. Again, I'm sure it wasn't all 1997 borns, but there are probably a lot who's parents bought them a PS1 around 2000 or so as their first console.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/25/17 at 10:29 am


But kids don't always get new consoles as their first when they are that young. Maybe it's because I grew up around a lot of poor folks, but parents here didn't always buy their kids the hottest new console. My parents got my Super Nintendo and Sega Genesis around 1992 or 1993, but that was early, with some kids I knew not getting an SNES until 1995. Also, I didn't get my NES until 1995, which was 10 years after it's American launch. Again, I'm sure it wasn't all 1997 borns, but there are probably a lot who's parents bought them a PS1 around 2000 or so as their first console.

Some of my friends who were born in 1998 and 1999 grew up with poorer parents and their parents had PS1s and N64s and those were the first consoles that they played. However, they aren't representative of 1998 and 1999 borns in general. If you were born in 1997-1999, in general, your first video game console was a PS2, original Xbox, or GameCube....PERIOD!.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 2001 on 08/25/17 at 12:34 pm

My '97 born friend's first console was an N64. Well, it actually belongs to his sister born 1995, and he didn't play it that much. ;D

My first console was an NES, and then an Atari in 1996. I still distinctly remember my dad teaching me how to play Duckhunt, and I had to stand on the sofa because I couldn't reach the TV standing on the floor. ;D But obviously I'm not similar to people my age in that regard.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/25/17 at 5:35 pm

1987
- They remember MJ in NBA before he retired the first time.
- They recall a pre-Windows 98 era
- They remember a pre-Kobe Bryant era.
- They are one of the last to remember a pre-PlayStation era.

1997
- One of the last to remember Web 1.0
- One of the last to remember film cameras
- They could remember a pre-Rivers era.
- They could remember when cell-phones were a luxury.


As someone born in 95, a lot of people (mostly Twitter and Facebook, but they're full of narcissistic jackasses on average so I'm not surprised) seem to use my year as "the year where everything went to sh*t", the first year where spoiled kids were born, or the first year where people who don't know about floppy disks, rotary phones, and VHS tapes were born,

I've heard many times from people born in the late 80s say "If you were born 95 and up...", "95 and up ain't got no common sense", blah blah blah. It's very annoying because I most certainly did experience the old tech they did; not everyone was rich enough to throw out their old tech by the time we hit 2000.

Most of the time I see 2000 marked as the "year of doom" by nostalgia posters, but sometimes 95 gets it a lot too. It's very ANNOYING to me.
Yeah, it's so irritating. I see that all the time. Those people seem to realize they are exaggerating, and that most of the things they say are not true.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/25/17 at 6:42 pm


1987
- They remember MJ in NBA before he retired the first time.
- They recall a pre-Windows 98 era
- They remember a pre-Kobe Bryant era.
- They are one of the last to remember a pre-PlayStation era.

1997
- One of the last to remember Web 1.0
- One of the last to remember film cameras
- They could remember a pre-Rivers era.
- They could remember when cell-phones were a luxury.

What is "pre-Rivers"? ???

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/25/17 at 6:50 pm


What is "pre-Rivers"? ???
Phillip rivers who used to be the chargers quarterback.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/25/17 at 6:55 pm


Phillip rivers who used to be the chargers quarterback.

Philip Rivers is still QB for the Chargers.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/25/17 at 7:23 pm


Philip Rivers is still QB for the Chargers.
Oh really? I heard a rumor that he was cut from the team, or that he wasn't QB anymore.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/25/17 at 7:46 pm


Oh really? I heard a rumor that he was cut from the team, or that he wasn't QB anymore.

Nah, he's still there.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/25/17 at 8:11 pm


Nah, he's still there.
I think it's time for him to change positions. He's been the Chargers QB for too long, and there hasn't been any success to a super bowl.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 08/25/17 at 8:37 pm


I think it's time for him to change positions. He's been the Chargers QB for too long, and there hasn't been any success to a super bowl.

It would be good for the Chargers to move on.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 08/26/17 at 12:26 am


Though it's probably not everybody, there's more than a few 1997 borns, and probably even some of you 1999 borns, who's first console was a PS1.


Yep, that's right. My Dad bought a PS1 for himself sometime in 1997, however it was naturally passed down for me to use. After my parents divorced in Late 2000, they agreed to keep the PS1 console for me and I used to play it on a regular basis until Christmas 2003, when I received a PS2 as a present. So I can certainly vouch for the PS1 being my first console. :)

Just as a side note, it wouldn't surprise me if a fair few number of 1997 borns had a Sega Saturn as their first console. I personally have a cousin born in 1997 and I know for a fact that his first console was a Sega Saturn, because his father had bought one (for himself) prior to when my cousin was born and I have a vague memory from 2001 of seeing the console at their place.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 08/26/17 at 1:10 am


Yep, that's right. My Dad bought a PS1 for himself sometime in 1997, however it was naturally passed down for me to use. After my parents divorced in Late 2000, they agreed to keep the PS1 console for me and I used to play it on a regular basis until Christmas 2003, when I received a PS2 as a present. So I can certainly vouch for the PS1 being my first console. :)

Just as a side note, it wouldn't surprise me if a fair few number of 1997 borns had a Sega Saturn as their first console. I personally have a cousin born in 1997 and I know for a fact that his first console was a Sega Saturn, because his father had bought one (for himself) prior to when my cousin was born and I have a vague memory from 2001 of seeing the console at their place.


When I was a kid I played on PS2 and N64. :)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 2001 on 08/26/17 at 7:18 pm


Yep, that's right. My Dad bought a PS1 for himself sometime in 1997, however it was naturally passed down for me to use. After my parents divorced in Late 2000, they agreed to keep the PS1 console for me and I used to play it on a regular basis until Christmas 2003, when I received a PS2 as a present. So I can certainly vouch for the PS1 being my first console. :)

Just as a side note, it wouldn't surprise me if a fair few number of 1997 borns had a Sega Saturn as their first console. I personally have a cousin born in 1997 and I know for a fact that his first console was a Sega Saturn, because his father had bought one (for himself) prior to when my cousin was born and I have a vague memory from 2001 of seeing the console at their place.


No one outside of Japan owns a Saturn. Your memory betrays you.  :-X

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 08/26/17 at 7:39 pm


No one outside of Japan owns a Saturn. Your memory betrays you.  :-X


Well I know that it was definitely a Sega console.  :-[

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 08/29/17 at 11:07 am


As someone born in 95, a lot of people (mostly Twitter and Facebook, but they're full of narcissistic jackasses on average so I'm not surprised) seem to use my year as "the year where everything went to sh*t", the first year where spoiled kids were born, or the first year where people who don't know about floppy disks, rotary phones, and VHS tapes were born,

I've heard many times from people born in the late 80s say "If you were born 95 and up...", "95 and up ain't got no common sense", blah blah blah. It's very annoying because I most certainly did experience the old tech they did; not everyone was rich enough to throw out their old tech by the time we hit 2000.

Most of the time I see 2000 marked as the "year of doom" by nostalgia posters, but sometimes 95 gets it a lot too. It's very ANNOYING to me.


Some people on Buzzfeed even use unusual years, like 1998 for example, as a "year of doom". I don't see the one about 2000 as much as I do with 1995.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 08/31/17 at 10:10 pm


Some people on Buzzfeed even use unusual years, like 1998 for example, as a "year of doom". I don't see the one about 2000 as much as I do with 1995.
Sometimes, I'll see 1990 being the "year of doom" but not as much compared to 1995 and 2000.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/02/17 at 9:02 pm


Sometimes, I'll see 1990 being the "year of doom" but not as much compared to 1995 and 2000.


1996 is also commonly used as a "year of doom" to some .

I hardly see 1999 for example as being a "year of doom", aside from probably a small amount of people.

1995 is still probably the most commonly used "year of doom".

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 80sfan on 09/02/17 at 9:06 pm


1996 is also commonly used as a "year of doom" to some .

I hardly see 1999 for example as being a "year of doom", aside from probably a small amount of people.

1995 is still probably the most commonly used "year of doom".


What happened in 1996?

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/02/17 at 9:12 pm


What happened in 1996?


I remembered seeing comments on YouTube (when I was there) talking about how people born in 1996 and after are spoiled brats (this was around 2012-2014-ish).

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 80sfan on 09/02/17 at 9:29 pm


I remembered seeing comments on YouTube (when I was there) talking about how people born in 1996 and after are spoiled brats (this was around 2012-2014-ish).


Oh, I see.  ;D

Personally, I think those born 1980 and after, in the US, have it pretty good!

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Rainbowz on 09/02/17 at 10:05 pm


An interesting thing I have noted is that a lot of 1999 and 2000 borns view themselves as the very last of Gen Y. Meanwhile, a lot of 2001 and 2002 borns view themselves as very early Gen Zers, lol.

As a 2002 born, I definitely see myself as an early Z.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/02/17 at 10:30 pm


As a 2002 born, I definitely see myself as an early Z.


The whole thing with generations could get odd.

A new friend I made in college (born December 1998) identifies herself as being Z, whereas the people ReignMan has been talking about that were born in 1999-2000 identify themselves as Y.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 09/02/17 at 10:35 pm


The whole thing with generations could get odd.

A new friend I made in college (born December 1998) identifies herself as being Z, whereas the people ReignMan has been talking about that were born in 1999-2000 identify themselves as Y.

I'm one of those people myself.

However, to be honest, if you were born from 1995-2000...you're a Gen Y/Z cusper and it really depends on the individual whether they lean more towards Gen Y or Gen Z.

Anyways, let's NOT drag out ANOTHER generational debate.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/02/17 at 10:38 pm


I'm one of those people myself.

However, to be honest, if you were born from 1995-2000...you're a Gen Y/Z cusper and it really depends on the individual whether they lean more towards Gen Y or Gen Z.

Anyways, let's NOT drag out ANOTHER generational debate.


Alright then.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 80sfan on 09/02/17 at 10:51 pm

1987 borns probably could remember ALL of 1990 to 1999.           

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 09/02/17 at 10:56 pm


1987 borns probably could remember ALL of 1990 to 1999.         


And some would no doubt be able to remember 1989 :)

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 80sfan on 09/02/17 at 10:58 pm


And some would no doubt be able to remember 1989 :)


Probably like a 4 second clip of a movie. Maybe two, or three, memories. But not like a reel of memories, probably not.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 09/02/17 at 11:06 pm


Probably like a 4 second clip of a movie. Maybe two, or three, memories. But not like a reel of memories, probably not.

That's basically the same for me and 2001.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: 80sfan on 09/03/17 at 12:54 am


That's basically the same for me and 2001.


It's blurry the first few years, isn't it?  ;D

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 09/03/17 at 1:53 am


It's blurry the first few years, isn't it?  ;D

Yep :P.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 09/03/17 at 3:27 am

I really miss my personal life from 2002-2004. Even though I was only little, there was absolutely nothing that I needed to strees and worry about, and imo the world was a much better place then. :P

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Rainbowz on 09/03/17 at 11:30 am


I really miss my personal life from 2002-2004. Even though I was only little, there was absolutely nothing that I needed to strees and worry about, and imo the world was a much better place then. :P

I don't remember anything from when I was 2

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 09/03/17 at 11:33 am


I don't remember anything from when I was 2

That's pretty normal. Most people can't remember anything from before they were 3 or 4 years old.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Rainbowz on 09/09/17 at 3:28 pm

To be honest, I actually feel a bit sorry for people born in 2000, because I know for a fact that they had a very similar childhood to Late '90s babies, yet they are treated as if they had a completely social media dominated childhood. That would really annoy me.

Funny you say that because I remember seeing a post you made on PerC back in 2015 saying that people born in 2001 onwards grew up with smartphones and things like that. Just read the text that is highlighted in blue.

https://gyazo.com/9b4c543f4e791b2dbf75a9ce52463542

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 09/09/17 at 6:45 pm


Funny you say that because I remember seeing a post you made on PerC back in 2015 saying that people born in 2001 onwards grew up with smartphones and things like that. Just read the text that is highlighted in blue.

https://gyazo.com/9b4c543f4e791b2dbf75a9ce52463542


I don't think that people born between 2001-2003 babies grew up with smartphones/social media from day dot. However, as I suggested in my post from two years ago, I think smartphones/social media would have had more of an influence on them at a younger age and it's possible that many of them could have had a smartphone device or social media during their core childhood. I mean, someone born in 2003 would have only been 7 in 2010, when the iPad was released and smartphones exploded in popularity.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Rainbowz on 09/09/17 at 7:40 pm


I don't think that people born between 2001-2003 babies grew up with smartphones/social media from day dot. However, as I suggested in my post from two years ago, I think smartphones/social media would have had more of an influence on them at a younger age and it's possible that many of them could have had a smartphone device or social media during their core childhood. I mean, someone born in 2003 would have only been 7 in 2010, when the iPad was released and smartphones exploded in popularity.

Well someone born in 2000 was also in their core childhood when it was released. They were 10 or maybe even still 9 if they were born late in that year

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 09/09/17 at 7:58 pm


Well someone born in 2000 was also in their core childhood when it was released. They were 10 or maybe even still 9 if they were born late in that year


Yeah, they were, but they were in the final year of their core childhood. They experienced the rest of their core childhood in the Mid-Late 2000s, which were not dominated by smartphones and tablets. You could argue that people born in 2001 are the last group of people who experienced most of their childhood prior to the explosion of smartphone and tablet devices, since they turned 9 in 2010. I'm not being ageist, it's just fact. People born in 2002 were only at the half-way point of their core childhood in 2010. It's likely that smartphones and tablets would have had more of an influence on their childhood, because they were of a younger age.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Longaotian00 on 09/10/17 at 3:37 am


Well someone born in 2000 was also in their core childhood when it was released. They were 10 or maybe even still 9 if they were born late in that year


Yeah. I was 10 when the IPad was released, so like you said I was in my core childhood. However, I know for a fact that I defiently don't associate that with my childhood, because well I never had one neither did anyone I know until maybe 2011 or 2012. Plus, like SharksFan99 said, I was already near the end of my core childhood by the time it was released so I already had most of my childhood without it. Btw, I'm not saying you grew up with IPads as a little kid just because you were born in 2002 because that would just be ridiculous. For example, the IPhone was released during my core childhood when I was 7, however it had no effect on me growing up, Becasue no one I knew had a iPhone or any type of smartphone until at least 3 years later in 2010/11. It's  more people born in the mid-late 00's who grew up with social media/iPhones/iPads etc.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: Rainbowz on 09/10/17 at 1:26 pm


Yeah. I was 10 when the IPad was released, so like you said I was in my core childhood. However, I know for a fact that I defiently don't associate that with my childhood, because well I never had one neither did anyone I know until maybe 2011 or 2012. Plus, like SharksFan99 said, I was already near the end of my core childhood by the time it was released so I already had most of my childhood without it. Btw, I'm not saying you grew up with IPads as a little kid just because you were born in 2002 because that would just be ridiculous. For example, the IPhone was released during my core childhood when I was 7, however it had no effect on me growing up, Becasue no one I knew had a iPhone or any type of smartphone until at least 3 years later in 2010/11. It's  more people born in the mid-late 00's who grew up with social media/iPhones/iPads etc.

Yeah, I'd say people born in the mid-late 2000's were more likely to grow up with it, but that doesn't mean they did tho. Some of them  probably don't have a smartphone cause their parents won't let them get one. I know someone born in 2001 who made a twitter account at age 9 and someone born in 2003 who didn't even get a twitter until they were 13. So IMO it depends on how they grew up.

Subject: Re: What are the biggest differences between people born in 1987 and 1997?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 09/10/17 at 1:46 pm


1996 is also commonly used as a "year of doom" to some .

I hardly see 1999 for example as being a "year of doom", aside from probably a small amount of people.

1995 is still probably the most commonly used "year of doom".


Yeah, I have actually seen 1996 sometimes being as the year of doom, but I think that has died down since the last time time I've seen those types of comments were in 2015. Now, it's either 1995 or 2000.

Check for new replies or respond here...